Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T22:41:19.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2025

Jorge Antonio Gómez Díaz*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico
*
Corresponding author: Jorge Antonio Gómez Díaz; Email: jorggomez@uv.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cycads, an ancient lineage, face a higher threat of extinction than any other plant group. To address this urgent issue, a more comprehensive method for assessing extinction threat, the Conservation and Prioritization Index (CPI), is proposed and tested for cycads in the State of Veracruz, Mexico. The CPI is a multifaceted approach that incorporates techniques used in conservation status assessments by the IUCN and the Mexican NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 but incorporates other information, including georeferenced distribution data, endemism in Veracruz, number of locations, extent of occurrence, and distribution area. Using CPI, correlations were found between longitude and extinction risk for Ceratozamia species in Veracruz. Zamia vazquezii and Z. inermis were assessed to have the highest level of extinction risk. Overall, this study indicates that a more holistic approach, incorporating broader sources of environmental health, can be used to more effectively and proactively manage extinction threats to cycads in Veracruz. In this sense, Veracruz can serve as a model for conservation planning in different states in Mexico and worldwide. CPI is a tool that can be applied to other regions to manage another threatened biota. This method enhances objectivity and effectiveness in conservation efforts, promoting data-driven decision-making that can be used globally.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Raw data used to calculate the Conservation Prioritization Index (CPI) for cycad species in Veracruz, Mexico. The variables include IUCN (conservation category according to the IUCN Red List), Endemic (whether the species is endemic to Veracruz: Yes/No), NOM-059 (risk category under Mexican law NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010), Loc (number of recorded localities), EOO (Extent of Occurrence in km²), Area (percentage of the species’ distribution within Veracruz), Habitat Loss (percentage of habitat loss for the species), Out PA (percentage of the species’ distribution outside Protected Areas), and Mun (number of municipalities in Veracruz where the species are found)

Figure 1

Table 2. Values used to calculate the Conservation Prioritization Index (CPI) for cycad species in Veracruz, Mexico, which include IUCN (normalised IUCN risk category), Endemic (1 for endemic, 0 for non-endemic), NOM-059 (normalised risk category under Mexican law NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010), Locations (inverse normalised number of localities), EOO (inverse normalised Extent of Occurrence), Area Veracruz (percentage of the species’ distribution within Veracruz), Habitat Loss (percentage of habitat loss), Out PA (percentage of the species’ distribution outside Protected Areas), Municipalities (inverse normalised number of municipalities), and CPI (calculated as the sum of all standardised values)

Figure 2

Figure 1. Biplot illustrating species ordination and key variable influences via multiple-factor analysis. The four groups of species, determined through hierarchical clustering with Gower’s distance and Ward’s method, are represented by different colours, highlighting distinct patterns about the influencing variables.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Relation between the latitude (A), longitude (B) and the Conservation Priority Index across all species of Zamiaceae found in Veracruz.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Relation between the Conservation Priority Index and the longitude of the genera Ceratozamia found in Veracruz.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Species richness of Zamiaceae and the current network of Protected Areas in Veracruz.

Figure 6

Table 3. Knowledge shortfalls for the species of Zamiaceae of Veracruz, including number of individuals (ind.), genetic information (GB), studies (Google Scholar), population ecology, pollinators and the sum of the fields with information

Supplementary material: File

Gómez Díaz supplementary material 1

Gómez Díaz supplementary material
Download Gómez Díaz supplementary material 1(File)
File 248.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gómez Díaz supplementary material 2

Gómez Díaz supplementary material
Download Gómez Díaz supplementary material 2(File)
File 14.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gómez Díaz supplementary material 3

Gómez Díaz supplementary material
Download Gómez Díaz supplementary material 3(File)
File 12.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gómez Díaz supplementary material 4

Gómez Díaz supplementary material
Download Gómez Díaz supplementary material 4(File)
File 14.7 KB

Author comment: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R0/PR1

Comments

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Extinction

Dear Professor Barry Brook and Dr John Alroy,

Subject: Manuscript Submission - “Assessing the Extinction Risk of Veracruz Cycads”

I am writing to submit my manuscript entitled “Assessing the Extinction Risk of Veracruz Cycads” for consideration for publication in Cambridge Prisms: Extinction. My research aligns with the journal’s scope, as it delves into the extinction risk, population ecology, and genetic aspects of cycad species in Veracruz, encompassing both empirical and theoretical dimensions.

Manuscript Highlights:

- Title: Assessing the Extinction Risk of Veracruz Cycads

- Keywords: Conservation, Biodiversity, Endemism, Threat, Habitat Loss.

- Abstract: My study investigates the extinction risk of 21 cycad species in Veracruz, combining ecological, distributional, and genetic data. It provides insights into the challenges faced by these species, offering a comprehensive evaluation of their conservation status.

Key Contributions:

1. Extinction Risk Assessment: I utilised a multidimensional approach, integrating ecological, distributional, and genetic information to evaluate the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads.

2. Conservation Prioritization Index (CPI): As part of our study, I introduced a novel Conservation Prioritization Index (CPI) designed explicitly for Veracruz cycads. This index provides a robust framework for prioritising species based on a comprehensive ecological, distributional, and conservation status data evaluation. The CPI facilitates the identification of high-priority species, offering a practical tool for developing targeted conservation projects and initiatives. By systematically ranking species according to their conservation significance, the CPI assists in allocating resources efficiently and strategically, ensuring focused efforts for preserving Veracruz cycads. This innovative contribution can potentially guide conservation practitioners, policymakers, and researchers in developing effective strategies for the sustainable management and protection of these unique plant species.

Relevance to Cambridge Prisms: Extinction:

Our manuscript aligns with the journal’s focus on documenting species extinction, diversity loss, and population processes. By addressing the extinction risk of cycads in Veracruz, our study offers practical insights for biodiversity protection, considering both scientific and social dimensions.

We trust that our research will contribute to Cambridge Prisms: Extinction and look forward to sharing our findings with the scientific community.

Thank you for considering our submission. We appreciate your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Jorge Antonio Gómez Díaz

Universidad Veracruzana

Review: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The article proposes a model for a comprehensive approach to the risk of extinction of Veracruz cycads. The systematization of the information allows different bibliographic and methodological sources of office estimation to be combined, making it a relevant article for the magazine.

However, there are two substantial problems, the information available for the species is very heterogeneous, which generates gaps that underestimate the estimates in poorly studied species and, on the contrary, overestimates for the species with more information available.

The second problem is the multivariate approach. Better management of this type of tool is required to avoid violating assumptions, especially the nature of the data and multiple adjustment tests.

Finally, the writing requires substantial revision by a native English speaker and avoidance of superlatives.

I add an anonymous address where you can access comments on the writing.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Re3fVo_DQiR4qfXA-U0riZX2SnK6I8U7/view?usp=sharing

Review: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Overview

The research paper attempts to provide a quantitative measure to rank the cycads of Veracruz according to their risk of extinction by using the Conservation Prioritization Index (CPI) method. This was done to prioritize species according to their conservation status to ensure that limited resources are allocated to the most vulnerable species in need of urgent conservation action.

Overall, it is an interesting and important study, but it can be improved with a more in-depth analysis of some variables used to develop the CPI.

Introduction

Line 47: Cycads were previously regarded as an ancient group of gymnosperms. Modern-day cycads are known to have recently diversified from a few ancestor species in the late Miocene (Crisp and Cook 2011; Nagalingum et al. 2011).

After line 73: It might be worth including the concept of extinction debt and cycads in the introduction (theoretical background). Cronk (2016) explored extinction lag times experienced by long-lived plants such as cycads, sometimes measured in many centuries. The slow-burning fuse of plant extinction is relevant to studies assessing the extinction risk of cycads. It is vital that conservation action is taken during the window period before the extinction process is complete, but at the same time, the cautionary approach should be applied to ensure that conservation action does not speed up lag time to extinction - see Type I, Type II and Type III conservation intervention types explored in Cronk (2016) Swart (2019 - PhD thesis).

Methodology

Variable selection: How did the researcher ensure that only reliable data/data of high quality was used to include in the CPI. Inaccurate/incomplete data could lead to biased or unreliable CPI scores, affecting the validity of conservation decisions. The choice of variables is also subjective; researchers/stakeholders may have varying opinions on which variables are most important. The research will be strengthened if experts and stakeholders are part of the variable selection process to ensure a comprehensive and inclusive approach. In addition, some variables may change over time; how does the CPI accommodate updates and revisions based on new scientific knowledge?

