Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-4jdj6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-08T22:39:38.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Longitudinal surveillance and transmission of Acinetobacter baumannii using whole genome sequencing—a tale of two hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2025

Chetan Jinadatha
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX, USA
Hosoon Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Research, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX, USA
Sorabh Dhar
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA Department of Internal Medicine, John D Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
Keith S. Kaye
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
Munok Hwang
Affiliation:
Department of Research, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX, USA
Jing Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Research, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX, USA
Thanuri Navarathna
Affiliation:
Department of Research, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX, USA
John David Coppin
Affiliation:
Department of Research, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX, USA
Piyali Chatterjee*
Affiliation:
Department of Research, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX, USA
*
Corresponding author: Piyali Chatterjee; Email: Piyali.Chatterjee@va.gov

Abstract

Objective:

Acinetobacter baumannii is known to cause global outbreaks and routine surveillance to prevent nosocomial transmission has historically been limited. A longitudinal surveillance study of Acinetobacter isolates using whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole genome multilocus sequence typing (wgMLST) was performed to map the distribution of sequence types (STs) and intrahospital transmission.

Methods:

All Acinetobacter clinical isolates were collected in two hospitals (H1, H2) from fifteen units between 2017 and 2021 in Southeast Michigan and analyzed. The isolates were subjected to WGS using the NextSeq instrument (Illumina). The contigs were de novo assembled using SPAdes (v3.7.1) and wgMLST analysis was performed using BioNumerics software v7.6. Minimum spanning tree (MST) and dendrograms were created to map distribution of STs and putative transmissions.

Results:

ST2Pas was the most prevalent in both hospitals (H1:47.2% and H2:59.7%), followed by ST406Pas (H1:11.1%, H2:8%). ST15Pas (H1:9.7%) was only found in H1. Transmission was mapped for ST2Pas, ST406Pas (H1, H2), and ST15Pas for H1 and mainly located in the ICU settings.

Conclusions:

Presence of several STs (ST2Pas, ST406Pas, and ST15Pas) prevalent from both hospitals suggest that these are common circulating strains in the area. Sporadic transmission events mainly in the ICU settings in both hospitals (H1 and H2) were noted indicating attention to enhanced infection prevention and control measures. Given that Acinetobacter infections are predominantly hospital acquired, an effective surveillance plan incorporating WGS and wgMLST may improve the ability to identify and track trends rapidly, implement effective infection control intervention, and reduce healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© Central Texas VA, 2025. This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Figure 0

Table 1. Hospital 1

Figure 1

Table 2. Hospital 2

Figure 2

Figure 1. (a, b) Minimum spanning tree of A. baumannii clinical isolates in hospitals (H1: Figure a and H2: Figure b) and different wards (U1-U15). For identical strains circles are marked with dividing lines. Each ST is marked on the side bar with different colors.

Figure 3

Figure 2. (a, b) Minimum spanning tree of A. baumannii clinical isolates in hospitals (H1: Figure a and H2: Figure b) and different years (2017–2021). For identical strains circles are marked with dividing lines. Each ST is marked on the side bar with different colors.

Figure 4

Figure 3. (a, b) Dendrogram demonstrating the SNP differences between ST2Pas sequences of A. baumannii clinical isolates in hospitals (H1: Figure a and H2: Figure b) that were related (≤2 SNP differences) or putatively related (≤10 SNP differences) and transmission clusters are marked in dotted rectangles. Each unit is marked on the side bar with different colors.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Dendrogram demonstrating the SNP differences between ST15PasA. baumannii clinical isolates in hospitals (H1) that were related (≤2 SNP differences) or putatively related (≤10 SNP differences) and transmission clusters are marked in dotted rectangles. Each unit is marked on the side bar with different colors.

Figure 6

Figure 5. (a, b) Dendrogram demonstrating the SNP differences between ST406PasA. baumannii clinical isolates in hospitals (H1: Figure a and H2: Figure b) that were related (≤2 SNP differences) or putatively related (≤10 SNP differences) and transmission clusters are marked in dotted rectangles. Each unit is marked on the side bar with different colors.