Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T17:22:11.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mediating links between HRM bundle and individual innovative behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2016

Fang Liu ,
Irene Hau-Siu Chow ,
Yuanyuan Gong  and
Hao Wang
Fang Liu*
Affiliation:
School of Business, Guangzhou University, Guangdong, China
Irene Hau-Siu Chow
Affiliation:
Department of Marketing & Management, Hang Seng Management College, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
Yuanyuan Gong
Affiliation:
Business School, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
Hao Wang
Affiliation:
College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, China
*
Corresponding author: l_fang@foxmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using multi-level analysis, the present study proposes that psychological empowerment and perceived organizational support serve as mediators of the effects of human resource management (HRM) bundle on individual innovative behavior. We tested the model using data from 705 employees of 162 firms in China. The results revealed that both psychological empowerment and perceived organizational support partially mediate the relationship between HRM bundle and individual innovative behavior. This study contributes to the understanding of how HRM bundle impact on individual innovative behavior.

Keywords

HRM bundlepsychological empowermentperceived organizational supportindividual innovative behaviormediating links

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 157 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agarwal, U. A. (2014). Examining the impact of social exchange relationships on innovative work behaviour: Role of work engagement. Team Performance Management, 20(3/4), 102–120.Google Scholar
Alpkan, L., Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., & Killic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. Management Decision, 48(5), 733–755.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1998). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Seidu, E. Y. M., & Otaye, L. E. (2012). Impact of high performance work systems on individual and branch-level performance: Test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 287–300.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.Google Scholar
Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64–76.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the ‘strength’ of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis, & W. Lonner (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Chiang, H. H., Han, T. S., & Chuang, J. S. (2011). The relationship between high-commitment HRM and knowledge-sharing behavior and its mediators. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5/6), 604–622.Google Scholar
Cooke, F. L., & Saini, D. S. (2010). (How) Does the HR strategy support an innovation oriented business strategy? An investigation of institutional context and organizational practices in Indian firms. Human Resource Management, 49(3), 377–400.Google Scholar
Cotterell, N., Eisenberger, R., & Speicher, H. (1992). Inhibiting effects of reciprocation wariness on interpersonal relationships. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 658–668.Google Scholar
De Stobbeleir, K. M., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 811–831.Google Scholar
Ehrnrooth, M., & Björkman, I. (2012). An integrative HRM process theorization: Beyond signalling effects and mutual gains. Journal of Management Studies, 49(6), 1109–1135.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51–59.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.Google Scholar
Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30(4), 453–470.Google Scholar
Hayton, J. C. (2003). Strategic human capital management in SMEs: An empirical study of entrepreneurial performance. Human Resource Management, 42(4), 375–391.Google Scholar
Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: A review of empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 21–41.Google Scholar
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744.Google Scholar
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.Google Scholar
Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573–579.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. M., Patel, P. C., & Messersmith, J. G. (2013). High-performance work systems and job control consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1699–1724.Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Wang, S., & Zhao, S. (2012). Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(19), 4025–4047.Google Scholar
Jones, F. F., Morris, M. H., & Rockmore, W. (1995). HR practices that promote entrepreneurship. HR Magazine, 86–91.Google Scholar
Jong, J. P., Parker, S. K., Wennekers, S., & Wu, C. H. (2013). Entrepreneurial behavior in organizations: Does job design matter? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 1–15.Google Scholar
Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 785–804.Google Scholar
Klaas, B. S., Semadeni, M., Klimchak, M., & Ward, A. (2012). High-performance work system implementation in small and medium enterprises: A knowledge-creation perspective. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 487–510.Google Scholar
Laursen, K., & Foss, N. J. (2013). Human resource management practices and innovation. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillip (Eds.), Handbook of Innovation Management (pp. 505–529). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laursen, K., & Foss, N. J. (2003). New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 243–263.Google Scholar
Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D. P., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 371–391.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341.Google Scholar
Messersmith, J. G., & Guthrie, J. P. (2010). High performance work systems in emergent organizations: Implications for firm performance. Human Resource Management, 49(2), 241–264.Google Scholar
Pieters, A. N., Knippenberg, D. V., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609–623.Google Scholar
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.Google Scholar
Schmelter, R., Mauer, R., Börsch, C., & Brettel, M. (2010). Boosting corporate entrepreneurship through HRM practices: Evidence from German SMEs. Human Resource Management, 49(4), 715–741.Google Scholar
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.Google Scholar
Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237.Google Scholar
Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003.Google Scholar
Seidu, Y. (2011). Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance: Evidence from the Retail Banking Sector. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, United Kingdom: Aston University.Google Scholar
Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.Google Scholar
Shipton, H., West, M. A., Dawson, J., Birdi, K., & Patterson, M. (2006). HRM as a predictor of innovation. Human Resource Management Journal, 16(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
Shore, L. M., & Shore, T. H. (1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. In R. S. Cropanzano, & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace (pp. 149–164). Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In J. Barling, & C. J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 73–88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558–577.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An ‘interpretive’ model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 661–681.Google Scholar
Tsai, C. (2006). High performance work systems and organizational performance: An empirical study of Taiwan’s semiconductor design firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(9), 1512–1530.Google Scholar
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 590–598.Google Scholar
Xerri, M. (2013). Workplace relationships and the innovative behaviour of nursing employees: A social exchange perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 103–123.Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. M., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719.Google Scholar