Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-rbv74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T14:17:54.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cold-loving microorganisms in Antarctic glaciers: a review of South Shetland archipelago glaciers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2025

Víctor Muñoz-Hisado
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrobiologia (CAB), https://ror.org/038szmr31 CSIC-INTA , Madrid, Spain https://ror.org/01cby8j38 Escuela de Doctorado de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid , Centro de Estudios de Posgrado, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain
Andrea Hidalgo-Arias
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrobiologia (CAB), https://ror.org/038szmr31 CSIC-INTA , Madrid, Spain https://ror.org/01cby8j38 Escuela de Doctorado de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid , Centro de Estudios de Posgrado, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain
Eva Garcia-Lopez
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrobiologia (CAB), https://ror.org/038szmr31 CSIC-INTA , Madrid, Spain
Cristina Cid*
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrobiologia (CAB), https://ror.org/038szmr31 CSIC-INTA , Madrid, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Cristina Cid; Email: cidsc@cab.inta-csic.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antarctic glaciers have been considered classically uninhabited. However, they constitute an authentic biome and are populated by microorganisms that not only survive in them but also maintain an active metabolism. The South Shetland archipelago is a good study model to observe the diversity and evolution of the microbial populations that inhabit its glaciers. From a geological point of view, this archipelago is of considerable interest due to the intense and relatively recent volcanic eruptions on Deception Island. Additionally, it has been a place of transit for human and animal populations over time. All of these factors have influenced the composition and diversity of the microbial communities inhabiting the glacial ice. Among these microorganisms, a great diversity of bacteria, archaea, viruses and microeukaryotes such as algae and unicellular fungi have been identified thanks to high-throughput technologies. These cold-adapted microorganisms develop molecular mechanisms of adaptation to the extreme environment they inhabit and contribute to global energy cycles through the processing of organic and inorganic compounds. This review summarizes current knowledge on the biodiversity, ecology and molecular mechanisms of adaptation of cold-adapted microorganisms, and it details the specific characteristics of the microbial populations housed in the Antarctic glaciers in the South Shetland archipelago.

Type
Biological Sciences
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antarctic Science Ltd

Introduction

Antarctic glaciers have been little explored until now. Historically, the Antarctic region has been prospected solely for lucrative economic purposes, especially for hunting, fishing and mining, but glacial areas have classically been considered to lack potential utility and to be uninhabited. The earliest research on the microorganisms that inhabit glaciers dates back to 1918, but these microorganisms were underestimated until the 1980s (McLean Reference McLean1918). Subsequently, these microorganisms have been studied profusely for their great interest as survivors at the limits of life and for their remarkable biotechnological potential (Garcia-Descalzo et al. Reference Garcia-Descalzo, Alcazar, Baquero, Cid and Singh2012).

It has been estimated that in the next decade the global temperature of Earth will rise by ~2°C (IPCC Reference Pörtner, Roberts, Tignor, Poloczanska, Mintenbeck and Alegría2022). This increase will be especially significant in some Antarctic regions such as the Antarctic Peninsula, where this increment will be five times greater than the global average (Turner et al. Reference Turner, Maksym, Phillips, Marshall and Meredith2013). Climate change is threatening the climatological stability of our planet, and glaciers are suffering ice reduction that produces serious consequences for the associated ecosystem processes. Severe shrinkage processes have been described in Arctic (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference Garcia-Lopez, Rodriguez-Lorente, Alcazar and Cid2019) and Antarctic glaciers (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021), as well as in high mountain glaciers such as those in the Alps (Sommer et al. Reference Sommer, Malz, Seehaus, Lippl, Zemp and Braun2020), Pyrenees (Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Bartolomé, López-Moreno, Pey, Corella and García-Orellana2021) and Himalayas (Mukhia et al. Reference Mukhia, Kumar and Kumar2024).

Among all of the climatic indicators, glacial ice is one of the most effective because it contains a large amount of data, including its microbiological composition, which allows us to increase our knowledge of the palaeoclimatic history of these regions and to predict the future course of these environments (Varghese et al. Reference Varghese, Patel, Kumar and Sharma2023). Among microorganisms in glaciers, a great diversity of bacteria, archaea, viruses and microeukaryotes such as algae and unicellular fungi have been identified (Boetius et al. Reference Boetius, Anesio, Deming, Mikucki and Rapp2015). These glaciers constitute a biome, and they are populated by microorganisms that maintain the nutrient cycling pathways and form the basis of the ecosystem’s food webs (Anesio & Laybourn-Parry Reference Anesio and Laybourn-Parry2012). These cold-adapted microorganisms develop molecular mechanisms of adaptation to the extreme environment they inhabit, and they contribute to global energy cycles through the processing of organic and inorganic carbon and nitrogen compounds. As there are nearly no plants or animals in these pristine environments, microorganisms, which maintain an active metabolism, are responsible for carrying out the biogeochemical cycles in these areas (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019, Trejos-Espeleta et al. Reference Trejos-Espeleta, Marin-Jaramillo, Schmidt, Sommers, Bradley and Orsi2024).

The South Shetland archipelago is a good study model to observe the diversity and evolution of the microbial populations that inhabit its glaciers. It is located ~120 km off the coast of the Antarctic Peninsula, south of the American continent, and it has been a place of transit of human and animal populations over time. It was one of the areas first discovered by Antarctic explorers, and it was later used by whalers and researchers. At present, there are 17 Antarctic research stations belonging to 12 countries on the South Shetland archipelago. From a geological point of view, the South Shetland archipelago is of great interest due to the intense and relatively recent volcanic eruptions on Deception Island. This activity has conditioned the diversity of microbial populations throughout the archipelago (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021, Hidalgo-Arias et al. Reference Hidalgo-Arias, Muñoz-Hisado, Valles, Geyer, Garcia-Lopez and Cid2023). Recently, tourism to exotic regions such as the poles is also significantly altering this delicate environment. Over 10 years, tourism to the South Shetland archipelago has grown from 35 000 to 105 000 visitors in the 4 months of the summer season, in addition to the presence of some 10 000 scientists. This represents a growing threat that is shifting the glacier microbiome composition (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021).

Whereas Antarctic tourism is strictly restricted by the International Association of Antarctic Tour Operators (IAATO; Bauer & Dowling Reference Bauer and Dowling2003), the Arctic does not have a body that is equivalent to IAATO, and its economic and touristic exploitation is much more intense. In the Arctic, the number of visitors has also increased significantly from 35 million in the year 1995 to 66 million in 2017 (Shijin et al. Reference Shijin, Yaqiong, Xueyan and Jia2020). A study comparing Arctic and Antarctic microbial populations living in wet soil, small streams and ponds showed that the percentage of cosmopolitan taxa was higher in Arctic (43%) than in Antarctic samples (36%; Kleinteich et al. Reference Kleinteich, Hildebrand, Bahram, Voigt, Wood and Jungblut2017). These researchers concluded that the widespread distribution of polar microorganisms could be explained by natural or anthropogenic dispersal, and that this could favour the establishment of cosmopolitan genotypes and the loss of endemic taxa.

Figure 1. Map of Antarctica showing some of the glaciers where microorganisms have been explored to date. a. South Shetland archipelago. b. Antarctica. Details on the glaciers and references are summarized in Table I.

There are few studies on the impacts of tourists and researchers on microbial populations in Arctic glaciers. In a study that compared the microbial populations of seven glaciers in the Svalbard archipelago, microorganisms of human origin such as Escherichia and Helicobacter species were also found in the surroundings of local research stations (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference Garcia-Lopez, Rodriguez-Lorente, Alcazar and Cid2019). However, these results demonstrated that the most abundant species in Arctic glaciers were related to the degradation of hydrocarbons and chemical pollutants (e.g. Rhodococcus phenolicus, Pseudonocardia hydrocarbonoxydans, Polaromonas naphthalenivorans and Sphingomonas oligophenolica). These microorganisms have been described as degraders of chlorobenzene, dichlorobenzene and phenol (Rehfuss & Urban Reference Rehfuss and Urban2005), hydrocarbons, naphthalene (Jeon et al. Reference Jeon, Park, Ghiorse and Madsen2004) and phenolic acids (Ohta et al. Reference Ohta, Hattori, Ushiba, Mitsui, Ito and Watanabe2004), respectively.

This review discusses the diversity and molecular mechanisms of adaptation that are being investigated from studies on cold-adapted microorganisms, and it details the specific characteristics of the microbial populations housed in the Antarctic glaciers of the South Shetland archipelago.

