Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T14:29:26.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty in Judgecraft: New Narratives through the Language of Equality – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2025

Sarah Ganty Open the ORCID record for Sarah Ganty [Opens in a new window]
Sarah Ganty*
Affiliation:
Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut, USA UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Povertyjudgecraftnarrativescultureequalitypowerstigmatizationracializationrationalization

Information

Type
Corrigendum
Information
German Law Journal , First View , pp. 1
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the German Law Journal

The author has informed us of the following corrections to the published article.

In Section II, the following sentence is inaccurate:

“The Court could have opted for a narrative that excluded such a myth—after all, social benefits were available in Sweden, Ms. Dano’s country.” (p. 175)

It should read:

“The Court could have opted for a narrative that excluded such a myth—especially if social benefits were available in Romania, Ms. Dano’s country.”

The reference in footnote 203 is incorrect.

The text containing the footnote reads:

“Considering that the “unemployment of a parent is already a factor that has a harmful impact on children,” and that such restriction “makes their position even more difficult,”203 the Committee insisted on the fact:” (p. 195)

The correct citation is:

203. Central Union for Child Welfare (CUCW) v. Finland, Complaint No. 139/2016, § 71 (Sept. 11, 2019), https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/.

References

Ganty, S. Poverty in Judgecraft: New Narratives through the Language of Equality. German Law Journal. 2025;26(2):170–197. doi:10.1017/glj.2025.6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar