Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T08:29:19.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: Insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2023

Opeyemi Soremekun
Affiliation:
The African Computational Genomics (TACG) Research Group, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK Molecular Bio-Computation and Drug Design Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa
Marie-Joe Dib
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, Imperial College London, London, UK
Skanda Rajasundaram
Affiliation:
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
Segun Fatumo
Affiliation:
The African Computational Genomics (TACG) Research Group, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology (NCDE), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Dipender Gill*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, Imperial College London, London, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Dipender Gill, E-mail: dipender.gill@imperial.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are complex in their aetiology, arising due to a combination of genetics, lifestyle and environmental factors. By nature of this complexity, different CVDs vary in their molecular mechanisms, clinical presentation and progression. Although extensive efforts are being made to develop novel therapeutics for CVDs, genetic heterogeneity is often overlooked in the development process. By considering molecular mechanisms at an individual and ancestral level, a richer understanding of the influence of environmental and lifestyle factors can be gained and more refined therapeutic interventions can be developed. It is therefore expedient to understand the molecular and clinical heterogeneity in CVDs that exists across different populations. In this review, we highlight how the mechanisms underlying CVDs vary across diverse population ancestry groups due to genetic heterogeneity. We then discuss how such genetic heterogeneity is being leveraged to inform therapeutic interventions and personalised medicine, highlighting examples across the CVD spectrum. Finally, we present an overview of how polygenic risk scores and Mendelian randomisation can foster more robust insight into disease mechanisms and therapeutic intervention in diverse populations. Fulfilment of the vision of precision medicine requires more exhaustive leveraging of the genetic variability across diverse ancestry populations to improve our understanding of disease onset, progression and response to therapeutic intervention.

Topics structure

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Precision medicine approaches in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and challenges to overcome. Multi-ancestry genetic studies play a pivotal role in advancing precision medicine. Comparisons of ancestry-specific and trans-ancestry GWAS findings provide insights into CVD aetiology and its heterogeneity. Secondary analyses of GWAS data, notably using Mendelian randomisation methods, provide additional insights into causal relationships between cardiometabolic risk factors and CVD outcomes. This allows for risk factor prioritisation and optimised risk stratification in diverse ancestry population groups. Integrating ancestry-specific GWAS associations in polygenic risk scores allows for improved predictability of CVD outcomes. Together these approaches contribute to the improved primary prevention, diagnosis and prognosis and targeted therapeutics of CVD. Figure created using BioRender.com (2019).

Figure 1

Table 1. Examples of genes implicated in different CVD outcomes and risk factors that confer heterogeneity across ancestries

Figure 2

Figure 2. Multi-ancestry pharmacogenetics in the scope of personalised drug therapy. Figure created using BioRender.com.

Figure 3

Table 2. Influence of ancestry on drug response

Author comment: Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention — R0/PR1

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

I have no competing interests to declare

Comments

Comments to Author: This article gives and overview how CVD and potential mechanism for CVD differ by ancestry due to genetic heterogeneity. The authors also describe how this genetic heterogeneity is being utilized to inform the development of potential drug development and therapeutic interventions. The role of genetics in the drug development process are illustrated using exemplars of polygenetic risk scores and Mendelian Randomization studies for CAD and stroke and their modifiable risk factors, such as BMI and lipids in different ancestry groups.

1. On page 5 the authors make the point that “Whilst there are other CVD endpoints and modifiable risk factors, these few were selected based on their burden and contributions to CVD.” This seems reasonable but it was not clear whether there was a systematic search strategy utilized for the studies included in the review. It would be better if this was the case as it seems as if studies have been cherry-picked. I would like to see the search strategy reported with clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for a scoping review or something similar.

2. The authors mention development of therapeutic targets for ALDH2 for alcohol use disorder. This is interesting but wasn’t there a planned trial targeting AUD using HORIZANT in extended-release tablets that was unable to be conducted due to ethical issues. Would Antabuse potentially be limited by the same issues?

3. The paper by Sun et al. (Nature Medicine https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0366-x ) that showed concordance between observational, Mendelian Randomization and RCT data for the opposing relationship of LDL-c with ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in a Chinese population should be included as it provides good evidence for benefits and harm for LDL lowering for CHD and stroke.

4. I would have liked to see a section on “fairness and bias” included in the review with recommendations on how the representation of different ancestries in CVD precision medicine research can be improved as well as strategies to empower researchers from low resource settings. Also how the findings of research will be used is also important as this could exacerbate inequalities and bias against different ancestries (e.g. differences in drug responses).

5. Table 2 reports identical “ancestral differences” for CCB and Diuretics. This seems to be an error.

6. There are several typographical errors throughout the manuscript. For example on page 5 the authors wrote “…it also allude to an individual’s phenotype…“ should be “it also alludes to an individual’s phenotype…”. On page 6 “with established risk facts….” Should be “…established risk factors…”

Recommendation: Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention — R0/PR3

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention — R1/PR5

Comments

Dear Editor,

The revisions have now been made, as requested. In undertaking this process, the expertise of an additional co-author (Segun Fatumo) was introduced, and all authors are in agreement with this. Prof. Fatumo critically revised the material for intellectual content and has agreed to be a co-author.

Best wishes,

Dipender

Review: Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention — R1/PR6

Conflict of interest statement

I have no competing interests to declare

Comments

Comments to Author: The authors have responded satisfactorily to all my comments and I have no further comments to make.

Recommendation: Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention — R1/PR7

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention — R1/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.