Line 146 & 162: Using records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) in the research paper can be valuable but the accuracy and completeness of locality records can vary. Was the information used in the research paper scrutinized for accuracy by assessing the metadata associated with each record (information about the data source, collection methods, whether the point is georeferenced or not, etc)? Was the taxonomic identification of the locality record verified? If possible, field verification of records should be done to help validate accuracy and confirm species identifications.

Line 173: The identification of suitable habitat is based on one set of data (Global Canopy Height). This is simplistic given the many factors influencing habitat suitability for cycads. Were other environmental factors for the different species considered (geology, climate, vegetation type, etc.)? Gomez-Dıaz (2024) used bioclimatic data to determine the distribution of Ceratozamia morettii, C. brevifrons, and C. Tenuis and found that each species occupies a unique ecoregion and climatic niche. Similarly, Swart (2019) found that geology was an important environmental predictor in determining suitable habitat for Encephalartos latifrons (South African cycad). The researchers may want to expand on this to strengthen the results of the research and include other environmental factors that may be important to include. The resolution of the datasets used and the software used in the computation is also unclear.

Results

It is important to consider geographic range and distribution patterns when assessing species' conservation status and prioritizing conservation efforts, particularly for species with limited ranges that may be more vulnerable to extinction threats. While correlation is a useful statistical measure for quantifying relationships between variables, caution is necessary when interpreting correlations. Potential confounding factors, alternative explanations, and the need for further causal inference methods should be explored or mentioned in the text.

Discussion

Line 322: Reword? This sentence does not make sense. ...such as......change to .....as with......?

Line 357: As mentioned in the introduction, the type of conservation intervention is important and should be applied with caution. It was assumed that Encephalartos latifrons cycad had lost its regenerative potential, allowing landowners to propagate seedlings from wild parent plants but this comes with some serious risks and can further contribute to the decline of some populations e.g. harvesting male cones for pollen used in artificial pollination removes the breeding site for important weevil pollinators (see Swart PhD thesis for more information).

Line 421: .......are part of the current [PA] network......reword

Line 428: It may be worth mentioning how the CPI index developed can be incorporated into (CITES Non-detriment) NDF findings for the three Zamia species. Components of the CPI, such as threat level, ecological importance, genetic diversity, rarity and human impact, can be used to assess the species' overall conservation needs and vulnerabilities as part of the NDF process. This will also encourage stakeholder engagement and collaboration among scientific experts, conservation organizations, government agencies, local communities etc.

Discussion relating to Line 287: Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are an important approach to filling conservation gaps for species not represented in PAs (Eken et al. 2004).

It may be worth exploring how the CPI fits in with and could be used in local, national and international conservation policy development improving the conservation of cycads in Veracruz.

References:

Crisp MD, Cook LG (2011) Cenozoic extinctions account for the low diversity of extant gymnosperms compared with angiosperms. New Phytol 192:997–1009

Nagalingum NS, Marshall CR, Quental, TB, Rai HS, Little DP and Mathews S (2011) Recent synchronous radiation of a living fossil. Science 334: 796 – 799

Cronk Q (2016) Plant extinctions take time. Science 353: 446–448

Swart, C., Donaldson, J. & Barker, N. Predicting the distribution of Encephalartos latifrons, a critically endangered cycad in South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 27, 1961–1980 (2018).

Swart C (2019) The conservation, ecology, and distribution of the Critically Endangered Encephalartos latifrons Lehm. (PhD thesis)

Line 564: Correct reference year: Gomez-Dıaz JA, Carvajal-Hernandez CI, Dattilo W (2024) Past, present and future in the geographical distribution of Mexican Tepezmaite cycads: Genus Ceratozamia. PLoS ONE 19(2): e0284007

Eken G, Bennun L, Brooks TM, Darwall W, Fishpool DC, Foster M, Knox D, Langhammer P, Matiku P, Radford E, Salaman P, Sechrest WES, Smith ML, Tordoff A (2004) Key Biodiversity Areas as site conservation targets. Bioscience 54: 1110–1118

Recommendation: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R1/PR6

Comments

Jorge Antonio Gómez Díaz

Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana

Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

September 15th 2024

Prof. Barry Brook & Assoc. Prof. John Alroy

Editors-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Extinction

Dear Prof. Brook and Assoc. Prof. Alroy,

I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing in response to the decision regarding my manuscript titled “Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads” (Manuscript ID: EXT-23-0036]). I appreciate the time and effort you and the reviewers have dedicated to evaluating my work.

