Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-10T16:21:50.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2026

Farhad Shirzadov*
Affiliation:
Technological Transfer Office, Azerbaijan Technical University, Azerbaijan
Yadullah Babayev
Affiliation:
Special Technic and Technology, Azerbaijan Technical University, Azerbaijan
Mehti Soltanov
Affiliation:
Construction Machinary, Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, Azerbaijan
*
Corresponding author: Farhad Shirzadov; Email: farhad.shirzadov@aztu.edu.az
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study presents a sustainable surface engineering approach aimed at extending the service life and enabling the restoration of worn 42Cr4 steel components within a circular manufacturing framework. Wear-induced surface degradation is a primary failure mechanism in mechanical systems, leading to increased maintenance costs, energy losses, and excessive consumption of raw materials. In this work, the surface of 42Cr4 steel was modified by Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) surface remelting assisted by a high-frequency magnetic field. Unlike conventional TIG treatments and post-process magnetic field applications, the proposed method applies the magnetic field in situ during remelting, enabling real-time control of molten pool dynamics. The tribological performance of the treated specimens was evaluated using a ball-on-disc configuration under paraffin lubrication, and friction and wear behavior were systematically quantified. The results indicate that magnetically assisted TIG remelting significantly enhances surface hardness and tribological performance. These improvements are attributed to intensified electromagnetic stirring within the molten pool, which promotes grain refinement, reduces porosity, and ensures a uniform distribution of alloying elements in the remelted layer. As a result, the treated surfaces exhibit improved load-bearing capacity and enhanced resistance to wear under lubricated sliding conditions. From an application perspective, the proposed hybrid process provides an effective and scalable solution for component repair and surface regeneration. Restoring functional surfaces without full component replacement offers clear environmental and economic advantages. In addition, localized surface treatment significantly reduces material consumption and energy demand, thereby supporting resource-efficient and circular economy strategies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.%) and nominal hardness of electrodes used for cladding.Table 1. long description.

Figure 1

Table 2. Cladding parameters for different electrode grades.Table 2. long description.

Figure 2

Table 3. Process parameters of magnetically assisted TIG remelting.Table 3. long description.

Figure 3

Table 4. Physico-mechanical and tribological test conditions and investigated parameters.Table 4. long description.

Figure 4

Figure 1. Microstructure of the UTP 7100 coating after TIG remelting under (a) conventional conditions and (b) high-frequency magnetic field assistance.

Figure 5

Figure 2. Microstructure of the UTP Ledurit 65 coating after TIG remelting under (a) conventional conditions and (b) high-frequency magnetic field assistance.Figure 2 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 3. Microstructure of the UTP DUR 600 coating after TIG remelting under (a) conventional conditions and (b) high-frequency magnetic field assistance.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Microstructure of the T590 coating after TIG remelting under (a) conventional conditions and (b) high-frequency magnetic field assistance.

Figure 8

Figure 5. Fishbone-like boride phases formed in the T590 coating after MMA cladding followed by TIG remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field.

Figure 9

Figure 6. EDX analysis of the UTP Ledurit 65 coating after TIG remelting assisted by a high-frequency magnetic field.Figure 6 long description.

Figure 10

Figure 7. EDX elemental distribution of the T590 coating after TIG remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field.Figure 7 long description.

Figure 11

Graph 1. Hardness variation of 42Cr4 steel and cladded layers after TIG remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field.

Figure 12

Graph 2. Wear tracks and wear profiles of 42Cr4 substrate and coated specimens after TIG remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field.Graph 2. long description.

Figure 13

Graph 3. Friction coefficient evolution of 42Cr4 substrate and coated specimens under lubricated sliding conditions.Graph 3. long description.

Figure 14

Graph 4. Average friction coefficient of 42Cr4 substrate and coated specimens modified by TIG remelting assisted by a HF magnetic field.

Figure 15

Graph 5. Volumetric wear of 42Cr4 substrate and coated specimens measured under paraffin-lubricated ball-on-disc conditions after TIG remelting assisted by a high-frequency magnetic field.Graph 5. long description.

