Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g4pgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T22:46:25.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of inbred mouse strains to infection with intestinal nematodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

M.S. Dehlawi  and
P.K. Goyal
M.S. Dehlawi
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
P.K. Goyal*
Affiliation:
School of Studies in Zoology, Vikram University, Ujjain 456 010, Madhya Pradesh, India.
*
* Author and address for correspondence: Department of Immunology, Groote Schuur Hospital, Old Main Building H47, Observatory 7924, Cape Town, South Africa E-mail: pkgoyal50@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparisons were made of the immune and inflammatory responses of four strains of inbred mice to infection with the intestinal nematodes Trichinella spiralis and Nippostrongylus brasiliensis to determine whether genetically determined ‘high responsiveness’ to infection, seen most clearly in intestinal responses, is independent of the parasite concerned and necessarily correlated with protection. The time course of infection was followed by counting adult worms at intervals after infection. Mucosal mast cells and Paneth cell numbers were determined as indices of the intestinal inflammatory response. Levels of IgG2a and IgG1 antibodies and of the cytokines IFN-γ and IL-5 released from in vitro-stimulated mesenteric node lymphocytes were measured to assess type 1 and type 2 responses. NIH and CBA mice were the most resistant to T. spiralis and N. brasiliensis respectively, resistance in each case being correlated with the most intense intestinal inflammatory responses. C57BL/10 (B10) and B10.BR were the least resistant to T. spiralis, but were as resistant as CBA to N. brasiliensis, despite their intestinal inflammatory responses to both parasites being much lower than the other two strains. Mice infected with T. spiralis made the expected switch from a type 1 (IFN-γ) to a type 2 (IL-5) response between days 2 and 8, and there were no significant differences in levels of these cytokines between the strains. In contrast, when infected with N. brasiliensis, CBA showed an IFN-γ response at day 4, all strains switching to IL-5 by day 8 and NIH mice releasing the greatest amount of IL-5. The results indicate that the ‘high responder’ phenotype to intestinal nematode infection is in part determined by host characteristics, but is also determined by the parasite concerned – seen most clearly by the differences between NIH and CBA when infected with T. spiralis and N. brasiliensis. The fact that ‘low responder’ B10 background mice were more resistant to N. brasiliensis than ‘high responder’ NIH implies that each parasite elicits a particular pattern of protective host responses, rather than parasites being differentially susceptible to the same response profile.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 119 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alizadeh, H. & Wakelin, D. (1983) Genetic factors controlling the intestinal mast cell response in mice infected with Trichinella spiralis . Clinical and Experimental Immunology 49, 331–337.Google Scholar
Artis, D. & Grencis, R.K. (2001) T helper cell cytokine responses during intestinal nematode infection: induction, regulation and effector function. pp. 331–371 in Kennedy, M.W. & Harnett, W. (Eds) Parasitic nematodes. Molecular biology, biochemistry and immunology. Wallingford, Oxon, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehlawi, M.S. & Wakelin, D. (2002) Parameters of intestinal inflammation in mice given graded infections of the nematode Trichinella spiralis . Journal of Helminthology 76, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faulkner, H.F., Humphreys, N.H., Renauld, J.C., Van Snick, J. & Grencis, R.K. (1997) Interleukin-9 is involved in host-protective immunity to intestinal nematode infection. European Journal of Immunology 27, 2536–2540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkelman, F.D., Shea-Donohue, T., Goldhill, J., Sullivan, C.A., Morris, S.C., Madden, K.B., Gause, W.C. & Urban, J.F. (1997) Cytokine regulation of host defense against parasitic gastrointestinal nematodes: lessons from studies with rodent models. Annual Reviews of Immunology 15, 505–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goyal, P.K., Wheatcroft, J. & Wakelin, D. (2002) Tyvelose and protective responses to the intestinal stages of Trichinella spiralis . Parasitology International 51, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermanek, J.P., Goyal, P.K. & Wakelin, D. (1994) Lymphocyte, antibody and cytokine responses during concurrent infections between helminths that selectively promote T helper 1 or T helper 2 activity. Parasite Immunology 16, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishikawa, N., Goyal, P.K., Mahida, Y.R., Li, K-F & Wakelin, D. (1998) Early cytokine responses during intestinal parasitic infections. Immunology 93, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamal, M., Wakelin, D., Oulette, A.J., Smith, A., Podolsky, D.K. & Mahida, Y.R. (2001) Mucosal T cells regulate Paneth and intermediate cell numbers in the small intestine of Trichinella spiralis-infected mice. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 126, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, C.E., Kennedy, M.W. & Garside, P. (2001) Gut immunopathology in helminth infections–paradigm lost. pp. 373–397 in Kennedy, M.W. & Harnett, W. (Eds) Parasitic nematodes. Molecular biology, biochemistry and immunology. Wallingford, Oxon, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T.D.G. & Wakelin, D. (1982) The use of host strain variation to assess the significance of mucosal mast cells in the spontaneous cure response of mice to the nematode Trichuris muris . International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 67, 302–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, K.B., Urban, J.F., Zitener, H.J., Schrader, J.W., Finkelman, F.D. & Katona, I. (1991) Antibodies to IL-3 and IL-4 suppress helminth-induced intestinal mastocytosis. Journal of Immunology 147, 1387–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, K., Bellaby, T. & Wakelin, D. (1995) Immune response profiles in vaccinated and non-vaccinated high- and low-responder mice during infection with the intestinal nematode Trichinella spiralis . Parasitology 110, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, M., Wahid, F.N., Behnke, J.M. & Gilbert, F.S. (1989) Immunological relationships during primary infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematospiroides dubius): dose-dependent expulsion of adult worms. Parasitology 98, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urban, J.F., Noben-Trauth, N., Donaldson, D.D., Madden, K.B., Morris, S.C. & Finkleman, F.D. (1998) IL-13, IL-4R alpha and Stat6 are required for the expulsion of the gastrointestinal nematode parasite Nippostrongylus brasiliensis . Immunity 8, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, J.F., Schopf, L., Morris, S.C., Orekhova, T., Madden, K.B., Betts, C.J., Gamble, H.R., Byrd, C., Donaldson, D., Else, K.J. & Finkleman, F.D. (2000) Stat 6 signaling promotes protective immunity against Trichinella spiralis through a mast cell- and T cell-dependent mechanism. Journal of Immunology 164, 2046–2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahid, F.N. & Behnke, J.M. (1993) Immunological relationships during primary infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus . Regulation of fast responder phenotype by H-2 and non-H-2 genes. Parasitology 107, 343–350.Google ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1980) Genetic control of immunity to parasites. Infection with Trichinella spiralis in inbred and congenic mice showing rapid and slow responses to infection. Parasite Immunology 2, 85–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1988) Helminth infections. pp. 153–224 in Wakelin, D. & Blackwell, J.M. (Eds) Genetics of resistance to bacterial and parasitic infection. London, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. & Donachie, A.M. (1983) Genetic control of eosinophilia. Mouse strain variation in response to antigens of parasite origin. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 51, 239–246.Google ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. & Lloyd, M. (1976) Immunity to primary and challenge infections of Trichinella spiralis in mice: a re-examination of conventional parameters. Parasitology 72, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassom, D.L., Brooks, B.O., Cypess, R.H. & David, C.S. (1983) A survey of susceptibility to infection with Trichinella spiralis of inbred mouse strains sharing common H-2 alleles but different genetic backgrounds. Journal of Parasitology 69, 1033–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed