Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T00:57:21.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applicability of heat pipes and impingement cooling for axial compressor tip clearance control: a preliminary investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2025

G.M. Luz*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Institute of Turbomachinery and Flight Propulsion, Munich, Germany
V. Gümmer
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Institute of Turbomachinery and Flight Propulsion, Munich, Germany
*
Corresponding author: G.M. Luz; Email: guilherme.luz@tum.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This publication presents the results of a numerical analysis aimed at assessing the applicability of thermal tip clearance control (TCC) to the fore-to-last stage of a 10-stage high-pressure compressor system. The chosen geometry is representative for the HPC rear stages of a modern middle-sized turbofan, designed for large business jets and regional airliners. Simplified models for two TCC concepts were implemented, isolated and in combination: external impingement cooling and heat pipes. The analysis was performed by means of finite-element thermostructural simulations. Transient operational cycles, derived from a meanline model, along with empiric correlations for heat convection provided the required boundary conditions. Qualitative similarity to selected previous works in terms of temperature, stress and clearance evolutions was achieved. The combination of concepts demonstrated its potential as a TCC system with up to 0.45% reductions in rotor and stator clearances. Calculated heat pipe temperatures and heat fluxes were inside the estimated operational limitations. Regarding stresses, some local concentrations were observed, without significant impact in critical stress regions. A slam cycle analysis showed that, while blade rubbing remains a possibility, it can be mitigated by robust cooling control. All in all, the concept was deemed worthy of more detailed studies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Model setup workflow.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Cut view of representative HPC chosen for the study.

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of grid independence study (GIS). Percentual values were calculated as ${(\Delta \phi )_{max.}} = max\left| {1 - {\phi _{finest}}\left( t \right)/{\phi _i}\left( t \right)} \right|$ for all tracked variables

Figure 3

Figure 3. Reference meshes for rotor (left) and casing (right).

Figure 4

Table 2. Summary of adopted correlations for convective heat transfer over the structure

Figure 5

Figure 4. Meridional view of domain with considered BCs. Static pressures were also modeled for all surfaces.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Conceptual design of impingement system.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Impingement cooling model workflow.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Impingement jet properties for fixed feedflow conditions (cruise-flight). Parameter range for which the model is valid: Re $ \in $ [10000,60000]; Ma $ \in $ [0.2,0.6].

Figure 9

Figure 8. Conceptual design of the concentric annular heat pipe.

Figure 10

Table 3. Estimated parameters of the star-forming regions in the NGC 7,252 interacting system

Figure 11

Figure 9. Heat pipe calculated operational envelope for anti-gravity operation.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Temperature and stress evolutions for the rotor disk for a square test cycle (left). Reference measuring nodes (right). The time span was adjusted to match the curves displayed by Merkler et al. [5].

Figure 13

Figure 11. Calculated tip clearances in stage 9. The time span was adjusted to match the curves displayed by Schulte et al. [6].

Figure 14

Figure 12. 10${{\rm{\;}}^ \circ }$ pitch HP concept. In red, impingement BC surface.

Figure 15

Figure 13. Clearance evolutions for implemented concepts.

Figure 16

Figure 14. Stress concentration at heat pipe bores.

Figure 17

Figure 15. Temperatures at rear part of casing (left) and Von-Mises stresses in critical region (right) for the implemented concepts.

Figure 18

Figure 16. 5${{\rm{\;}}^ \circ }$ pitch HP concept. In red, impingement BC surface.

Figure 19

Figure 17. Clearance evolutions for different pitchwise and axial distribution of heat pipes.

Figure 20

Figure 18. Stress concentration at heat pipe bores for configuration of Fig. 16.

Figure 21

Figure 19. Variation of ADP clearances, HP temperature and max. heat flux with ${{\rm{\alpha }}_{\rm{j}}}$.

Figure 22

Figure 20. Clearance evolutions for high-altitude slam transient cycle.