Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T17:52:18.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

R&D SPILLOVERS IN AN ENDOGENOUS GROWTH MODEL WITH PHYSICAL CAPITAL, HUMAN CAPITAL, AND VARIETIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2010

Tiago Neves Sequeira
Tiago Neves Sequeira*
Affiliation:
Universidade da Beira Interior and INOVA Research Center, Universidade Nova de Lisbõa
*
Address correspondence to: Tiago Neves Sequeira, Departamento de Gesto e Economia, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6200-001 Covilhã, Portugal; e-mail: sequeira@ubi.pt.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a family of models with physical and human capital and R&D for which convergence properties have been discussed [Lutz G. Arnold, European Economic Review 44, 1599–1605 (2000); Manuel Gómez, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 9(1), Article 5 (2005)]. However, spillovers in R&D have been ignored in this context. We introduce spillovers in this model and derive the steady-state and stability properties. This new feature implies that the model is characterized by a system of four differential equations. A unique balanced growth path, along with a two-dimensional stable manifold, is obtained under simple and reasonable conditions. Transition is oscillatory toward the steady state for plausible values of parameters. We discovered that these features are due to the presence of the R&D spillovers externality in the decentralized equilibrium.

Keywords

ConvergenceStabilitySpilloversR&D

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 223 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, Lutz G. (1998) Growth, welfare and trade in an integrated model of human-capital accumulation and research. Journal of Macroeconomics 20 (1), 81–105.Google Scholar
Arnold, Lutz G. (2000a) Endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety: A comment. European Economic Review 44, 1599–1605.Google Scholar
Arnold, Lutz G. (2000b) Endogenous technological change: A note on stability. Economic Theory 16, 219–226.Google Scholar
Arnold, Lutz G. (2000c) Stability of the market equilibrium in Romer's model of endogenous technological change: A complete characterization. Journal of Macroeconomics 22 (1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Lutz G. (2006) The Jones R&D growth model: Comment on stability. Review of Economic Dynamics 9 (1), 143–152.Google Scholar
Barrio-Castro, Tomas, López-Bazo, Enrique, and Serrano-Domingo, Guadalupe (2002) New evidence on international R&D spillovers, human capital and productivity in the OECD. Economics Letters 77, 41–45.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Jess and Perli, Roberto (1994) Uniqueness and indeterminacy: On the dynamics of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Theory 63, 113–142.Google Scholar
Brunner, Martin and Strulik, Holger (2002) Solution of perfect foresight saddlepoint problems: A simple method and applications. %Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25 (5), 737–753.Google Scholar
Coe, David and Helpman, Elhanan (1995) International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review 39, 859–887.Google Scholar
Eicher, Teo and Turnovsky, Stephen (2001) Transitional dynamics in a two-sector non-scale growth model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht, Hans-Jürgen (1997) International R&D spillovers, human capital and productibity in OECD countries: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review, 41, 1479–1488.Google Scholar
Fiaschi, Davide and Lavezzi, Andrea M. (2007) Nonlinear economic growth and cross-country evidence. Journal of Economic Development 84 (1), 271–290.Google Scholar
Fiaschi, Davide and Lavezzi, Andrea M. (2003) Distribution dynamics and nonlinear growth. Journal of Economic Growth 8, 379–401.Google Scholar
Funke, Michael and Strulik, Holger (2000) On endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety. European Economic Review 44, 491–515.Google Scholar
Gali, Jordi (1994) Monopolistic competition, endogenous markups and growth. European Economic Review 38, 748–756.Google Scholar
Gómez, Manuel (2005) Transitional dynamics in an endogenous growth model with physical capital, human capital and R&D. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 9 (1), Article 5.Google Scholar
Griliches, Zvi (1992) The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (Supplement), 29–47.Google Scholar
Horn, Roger and Johnson, Charles (1985) Matrix Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles (1995) R&D-based models of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 103 (4), 759–584.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles and Williams, John (2000) Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth 5, 65–85.Google Scholar
Ladrón-de-Guevara, Antonio, Ortigueira, Salvador, and Santos, Manuel (1997) Equilibrium dynamics in two-sector models of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21, 115–143.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus (2001) The World Economy, a Millenial Perspective. Paris: OECD Development Center Studies.Google Scholar
Norrbin, Stefan (1993) The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry: A contradiction. Journal of Political Economy 101 (6), 1149–1164.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael and Stern, Scott (2000) Measuring the “Ideas” Production Function: Evidence from International Patent Output. NBER Working Paper 7891.Google Scholar
Reis, Ana and Sequeira, Tiago N. (2007) Human capital and overinvestment in R&D. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109 (3), 573–591.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, S1971–2102.Google Scholar