Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T21:30:14.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tuberculosis in the Workplace: OSHA's Compliance Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Melissa McDiarmid ,
Melissa J. Gamponia ,
Margaret A.K. Ryan ,
Jon Mark Hirshon ,
N.A. Gillen  and
Maureen Cox
Melissa McDiarmid*
Affiliation:
Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC
Melissa J. Gamponia
Affiliation:
Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC
Margaret A.K. Ryan
Affiliation:
Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC
Jon Mark Hirshon
Affiliation:
Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC
N.A. Gillen
Affiliation:
Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC
Maureen Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC
*
Office of Occupational Medicine, Room N3506, 200 Constitution Ave NW, Washington, DC 20210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Inspections of 272 facilities were performed between May 1992 and October 1994 to determine compliance with applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements for prevention of tuberculosis (TB) transmission.

Design:

Retrospective record review of two data sources: (1) OSHA's Computerized Integrated Management Information System and (2) an inspector-completed questionnaire on inspection results.

Setting/Participants:

Inspections of five types of facilities: healthcare institutions, correctional facilities, homeless shelters, long-term–care facilities for the elderly, and others, including drug treatment centers that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified as having a higher than expected rate of TB.

Methods:

The OSHA Compliance Memorandum, based on the 1990 CDC Guidelines, which outlined elements of a TB prevention program, was used in performing 272 inspections of facilities between May 1992 and October 1994. Elements of compliance were recorded and reviewed from the IMIS database and inspectors' questionnaires.

Results:

Regulated facilities were not fully compliant with OSHA guidance. Generally, healthcare facilities performed better than other facilities. Most facilities (79%) were compliant with administrative elements of a comprehensive TB control program, such as early identification of known or suspected infectious TB patients and skin testing of workers. Only 29% of inspected facilities were found to have acceptable respiratory protection programs for the prevention of occupational TB.

Conclusion:

Facilities have not been fully compliant with the OSHA memorandum describing protection of workers from TB. Facility compliance was better with some traditionally recognized TB infection control elements, but was weaker in the area of respiratory protection programs. This may reflect a lack of familiarity with the latter type of hazard protection.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , March 1996 , pp. 159 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Core Curriculum on Tuberculosis: What the Clinician Should Know. 3rd ed. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1994.Google Scholar
2. Joseph, S. Editorial: tuberculosis again. Am J Public Health 1993;83:647–648.Google Scholar
3. Braun, MM, Truman, BI, Maguire, B, et al. Increasing incidence of tuberculosis in a prison inmate population. JAMA 1989;261:393–397.Google Scholar
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Control of Tuberculosis in Correctional Facilities: A Guide for Health Care Workers. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1978.Google Scholar
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of tuberculosis in health-care settings, with special focus on HIV-related issues. MMWR 1990;39(No. RR–17):1–29).Google Scholar
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tuberculosis control among homeless populations. MMWR 1987;36(17):257–259.Google Scholar
7. Centers for Disease Control. Prevention and control of tuberculosis in facilities providing long-term care to the elderly. MMWR 1990;39(No. RR–10):7–10.Google Scholar
8. Centers for Disease Control. Epidemiologic notes and report: transmission of MDR-TB from an HIV-positive client in a residential substance-abuse treatment facility—Michigan. MMWR 1990;40(No. RR–8):129–131.Google Scholar
9. Bowden, K, McDiarmid, MA. Occupationally-acquired tuberculosis: what's known. J Occup Med 1994;36:320–325.Google Scholar
10. Rudnick, J, Krock, K, Manangan, L, Banerjee, S, Pugliese, G, Jarvis, W. How prepared are US hospitals to control nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis? In: Abstracts of the annual meeting of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America; Chicago, IL; 04 1993. Abstract.Google Scholar
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Proportionate mortality from pulmonary tuberculosis associated with occupations—28 states, 1979-1990. MMWR 1995;44:14–19.Google Scholar
12. Soule, RD. Industrial hygiene engineering controls. In: Clayton, GD, Clayton, FE, eds. Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1978;1:707–771.Google Scholar
13. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Policy and Procedures for Occupational Exposures to Tuberculosis. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor Enforcement; 10 18, 1993.Google Scholar
14. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Respiratory Protective Devices; Final Rules and Notice. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 06 8, 1995.Google Scholar