After carefully considering the reviewers' comments, I respectfully submit my rebuttal and the revised manuscript for your reconsideration.

Review: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The work provides a comprehensive overview, but unfortunately, many species lack complete data, leading to bias and the need for field verification. Another issue is that the absence of data is not considered; instead, the program disregards the attribute when summing. Despite these challenges, it represents a significant effort and an acceptable initial approach. It paves the way for future research to confirm whether the model suits each species and fills the existing information gaps, particularly genetic data. This aspect should be included in the discussion, not only environmental stochasticity.

I also propose a contrast between risk classification models, as the IUCN criteria are much more extensive than the MER. Yet ignoring the value that missing data would have has serious shortcomings. There is also no averaging, stochastic calculation, or suggested resampling to assess temporal differences.

Recommendation: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R1/PR8

Comments

I thank the authors for their comprehensive revision of the MS. Some further critical comments were offered by the original reviewer #1 that will require some consideration.

In short, the referee’s concerns about incomplete data and the absence of a clear accounting for missing information are legitimate, as is their suggestion that ignoring absent data potentially skews the results. A brief but direct acknowledgment of how missing attributes could bias the CPI, and a plan for iterative improvement as more data become available, would suffice in the revision. Their call to contrast IUCN and MER criteria more explicitly and to incorporate genetic data gaps into the discussion also seems valid. Incorporating a short paragraph acknowledging these deficiencies, explaining why they exist, and proposing future work (e.g., targeted field verification, genetic sampling, or stochastic resampling methods) would both satisfy these concerns and enhance the manuscript’s scientific rigor.

From my perspective as Handling Editor, a few other areas could still be strengthened. First, more explicit discussion should be included on the limitations and uncertainties inherent in the CPI method, especially given the data shortfalls. The text should clarify how missing or incomplete population and genetic data might bias the CPI and how these biases can be mitigated. Also, while the importance of habitat loss is underscored, some finer discussion is needed about why certain environmental variables (e.g., climate or geology) were excluded, and how their incorporation could alter the risk rankings. Finally, although the methods section is extremely detailed, but the reasoning behind each chosen variable in the CPI (and not others) could be more succinctly justified. Additionally, the emphasis on practical conservation outcomes and policy recommendations could be sharpened. While the manuscript does mention how findings might guide key biodiversity area designations or inform CITES listings, it could more directly map the results to concrete conservation interventions. For instance, specifying which management actions (e.g., targeted habitat restoration, stricter enforcement of protected area boundaries) might be most urgent for the top-ranked at-risk species would strengthen the impact and clarity of the discussion.

Decision: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R2/PR10

Comments

February 12th, 2025

Dr. John Alroy and Prof. Barry Brook

Editors-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Extinction

Subject: Rebuttal Letter for Manuscript Assessing the Extinction Risk of Veracruz Cycads

Dear Dr. Alroy and Prof. Brook,

I sincerely thank you and the reviewers for your thoughtful and constructive feedback on our manuscript, Assessing the Extinction Risk of Veracruz Cycads. I appreciate the time and effort dedicated to evaluating our work and providing valuable suggestions to improve its quality and impact. I have carefully addressed all the comments and made the necessary revisions to the manuscript. Below, I give a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and outline the changes implemented.

The revisions have significantly improved the manuscript and addressed all the concerns raised by the reviewers and editors. I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to Cambridge Prisms: Extinction and hope the revised version meets the journal’s standards. Please do not hesitate to contact us if further clarifications or adjustments are needed.

Thank you once again for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Jorge Antonio Gómez Díaz

Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas

Universidad Veracruzana

jorggomez@uv.mx

Recommendation: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R2/PR11

Comments

I thank the author for the thorough response to the critiques of the R1 revision (from one reviewer in R2 and myself), and for clearly tracking these changes in the revised MS. After 2 rounds of review and revision, I am satisfied that the MS is now ready for publication.

Decision: Assessing the extinction risk of Veracruz cycads — R2/PR12

Comments

No accompanying comment.