Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T07:17:11.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental investigation of the role of komatiite–peridotite interaction in generating silica enrichment in the cratonic lithosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2026

Caterina Melai
Affiliation:
Geology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin, Ireland
Anthony C. Withers
Affiliation:
Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
Paul C. Guyett
Affiliation:
Geology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin, Ireland
Emma L. Tomlinson*
Affiliation:
Geology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin, Ireland
*
Corresponding author: Emma L. Tomlinson; Email: tomlinse@tcd.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Silica enrichment in cratonic peridotites, expressed as high modal contents of orthopyroxene is a common yet enigmatic feature of Archean lithospheric mantle. Less widely recognised, silica depletion, expressed as high olivine content is also present in some locations. Although high-pressure melting alone cannot account for the full range of observed silica contents, open-system interaction between mantle melts and lithospheric peridotite offers a viable alternative. We present results from high-pressure (5 GPa), high-temperature (1600–1690°C) multi-anvil experiments designed to investigate the reaction between Al-depleted komatiitic melts and both fertile and moderately depleted peridotite. Using hybrid and reaction-couple experimental configurations, we track mineralogical and compositional changes across controlled thermal gradients within the experimental capsules. Modal and compositional data reveal a two-stage reaction process. Stage 1 involves high-temperature olivine precipitation from primitive Al-depleted komatiitic melts interacting with peridotite to produce olivine-rich residues with high MgO/SiO2 and low Al2O3/ SiO2. As a result of olivine removal, the coexisting melt becomes enriched in SiO2. In stage 2, the now silica-enriched komatiite melt reacts with residual olivine (±clinopyroxene and garnet) to form orthopyroxene at moderate temperature, increasing the bulk SiO2 content. Residue bulk compositions from olivine-rich zones resemble high-Mg# garnet dunites from Archean lithosphere, whereas orthopyroxene-rich zones are analogues to natural silica-rich cratonic peridotites. Coexisting melts evolve from komatiitic toward picritic compositions as the reaction progresses. We infer that reactive porous flow of komatiitic melts through depleted lithosphere can simultaneously generate silica-depleted and silica-enriched, refractory residues and diversify melt compositions, providing a process-based framework for the chemical and textural diversity of cratonic mantle.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Figure 0

Table 1. Composition of synthetic starting powders normalized from the ICP-OES analysis conducted by Actlabs after lithium metaborate/tetraborate fusion

Figure 1

Table 2. Run conditions and recovered phases in the different experimental conditions

Figure 2

Figure 1. Experimental configurations used in this study. (A) Partial melting: paired 1 mm capsules loaded with peridotite (top) and komatiite (bottom). (B) Hybrid mixing: 2 mm capsule filled with a 50:50 peridotite–komatiite powder mixture. (C) Layered (powder–powder) reaction: 1 mm capsule with basal komatiite powder overlain by peridotite powder (50:50). (D) Reaction couple: solid, pre-synthesised peridotite cylinder placed above komatiite powder. All experiments were performed in an 18/11 assembly at 5 GPa; details in Table 2. D1 – Internal components of the 18/11 BGI standard high-pressure assembly, including a graphite heater, a 2 mm graphite capsule, and a representative synthesized peridotite cylinder. D2 – Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) phase map of the peridotite cylinder. In the phase map, garnet is shown in purple, clinopyroxene (cpx) in dark green, and olivine in bright green.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Representative EDX maps from each experimental setup. (A) Cylinder synthesis experiment (sample S8214); (B) Hybrid experiment (sample S8152); (C) Reaction-couple experiment (sample S8222); (D) Layered powder experiment (sample S8025_A); (E) Partial melting of depleted peridotite (S8270_A); (F) Partial melting of komatiite (S8270_B). In all phase maps, garnet (grt) appears in purple, clinopyroxene (cpx) in dark green, olivine (ol) in lime green, orthopyroxene (opx) in forest green, and melt in orange.

Figure 4

Figure 3. High-resolution EDX maps of hybrid experiments for (A) depleted (S8165) and (B) fertile (S8512) peridotite compositions. White lines delineate temperature equilibration zones. Phase assemblages evolve from olivine (lime green) + garnet (purple) + clinopyroxene (dark green) at lower temperatures, to ol + grt + orthopyroxene (forest green) at intermediate temperatures, to olivine ± orthopyroxene + melt (orange) at the highest temperatures (up to 30 vol.% melt) (C) vol.% of the phases vs melt% for the 50:50 mix of depleted peridotite and komatiite showing both the experimental (S8165) and the THERMOCALC model output for the same bulk composition (calculated with THERMOCALC using tc350beta (Powell and Holland, 1988) and the peridotite thermodynamic dataset of Tomlinson and Holland (2021).

