No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Demanding Theology of Mister Rogers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
There has been a resurgence of interest in Mister Rogers, the person behind Mister Rogers' Neighborhood. The interest goes beyond stories of a famous television personality. There is a sense that Mister Rogers is needed today. U. S. culture is experiencing high levels of fear and anxiety, divisions and hostilities. Mister Rogers offers more than 'niceness' but a demanding theology. This theology offers tools for both diagnosing and treating our contemporary situation. Rogers believes that people have a need for acceptance and love, a vulnerability that is fundamental to our humanity. When this need is not met, people can turn in on themselves or lash out at others. Their fear can flow out into society and make it increasingly hostile. Rogers' treatment begins with the principle of specialness. People need to know that they are loved and accepted, and the affirmation of specialness meets this need. The principle also calls people to recognize the specialness in others, to love as they need to be loved. Rogers’ principle sets in motion a system of circulating love. Instead of unleashing hostility, Rogers' call to specialness unleashes empathy so more and more people are brought into the dynamics of love.
Information
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2021 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 Sacks, Ethan, ‘Mr. Roger's Message of Kindness and Empathy is Needed More than Ever’, NBC News, November 22, 2019, https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/movies/mr-rogers-message-kindness-empathy-needed-more-ever-n1088796Google Scholar.
2 Whitaker, Abby, ‘Why We Need Mister Rogers, Big Bird, and Oscar the Grouch Now More than Ever’, The Washington Post, December 12, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/12/12/why-we-need-mr-rogers-big-bird-oscar-grouch-now-more-than-ever/Google Scholar.
3 Ruscio, AM, Hallion, LS, Lim, CCW, et al, ‘Cross-sectional Comparison of the Epidemiology of DSM-5 Generalized Anxiety Disorder Across the Globe’, JAMA Psychiatry 74, no. 5 (2017), pp. 465–475, doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0056CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; American Psychiatric Association, ‘Americans Say They Are More Anxious than a Year Ago’, May 7, 2018, https://www.psychiatry.org/newsroom/news-releases/americans-say-they-are-more-anxious-than-a-year-ago-baby-boomers-report-greatest-increase-in-anxiety.
4 This analysis of is based on Eatwell, Roger and Goodwin, Matthew, National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy (New York: Pelican Books, 2018)Google Scholar.
5 See Aral, Sinan, The Hype Machine: How Social Media Disrupts Our Elections, Our Economy, and Our Health – and How We Must Adapt (New York: Penguin Random House, 2020)Google Scholar and Ford, Martin, Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future (New York: Basic Books, 2015)Google Scholar.
6 Junod, Tom, ‘My Friend Mister Rogers’, The Atlantic, December 2019, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/12/what-would-mister-rogers-do/600772/Google Scholar.
7 Material found through courtesy of the Fred Rogers Center.
8 Fred Rogers, ‘Invisible Essentials’, May 10, 1997, Fred Rogers Center Archives, p. 5.
9 Guy, William, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, in Kimmel, Margaret Mary and Collins, Mark, eds., Mister Rogers Neighborhood: Children Television And Fred Rogers (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996), pp. 102-104Google Scholar.
10 Wendy Murray Zoba, ‘Won't You Be My Neighbor?’, Christianity Today, March 6, 2000, 40.
11 Fred Rogers, ‘Anxiety and Guilt’, Fred Rogers Center Archives.
12 Rogers, ‘Anxiety and Guilt’, p. 3.
13 Rogers, ‘Invisible Essentials’, p. 3.
14 Toorn, Jojanneke van der, Feinberg, Matthew, Jost, John, Kay, Aaron, Tyler, Tom, Willer, Robb, Wilmuth, Caroline, ‘A Sense of Powerlessness Fosters System Justification: Implications for the Legitimation of Authority, Hierarchy, and Government’, Political Psychology 36, no. 1 (2015), pp. 94-95Google Scholar. See also, Tyler, Tom, Lind, E. Allan, Huo, Yuen, ‘Cultural Values and Authority Relations’, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6, no. 4 (2000), pp. 1138-1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 Eatwell and Goodwin, National Populism, chapter 4.
16 Massingale, Bryan, Racial Justice and the Catholic Church (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2010), p. 12Google Scholar.
17 Howe, Leroy T., ‘A Seminar with Fred Rogers’, Perkins Journal 31, no. 1 (1977): p. 4Google Scholar.
18 Guy, ‘Theology of Mister Rogers’, p. 106.
19 Cook, Elizabeth, ‘Play in the Real World’, in Mohr, Eric and Mohr, Holly, eds., Mister Rogers and Philosophy (Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company, 2020), p. 85Google Scholar.
20 Cook, ‘Play in the Real World’, p. 86.
21 Cook, ‘Play in the Real World’, p. 87.
22 Cook, ‘Play in the Real World’, p. 87.
23 Cook, ‘Play in the Real World’, pp. 89-90.
24 Howe, ‘A Seminar with Fred Rogers’, p. 1.
25 Howe, ‘A Seminar with Fred Rogers’, p. 3.
26 Cook, ‘Play in the Real World’, pp. 88-89.
27 Cook, ‘Play in the Real World’, p. 91.
28 Howe, ‘A Seminar With Fred Rogers’, p. 2.
29 Lindy, Sara and King, Jason, ‘Puppets Are People Too’, in Mohr, Eric and Mohr, Holly, eds., Mister Rogers and Philosophy (Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company, 2020), p. 105Google Scholar.
30 Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, p. 119.
31 Episode 1520, 1983. Quoted in Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, p. 117.
32 Howe, ‘A Seminar with Fred Rogers’, p. 2.
33 Tuttle, Shea, Exactly as You Are: The Life and Faith of Mister Roger (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co, 2019), p. 68Google Scholar.
34 Sorkin, Amy Davidson, ‘The Two Freds: When Phelps Protested Mr. Rogers's Memorial’, The New Yorker, March 20, 2014, https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-two-freds-when-phelps-protested-mr-rogerss-memorialGoogle Scholar; Mikkelson, David, ‘Did ‘Fox and Friends’ Call Fred Rogers an “Evil, Evil Man”?’ Snopes, August 12, 2009, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fox-fred-rogers-evil/Google Scholar; Diller, Lawrence, ‘Mr. Rogers Was Wrong’, Psychology Today, April 20, 2008, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-last-normal-child/200804/mr-rogers-was-wrongGoogle Scholar; Zaslow, Jeffrey, ‘Blame It on Mr. Rogers: Why Young Adults Feel So Entitled’, The Wall Street Journal, July 5, 2007, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118358476840657463Google Scholar.
35 Hollingsworth, Amy, The Simple Faith of Mister Rogers: Spiritual Insights from the World's Most Beloved Neighbor (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2005), p. 51Google Scholar.
36 Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, p. 113.
37 Hollingsworth, The Simple Faith of Mister Rogers, p. 35.
38 Wendy Murray Zoba, ‘Won't You Be My Neighbor?’, Christianity Today, March 6, 2000, p. 43.
39 Matt Malone, ‘Life in the Neighborhood’, America, March 5, 2018, p. 3.
40 Malone, ‘Life in the Neighborhood’, p. 3.
41 Zoba, ‘Won't You Be My Neighbor?’, p. 43.
42 Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, p. 106.
43 Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, p. 106.
44 Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, p. 106.
45 Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, p. 114.
46 Zoba, ‘Won't You Be My Neighbor?’, p. 40.
47 Dimock, Michael and Wike, Richard, ‘America is Exceptional in the Nature of its Political Divide’, Pew Research Center, November 13, 2020, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/11/13/america-is-exceptional-in-the-nature-of-its-political-divide/Google Scholar.
48 Alexander, Michelle, The New Jim Crow (New York: The New Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Manne's, Kate Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar.
49 Putnam, Robert, Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2015)Google Scholar; Bishop, Bill, The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, 2008)Google Scholar.
50 Brady, William, Wills, Julian, Jost, John, Tucker, Joshua, and Bavel, Jay Van, ‘Emotion Shapes the Diffusion of Moralized Content in Social Networks’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, no. 28 (2017), pp. 7313-7318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
51 Massingale, Racial Justice and the Catholic Church, p. 136.
52 Boersema, David, ‘The Virtues of Art’, in Mohr, Eric J. and Mohr, Holly K., eds., Mister Rogers and Philosophy: Wondering Through the Neighborhood (Chicago: Open Court, 2020), p. 71Google Scholar.
53 Boersema, ‘The Virtues of Art’, p. 70.
54 Boersema, ‘The Virtues of Art’, p. 69.
55 Boersema, ‘The Virtues of Art’, p. 71-72.
56 Boersema, ‘The Virtues of Art’, p. 73.
57 Carol Zaleski, ‘Mister Rogers’, Christian Century, April 19, 2003, p. 35.
58 Buczinsky, Chris, ‘The Performance of the Pastoral’, in Jackson, Kathy Merlock and Emmanuel, Steven M., eds., Revisiting Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood: Essays on Lessons About Self and Community (Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland and Company, Inc., 2015), p. 9Google Scholar.
59 Zaleski, ‘Mister Rogers’, p. 35.
60 Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, p. 105.
61 Buczinsky, "The Performance of the Pastoral," p. 8.
62 Fred Rogers, ‘Sin and Covenant’, Fred Rogers Center Archives, pp. 3-4.
63 Rogers, ‘Sin and Covenant’, p. 4.
64 Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, p. 111.
65 Fred Rogers, ‘Sermon for Installation of the Reverend Kenneth L. Barley’, January 15, 1989, Fred Rogers Center Archives, p. 7.
66 Rogers, ‘Invisible Essentials’, p. 6.
67 Rogers, ‘Invisible Essentials’, p. 6.
68 Rogers, ‘Invisible Essentials’, p. 9.
69 Zoba, ‘Won't You Be My Neighbor?’, p. 45.
70 Guy, ‘The Theology of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood’, pp. 111-112.