Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T10:28:52.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glass Formulation Development in Support of Melter Testing to Demonstrate Enhanced High Level Waste Throughput

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

James C. Marra ,
Kevin M. Fox ,
David K. Peeler ,
Thomas B. Edwards ,
Amanda L. Youchak ,
James H. Gillam Jr. ,
John D. Vienna ,
Sergey V. Stefanovsky  and
Albert S. Aloy
James C. Marra
Affiliation:
Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC, U.S.A.
Kevin M. Fox
Affiliation:
Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC, U.S.A.
David K. Peeler
Affiliation:
Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC, U.S.A.
Thomas B. Edwards
Affiliation:
Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC, U.S.A.
Amanda L. Youchak
Affiliation:
Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC, U.S.A.
James H. Gillam Jr.
Affiliation:
Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC, U.S.A.
John D. Vienna
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, U.S.A.
Sergey V. Stefanovsky
Affiliation:
SIA Radon Institute, Moscow, Russia
Albert S. Aloy
Affiliation:
V. G. Khlopin Radium Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
Get access

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently processing high-level waste (HLW) through a Joule-heated melter (JHM) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) and plans to vitrify HLW and Low activity waste (LAW) at the Hanford Site. Over the past few years at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), work has concentrated on increasing waste throughput. These efforts are continuing with an emphasis on high alumina concentration feeds. High alumina feeds have presented specific challenges for the JHM technology regarding the ability to increase waste loading yet still maintain product quality and adequate throughput. Alternatively, vitrification technology innovations are also being investigated as a means to increase waste throughput. The Cold Crucible Induction Melter (CCIM) technology affords the opportunity for higher vitrification process temperatures as compared to the current reference JHM technology. Higher process temperatures may allow for higher waste loading and higher melt rate.

Glass formulation testing to support melter demonstration testing was recently completed. This testing was specifically aimed at high alumina concentration wastes. Glass composition/property models developed for DWPF were utilized as a guide for formulation development. Both CCIM and JHM testing will be conducted so glass formulation testing was targeted at both technologies with a goal to significantly increase waste loading and maintain melt rate without compromising product quality.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1107: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXI , 2008 , 231
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Smith, M.E., Barnes, A.B., Coleman, J.R., Hopkins, R.C., Iverson, D.C., O'Driscoll, R.J. and Peeler, D.K., “Recent Process and Equipment Improvements to Increase High Level Waste Throughput at the Defense Waste Processing Facility,” MS&T'06 Conference Proceedings, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH (2006).Google Scholar
2 Smith, M.E., Barnes, A.B., Bickford, D.F., Imrich, K.J., Iverson, D.C. and Guerrero, H.N., “DWPF Glass Air-lift Pump Life Cycle Testing and Plant Implementation,”, Ceramic Transactions, Vol. 168, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH (2005).Google Scholar
3 Perez, J.M., Barnes, S.M., Kelly, S., Petkus, L. and Morrey, E.V., “Vitrification Testing and Demonstration for the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant,” Ceramic Transactions, Vol. 168, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH (2005).Google Scholar
4 Peeler, D.K., Edwards, T.B., Best, D.R., Reamer, I.A. and Workman, R.J., “Nepheline Formation Study for Sludge Batch 4 (SB4): Phase 2 Experimental Results,” WSRC-TR-2006-00006, Washington Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC (2006).Google Scholar
5 Hrma, P., Piepel, G.F., Vienna, J.D., Redgate, P.E., Schweiger, M.J. and Smith, D.E., “Prediction of Nuclear Waste Glass Dissolution as a Function of Composition,” Ceramic Transactions, Vol. 61, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH (1995).Google Scholar
6 Hrma, P., Piepel, G.F., Redgate, P.E., Smith, D.E., Schweiger, M.J., Vienna, J.D. and Kim, D.S., “Prediction of Processing Properties for Nuclear Waste Glasses,” Ceramic Transactions, Vol. 61, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH (1995).Google Scholar
7 Jantzen, C.M., Pickett, J.B., Brown, K.G., Edwards, T.B. and Beam, D.C., “Process/Product Models for the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF): Part I Predicting Glass Durability from Composition Using a Thermodynamic Hydration Energy Reaction Model (THERMO),” WSRC-TR-93-672, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC (1995).Google Scholar
8 Peeler, D.K. and Edwards, T.B., “Frit Development for Sludge Batch 3,” WSRC-TR-2002-00491, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC (2002).Google Scholar
9 Li, H., Hrma, P., Vienna, J.D., Qian, M., Su, Y. and Smith, D.E., “Effects of Al2O3, B2O3, Na2O, and SiO2 on Nepheline Formation in Borosilicate Glasses: Chemical and Physical Correlations”, J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 331 (2003).Google Scholar
10 Peeler, D.K. and Edwards, T. B., “High B2O3/Fe2O3-based Frits: MAR Assessments for Sludge Batch 4 (SB4),” WSRC-TR-2006-00181, Washington Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC (2006).Google Scholar
11 Marra, S. L. and Jantzen, C. M., “Characterization of Projected DWPF Glass Heat Treated to Simulate Canister Centerline Cooling,” WSRC-TR-92-142, Revision 1, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC (1993).Google Scholar
12 “Standard Test Methods for Determining Chemical Durability of Nuclear Waste Glasses: The Product Consistency Test (PCT),” ASTM C-1285, (2002).Google Scholar
13 Aloy, A., Vienna, J. D., Fox, K. M., Edwards, T. B. and Peeler, D. K., “Glass Selection Strategy: Development of US and KRI Test Matrices,” WSRC-STI-2006-00205, Washington Savannah River Company, Aiken, SC (2006).Google Scholar