Glacial habitats

Several reports have been published on the microbiology associated with glacial environments in Antarctica such as Lake Vostok (Shtarkman et al. Reference Shtarkman, Koçer, Edgar, Veerapaneni, D'Elia and Morris2013) and the Blood Falls (Fig. 1; Mikucki et al. Reference Mikucki, Pearson, Johnston, Turchyn, Farquhar and Schrag2009). Lake Vostok is one of the largest of the nearly 400 subglacial Antarctic lakes, and it has been continuously buried by glacial ice for 15 million years. Moreover, the Blood Falls is an iron-rich subglacial drainage that flows from the Taylor Glacier (Mikucki et al. Reference Mikucki, Pearson, Johnston, Turchyn, Farquhar and Schrag2009). The appeal of these two sites has encouraged research into other Antarctic glacial environments. The case of the perennially cold, anoxic hypolimnion of Ace Lake in the Vestfold Hills of Antarctica should be highlighted. In this extreme environment, methanogenic and psychrophilic microorganisms have been reported (Franzmann et al. Reference Franzmann, Liu, Balkwill, Aldrich, Conway de Macario and Boone1997). In addition, in the interior of the Antarctic continent, microbial populations housed in the surface snow from the High Antarctic Plateau (Dome C) have been described, noting that polar microorganisms can not only be considered as deposited airborne particles but as an active component of the snowpack ecology (Michaud et al. Reference Michaud, Lo Giudice, Mysara, Monsieurs, Raffa and Leys2014). Furthermore, many of the South Shetland archipelago glaciers have been investigated, especially the coastal glaciers that discharge into the sea (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019, Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021, Reference Garcia-Lopez, Ruiz-Blas, Sanchez-Casanova, Peña Perez, Martin-Cerezo and Cid2022). The distance of the glaciers from the shoreline has been reported to be of great importance to the composition and diversity of their microbial populations due to the exchange of microorganisms between terrestrial and marine ecosystems (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference Garcia-Lopez, Rodriguez-Lorente, Alcazar and Cid2019). Figure 2 shows some examples of these coastal Antarctic glaciers of the South Shetland archipelago.

Table I. Studies performed on microorganisms from Antarctic glaciers. The glaciers with samples shown in Figs 4 & 5 are highlighted in bold.

Figure 2. Examples of coastal Antarctic glaciers of the South Shetland archipelago: a. Mount Pond glacier, b. Johnson glacier, c. Quito glacier and d. Rojo glacier. The glaciers in images a. and d., located on Deception Island, clearly show the remains of lava and volcanic ash that colour the glacial ice.

In most glaciers, three habitats can be distinguished that condition the composition of microbial communities: a sunlit and oxygenated supraglacial habitat, an intermediate englacial habitat and a basal subglacial habitat (Boetius et al. Reference Boetius, Anesio, Deming, Mikucki and Rapp2015). These three environments differ greatly in terms of their physicochemical characteristics, nutrient concentration, temperature, solar radiation and pressure. Figure 3 presents a principal component analysis (PCA) of the microorganisms distributed in these three glacial habitats in glaciers. According to this analysis, significant differences exist between the diversity of the populations of the three glacial ecosystems.

Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the microorganisms distributed in the three glacial habitats: a. Bacteria and b. Eukaryota. The influence of the environment on the microbial community composition was investigated by PCA developed using CANOCO 5 software (Leps & Smilauer Reference Leps and Smilauer2003). The analyses were evaluated using a Monte Carlo test with 500 permutations. Data are from the glaciers highlighted in bold in Table I.

Supraglacial habitat

The supraglacial habitat is mainly composed of surface snow and ice that melt during the summer. This zone receives solar radiation and contains photosynthetic algae, fungi (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Fair, Liu, Wang, Duan and Lu2023) and coloured bacteria (Garcia-Lopez & Cid Reference Garcia-Lopez, Cid and Singh2016) that give the glacial surface reddish, greenish or brownish tones (Martín-Cerezo et al. Reference Martín-Cerezo, García-López and Cid2015). The most abundant representatives of these microorganisms are unicellular algae of the family Chlamydomonaceae (included in Archaeplastida), mainly the species Chlamydomonas nivalis (Garcia-Lopez & Cid Reference Garcia-Lopez, Cid and Singh2016). The juvenile stages of these algae synthesize green pigments involved in photosynthesis. When mature, the algae produce reddish carotenoids that protect them from excess solar radiation (Lutz et al. 2014, Khan et al. Reference Khan, Dierssen, Scambos, Höfer and Cordero2021).

In the supraglacial habitat, the important role played by cryoconite holes must be emphasized. Cryoconite is defined as the sediment that forms due to the interaction of mineral particles deposited on the glacier surface and the microbial communities that inhabit them. Over time, the surface snow melts, giving rise to cryoconite holes filled with liquid water. These holes are true oases for the development of microbial communities, containing sufficient nutrients for their growth (Hassan et al. Reference Hassan, Mushtaq, Ganiee, Zaman, Yaseen and Shah2024). Cryoconite holes are populated mainly by primary producers such as cyanobacteria (Fig. 3a) and microalgae (Fig. 3b; Hodson et al. Reference Hodson, Anesio, Tranter, Fountain, Osborn and Priscu2008). It has been demonstrated that significant metabolic heat is produced within cryoconite holes, which contributes to ice melting and in turn increases the size and depth of these pools (Gladkov et al. Reference Gladkov, Kimeklis, Tembotov, Ivanov, Andronov and Abakumov2024). Some cryoconite holes generate at least 13% of the observed runoff on the one glacier for which this has been measured (Fountain et al. Reference Fountain, Tranter, Nylen, Lewis and Mueller2004).

Englacial habitat

The englacial habitat, consisting of the area and veins occurring within a glacier, is the least understood part of the glacial environment. It is also the most inhospitable area of these glaciers due to the presence of low temperatures, high pressures and total darkness. Researching this habitat is difficult as such research requires the extraction of ice cores under sterile conditions to avoid contamination. The first studies on the microbiology of these cores were carried out by Abyzov (Reference Abyzov1993). The microorganisms in this stratum could come from the upper layer and the marginal moraines by dragging through the ice. They reside in the air bubbles, veins and water microchannels that form between the ice crystals. It has been shown that the populations inhabiting these environments are not in a quiescent state but are functional (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019). The microorganisms of this glacial zone are generally chemoautotrophs. They can also be heterotrophs that feed on the organic debris carried by the ice. They usually perform anaerobic respiration due to the lack of oxygen.

Subglacial habitat

Subglacial environments represent a largely unexplored component of Earth’s biosphere. This environment is generated as a result of ice friction on rocks, fragmenting minerals and organic debris that, combined with subglacial water, create optimal niches for microbial life. It has been described that under glaciers there is often a stream of water. This water may originate from the melting of the ice by geothermal heat from the underlying rock or from supraglacial channels that cross these glaciers and form lakes on their bedrock (Anesio & Laybourn-Parry Reference Anesio and Laybourn-Parry2012). Although, as mentioned earlier, this ecosystem was one of the first glacial environments to come to the attention of researchers in the 1980s thanks to the exploration of the microbiology of Ace Lake (Franzmann et al. Reference Franzmann, Liu, Balkwill, Aldrich, Conway de Macario and Boone1997) and Lake Vostok (Shtarkman et al. Reference Shtarkman, Koçer, Edgar, Veerapaneni, D'Elia and Morris2013), few studies have sampled subglacial environments given the difficulties associated with accessing these sites. In these surveys, several species of archaea, bacteria and fungi have been found (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference Garcia-Lopez, Ruiz-Blas, Sanchez-Casanova, Peña Perez, Martin-Cerezo and Cid2022).

Diversity of the microorganisms in Antarctic glaciers

Antarctic glacier microbiology has been extensively studied in recent years thanks to the development of omics techniques (Doytchinov & Dimov Reference Doytchinov and Dimov2022, Vick-Majors et al. Reference Vick-Majors, Singh and Singh2024). These methodologies have made it possible to elucidate the genomic compositions of microbial communities and their distributions in the various glacial ecosystems.

This review paper compares this previous knowledge with the microbial diversity results found in our previous works on 11 glaciers in the South Shetland archipelago by re-analysing the sequences from the amplicon sequencing of 16S and 18S rRNA genes (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019, Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021, Reference Garcia-Lopez, Ruiz-Blas, Sanchez-Casanova, Peña Perez, Martin-Cerezo and Cid2022). These DNA databases are becoming more complete, and they contain an increasing number of identified sequences. Therefore, fewer unspecified sequences have been obtained in this review than in previous analyses.

Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree and taxonomy of bacteria identified in South Shetland archipelago glaciers. The phylogenetic was tree generated from 16S amplicon sequences previously obtained for Martinez-Alonso et al. (Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019) and Garcia-Lopez et al. (Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021, Reference Garcia-Lopez, Ruiz-Blas, Sanchez-Casanova, Peña Perez, Martin-Cerezo and Cid2022). Sequence analysis and tree construction were performed as previously described (Ruiz-Blas et al. Reference Ruiz-Blas, Muñoz-Hisado, Garcia-Lopez, Moreno, Bartolomé and Leunda2023). Barplots were generated from taxonomic annotations using the SILVA rRNA database. The first barplot ring (closer to the tree) represents the glacial environments, the second barplot ring represents taxonomic level 1, the third barplot ring represents taxonomic level 2 and the most external barplot ring represents taxonomic level 6 (genus). The legend corresponding to the genera (level 6) has not been represented due to its large size, but the major genera are detailed in the text.

Bacteria

It has been reported that all major phyla of bacteria are represented in glaciers, especially Acidobacteriota, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadota, Planctomycetota, Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobiota (Anesio & Laybourn-Parry Reference Anesio and Laybourn-Parry2012).

In this work, great bacterial diversity has been observed when compared with other Antarctic glaciers (Grzesiak et al. Reference Grzesiak, Zdanowski, Górniak, Świątecki, Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk and Szatraj2015). According to our results, it is confirmed that all major phyla of bacteria are represented in glaciers. Most of the phyla of the englacial ecosystem were identified as Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota (Fig. 4, level 2), and the major genera in this habitat were Polaromonas, Pedobacter, Sulfobacillus, Flavobacterium, Clostridium and Sphingomonas (Fig. 4, level 6).

Regarding the subglacial ecosystem, samples from two glaciers on Deception Island were analysed (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference Garcia-Lopez, Ruiz-Blas, Sanchez-Casanova, Peña Perez, Martin-Cerezo and Cid2022). These samples were collected in the basal margins of the glaciers, in contact with the lower bedrock. The major phyla in the subglacial ecosystem were Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria (Fig. 4, level 2). Most of the bacterial genera of the subglacial habitat were Hymenobacter, Pontibacter, Frankia, Cyanobacterium and Symploca (Fig. 4, level 6).

It is worth highlighting the presence of sentinel microorganisms of human contamination inside the glacial ice, which have altered the composition of native microbial populations. In a study comparing the gradient of microbial populations across the archipelago, it was observed that the western islands contained greater microbial diversity, possibly due to the existence of volcanic minerals that serve as nutrients for chemolithotrophic bacteria (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021). However, in the eastern islands, where the number of research stations and tourists is higher, the diversity of chemolithotrophs decreased and the existence of microorganisms associated with human presence was observed. These microbial populations include various species of enterobacteria such as Escherichia coli, as well as other microorganisms such as Helicobacter, Bacteroides, Streptococcus and Oscillospira (Power et al. Reference Power, Samuel, Smith, Stark, Gillings and Gordon2016). The presence of animal parasitic microeukaryotes such as Cryptosporidium was also observed (Kleinertz et al. Reference Kleinertz, Christmann, Silva, Hirzmann, Hermosilla and Taubert2014). The problems associated of human frequentation through tourism and the expansion of scientific operations have been reported previously, and these activities can have serious repercussions such as increased human-mediated antimicrobial resistance (Clark et al. Reference Clark, Gregson, Greco, Evans and Hwengwere2025).

A comparison of the microbial populations of the glaciers at the two poles shows that the differences between the two geographical regions are significant, and these disparities condition their observed environmental microbiology. The Arctic is an ocean surrounded by continents. Arctic glaciers are heavily influenced by marine microorganisms that have colonized the land from the sea, and vice versa. Sentinel microorganisms of this transfer such as the genus Hymenobacter have been described (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference Garcia-Lopez, Rodriguez-Lorente, Alcazar and Cid2019). This process is less observed in Antarctica, where the continent is surrounded by the ocean. It is also significant that the microbial diversities at both poles are very different, and there are taxonomic groups that only exist in either one or the other of them. Also noteworthy is the presence of microorganisms of the same genus (e.g. Psychrobacter) but different species (e.g. Psychrobacter frigidicola and Psychrobacter arcticus) in the glaciers of both poles, which may be due to evolutionary convergence or past migrations (Bowman et al. Reference Bowman, Cavanagh, Austin and Sanderson1996, Bakermans et al. Reference Bakermans, Ayala-del-Río, Ponder, Vishnivetskaya, Gilichinsky, Thomashow and Tiedje2006).

Archaea

The greatest number and diversity of archaea on the planet exist in cold environments (Caviccioli Reference Caviccioli2006). Archaea have been reported both within glacier ice and beneath glaciers (Skidmore et al. Reference Skidmore, Foght and Sharp2000). Methanogenic archaea represent one of the most abundant resident groups in glaciers, especially in the subglacial environment (Tung et al. Reference Tung, Bramall and Price2005). For example, Methanogenium frigidum and Methanococcoides burtonii are two of the most studied such species, and they were isolated from samples from the aforementioned Ace Lake, Antarctica (Franzmann et al. Reference Franzmann, Liu, Balkwill, Aldrich, Conway de Macario and Boone1997, Saunders et al. Reference Saunders, Thomas, Curmi, Mattick, Kuczek and Slade2003). Other archaea that are not methanogenic have also been described, such as Halorubrum lacusprofundi, which was isolated from Deep Lake, Antarctica. This psychrophilic microorganism is also capable of living in a subglacial lake with a salinity that is 10 times higher than that of seawater (Caviccioli Reference Caviccioli2006). In our sequence analyses, although they were not specifically designed to search for archaea, some archaea of the Halobacterota and Euryarchaeota groups were identified (Fig. 4).

Microeukaryotes

Eukaryotic microorganisms mostly populate the surface of glaciers, especially cryoconite holes (Christner et al. Reference Christner, Kvitko and Reeve2003). However, eukaryotic microorganisms have also been found in the englacial ecosystem. The majority of the groups of the englacial ecosystem belonged to Opisthokonta (41.57%, of which 65.27% were fungi), SAR (38.09%) and Archaeplastida (12.58%), although 7.68% of the sequences were assigned as unspecified eukaryotes (Fig. 5, level 2).

Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree and taxonomy of microeukaryotes identified in South Shetland archipelago glaciers. The phylogenetic tree was generated from 18S amplicon sequences previously obtained for Martinez-Alonso et al. (Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019) and Garcia-Lopez et al. (Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021). Sequence analysis and tree construction were performed as previously described (Ruiz-Blas et al. Reference Ruiz-Blas, Muñoz-Hisado, Garcia-Lopez, Moreno, Bartolomé and Leunda2023). Barplots were generated from taxonomic annotations using the SILVA rRNA database. The first barplot ring (closer to the tree) represents the glacial environments, the second barplot ring represents taxonomic level 1, the third barplot ring represents taxonomic level 2 and the most external barplot ring represents taxonomic level 6 (genus). The legend corresponding to the genera (level 6) has not been represented due to its large size, but the major genera are detailed in the text.

The most abundant genera of eukaryotes in the englacial environment were diatoms such as Thalassiosira and Cocconeis, green algae such as Hydrurus and Urospora, cercozoa such as Glissomonadida and Bodomorpha and fungi such as Phytophthora, Sporobolomyces and Hyphozyma (Fig. 5, level 6). It has been previously reported that the lack of light and the anoxic conditions of the englacial and subglacial environments favour the growth of numerous fungal species (Anesio et al. Reference Anesio and Laybourn-Parry2012).

Some microorganisms that denote environmental contamination, such as the microeukaryote Cryptosporidium, a characteristic gastrointestinal parasite of emperor penguins, were identified in the glaciers Traub (Greenwich Island) and Ecology and Machu Picchu (King George Island; Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021). The genus Giardia, an anaerobic flagellated parasite of vertebrates, was also detected in the englacial habitat of Mount Pond glacier (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019).

Viruses

Most of the studies conducted on Antarctic viruses have been done using freshwater samples from lakes (Lopez-Bueno et al. Reference Lopez-Bueno, Tamames, Velázquez, Moya, Quesada and Alcamí2009) or seawater samples taken under the Antarctic ice shelves (Lopez-Simon et al. Reference Lopez-Simon, Vila-Nistal, Rosenova, De Corte, Baltar and Martinez-Garcia2023). However, very few studies exist on the diversity of viruses in Antarctic glacier ice. Yet, by analysing the genomes of bacteria and microeukaryotes, the presence of viruses that infect microorganisms (phages) can be detected (Boetius et al. Reference Boetius, Anesio, Deming, Mikucki and Rapp2015). It is known that viruses in cold environments play an important role in controlling the mortality and diversity of microbial communities, but further research is needed on ice-hosted viral populations, which remain poorly understood (Anesio & Laybourn-Parry Reference Anesio and Laybourn-Parry2012). As a consequence of climate change, glaciers and permafrost are melting. This means that pathogenic viruses could awaken and infect the surrounding fauna and flora (Varghese et al. Reference Varghese, Patel, Kumar and Sharma2023).

