Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T00:08:48.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of temperature in reported chickenpox cases from 2000 to 2011 in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2015

K. HARIGANE
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Tenshi College, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
A. SUMI*
Affiliation:
Department of Hygiene, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
K. MISE
Affiliation:
Center of Medical Education, Department of Admission, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
N. KOBAYASHI
Affiliation:
Department of Hygiene, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
*
* Author for correspondence: Dr A. Sumi, Department of Hygiene, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S-1, W-17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060–8556, Japan. (Email: sumi@sapmed.ac.jp)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Annual periodicities of reported chickenpox cases have been observed in several countries. Of these, Japan has reported a two-peaked, bimodal annual cycle of reported chickenpox cases. This study investigated the possible underlying association of the bimodal cycle observed in the surveillance data of reported chickenpox cases with the meteorological factors of temperature, relative humidity and rainfall. A time-series analysis consisting of the maximum entropy method spectral analysis and the least squares method was applied to the chickenpox data and meteorological data of 47 prefectures in Japan. In all of the power spectral densities for the 47 prefectures, the spectral lines were observed at the frequency positions corresponding to the 1-year and 6-month cycles. The optimum least squares fitting (LSF) curves calculated with the 1-year and 6-month cycles explained the underlying variation of the chickenpox data. The LSF curves reproduced the bimodal and unimodal cycles that were clearly observed in northern and southern Japan, respectively. The data suggest that the second peaks in the bimodal cycles in the reported chickenpox cases in Japan occurred at a temperature of approximately 8·5 °C.

Information

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distribution of 47 prefectures in Japan. Dashed lines indicate the boundaries of the four main islands constituting Japan: Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku and Kyushu.

Figure 1

Table 1. Longitude, latitude, population size and the peaks of LSF curves of eight prefectures in Japan

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Age distribution of the reported chickenpox cases from paediatric sentinel clinics.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Weekly incidence data of chickenpox from eight prefectures in Japan from 2000 to 2011: (a) Hokkaido, (b) Miyagi, (c) Tokyo, (d) Nagano, (e) Kyoto, (f) Kochi, (g) Fukuoka, (h) Okinawa.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Power spectral densities (PSDs) obtained from weekly incidence data of chickenpox from eight prefectures in Japan from 2000 to 2011: (a) Hokkaido, (b) Miyagi, (c) Tokyo, (d) Nagano, (e) Kyoto, (f) Kochi, (g) Fukuoka, (h) Okinawa.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Comparisons of the weekly incidence data (dashed line) and least-squares-fitting curves calculated with the 1-year and 6-month periodic modes (red solid line): (a) Hokkaido, (b) Miyagi, (c) Tokyo, (d) Nagano, (e) Kyoto, (f) Kochi, (g) Fukuoka, (h) Okinawa.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Gradient of Q1 (left-hand side) and Q2 (right-hand side) against meteorological factors in 47 prefectures in Japan from 2000 to 2011. (a) and (a’) Daily mean temperature (°C); (b) and (b’) daily mean relative humidity (%); (c) and (c’) summation of daily rainfall (mm).

Figure 7

Table 2. Spearman's ρ calculated for meteorological factors and contribution ratio of seasonal cycles (Q1 and Q2)

Figure 8

Table 3. The value of mean, standard deviation (s.d.) and s.d./mean for (a) daily temperature, (b) daily relative humidity and (c) daily rainfall, and (d) the value of a summation of the daily rainfall during 2000–2011 for the eight prefectures in Japan

Figure 9

Fig. 7. A plot of Q1 and Q2 against latitude. (a) Q1 and (b) Q2.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. A plot of Q2 against the mean temperature of the minimum incidence between the first and second peaks of the least-squares-fitting curve during 2000–2011.