Law and History, History and Law

doi:10.1017/9781009231053.002

1 - Law and History, History and Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 December 2022

Michael Lobban

Edited by

Richard Bourke and

Quentin Skinner

Show author details

Richard Bourke: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Quentin Skinner: Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Do lawyers and historians think differently about history? Claims have recently been made, in the context of debates on the history of international law, that the way that lawyers treat historical texts is quite different from the way historians treat them. According to this argument, while historians think about concepts in their historical contexts, lawyers turn to history to understand the nature of present concepts and obligations. Questioning whether there is such a distinct historical method, this chapter suggests that lawyers turning to history should apply the methods of the contextual historian, just as historians examining legal matters should draw on the conceptual insights of jurists. When lawyers attempt to use a distinct lawyerly version of history, the results may not only be anachronistic but also unsatisfactory for explaining law. At the same time, the methods of history can be fruitfully drawn on by jurists, both in testing and rethinking modern juristic concepts, and in explaining the genealogy and nature of doctrines built on long precedents. For the historian, the tools of legal analysis can help identify what past societies considered to be ‘law’ and to understand the specialist languages associated with matters of governance, property and family.

Keywords

Law history

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: History in the Humanities and Social Sciences , pp. 20 - 48

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009231053.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allan, T. R. S. 1999. ‘The Rule of Law as the Rule of Reason: Consent and Constitutionalism’, Law Quarterly Review, 115, pp. 221–44.Google Scholar

Allan, T. R. S. 2000. ‘Common Law Constitutionalism and Freedom of Speech’ in Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information, ed. Beatson, J. and Cripps, Y.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Allison, J. W. F. 2013. ‘History to Understand, and History to Reform, English Public Law’, Cambridge Law Journal, 72: 3, pp. 526–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Armitage, David. 2017. Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. New York.Google Scholar

Austin, John. 1995. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. Rumble, Wilfrid E.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C. 2011. The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bellomo, Manlio. 1995. The Common Legal Past of Europe, 1000–1800, trans. Lydia G. Cochrane. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad. 1999. The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren. 2019. ‘Beyond Anachronism: Histories of International Law and Global Legal Politics’, Journal of the History of International Law, 21: 1, pp. 7–40.Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel S. 2011. Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law. Princeton.Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel S. 2021. ‘Between History, Politics and Law: History of Political Thought and History of International Law’ in History, Politics, Law: Thinking through the International, ed. Brett, Annabel, Donaldson, Megan and Koskenniemi, Martti. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cavaller, Georg. 2008. ‘Vitoria, Grotius, Pufendorf, Wolff and Vattel: Accomplices of European Colonialism and Exploitation or True Cosmopolitans?’, Journal of the History of International Law, 10: 2, pp. 181–209.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chanock, Martin. 1985. Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Coke, Edward. 2003. The Selected Writings of Sir Edward Coke, ed. Sheppard, Steve. 3 vols. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Comaroff, John. 2001. ‘Colonialism, Culture, and Law: A Foreword’, Law and Social Inquiry, 26: 2, pp. 305–14.Google Scholar

Davies, Paul S. 2016. ‘Rectification versus Interpretation: The Nature and Scope of the Equitable Jurisdiction’, Cambridge Law Journal, 75: 1, pp. 62–85.Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V. 2013. The Law of the Constitution, ed. Allison, J. W. F., 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dresch, Paul. 2012. ‘Introduction Legalism, Anthropology, and History: A View from Part of Anthropology’ in Legalism: Anthropology and History, ed. Dresch, Paul and Skoda, Hannah. Oxford.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duxbury, Neil. 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford.Google Scholar

Duxbury, Neil. 2004. ‘Why English Jurisprudence is Analytical’, Current Legal Problems, 57: 1, pp. 1–51.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Erickson, A. L. 1993. Women and Property in Early Modern England. London.Google Scholar

Farmer, Lindsay. 2016. Making the Modern Criminal Law: Criminalization and Civil Order. Oxford.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. 2018. ‘Context in the History of International Law’, Journal of the History of International Law, 20: 1, pp. 5–30.Google Scholar

Forsyth, William. 1869. Cases and Opinions on Constitutional Law. London.Google Scholar

Freeman, Michael and Mindus, Patricia. 2013. The Legacy of John Austin’s Jurisprudence. Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. 1985. History of American Law, 2nd ed. New York.Google Scholar

Gardner, John. 2010. Law as a Leap of Faith. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. W. 1975. ‘Introduction: J. Willard Hurst and the Common Law Tradition in American Legal Historiography’, Law and Society Review, 10: 1, pp. 9–55.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John. 2008. ‘The Idea of Sociology of Law and its Relation to Law and to Sociology’ in Law and Sociology, ed. Freeman, Michael. Oxford.Google Scholar