Molecular mechanisms of the adaptation of microorganisms in Antarctic glaciers

Antarctic microorganisms have successfully coped with various stresses thanks to various molecular mechanisms of adaptation and evolutionary pressure that have selected certain species (Leo et al. Reference Leo, Nardi, Cucini, Frati, Convey and Weedon2021). Using proteomics techniques, the molecular machinery at work in Antarctic glacier inhabitants has been discovered and the molecular mechanisms of adaptation to the polar environment have been elucidated (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019). The ability to determine the complete genomes of microorganisms has recently enabled the reliable identification of a large number of related proteins. But, even in the best-studied model microorganisms, such as E. coli, there remain large numbers of genes with unknown functions (Ghatak et al. Reference Ghatak, King, Sastry and Palsson2019). In glacier microorganisms, this proportion is even higher, and much more information is still needed on the metagenomes of glacier microorganisms because ~20–30% of the analysed proteins are listed in databases as hypothetical or unknown proteins. Many other proteins are identified by analogy with the proteomes of other types of microorganisms that have been much more studied, but this type of identification is not very reliable, as low significance scores are obtained from such searches in protein databases.

Adaptation to temperature changes

Antarctic glacier ice shows a wide temperature range. Average summer temperatures are close to 0°C, although temperatures of up to 18.3°C have been recorded on the surface of glaciers, where solar radiation amplified by the albedo heats the ice (Bergstrom et al. Reference Bergstrom, Gooseff, Myers, Doran and Cross2020). During the winter (March–September), there is little to no incoming solar radiation, and temperatures average -30°C (Fountain et al. Reference Fountain, Lyons, Burkins, Dana, Doran and Lewis1999). These enormous temperature variations must be added to the generalized temperature increase that the entire planet is undergoing due to climate change linked to anthropogenic greenhouse gases. Although this change is less pronounced in Antarctica than in other regions of Earth, the temperature increase in the South Shetland archipelago has been ~3°C since the middle of the 20th century (Gorodetskaya et al. Reference Gorodetskaya, Durán-Alarcón, González-Herrero, Clem, Zou and Rowe2023).

Microorganisms adapt to temperature changes by adopting various modifications in their cellular and molecular machinery. These adjustments include the synthesis of heat shock proteins (Hsps) and cold shock proteins (Csps) that are involved in several cellular processes such as transcription, translation, protein folding and the regulation of membrane fluidity (Garcia-Descalzo et al. Reference Garcia-Descalzo, Alcazar, Baquero and Cid2011, Yusof et al. Reference Yusof, Masnoddin, Charles, Thien, Nasib and Wong2022). These proteins have been extensively investigated in the context of the adaptation of Antarctic yeasts and bacteria to temperature increases (Deegenaars et al. Reference Deegenaars and Watson1997, Che et al. Reference Che, Song and Lin2013, Garcia-Descalzo et al. Reference Garcia-Descalzo, García-López and Cid2022). For example, when the bacterium Shewanella frigidimarina is exposed to high temperatures, it accumulates Hsps, as well as other proteins related to stress, redox homeostasis or protein synthesis and degradation and the depletion of enzymes and cell envelope components. In addition, the entire cellular machinery is remodelled, and chaperone proteins, such as Hsps, reorganize their interaction networks with other proteins (Garcia-Descalzo et al. Reference Garcia-Descalzo, García-López, Alcazar, Baquero and Cid2014).

Another adaptation of microorganisms to cold is the modification of the composition of their cell membranes. Cold reduces the fluidity of membranes, and to compensate for this effect, the fatty acid composition of the membranes of these microorganisms is different from that of membranes of other prokaryotes (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Chen, Nian, Ji, Lin, Wei and Zhang2017). Among the modifications to membrane fatty acids, the synthesis of lipids with cis-unsaturated double bonds has been described previously, as well as the incorporation of branched lipids and the incorporation of short fatty-acyl chains that reduce the contacts between adjacent chains (Feller Reference Feller2007, Chen et al. Reference Chen, Zhang, Li, Cui, Yang and Zhang2022).

Recently, high-throughput technologies have been developed to determine the function of a large number of enzymes from psychrophilic microorganisms, combining proteomics techniques and the reconstruction of protein networks (Garcia-Descalzo et al. Reference Garcia-Descalzo, García-López and Cid2022, Ramasamy et al. Reference Ramasamy, Mahawar, Rajasabapathy, Rajeshwari, Miceli and Pucciarelli2023). It has been shown that living at low temperatures is benefitted by the ability to synthesize enzymes that continue to function at near-freezing temperatures. Psychrophilic enzymes constitute an important class of proteins in which structure-function relationships can be investigated by comparing their properties with those of homologous mesophilic and thermophilic counterparts (Ruggiero et al. Reference Ruggiero, Raimo, Palma, Acari and Masullo2007). In this comparison, it has been observed that psychrophilic enzymes are more flexible (the space available for amino acid side chains is larger than that for mesophilic enzymes), and this fact allows them to continue to function at low temperatures. The flexibility of these proteins sometimes affects the whole molecule, but it is sufficient if only the catalytic region has such flexibility (Hochachka & Somero Reference Hochachka and Somero2002, D’Amico et al. Reference D'Amico, Collins, Marx, Feller and Gerday2006, Giordano et al. Reference Giordano, Russo, Di Prisco and Verde2012).

Adaptation to high levels of radiation

Microorganisms that are highly resistant to radiation are called ‘radiophiles’. Among them, representatives of the genus Deinococcus such as Deinococcus radiodurans and Deinococcus radiophilus have been described, which are mostly found on the surface of glacial ice, where solar radiation and albedo are very intense (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Zhu, Li, Rao, Li and Guo2020, Cheng et al. Reference Cheng, Mu, Zhang, Jiang, Liu and Li2024). These microorganisms are also highly resistant to oxidative damage and dehydration. It has been observed that these bacteria utilize several repair mechanisms (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Li and Zhang2023). The DNA of cells subjected to high doses of radiation is damaged and becomes non-functional, but these bacteria can repair such damaged DNA (Singh & Gabani Reference Singh and Gabani2011).

Another important resistance mechanism of microorganisms to protect themselves from solar radiation is the synthesis of pigments. Bacteria, as well as archaea and algae, are pigment producers (Garcia-Lopez & Cid Reference Garcia-Lopez, Cid and Singh2016). For example, the bacterium Sphingobacterium antarcticus produces zeaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin and β-carotene (Jagannadham et al. Reference Jagannadham, Chattopadhyay, Subbalakshmi, Vairamani, Narayanan and Rao2000). Another pigment capable of protecting organisms from radiation is xanthomonadin, which is exclusively produced by Xanthomonas (Rajagopal et al. Reference Rajagopal, Sundari, Balasubramanian and Sonti1997). Other pigments produced by halophilic archaea are bacterioruberin and bacteriorhodopsin (Rodrigo-Baños et al. Reference Rodrigo-Baños, Garbayo, Vílchez, Bonete and Martínez-Espinosa2015). Among the microalgae, Chlorella zofingiensis and Chlamydomonas nivalis produce xanthophylls (Smaoui et al. Reference Smaoui, Barkallah, Ben Hlima, Fendri, Mousavi Khaneghah and Michaud2021).

Adaptation to the lack of oxygen

The supraglacial habitat is populated by aerobic microorganisms that use oxygen as an electron acceptor (Maccario et al. Reference Maccario, Sanguino, Vogel and Larose2015). Oxygen is the acceptor of choice for cells as the reduction of oxygen produces a large amount of energy compared to that produced by the reduction of other electron acceptors (Madigan et al. Reference Madigan, Martinko, Bender, Buckley, Stahl and Nakagawa2015). However, in the englacial and subglacial habitats, the oxygen concentration is very limited, and so the respiration of microorganisms in these habitats is anaerobic. These microorganisms use other electron acceptors, such as nitrate reduced to nitrite or nitrogen by Pseudomonas species (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019). Other bacteria use other inorganic compounds, such as Geobacter using ferric iron and Desulfovibrio using sulphate (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019). Some methanogenic microorganisms reduce carbonate to methane, whereas acetogens reduce carbonate to acetate. Even organic molecules such as fumarate can be used as electron acceptors in anaerobic respiration (Madigan et al. Reference Madigan, Martinko, Bender, Buckley, Stahl and Nakagawa2015). Similarly to aerobic respiration, anaerobic respiration requires electron transport and uses the enzyme ATPase to synthesize adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Most of the enzymes and proteins used in these cellular processes have been discovered only recently through proteomics analysis (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019).