Figure 5

Figure 4. Phase maps from reaction-couple experiments illustrating melt–rock interaction textures. (A) Unreacted peridotite (65 vol.% olivine, 19% clinopyroxene, 16% garnet). (B) Reacted zone showing clinopyroxene loss, development of poikilitic orthopyroxene (15%) enclosing resorbed olivine (58%) and garnet (16%), and preserved melt (orange). Corner insets show the full recovered-run map for each sample; the enlarged panels correspond to regions outlined by white rectangles.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Both fertile (A) and depleted (B) compositions show olivine (lime green)-rich assemblages in the hotter areas of the experimental capsule (see Fig. S1). In these regions, melt (orange) is minor (<10 vol.%) and occurs as small inter-grain pockets; even at higher temperatures, where melt increases slightly, olivine (lime green) still constitutes ∼85–95 vol.%.

Figure 7

Figure 6. (A) SiO2 (wt.%) versus MgO/SiO2 for experimental residues recalculated on a melt-free basis. Diamonds = residues; squares = starting composition of both peridotites and the komatiites powders; crosses = composition of the partial melting experiments for both peridotite composition and the komatiite. The arrow shows the residue trend for the peridotites and the komatiite without mixing. Natural garnet-bearing and garnet-free cratonic peridotites are shown for comparison (Canil and Lee, 2009; Tomlinson and Kamber, 2021). Fields for orthopyroxene (opx); clinopyroxene (cpx); garnet (grt) and olivine (ol) are also displayed. (B) Modal abundance of olivine with depth in the Kaapvaal cratonic lithosphere, olivine modes from the original publications (Boyd and McCallister, 1976; Shee et al., 1982; Cox et al., 1987; Skinner, 1989; Boyd et al., 1993; Schulze, 1995; Saltzer et al., 2001; Simon et al., 2003; Maier et al., 2005; Grant et al., 2007; Simon et al., 2007; Gibson et al., 2008; Katayama et al., 2009; Lazarov et al., 2009; Wasch et al., 2009; Peslier et al., 2010; Peslier et al., 2012), pressure calculated using the orthopyroxene-garnet barometer of Nickel and Green (1985), calculated iteratively using the Ca-in-orthopyroxene thermometer of Kohler and Brey (1990). Residues of peridotite–komatiite reaction experiments are plotted for comparison.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Mg# of olivine versus Mg# of coexisting melt in experimental run products. The solid black line represents the equilibrium Fe–Mg exchange between olivine and melt based on a partition coefficient KD = 0.35, with envelopes at 3σ and 6σ, where σ = one standard deviation based on the experiments of Walter (1998). Data symbols indicate the phases coexisting with melt identified by the coloured boxes as described in the key on the lower right; open pentagons = experiments from Walter (1998).

Figure 9

Figure 8. Experimental melt compositions from partially molten peridotite–komatiite mixtures (squares) are plotted separately for fertile (green) and depleted (blue) systems. The filled squares indicate the coexisting phases with the melt following the key. (A) CaO vs. MgO (wt.%) for experimental melts from this study compared with natural komatiite compositions and previous high-pressure experimental data. (B) Melt compositions from experimental runs plotted as SiO2 vs MgO (wt.%). Starting materials are presented as stars. Vertical lines approximate typical compositional boundaries between komatiite (>17 wt.% MgO), picrite (13–20 wt.%), and tholeiitic basalt (<13 wt.%). Grey symbols show partial melting experiments from Takahashi (1986); Hirose and Kushiro (1993); Takahashi et al. (1993); Walter (1998); Rodrigues et al. (2025) for comparison. Coloured fields highlight the compositional envelopes of the Commondale (yellow) and Barberton (purple) komatiites (Sossi et al., 2016; Wilson, 2019). (C) CaO vs MgO and (D) SiO2 vs MgO for experimental melts; symbols are coloured by melt Mg# = 100·Mg/(Mg+Fe2+) mol.

Figure 10

Figure 9. (A) Plot of melt compositions from this study in CaO/Al2O3 vs. Al2O3 (wt.%) space. Also shown are experimental melt compositions from previous peridotite melting studies; grey symbols (Takahashi, 1986; Hirose and Kushiro, 1993; Takahashi et al., 1993; Walter, 1998; Rodrigues et al., 2025). Coloured fields represent typical komatiite types: Barberton-type Al-depleted komatiites (orange), Munro-type Al-undepleted (green), and Gorgona-type Al-enriched komatiites and picrites (blue) and the compositional field of modern basalts and picrites (red) (Robin-Popieul et al., 2012; Herzberg, 2016; Wilson, 2019). (B) CaO/Al2O3 vs. Al2O3 (wt.%) for experimental melts; symbols are coloured by melt Mg# = 100·Mg/(Mg+Fe2+) mol.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Schematic model showing the effect of reactive porous flow of komatiite through depleted cratonic lithosphere.

Supplementary material: File

Melai et al. supplementary material 1

Melai et al. supplementary material
Download Melai et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 20.6 MB
Supplementary material: File

Melai et al. supplementary material 2

Melai et al. supplementary material
Download Melai et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 109.5 KB