Habakkuk, John. 1994. Marriage, Debt and the Estates System: English Landownership, 1650–1950. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 2012. The Concept of Law, 3rd ed., ed. Raz, J. and Bulloch, P. A.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1897. ‘The Path of the Law’, Harvard Law Review, 10: 8, pp. 457–78.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. 2010. ‘Global Justice and Regional Metaphysics: On the Critical History of the Law of Nature and Nations’ in Law and Politics in British Colonial Thought: Transpositions of Empire, ed. Dorsett, Shaunnagh and Hunter, Ian. New York.Google Scholar

Ibbetson, David. 2009. ‘Custom in Medieval Law’ in The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives, ed. Perreau-Sassine, Amanda and Murphy, James B.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. 2014. ‘Vitoria and Us: Thoughts on Critical Histories of International Law’, Rechtsgeschichte, 22, pp. 119–38.Google Scholar

Lacey, Nicola. 2016. In Search of Criminal Responsibility: Ideas, Interests, and Institutions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Laws, John. 1996. ‘The Constitution: Morals and Rights’, Public Law, pp. 622–35.Google Scholar

Lee, Ivan. 2019. ‘British Extradition Practice in Early Colonial Hong Kong’, Law & History, 6, pp. 85–114.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, Randall. 2007. ‘International Law and its History: The Story of an Unrequited Love’ in Time, History and International Law, ed. Craven, Matthew, Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Vogiatzi, Maria. Leiden.Google Scholar

Lobban, Michael. 2007. A History of the Philosophy of Law in the Common Law World, 1600–1900. Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. 2010. Foundations of Public Law. Oxford.Google Scholar

MacMillan, Catharine. 2010. Mistakes in Contract Law. Oxford.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry. 1875. Lectures on the Early History of Institutions. London.Google Scholar

Maitland, F. W. 1911. ‘Why the History of English Law is not Written’ in The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland, ed. Fisher, H. A. L., vol. I. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McLauchlan, David. 2014. ‘Refining Rectification’, Law Quarterly Review, 130, pp. 83–111.Google Scholar

Milsom, S. F. C. 1981. Historical Foundations of the Common Law, 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar

Milsom, S. F. C. 2003. A Natural History of the Common Law. New York.CrossRef Google Scholar

Orford, Anne. 2012. ‘The Past as Law or History? The Relevance of Imperialism for Modern International Law’, Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper 2012/2.Google Scholar

Orford, Anne. 2013. ‘On International Legal Method’, London Review of International Law, 1: 1, pp. 166–97.Google Scholar

Orford, Anne. 2017. ‘International Law and the Limits of History’ in The Law of International Lawyers: Reading Martti Koskenniemi, ed. Werner, Wouter, de Hoon, Marieke and Galán, Alexis. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Orford, Anne. 2021. International Law and the Politics of History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Poole, Thomas. 2003. ‘Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23: 3, pp. 435–54.Google Scholar

Poole, Thomas. 2005. ‘Questioning Common Law Constitutionalism’, Legal Studies, 25: 1, pp. 142–63.Google Scholar

Rabban, David M. 2013. Law’s History: American Legal Thought and the Transatlantic Turn to History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rumble, Wilfrid E. 1985. The Thought of John Austin: Jurisprudence, Colonial Reform, and the British Constitution. London.Google Scholar

Schofield, Philip. 2006. Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 2002a. ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’ in Skinner, Q., Visions of Politics, vol. I: Regarding Method. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 2002b. ‘Interpretation and the Understanding of Speech Acts’ in Skinner, Q., Visions of Politics, vol. I: Regarding Method. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 2002c. ‘From the State of Princes to the Person of the State’ in Skinner, Q., Visions of Politics, vol. II: Renaissance Virtues. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Skoda, Hannah. 2012. ‘A Historian’s Perspective on the Present Volume’ in Legalism: Anthropology and History, ed. Dresch, Paul and Skoda, Hannah. Oxford.Google Scholar

Smith, K. J. M. 1998. Lawyers, Legislators, and Theorists: Developments in English Criminal Jurisprudence 1800–1957. Oxford.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2001. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2017. A Realistic Theory of Law. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. 1975. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

van Caenegem, R. C. 1990. English Lawsuits from William I to Richard I. London.Google Scholar

Walters, Mark D. 2008. ‘Legal Humanism and Law as Integrity’, Cambridge Law Journal, 67: 2, pp. 352–75.Google Scholar

Walters, Mark D. 2012. ‘Is Public Law Ordinary?’, Modern Law Review, 75: 5, pp. 894–913.Google Scholar

Wells, Jennifer. 2011. ‘Clashing Kingdoms, Hidden Agendas: The Battle to Extradite Kwok-a-sing and British Legal Imperialism in Nineteenth-Century China’, East Asia Law Review, 7: 1, pp. 161–93.Google Scholar

Wheatley, Natasha. 2021. ‘Law and the Time of Angels: International Law’s Method Wars and the Affective Life of Disciplines’, History and Theory, 60: 2, pp. 311–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, Elliott. 2015. ‘Chinese Coolies, Universal Rights and the Limits of Liberalism in an Age of Empire’, Past and Present, 227, pp. 121–49.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.