Adaptation to the lack of nutrients

Glacial microorganisms play an important ecological role as they participate in global geochemical fluxes. They are essential components of microbial food webs and are often dominant primary producers, playing important roles in chemical weathering and carbon and nitrogen cycling processes (Trejos-Espeleta et al. Reference Trejos-Espeleta, Marin-Jaramillo, Schmidt, Sommers, Bradley and Orsi2024).

In the supraglacial ecosystem, there is a large majority of photosynthesizing and heterotrophic microorganisms that feed on organic debris carried by the ice, and so the lack of nutrients is not a limiting factor to their survival (Maccario et al. Reference Maccario, Sanguino, Vogel and Larose2015). However, in the lower layers of glaciers, microorganisms have adapted to nutrient scarcity by developing a chemoautotrophic metabolism in which they feed on rocks and soil (Harrold et al. Reference Harrold, Skidmore, Hamilton, Desch, Amada and van Gelder2016). Most of the microorganisms in these ecosystems are heterotrophic and chemoautotrophic (Hodson et al. Reference Hodson, Anesio, Tranter, Fountain, Osborn and Priscu2008, Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019). The englacial and subglacial environments also favour the growth of numerous fungal species. Such fungal growth facilitates the weathering of rocks and the opening of internal channels. These fungi have a heterotrophic metabolism and degrade organic matter remains. In turn, the carbon obtained from this degradation and its transport through the hyphae into the rocks would facilitate the growth of other microorganisms such as heterotrophic bacteria (Butinar et al. Reference Butinar, Spencer-Martins and Gunde-Cimerman2007).

The anaerobic metabolism of microorganisms also include methanogenesis. As stated earlier, the Archaea contain methane-producing microorganisms. There are two groups of methanogenic archaea: methylotrophic and hydrogenotrophic. Hydrogenotrophic methanogens produce methane from H2 plus CO2 (or formate). Methylotrophic methanogens produce methane from simple monocarbon compounds such as methanol, methylamines and methylthiols (Madigan et al. Reference Madigan, Martinko, Bender, Buckley, Stahl and Nakagawa2015). It has been documented previously that when glaciers retreat, the methane that had been retained beneath the glacier in pockets of gas, which had been produced by methanogenic microorganisms, escapes into the atmosphere (Kleber et al. Reference Kleber, Hodson, Magerl, Mannerfelt, Bradbury and Zhu2023). Once these glaciers disappear, pedogenesis begins, and the organic matter in glacial forefields becomes subject to remineralization to CO2 by microbial respiration (Tao et al. Reference Tao, Huang, Hungate, Manzoni, Frey and Schmidt2023). In this succession, fungi play a main role in the initial stabilization of the assimilated carbon (Trejos-Espeleta et al. Reference Trejos-Espeleta, Marin-Jaramillo, Schmidt, Sommers, Bradley and Orsi2024)

Adaptation to dryness

The Antarctic continent is extremely dry, averaging 166 mm of precipitation per year (Vaughan et al. Reference Vaughan, Bamber, Giovinetto, Russell and Cooper1999). The air in Antarctica is also dry, as the low temperatures result in very low absolute humidity levels. As a mechanism of adaptation to the lack of water, some species of bacteria, such as those of the genus Bacillus, produce structures called ‘endospores’. These survival mechanisms enable these organisms to withstand unfavourable growth conditions, such as extreme temperatures, dryness or a lack of nutrients. In addition, these endospores are easily dispersed by wind and water (Ryan-Payseur & Freitag Reference Ryan-Payseur and Freitag2018).

Among eukaryotic microorganisms, fungi, such as the genus Rhizopus identified in the Mount Pond glacier, are also capable of resisting dryness through the formation of a zygosporangium, which can remain dormant and resist dryness and other unfavourable conditions ( Gryganskyi et al. Reference Gryganskyi, Golan, Dolatabadi, Mondo, Robb and Idnurm2019).

Another mechanism of adaptation is the formation of biofilms. This mechanism has been investigated in bacteria of the genus Bacillus, which that can choose between two lifestyles: biofilm formation and flagellum-mediated swimming motility. This choice is made at the individual cell level, with bacterial cells in a population expressing either the genes required for biofilm formation or the genes required for flagellum-mediated swimming motility (Ryan-Payseur & Freitag Reference Ryan-Payseur and Freitag2018). Furthermore, to form a biofilm, the cells need to engage in intercellular communication (quorum sensing) that leads to a choice being made between living freely or forming a biofilm. It has been demonstrated previously that in the genus Pseudomonas quorum sensing induces the expression of a group of genes necessary for the synthesis of the exopolysaccharides that form a biofilm. Intracellular signalling is also involved in biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa through the cyclic di-GMP messenger protein, which is unique to prokaryotes (Lichtenberg et al. Reference Lichtenberg, Kragh, Fritz, Kirkegaard, Tolker-Nielsen and Bjarnsholt2022). In glaciers, biofilms can be observed on the surface of cryoconite holes in which there is a liquid water medium and in which cells can move and communicate with each other.

Conclusions

This review paper explores the diversity of the molecular mechanisms of adaptation of cold-loving microorganisms, and it details the specific characteristics of the microbial populations living in the Antarctic glaciers of the South Shetland archipelago. The main conclusions are as follows:

  • Antarctic glaciers had classically been considered uninhabited, but they have in fact been colonized by a great diversity of bacteria, archaea, viruses and microeukaryotes such as algae and unicellular fungi.

  • In this work, a great diversity of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms was observed in the glaciers of the South Shetland archipelago when compared with other Antarctic glaciers.

  • DNA databases are becoming more complete, and they contain an increasing number of identified sequences. Therefore, fewer unspecified sequences have been obtained in this review than in previous analyses. Even so, ~40% of microeukaryote sequences remain unknown or unspecified.

  • The South Shetland archipelago supports large numbers of scientists and tourists. The presence of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms of human origin can already be detected within the glacial ice of these islands.

  • The identification of the complete genomes of some microorganisms has recently enabled the reliable identification of a large number of related proteins. However, much more information on the metagenomes of Antarctic glacier microorganisms is still needed, because ~20–30% of the analysed proteins are still listed in the relevant databases as hypothetical or unknown proteins.

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Spanish Antarctic research stations Gabriel de Castilla and Juan Carlos I, the Ecuadorian research station Pedro Vicente Maldonado and the Polish research station Henryk Arctowski for their skilful assistance. We also thank Paula Alcazar for reading this manuscript and for her helpful revisions. This research is part of the POLARCSIC activities.

Financial support

This research has been funded by grant no. PID2023-146641NB-C21 by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation/State Agency of Research MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. EG-L is supported by grant PTA2022-021737-I provided by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. VM-H is supported by grant MDM-2017-0737, Unidad de Excelencia ‘Maria de Maeztu’-Centro de Astrobiología (INTA-CSIC) by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation/State Agency of Research MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. AH-A is supported by grant MPSL provided by the Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The amplicon sequencing data are available at SRA (NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA) under the project IDs PRJNA430179 (Martinez-Alonso et al. Reference Martinez-Alonso, Pena-Perez, Serrano, Garcia-Lopez, Alcazar and Cid2019); SAMN14863991, SAMN14868361, SAMN14868400, SAMN14868414, SAMN14868429, SAMN14868542, SAMN14868580, SAMN14868598, SAMN14868636, SAMN14868654, SAMN14868683, SAMN14868702, SAMN14868717, SAMN14868740, SAMN14868844, and SAMN14868902 (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference García-Lopez, Serrano, Calvo, Peña Perez, Sanchez-Casanova and García- Descalzo2021); SRS10910775-SRS10910778 (Garcia-Lopez et al. Reference Garcia-Lopez, Ruiz-Blas, Sanchez-Casanova, Peña Perez, Martin-Cerezo and Cid2022).

Author contributions

VM-H analysed the DNA sequences, EG-L and AH-A performed the laboratory analyses, CC designed the study and wrote the paper with valuable contributions from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

Footnotes

This article is dedicated to our colleague and friend Professor Andres Barbosa.

