Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T00:31:21.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic structure and long-distance dispersal in populations of the wingless pest springtail, Sminthurus viridis (Collembola: Sminthuridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2011

JOHN M. K. ROBERTS*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
ANDREW R. WEEKS
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: 30 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. Tel: 613 8344 2519. Fax: 61 3 8344 2279. e-mail: j.roberts3@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The lucerne flea, Sminthurus viridis (Collembola: Sminthuridae) (L.) is a major pest of broadacre agriculture across southern Australia. Few molecular studies have been conducted on S. viridis and none have examined its population genetics, despite the importance for developing effective control strategies. Here, we characterize the genetic structure of Australian populations using three allozyme and eight microsatellite loci, as well as sequencing a fragment of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase I gene. We found that S. viridis in Australia are diploid, sexually reproducing and exhibit significant population structure as a result of limited gene flow. Despite significant differentiation between populations, there was very low cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene sequence variation, indicating the presence of a single species in Australia. The observed structure only marginally complied with an ‘isolation by distance’ model with human-mediated long-distance dispersal likely occurring. Allozymes and microsatellites gave very similar FST estimates, although differences found for novel alternative estimates of differentiation suggest that the allozymes did not capture the full extent of the population structure. These results highlight that control strategies may need to vary for locally adapted S. viridis populations and strategies aimed at limiting the spread of any future pesticide resistance will need to manage the effects of human-mediated dispersal.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of S. viridis sample populations across Australia used for allozyme (▴) and microsatellite (•) analysis. Australian states reading left to right are Western Australia, South Australia, New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania.

Figure 1

Table 1. Molecular markers used to screen Australian populations of S. viridis. Overall values of populations for sample size (n), allelic number (a), observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity, inbreeding coefficient (FIS) and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium P-values are given

Figure 2

Table 2. Population statistics for S. viridis analysed with allozyme and microsatellite markers. Overall loci values for sample size (n), allelic richness (r), observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity, inbreeding coefficient (FIS) and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium P-values are given

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Factorial correspondence analysis by populations for S. viridis. Each point represents a sample region weighted by the number of individuals and the sum of alleles present. (a) Allozyme data; percentage of variation explained by the first factor is 60·89%. ECH=Echuca, VIC; MEL=Melton, VIC; SAL=Sale, VIC. (b) Microsatellite data; open diamonds=Western Australian population samples, star=South Australian population samples, closed circles=Victorian populations samples, open squares=New South Wales population samples, closed triangles=Tasmanian population samples. Percentage of variation explained by the first factor is 15·16%. CAC=Coolac, NSW; CLA=Clare, SA; COU=Coulta, SA; KOO=Koorda, WA; MGA=Mt Gambier, SA; MOL=Molong, NSW; TIM=Timboon, VIC.

Figure 4

Table 3. Estimates of differentiation between S. viridis populations and their 95% confidence intervals obtained from three allozymes and eight microsatellite markers

Figure 5

Table 4. Analysis of the molecular variation at three allozyme and eight microsatellite markers among regions (Western Australia, South Australia, Victoria, New South Wales and Tasmania), among populations within regions and within populations of S. viridis

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Regression of linearized FST (FST/1−FST) and natural log geographic distance (km) for (a) all microsatellite-analysed Australian populations (Mantel r=0·140, P=0·075; R2=0·020, F=9·867, P=0·002); and (b) all microsatellite-analysed Victorian populations (Mantel r=0·191, P=0·117; R2=0·036, F=3·897, P=0·051).

Figure 7

Table 5. Statistical power of the allozyme and microsatellite markers for detecting various true FST values with Fisher's exact test and chi-square tests when using the study loci, allele frequencies and sample sizes. The power is expressed as the proportion of simulations that are statistically significant at the 0·05 level

Supplementary material: File

Roberts Supplementary Material

Roberts Supplementary Appendix

Download Roberts Supplementary Material(File)
File 350.7 KB