Author comment: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R0/PR1

Comments

Cover Letter to the Article

Submission of Manuscript for Consideration – “Enhancing the Circularity of 42Cr4 Steel Components Through TIG Surface Remelting Under a High-Frequency Magnetic Field: A Sustainable Approach to Restoration and Remanufacturing”

Dear Editor in Chief,

We are pleased to submit our manuscript titled “Enhancing the Circularity of 42Cr4 Steel Components Through TIG Surface Remelting Under a High-Frequency Magnetic Field: A Sustainable Approach to Restoration and Remanufacturing” for consideration for publication in Cambridge Materials: Circularity.

Our research addresses a critical challenge in modern industry: the wear and degradation of mechanical components, which leads to significant material waste and economic costs. In line with the core mission of Cambridge Materials: Circularity, this study focuses on developing sustainable solutions that promote the principles of the circular economy, particularly through the restoration and remanufacturing of valuable materials.

In this manuscript, we present a novel approach involving the TIG surface remelting of 42Cr4 steel under a high-frequency magnetic field. Our findings demonstrate that this method significantly enhances both the hardness and wear resistance of the steel, thereby extending the lifespan of components. Crucially, these improvements directly facilitate the repair, restoration, and remanufacturing of worn parts, offering a viable alternative to the conventional linear “take-make-dispose” model. By enabling components to be returned to service with enhanced properties, our work contributes to reducing raw material demand, minimizing industrial waste, and improving overall resource efficiency.

We believe that the innovative methodology and the strong emphasis on circularity, restoration, and remanufacturing presented in our paper will be of great interest to the readership of Cambridge Materials: Circularity. The practical implications of our findings offer a sustainable surface engineering solution that aligns perfectly with the journal’s scope and focus on materials efficiency and industrial sustainability.

We confirm that this manuscript is original, has not been published elsewhere, and is not under consideration for publication by any other journal. All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with its submission to Cambridge Materials: Circularity. We also declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to your positive response.

Sincerely,

Ass.Prof. Dr.-İng., PhD Shirzadov Farhad

Azerbaijan Technical University, Specialist in Technology

E-mail: farhad.shirzadov@aztu.edu.az

Mob. +994559029446

Ass.Prof., PhD Yadullah Babayev

Azerbaijan Technical University, Dean of Special Technique and Technology

E-mail: yadullah.babayev@aztu.edu.az

Mob. +994503995906

Ass.Prof., PhD Mehti Soltanov

E-mail: mehti.soltanov@azmiu.edu.az

Mob. +994705490069

H.Javid ave 25, Baku, Azerbaijan AZ 1073 Azerbaijan Technical University.

Review: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments:

1. The manuscript claims novelty in combining TIG surface remelting with a high frequency magnetic field; however, this contribution is not sufficiently differentiated from existing studies. The authors should clearly articulate how this combined approach advances the current state of the art beyond previously reported TIG based or magnetic field assisted surface modification techniques.

2. Several essential experimental details are missing from the methodology section, particularly parameters related to the cladding and remelting processes, such as travel speed, heat input, number of passes, and process reproducibility. The absence of these details limits the reproducibility and technical credibility of the study.

3. The manuscript does not clearly distinguish between plasma treatment, TIG remelting, and magnetic field–assisted modification. A clearer experimental framework is required to isolate and explain the specific role and contribution of each process step to the observed mechanical and tribological improvements.

4. The Results and Discussion section relies primarily on descriptive interpretation. The authors are encouraged to include quantitative tables, comparative metrics, and appropriate statistical analysis (e.g., standard deviation, repeatability, or error analysis) to strengthen the scientific rigor of the conclusions.

5. Tribological evaluation was conducted only under paraffin lubrication. Dry sliding conditions and tests using industrially relevant lubricants were not investigated. Including these conditions would significantly enhance the practical relevance and industrial applicability of the findings.

6. The manuscript lacks direct microstructural evidence to support the proposed mechanisms. Characterization techniques such as SEM, EDS, and XRD are strongly recommended to validate claims regarding microstructural refinement, carbide formation, phase distribution, and coating integrity.