References

Abyzov, S.S. 1993. Microorganisms in the Antarctic ice. In Friedmann, E.I., ed., Antarctic Microbiology. New York: Willey-Liss, Inc., 265295.Google Scholar
Anesio, A.M. & Laybourn-Parry, J. 2012. Glaciers and ice sheets as a biome. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.012.Google ScholarPubMed
Bakermans, C., Ayala-del-Río, H.L., Ponder, M.A., Vishnivetskaya, T., Gilichinsky, D., Thomashow, M.F. & Tiedje, J.M. 2006. Psychrobacter cryohalolentis sp. nov. and Psychrobacter arcticus sp. nov., isolated from Siberian permafrost. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 56, 10.1099/ijs.0.64043-0.Google ScholarPubMed
Bauer, T. & Dowling, R. 2003. Ecotourism policies and issues in Antarctica. Ecotourism Policy and Planning, 309, 10.1079/9780851996097.0309.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, A., Gooseff, M.N., Myers, M., Doran, P.T. & Cross, J.M. 2020. The seasonal evolution of albedo across glaciers and the surrounding landscape of Taylor Valley, Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 14, 10.5194/tc-14-769-2020.Google Scholar
Boetius, A., Anesio, A.M., Deming, J.W., Mikucki, J.A. & Rapp, J.Z. 2015. Microbial ecology of the cryosphere: sea ice and glacial habitats. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 13, 10.1038/nrmicro3522.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowman, J.P., Cavanagh, J., Austin, J.J. & Sanderson, K. 1996. Novel Psychrobacter species from Antarctic ornithogenic soils. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 46, 10.1099/00207713-46-4-841.Google ScholarPubMed
Butinar, L., Spencer-Martins, I. & Gunde-Cimerman, N. 2007. Yeasts in high Arctic glaciers: the discovery of a new habitat for eukaryotic microorganisms. Antony van Leeuwenhoek, 91, 10.1007/s10482-006-9117-3.Google ScholarPubMed
Caviccioli, R. 2006. Cold-adapted archaea. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 4, 10.1038/nrmicro1390.Google Scholar
Che, S., Song, W. & Lin, X. 2013. Response of heat-shock protein (HSP) genes to temperature and salinity stress in the Antarctic psychrotrophic bacterium Psychrobacter sp. G. Current Microbiology , 67, 10.1007/s00284-013-0409-3.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, W., Zhang, X., Li, S., Cui, J., Yang, X. & Zhang, Q. 2022. The MAP-kinase HOG1 controls cold adaptation in Rhodosporidium kratochvilovae by promoting biosynthesis of polyunsaturated fatty acids and glycerol. Current Microbiology, 79, 10.1007/s00284-022-02957-8.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheng, L., Mu, H., Zhang, X., Jiang, P., Liu, L. & Li, J. 2024. Deinococcus arenicola sp. nov., a novel radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from sandy soil in Antarctica. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 74, 10.1099/ijsem.0.006397.Google Scholar
Christner, B.C., Kvitko, B.H II & Reeve, J.N. 2003. Molecular identification of Bacteria and Eukarya inhabiting an Antarctic cryoconite hole. Extremophiles, 7, 10.1007/s00792-002-0309-0.Google ScholarPubMed
Clark, M.S., Gregson, B.H., Greco, C., Evans, C. & Hwengwere, K. 2025. Assessing the impact of sewage and wastewater on antimicrobial resistance in nearshore Antarctic biofilms and sediments. Environmental Microbiome, 20, 10.1186/s40793-025-00671-z.Google ScholarPubMed
D'Amico, S., Collins, T., Marx, J.C., Feller, G. & Gerday, C. 2006. Psychrophilic microorganisms: challenges for life. EMBO Reports, 7, 10.1038/sj.embor.7400662.Google ScholarPubMed
Deegenaars, M.L. & Watson, K. 1997. Stress proteins and stress tolerance in an Antarctic, psychrophilic yeast, Candida psychrophila . FEMS Microbiology Letters, 151, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12569.x.Google Scholar
Doytchinov, V.V. & Dimov, S.G. 2022. Microbial community composition of the antarctic ecosystems: review of the bacteria, fungi, and archaea identified through an NGS-based metagenomics approach. Life, 18, 10.3390/life12060916.Google Scholar
Feller, G. 2007. Life at low temperatures: is disorder the driving force? Extremophiles, 11, 10.1007/s00792-006-0050-1.Google Scholar
Fountain, A.G., Tranter, M., Nylen, T.H., Lewis, K.J. & Mueller, D.R. 2004. Evolution of cryoconite holes and their contribution to meltwater runoff from glaciers in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Journal of Glaciology, 50, 10.3189/172756504781830312.10.3189/172756504781830312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fountain, A.G., Lyons, W.B., Burkins, M.B., Dana, G.L., Doran, P.T., Lewis, K.J., et al. 1999. Physical controls on the Taylor Valley ecosystem, Antarctica. Bioscience, 49, 10.2307/1313730.10.2307/1313730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzmann, P.D., Liu, Y., Balkwill, D.L., Aldrich, H.C., Conway de Macario, E. & Boone, D.R. 1997. Methanogenium frigidum sp. nov., a psychrophilic, H2-using methanogen from Ace Lake, Antarctica. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 47, 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1068.Google Scholar
Garcia-Descalzo, L., García-López, E. & Cid, C. 2022. Comparative proteomic analysis of psychrophilic vs. mesophilic bacterial species reveals different strategies to achieve temperature adaptation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.841359.10.3389/fmicb.2022.841359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Descalzo, L., Alcazar, A., Baquero, F. & Cid, C. 2011. Identification of in vivo HSP90-interacting proteins reveals modularity of HSP90 complexes is dependent on the environment in psychrophilic bacteria. Cell Stress and Chaperones, 16, 10.1007/s12192-010-0233-7.10.1007/s12192-010-0233-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Descalzo, L., Alcazar, A., Baquero, F. & Cid, C. 2012. Biotechnological applications of cold-adapted bacteria. In Singh, O.V., ed., Extremophiles: sustainable resources and biotechnological implications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 159174.10.1002/9781118394144.ch6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Descalzo, L., García-López, E., Alcazar, A., Baquero, F. & Cid, C. 2014. Proteomic analysis of the adaptation to warming in the Antarctic bacteria Shewanella frigidimarina . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Proteins and Proteomics, 1844, 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.08.006.10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.08.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Lopez, E. & Cid, C. 2016. Color producing extremophiles. In Singh, O.V., ed., Bio-pigmentation and biotechnological implementations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 10.1002/9781119166191.ch3.Google Scholar
Garcia-Lopez, E., Rodriguez-Lorente, I., Alcazar, P. & Cid, C. 2019. Microbial communities in coastal glaciers and tidewater tongues of Svalbard archipelago, Norway. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 10.3389/fmars.2018.00512.10.3389/fmars.2018.00512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Lopez, E., Ruiz-Blas, F., Sanchez-Casanova, S., Peña Perez, S., Martin-Cerezo, M.L. & Cid, C. 2022. Microbial communities in volcanic glacier ecosystems. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.825632.10.3389/fmicb.2022.825632CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Lopez, E., Serrano, S., Calvo, M.A., Peña Perez, S., Sanchez-Casanova, S., García- Descalzo, L., et al. 2021. Microbial community structure driven by a volcanic gradient in glaciers of the Antarctic archipelago South Shetland. Microorganisms, 9, 10.3390/microorganisms9020392.10.3390/microorganisms9020392CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghatak, S., King, Z.A., Sastry, A. & Palsson, B.O. 2019. The y-ome defines the 35% of Escherichia coli genes that lack experimental evidence of function. Nucleic Acids Research, 47, 10.1093/nar/gkz030.10.1093/nar/gkz030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giordano, D., Russo, R., Di Prisco, G. & Verde, C. 2012. Molecular adaptations in Antarctic fish and marine microorganisms. Marine Genomics, 6, 10.1016/j.margen.2011.09.003.10.1016/j.margen.2011.09.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gladkov, G.V., Kimeklis, A.K., Tembotov, R.K., Ivanov, M.N., Andronov, E.E., & Abakumov, E.V. 2024. Linking the composition of cryoconite prokaryotic communities in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Central Caucasus with their chemical characteristics. Sci Rep. 4, 10.1038/s41598-024-64452-3. 15838.10.1038/s41598-024-64452-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorodetskaya, I.V., Durán-Alarcón, C., González-Herrero, S., Clem, K.R., Zou, X., Rowe, P., et al. 2023. Record-high Antarctic Peninsula temperatures and surface melt in February 2022: a compound event with an intense atmospheric river. Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6, 10.1038/s41612-023-00529-6.Google Scholar
Gryganskyi, A.P., Golan, J., Dolatabadi, S., Mondo, S., Robb, S., Idnurm, A., et al. 2019. Phylogenetic and phylogenomic definition of rhizopus species. G3 (Bethesda), 8, 10.1534/g3.118.200235.Google Scholar
Grzesiak, J., Zdanowski, M.K., Górniak, D., Świątecki, A., Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk, T., Szatraj, K., et al. 2015. Microbial community changes along the Ecology Glacier ablation zone (King George Island, Antarctica). Polar Biology, 38, 10.1007/s00300-015-1767-z.10.1007/s00300-015-1767-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrold, Z.R., Skidmore, M.L., Hamilton, T.L., Desch, L., Amada, K., van Gelder, W., et al. 2016. Aerobic and anaerobic thiosulfate oxidation by a cold-adapted, subglacial chemoautotroph. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 82, 10.1128/AEM.03398-15.10.1128/AEM.03398-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, S., Mushtaq, M., Ganiee, S.A., Zaman, M., Yaseen, A., Shah, A.J., et al. 2024. Microbial oases in the ice: a state-of-the-art review on cryoconite holes as diversity hotspots and their scientific connotations. Environmental Research, 252, 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118963.10.1016/j.envres.2024.118963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo-Arias, A., Muñoz-Hisado, V., Valles, P., Geyer, A., Garcia-Lopez, E. & Cid, C. 2023. Adaptation of the endolithic biome in Antarctic volcanic rocks. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24, 10.3390/ijms241813824.10.3390/ijms241813824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochachka, P.W. & Somero, G.N. 2002. Biochemical adaptation: mechanism and process in physical evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 466 pp.10.1093/oso/9780195117028.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, A., Anesio, A.M., Tranter, M., Fountain, A., Osborn, M., Priscu, J., et al. 2008. Glacial ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 78, 10.1890/07-0187.1.10.1890/07-0187.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y., Fair, H., Liu, Q., Wang, Z., Duan, B. & Lu, X. 2023. Diversity and co-occurrence networks of bacterial and fungal communities on two typical debris-covered glaciers, southeastern Tibetan Plateau. Microbiological Research, 273, 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127409.10.1016/j.micres.2023.127409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IPCC. 2022. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E.S., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., et al., eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3056 pp.Google Scholar
