Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T09:01:18.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three-dimensional printing of biomaterials and soft materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2015

Amit Bandyopadhyay
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, USA; amitband@wsu.edu
Sahar Vahabzadeh
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, USA; sahar.vahabzadeh@wsu.edu
Anish Shivaram
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, USA; anish.shivaram@wsu.edu
Susmita Bose
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, USA; sbose@wsu.edu

Abstract

During the past two decades, numerous biomaterials and soft materials, including ceramics, polymers, and their composites, have been fabricated for various biomedical devices and applications in tissue engineering using three-dimensional (3D) printing. This article offers a brief overview of some of the biomaterials and soft materials fabricated using some notable 3D printing techniques and related applications. A brief perspective regarding future directions of this field is also provided.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

Table I. Three-dimensional printing of biomaterials and soft materials.*

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Schematic of a stereolithography system.6 (b–c) Scanning electron microscope images of a poly(propylene fumarate)/diethyl fumarate–hydroxyapatite (PPF/DEF–HA) scaffold processed by microstereolithography and of (d–e) pre-osteoblast cells in a PPF/DEF–HA scaffold.30 (a) Reproduced with permission from Reference 6. © 2007 American Chemical Society. (b–e) Reproduced with permission from Reference 30. © 2009 Elsevier.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Fused deposition modeling-processed porous tricalcium phosphate/polypropylene scaffolds with (1) complex and (2,3) gradient-controlled porosity.19 (b) Scaffolds produced by selective laser sintering: (1) poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), (2) calcium phosphate/PHBV, (3) poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA), (4) carbonated hydroxyapatite/PLLA.21 (c) Bioplotted collagen/alignate/silica scaffold.24 (d) 3D-printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds fabricated using direct ink writing.16 (e) 3D-printed bionic ear.45 (a) Reproduced with permission from Reference 19. © 2003 Elsevier. (b) Reproduced with permission from Reference 21. © 2010 Elsevier. (c) Reproduced with permission from Reference 24. © 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) Reproduced with permission from Reference 16. © 2007 Wiley. (e) Reproduced with permission from Reference 45. © 2013 American Chemical Society.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Schematic of the inkjet 3D printing process.26 (b) Photographs of pure and SrO/MgO-doped tricalcium phosphate (TCP) scaffolds.50 (c) Compressive strengths of pure and SiO2/ZnO-doped TCP scaffolds with different pore sizes. (d) Human osteoblast cell adhesion on pure and SiO2/ZnO-doped TCP scaffolds.17 (e) Masson Goldner’s trichrome staining of pure and doped TCP scaffolds (gray/brown), showing mineralized implants (blue) and osteoid formation (orange). (f) von Willebrand factor staining of pure and SiO2/ZnO doped TCP scaffolds, where the dark red spots within the sections are blood vessels.49 (a) Reproduced with permission from Reference 26. © 2013 Elsevier. (b) Reproduced with permission from Reference 50. © 2015 Wiley. (c–d) Reproduced with permission from Reference 17. © 2012 Elsevier. (e–f) Reproduced with permission from Reference 49. © 2013 Elsevier.