Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-l4t7p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T09:10:39.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On more than two decades of Celestial Reference Frame VLBI observations in the deep south: IVS-CRDS (1995–2021)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2023

S. Weston*
Affiliation:
Institute for Radio Astronomy & Space Research (IRASR) School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
A. de Witt
Affiliation:
The South African Radio Astronomy Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
Hana Krásná
Affiliation:
Department für Geodäsie und Geoinformation, Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien), Wien, Austria
Karine Le Bail
Affiliation:
NVI, Inc. at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA Chalmers University of Technology/Onsala Space Observatory, Onsala, Sweden
Sara Hardin
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC, USA
David Gordon
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC, USA
Shu Fengchun
Affiliation:
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
Alan Fey
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology/Onsala Space Observatory, Onsala, Sweden U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC, USA
Matthias Schartner
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich, Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Zurich, Switzerland
Sayan Basu
Affiliation:
The South African Radio Astronomy Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
Oleg Titov
Affiliation:
Geoscience Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Dirk Behrend
Affiliation:
NVI, Inc. at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Christopher S. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Warren Hankey
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
Federico Salguero
Affiliation:
National Scientific and Technical Research Council, Argentina (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
John E. Reynolds
Affiliation:
CSIRO Space and Astronomy, Australia Telescope National Facility, Epping, NSW, Australia
*
Corresponding author: S. Weston; Email: sweston@aut.ac.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS) regularly provides high-quality data to produce Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP), and for the maintenance and realisation of the International Terrestrial and Celestial Reference Frames, ITRF and ICRF. The first iteration of the celestial reference frame (CRF) at radio wavelengths, the ICRF1, was adopted by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in 1997 to replace the FK5 optical frame. Soon after, the IVS began official operations and in 2009 there was a significant increase in data sufficient to warrant a second iteration of the CRF, ICRF2. The most recent ICRF3, was adopted by the IAU in 2018. However, due to the geographic distribution of observing stations being concentrated in the Northern hemisphere, CRFs are generally weaker in the South due to there being fewer Southern Hemisphere observations. To increase the Southern Hemisphere observations, and the density, precision of the sources, a series of deep South observing sessions was initiated in 1995. This initiative in 2004 became the IVS Celestial Reference Frame Deep South (IVS-CRDS) observing programme. This paper covers the evolution of the CRDS observing programme for the period 1995–2021, details the data products and results, and concludes with a summary of upcoming improvements to this ongoing project.

Keywords

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Astronomical Society of Australia
Figure 0

Figure 1. The ICRF3-SX (2018) has 4536 sources, but quite clearly the number of sources become sparse below a declination of $-30^{\circ}$ (Charlot et al. 2020).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The plot on the top shows the percentage of astrometric and geodetic VLBI observations for the period April 1980 to June 2021 June on Northern only (blue), Southern only (red), and North–South (green) baselines. The plot on the bottom shows the cumulative totals for the same baselines over the same period.

Figure 2

Table 1. The eleven participating CRDS VLBI stations, with their geocentric coordinates used in the session schedule files. The last three entries are the stations added very recently.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Network map showing IVS and cooperating stations (in red) and stations that participated in the CRDS programme during the last decade (in blue and orange). Hobart hosts two stations separated by a few hundred metres, so Hb on this figure represents both Hb and Ho. This is also true for Hartebeesthoek where Hh represents both Hh and Ht.

Figure 4

Figure 4. The total number of scheduled sessions by station for the 2011–2021 period (in grey), and the number of sessions for which an antenna had usable data (in light blue). The dashed green line shows the total number of sessions observed (67) for the 2011–2021 period.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The top plot shows the ICRF3 defining sources with a Mollweide projection using a heat colour scale (on the right hand side) for the points to show the number of sessions each source was observed in, with the blue end being the least and red being the greater. The bottom plot shows the ICRF3 defining sources, also using a heat colour scale for the points to show the number of observations for each source. Both plots are for sessions CRDS50-116.

Figure 6

Figure 6. The top plot shows all the sources with a Mollweide projection using a heat colour scale for the number of sessions per source (ICRF3 sources are squares and other sources are circles). The bottom plot shows the same sources, using a heat colour scale for the number of observations per source (ICRF3 sources are squares and other sources are circles). Both plots are for sessions CRDS50-116.

Figure 7

Figure 7. The u,v-coverage plots for source 0302-623 (left to right) for session CRDS63 (2013 January), CRD100 (2019 February) and for CRD102 (2019 May).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Sky visibility per station as a function of right ascension and Dec for the CRD115 network after applying the local horizon mask and a cut-off elevation of 5 degrees. Areas visible by six or more stations are hatched in black.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Scheduling statistics for the CRDS sessions between 2011 and 2021 (CRDS50–116) showing the number of stations (top plot), the number of sessions (middle plot), and the number of scans (bottom plot). The red dashed vertical lines indicate the time frames when different scheduling software were used, and the green dashed horizontal lines show the average of the distribution.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Scheduling statistics for the CRDS sessions between 2011 and 2021 (CRDS50–116), showing the average number of scans per sources (top plot), and the average number of observations per baselines (bottom plot), for each session. The red dashed vertical lines indicate the time frames when different scheduling software were used, and the green dashed horizontal lines show the average of the distribution.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Comparison of statistics between a CRF solution of the 182 deep-South sources observed in CRDS sessions with all sessions (in grey) and one without the CRDS sessions between 2018 and 2021 (in blue). Median values for each distribution are listed in parenthesis.

Figure 12

Table 2. The twelve CRDS sessions for which images have been produced.

Figure 13

Figure 12. Colour maps with contours for sources 0252-549 (top left), 0302-623 (top right), 0454-810 (bottom left), and 1925-610 (bottom right) at 8.6 GHz from CRDS sessions between 2018 and 2019. North is Up and East is to the Left. The Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) beam size is graphically indicated in the bottom left corner.

Figure 14

Figure 13. The per session statistics from the analysis reports ordered by time. In red is the total number of observations per session scheduled; in orange are those that were able to be correlated; in yellow is the number able to be recovered for analysis and in green are the number of observations used in the analysis solution.

Figure 15

Figure 14. The number of observations made by each baseline from the analysis reports, ordered by the number of scheduled observations greatest to lowest from right to left. In red is the total number of observations scheduled; orange are those that were able to be recovered; and green are the number of observations used in the analysis solution.

Figure 16

Figure 15. This figure shows the percentage of observations out of those scheduled which were used in an analysis solution by baseline. The order of the baselines is the same as in Fig. 14 to aid comparing the two figures.

Figure 17

Figure 16. The post-fit residual delay rms values over all observations of a CRDS schedule, ordered by session reference code.

Figure 18

Table B.1 Session summary statistics for CRDS53-116.