7. While the manuscript repeatedly emphasizes restoration, repair, and remanufacturing within a circular economy framework, no quantitative analysis is provided. A basic life cycle perspective, material or energy savings estimation, or comparative assessment against component replacement would substantially strengthen the sustainability argument.

8. The reference list relies heavily on older literature. The authors should incorporate more recent and higher impact references to reflect current developments in surface engineering and magnetic field assisted processing. Additionally, several typographical and spelling errors should be corrected (e.g., “paraffine” → paraffin, “osillation” → oscillation, “ambiant” → ambient).

Overall Recommendation

The manuscript addresses an important and timely topic related to surface engineering and circular economy strategies for component restoration and remanufacturing. However, substantial revisions are required to improve methodological transparency, quantitative robustness, microstructural validation, and language quality. The claimed novelty should be more clearly justified, and the sustainability aspects need stronger analytical support.

Review: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

1. Summary of the manuscript

The manuscript entitled “Enhancing the Circularity of 42Cr4 Steel Components Through TIG Surface Remelting Under a High-Frequency Magnetic Field” examines the impact of TIG remelting, facilitated by a high-frequency magnetic field, on the mechanical and tribological properties of 42Cr4 steel. The study assesses hardness, wear behavior, and friction coefficient utilizing a ball-on-disc system, with the objective of promoting restoration and remanufacturing within a circular economy framework. The authors report enhanced hardness and diminished wear for the modified surfaces, suggesting that this method improves durability and prolongs the lifespan of components.

2. Major comments

1) The novelty of the present study is not explicitly articulated. Similar methodologies, such as magnetic field-assisted coatings and TIG surface modification, have been previously documented in the literature, as acknowledged by the authors. The manuscript would benefit from a more detailed elucidation of the innovative aspects of the proposed methodology and how it represents an advancement beyond existing TIG and electromagnetic treatments.

2) The proposed mechanism lacks adequate experimental support. The authors attribute the enhanced properties to factors such as magnetic pressure exerted on the molten metal and increased chromium carbide precipitation. However, they do not provide direct microstructural or phase characterization through XRD or SEM analyses to substantiate these claims. Incorporating such analyses would be essential to validate the proposed mechanism.

3) In Section 5.1 (Hardness), while the hardness of the base 42Cr4 material can be deduced from Figure 1, the hardness of the cladded surface layers prior to TIG remelting and magnetic-field-assisted modification is not documented. Although Table 1 presents the theoretical hardness values of the electrode materials, these values do not necessarily correspond to the actual hardness of the deposited cladded layers. Given that the hardness of cladded coatings can vary considerably based on processing conditions, the lack of experimentally measured baseline values complicates the attribution of the observed hardness improvement to the remelting and modification process.

3. Minor comments

1) The quality of all figures requires enhancement to improve readability. Specifically, the text in Figure 2 lacks clarity and legibility. Furthermore, there is inconsistency in font type and size across the figures. The authors are advised to enhance the resolution and ensure uniform formatting throughout.

2) In Table 1, the text and numerical values are arranged vertically, which may impede readability. It is advisable to format them horizontally to enhance clarity and facilitate interpretation.

3) The manuscript exhibits a noticeable overuse of specific phrases. Terms such as ‘circular economy’ and ‘restoration and remanufacturing’ are frequently repeated, often appearing in consecutive paragraphs. Additionally, the phrase ‘modified by TIG processing under a high-frequency magnetic field’ is recurrently used in figure and table captions. Reducing repetition and varying the wording would enhance readability and the overall presentation.

4) The manuscript contains several typographical errors, including ‘electrods’, ‘Avarage’, and ‘Ambiant’. These errors are particularly evident in Table 2.

5) Please verify the unit ‘μkm2’ reported in Table 3, as it appears to be invalid or incorrectly formatted. The authors should confirm and revise the unit to ensure accuracy and clarity.