Jagannadham, M.V., Chattopadhyay, M.K., Subbalakshmi, C., Vairamani, M., Narayanan, K., Rao, C.M., et al. 2000. Carotenoids of an Antarctic psychrotolerant bacterium, Sphingobacterium antarcticus, and a mesophilic bacterium, Sphingobacterium multivorum . Archives of Microbiology, 173, 10.1007/s002030000163.10.1007/s002030000163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon, C.O., Park, W., Ghiorse, W.C. & Madsen, E.L. 2004. Polaromonas naphthalenivorans sp. nov., a naphthalene-degrading bacterium from naphthalene-contaminated sediment. International Journal of Systematic Evolutionary Microbiology, 54, 10.1099/ijs.0.02636-0.10.1099/ijs.0.02636-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A.L., Dierssen, H.M., Scambos, T.A., Höfer, J. & Cordero, R.R. 2021. Spectral characterization, radiative forcing and pigment content of coastal Antarctic snow algae: approaches to spectrally discriminate red and green communities and their impact on snowmelt, The Cryosphere, 15, 10.5194/tc-15-133-2021.10.5194/tc-15-133-2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleber, G.E., Hodson, A.J., Magerl, L., Mannerfelt, E.S., Bradbury, H.J., Zhu, Y. et al. 2023. Groundwater springs formed during glacial retreat are a large source of methane in the High Arctic. Nature Geoscience, 16, 10.1038/s41561-023-01210-6.10.1038/s41561-023-01210-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinertz, S., Christmann, S., Silva, L.M., Hirzmann, J., Hermosilla, C. & Taubert, A. 2014. Gastrointestinal parasite fauna of emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) at the Atka Bay, Antarctica. Parasitology Research, 113, 10.1007/s00436-014-4085-4.10.1007/s00436-014-4085-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinteich, J., Hildebrand, F., Bahram, M., Voigt, A.Y., Wood, S.A., Jungblut, A.D., et al. 2017. Pole-to-pole connections: similarities between Arctic and Antarctic microbiomes and their vulnerability to environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 10.3389/fevo.2017.00137.10.3389/fevo.2017.00137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leo, C., Nardi, F., Cucini, C., Frati, F., Convey, P., Weedon, J.T., et al. 2021. Evidence for strong environmental control on bacterial microbiomes of Antarctic springtails. Scientific Reports, 11, 10.1038/s41598-021-82379-x.10.1038/s41598-021-82379-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leps, J. & Smilauer, P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 269 pp.10.1017/CBO9780511615146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, M., Kragh, K.N., Fritz, B., Kirkegaard, J.B., Tolker-Nielsen, T. & Bjarnsholt, T. 2022. Cyclic-di-GMP signaling controls metabolic activity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Cell Reports, 41, 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111515.10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111515CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, F., Li, N. & Zhang, Y. 2023. The radioresistant and survival mechanisms of Deinococcus radiodurans . Radiation Medicine and Protection, 4, 10.1016/j.radmp.2023.03.001.10.1016/j.radmp.2023.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Bueno, A., Tamames, J., Velázquez, D., Moya, A., Quesada, A. & Alcamí, A. 2009. High diversity of the viral community from an Antarctic lake. Science, 326, 10.1126/science.1179287.10.1126/science.1179287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Simon, J., Vila-Nistal, M., Rosenova, A., De Corte, D., Baltar, F. & Martinez-Garcia, M. 2023. Viruses under the Antarctic Ice Shelf are active and potentially involved in global nutrient cycles. Nature Communications, 14, 10.1038/s41467-023-44028-x.10.1038/s41467-023-44028-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maccario, L., Sanguino, L., Vogel, T.M. & Larose, C. 2015. Snow and ice ecosystems: not so extreme. Research in Microbiology, 166, 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.09.002.10.1016/j.resmic.2015.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madigan, M.T., Martinko, J.M., Bender, K.S., Buckley, D.H. & Stahl, D.A. 2015. Brock. Biologia de los Microorganismos, 14th edition. Nakagawa, J.M., ed. Madrid: Pearson Education, 1131 pp.Google Scholar
Martín-Cerezo, M.L., García-López, E. & Cid, C. 2015. Isolation and identification of a red pigment from the Antarctic bacterium Shewanella frigidimarina . Protein and Peptide Letters, 22, 10.2174/0929866522666150915122247.10.2174/0929866522666150915122247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Alonso, E., Pena-Perez, S., Serrano, S., Garcia-Lopez, E., Alcazar, A. & Cid, C. 2019. Taxonomic and functional characterization of a microbial community from a volcanic englacial ecosystem in Deception Island, Antarctica. Scientific Reports, 9, 10.1038/s41598-019-47994-9.10.1038/s41598-019-47994-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLean, A. 1918. Bacteria of ice and snow in Antarctica. Nature, 102, 10.1038/102035a0.10.1038/102035a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaud, L., Lo Giudice, A., Mysara, M., Monsieurs, P., Raffa, C., Leys, N., et al. 2014. Snow surface microbiome on the High Antarctic Plateau (DOME C). PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0104505.10.1371/journal.pone.0104505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikucki, J.A., Pearson, A., Johnston, D.T., Turchyn, A.V., Farquhar, J., Schrag, D.P., et al. 2009. A contemporary microbially maintained subglacial ferrous ‘ocean’. Science, 324, 10.1126/science.1167350.10.1126/science.1167350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, A., Bartolomé, M., López-Moreno, J.I., Pey, J., Corella, J.P., García-Orellana, J., et al. 2021. The case of a southern European glacier which survived Roman and Medieval warm periods but is disappearing under recent warming. The Cryosphere, 15, 10.5194/tc-15-1157-2021.10.5194/tc-15-1157-2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukhia, S., Kumar, A., & Kumar, R. 2024. Bacterial community distribution and functional potentials provide key insights into their role in the ecosystem functioning of a retreating Eastern Himalayan glacier. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 100, 10.1093/femsec/fiae012. fiae012.10.1093/femsec/fiae012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, H., Hattori, R., Ushiba, Y., Mitsui, H., Ito, M., Watanabe, H., et al. 2004. Sphingomonas oligophenolica sp. nov., a halo- and organo-sensitive oligotrophic bacterium from paddy soil that degrades phenolic acids at low concentrations. International Journal of Systematic Evolutionary Microbiology, 54, 10.1099/ijs.0.02959-0.10.1099/ijs.0.02959-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M.L., Samuel, A., Smith, J.J., Stark, J.S., Gillings, M.R., & Gordon, D.M. 2016. Escherichia coli out in the cold: dissemination of human-derived bacteria into the Antarctic microbiome. Environmental Pollution, 215, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.013.10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajagopal, L., Sundari, C.S., Balasubramanian, D. & Sonti, R.V. 1997. The bacterial pigment xanthomonadin offers protection against photodamage. FEBS Letters, 415, 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01109-5.10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01109-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramasamy, K.P., Mahawar, L., Rajasabapathy, R., Rajeshwari, K., Miceli, C., & Pucciarelli, S. 2023. Comprehensive insights on environmental adaptation strategies in Antarctic bacteria and biotechnological applications of cold adapted molecules. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1197797.10.3389/fmicb.2023.1197797CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehfuss, M. & Urban, J. 2005. Rhodococcus phenolicus sp. nov., a novel bioprocessor isolated actinomycete with the ability to degrade chlorobenzene, dichlorobenzene and phenol as sole carbon sources, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 28, 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.05.011.10.1016/j.syapm.2005.05.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigo-Baños, M., Garbayo, I., Vílchez, C., Bonete, M.J. & Martínez-Espinosa, R.M. 2015. Carotenoids from Haloarchaea and their potential in biotechnology. Marine Drugs, 13, 10.3390/md13095508.10.3390/md13095508CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggiero, I., Raimo, G., Palma, M., Acari, P. & Masullo, M. 2007. Molecular and functional properties of the psychrophilic elongation factor G from the Antarctic Eubacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC 125. Extremophiles, 11, 10.1007/s00792-007-0088-8.10.1007/s00792-007-0088-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz-Blas, F., Muñoz-Hisado, V., Garcia-Lopez, E., Moreno, A., Bartolomé, M., Leunda, M., et al. 2023. The hidden microbial ecosystem in the perennial ice from a Pyrenean ice cave. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1110091.10.3389/fmicb.2023.1110091CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan-Payseur, B.K. & Freitag, N.E. 2018. Bacillus subtilis biofilms: a matter of individual choice. mBio, 9, 10.1128/mBio.02339-18.10.1128/mBio.02339-18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, N.F.W., Thomas, T., Curmi, P.M.G., Mattick, J.S., Kuczek, E., Slade, R. et al. 2003. Mechanisms of thermal adaptation revealed from the genomes of the Antarctic Archaea, Methanogenium frigidum and Methanococcoides burtonii . Genome Research, 13, 10.1101/gr.1180903.10.1101/gr.1180903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shijin, W., Yaqiong, M., Xueyan, Z. & Jia, X. 2020. Polar tourism and environment change: opportunity, impact and adaptation. Polar Science, 25, 10.1016/j.polar.2020.100544.10.1016/j.polar.2020.100544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shtarkman, Y.M., Koçer, Z.A., Edgar, R., Veerapaneni, R.S., D'Elia, T., Morris, P.F., et al. 2013. Subglacial Lake Vostok (Antarctica) accretion ice contains a diverse set of sequences from aquatic, marine and sediment-inhabiting Bacteria and Eukarya. PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0067221.10.1371/journal.pone.0067221CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, O.V. & Gabani, P. 2011. Extremophiles: radiation resistance microbial reserves and therapeutic implications. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 110, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011. 04971.x.10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04971.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skidmore, M.L., Foght, J.M. & Sharp, M.J. 2000. Microbial life beneath a High Arctic glacier. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3214-3220.2000.10.1128/AEM.66.8.3214-3220.2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smaoui, S., Barkallah, M., Ben Hlima, H., Fendri, I., Mousavi Khaneghah, A., Michaud, P., et al. 2021. Microalgae xanthophylls: from biosynthesis pathway and production techniques to encapsulation development. Foods, 10, 10.3390/foods10112835.10.3390/foods10112835CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommer, C., Malz, P., Seehaus, T.C., Lippl, S., Zemp, M. & Braun, M.H. 2020. Rapid glacier retreat and downwasting throughout the European Alps in the early 21st century. Nature Communications, 11, 10.1038/s41467-020-16818-0.10.1038/s41467-020-16818-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, F., Huang, Y., Hungate, B.A., Manzoni, S., Frey, S.D., Schmidt, M.W.I., et al. 2023. Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage. Nature, 618, 10.1038/s41586-023-06042-3.10.1038/s41586-023-06042-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trejos-Espeleta, J.C., Marin-Jaramillo, J.P., Schmidt, S.K., Sommers, P., Bradley, J.A. & Orsi, W.D. 2024. Principal role of fungi in soil carbon stabilization during early pedogenesis in the high Arctic, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121, 10.1073/pnas.2402689121.Google ScholarPubMed
Tung, H.C., Bramall, N.E. & Price, P.B. 2005. Microbial origin of excess methane in glacial ice and implications for life on Mars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10.1073/pnas.0507601102.Google ScholarPubMed
Turner, J., Maksym, T., Phillips, T., Marshall, G.J. & Meredith, M.P. 2013. The impact of changes in sea ice advance on the large winter warming on the western Antarctic Peninsula. International Journal of Climatology, 33, 10.1002/joc.3474.10.1002/joc.3474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varghese, R., Patel, P., Kumar, D. & Sharma, R. 2023. Climate change and glacier melting: risks for unusual outbreaks? Journal of Travel Medicine, 30, 10.1093/jtm/taad015.10.1093/jtm/taad015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaughan, D.G., Bamber, J.L., Giovinetto, M., Russell, J. & Cooper, A.P.R. 1999. Reassessment of net surface mass balance in Antarctica. Journal of Climate, 12, 933946.10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0933:RONSMB>2.0.CO;22.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vick-Majors, T.J., Singh, S.M. & Singh, P.K. 2024. Editorial: Microorganisms in polar regions: understanding their survival strategies for a sustainable future. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1442926.10.3389/fmicb.2024.1442926CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J., Chen, W., Nian, H., Ji, X., Lin, L., Wei, Y. & Zhang, Q. 2017. Inhibition of polyunsaturated fatty acids synthesis decreases growth rate and membrane fluidity of Rhodosporidium kratochvilovae at low temperature. Lipids, 52, 10.1007/s11745-017-4273-y.10.1007/s11745-017-4273-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yusof, N.A., Masnoddin, M., Charles, J., Thien, Y.Q., Nasib, F.N., Wong, C.M.V.L., et al. 2022. Can heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) serve as biomarkers in Antarctica for future ocean acidification, warming and salinity stress? Polar Biology, 45, 10.1007/s00300-022-03006-7.10.1007/s00300-022-03006-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, K., Zhu, J., Li, S., Rao, M.P.N., Li, N.M., Guo, A.Y., et al. 2020. Deinococcus detaillensis sp. nov., isolated from humus soil in Antarctica. Archives of Microbiology, 202, 10.1007/s00203-020-01920-0.10.1007/s00203-020-01920-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of Antarctica showing some of the glaciers where microorganisms have been explored to date. a. South Shetland archipelago. b. Antarctica. Details on the glaciers and references are summarized in Table I.