4. Final recommendations

In conclusion, this manuscript addresses a pertinent topic within the domains of surface engineering and the circular economy by investigating TIG remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field to enhance the tribological performance of 42Cr4 steel. However, the novelty of the study is not clearly articulated, and the proposed mechanisms lack sufficient experimental support. Furthermore, the absence of appropriate baseline data, inconsistencies in figure quality, and language issues impede the overall clarity and scientific rigor of the study. Consequently, substantial revisions are necessary to strengthen the manuscript. I recommend a major revision before it can be considered for publication.

Review: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R0/PR4

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The authors have reported on the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components achieved through TIG surface remelting under a high frequency magnetic field. However, this manuscript requires major revision to substantiate its claims. The microstructural stability of the material after processing, as well as the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components, needs further verification supported by additional experimental data.

1. The microstructural properties of the coating are paramount. Although the authors claim microstructural stability (250–252), the experimental data presented are not adequate to support this claim. A comprehensive microstructural analysis is necessary.

2. The authors have mentioned about circular economy, however, the presented correlation between restoration and remanufacturing of worn 42Cr4 steel components and circular economy, is not sufficient enough. Comprehensive analysis is required.

Recommendation: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R1/PR7

Comments

Dear Prof. Veena Sahajwalla,

Editor-in-Chief, Cambridge Materials: Circularity

We would like to thank you and the reviewers for the time and effort devoted to evaluating our manuscript entitled “Enhancing the Circularity of 42Cr4 Steel Components Through TIG Surface Remelting Under a High-Frequency Magnetic Field: A Sustainable Approach to Restoration and Remanufacturing”.

We have carefully considered all the comments and suggestions provided. In the revised version of the manuscript, we have made a concerted effort to address all criticisms and improve the clarity, scientific quality, and overall presentation of the work. We believe that the revised manuscript has been significantly strengthened as a result of these revisions.

We sincerely hope that the revised version will now meet the requirements for publication in your journal.

Thank you again for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Farhad Shirzadov

on behalf of all authors

Review: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R1/PR8

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The revised manuscript has been significantly improved compared to the original submission. The authors have made substantial efforts to address the reviewers’ comments by clarifying the novelty of the study, expanding the experimental and tribological discussions, improving the manuscript structure and figure quality, and incorporating additional SEM/EDX analyses. The revised version is now considerably more coherent and scientifically strengthened. Nevertheless, several important issues still require further revision before the manuscript can be considered fully convincing from a scientific perspective.

1. Although additional SEM and EDX analyses have been included, several phase-related interpretations remain insufficiently supported experimentally. The manuscript attributes the observed improvements to specific carbide and boride phases, as well as bainite/austenite structures, without direct crystallographic evidence. Since SEM morphology and EDX mapping alone are insufficient for conclusive phase identification, the authors should either provide direct phase characterization (e.g., XRD) or revise the wording to indicate that these phase assignments are inferred rather than definitively confirmed.

2. While the mechanisms in the manuscript are physically reasonable and likely contribute to the observed properties, they were not directly measured or quantitatively validated in the present work. Therefore, the authors are encouraged to moderate the wording and present these interpretations more cautiously to avoid overstatement of the conclusions.

3. The discussion of hardness improvement and microstructural refinement would benefit from further clarification. Although the manuscript reports significant grain refinement after magnetic-field-assisted processing, the methodology for grain size measurement and statistical evaluation is not clearly described. In addition, while the response letter states that baseline hardness values before remelting were added, the revised manuscript still indicates that the hardness of the cladded layer prior to TIG remelting was not directly measured. The authors should clarify this inconsistency and provide a clearer explanation of the quantitative analysis methodology.

4. Minor formatting and presentation revisions are still recommended before publication. Several typographical and language issues remain throughout the manuscript, and careful proofreading is advised. In addition, some figures would benefit from further refinement to improve consistency and readability, including font size uniformity, scale bar visibility, elemental labels in EDX mappings, axis formatting, and annotation clarity.

Review: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R1/PR9

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

I recommend publishing the revised version of this manuscript.

Recommendation: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R1/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Enhancing the circularity of 42Cr4 steel components through Tungsten Inert Gas surface remelting under a high-frequency magnetic field: A sustainable approach to restoration and remanufacturing — R1/PR11

Comments

No accompanying comment.