Figure 1

Table I. Studies performed on microorganisms from Antarctic glaciers. The glaciers with samples shown in Figs 4 & 5 are highlighted in bold.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Examples of coastal Antarctic glaciers of the South Shetland archipelago: a. Mount Pond glacier, b. Johnson glacier, c. Quito glacier and d. Rojo glacier. The glaciers in images a. and d., located on Deception Island, clearly show the remains of lava and volcanic ash that colour the glacial ice.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the microorganisms distributed in the three glacial habitats: a. Bacteria and b. Eukaryota. The influence of the environment on the microbial community composition was investigated by PCA developed using CANOCO 5 software (Leps & Smilauer 2003). The analyses were evaluated using a Monte Carlo test with 500 permutations. Data are from the glaciers highlighted in bold in Table I.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree and taxonomy of bacteria identified in South Shetland archipelago glaciers. The phylogenetic was tree generated from 16S amplicon sequences previously obtained for Martinez-Alonso et al. (2019) and Garcia-Lopez et al. (2021, 2022). Sequence analysis and tree construction were performed as previously described (Ruiz-Blas et al. 2023). Barplots were generated from taxonomic annotations using the SILVA rRNA database. The first barplot ring (closer to the tree) represents the glacial environments, the second barplot ring represents taxonomic level 1, the third barplot ring represents taxonomic level 2 and the most external barplot ring represents taxonomic level 6 (genus). The legend corresponding to the genera (level 6) has not been represented due to its large size, but the major genera are detailed in the text.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree and taxonomy of microeukaryotes identified in South Shetland archipelago glaciers. The phylogenetic tree was generated from 18S amplicon sequences previously obtained for Martinez-Alonso et al. (2019) and Garcia-Lopez et al. (2021). Sequence analysis and tree construction were performed as previously described (Ruiz-Blas et al. 2023). Barplots were generated from taxonomic annotations using the SILVA rRNA database. The first barplot ring (closer to the tree) represents the glacial environments, the second barplot ring represents taxonomic level 1, the third barplot ring represents taxonomic level 2 and the most external barplot ring represents taxonomic level 6 (genus). The legend corresponding to the genera (level 6) has not been represented due to its large size, but the major genera are detailed in the text.