Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-l4t7p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T06:24:29.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mafic rocks with back-arc E-MORB affinity from the Chotanagpur Granite Gneiss Complex of India: relicts of a Proterozoic Ophiolite suite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2021

Mansoor Ahmad
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of India, Northeastern Region, Shillong, Meghalaya 793003, India
Abdul Qayoom Paul
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of India, SU: Jammu and Kashmir 190008 India
Priyanka Negi
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
Salim Akhtar
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
Bibhuti Gogoi
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Cotton University, Guwahati, Assam 781001, India
Ashima Saikia*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
*
Author for correspondence: Ashima Saikia, Email: ashima.saikia@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Proterozoic Chotanagpur Granite Gneiss Complex (CGGC) at the northern boundary of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) of the eastern Indian shield preserves relics of fossilized oceanic back-arc crust. We describe the field, petrographical and geochemical characteristics of the mafic rocks comprising pillow basalts and dolerites from the Bathani area of the northern fringe of the CGGC, eastern India. The basalts consist of plagioclase feldspar, hornblende, opaque minerals (Fe–Ti oxide) and chlorite, and the dolerite consists of plagioclase, hornblende and opaque minerals. Our data indicate that the Bathani mafic rocks have tholeiitic to transitional composition and are overprinted by greenschist facies metamorphic conditions; however, REE and fluid immobile elements preserve their primary geochemical signatures. The (La/Sm)N ratios (1.38–2.15) and chondrite-normalized REE patterns point to an enriched mid-ocean ridge basalt (E-MORB) mantle source. Geochemical characteristics indicate a mixed signature of MORB and arc tholeiite with enrichment of Ba, Th, Eu and Sr, similar to that of back-arc supra-subduction zone ophiolites. These mafic rocks are the product of MORB-like magma derived from a depleted mantle corresponding to < 2% partial melting of spinel lherzolite, enriched by subduction-induced slab metasomatism and melting. The Bathani mafic rocks are representative of the upper part of a supra-subduction zone columnar ophiolite section, which was emplaced onto the present-day northern margin of the CGGC during suturing of the northern and southern Indian block at c. 1.9 Ga during the Nuna amalgamation.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Left: tectonic map of India showing the location of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) along with other Proterozoic mobile belts of India, including the Eastern Ghats Mobile Belt (EGMB) and the Aravalli Delhi Mobile Belt (ADMB). The CITZ comprises the central CITZ, the Chotanagpur Granite Gneiss Complex (CGGC) and the easternmost Shillong Plateau Gneissic Complex (SPGC). The Bathani Volcano Sedimentary Sequence (BVSS) lies within the ENE–WSW-trending Son-Narmada (SONA) lineaments shown in dashed lines. Four Archaean cratonic nuclei of India, namely Singhbhum, Bastar, Bundelkhand and Dharwar, are also shown (modified after Pradhan et al. 2009). GB – Godavari Basin; MB – Mahanadi Basin; MMB – Mahakoshal Mobile Belt; SB – Satpura Basin; NSMB – North Singhbhum Mobile Belt; SGT – Southern Granulite Terrain. Right: CGGC (map modified after Sanyal & Sengupta, 2012). The map represents five subdivisions of CGGC, namely (I) Ranchi–Purulia; (II) Hazaribagh–Dumka; (III) Giridih–Deoghar; (IV) Bihar Mica Belt; and (V) Rajgir–Kharagpur subdivisions as proposed by Mahadevan (2002) delineated by brown lines. Also shown in the map are current subdivisions of CGGC proposed by Mukherjee et al. (2019) marked as Domain I (IA and IB), Domain II and Domain III. The red square box shows the study area. NPSZ – North Purulia Shear Zone; SPSZ – South Purulia Shear Zone. (b) Geological map of the area near Bathani village of the Bathani Volcano sedimentary sequence after M Ahmad & AQ Paul, unpub. report (2013). Sample locations are marked in stars.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a, b) Cross-sectional view of pillows at Churi displaying variation in size and shape, inter-pillow space, rim/rind, vesicles, budding etc. (c) Longitudinal view of pillows at Mahadev Bigha. (d) Irregular shape pillow at Ghansura, loosely packed, inter-pillow space filled with quartz and carbonate. (e) Chert and jasper bands in carbonate (siliceous dolomite) rock. (f) banded iron formations (BIFs) in alternation with tuffaceous layers. Tuff is metamorphosed to tuffaceous phyllite. (g) Typical elephant skin weathering in siliceous dolomite.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Photomicrographs. (a) Metamorphosed pillow basalt showing spherulitic texture and greenschist facies mineralogy. (b) Metabasalt showing porphyritic texture. Phenocryst is of saussuritized plagioclase embedded in the fine-grained groundmass of amphibole, chlorite and opaque minerals (c) Metabasalt showing phenocryst of pyroxene, which has altered to amphibole, embedded in a groundmass of altered plagioclase and chlorite. (d) Relics of the porphyritic intergranular texture of an altered basalt. Altered plagioclase crystals can be observed with preserved subhedral to euhedral shapes. (e, f) Altered dolerite shows ophitic texture where laths of plagioclases are enclosed within pyroxenes, which are now altered to chlorite and amphibole. (g, h) Metadolerites showing saussuritization of plagioclase and alteration of pyroxene to amphibole and chlorite.

Figure 3

Table 1. Major oxides, trace and rare earth elements composition of the pillow lava basalts and dolerites from the Bathani volcano-sedimentary sequence of CGGC. BDL – below detection limit.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Bivariate diagrams. (a–d) Zr versus selected major elements such as SiO2 and K2O and fluid mobile elements such as Ba and Sr. (e–h) Zr versus selected fluid immobile elements such as TiO2, Sm, Nb and Gd. Major elements and fluid mobile elements show non-correlating behaviour. In contrast, the fluid immobile elements show a correlating trend.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. (a) Sample/chondrite-normalized rare earth element trends of Bathani mafics; normalizing data from Sun & McDonough (1989). (b) Sample/MORB normalized trace-element spidergrams; normalizing data from Hofmann (1988). For comparison purposes, trace-element data in blue and purple patterns plotted from the Izu–Bonin–Mariana and New Britain–Manus back-arc basins. Data source: Metcalf & Shervais (2008).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. (a) Ti/Y versus Ba/Zr; (b) Ti/Y versus Ba/Nb; and (c) Nb/Y versus Zr/Y variation diagrams of the mafic rocks of the BVSS. Average lower crust (+; Weaver and Tarney, 1984), N-MORB (half-filled square; Humphris et al.1985), E-MORB (open square; Humphris et al.1985), OIB (star; Sun, 1980), primordial mantle (circle; after McDonough & Sun, 1995). The value of average continental crust (+) is from Rudnick & Fountain (1995) and Rudnick & Gao (2003).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. (a) La/Yb versus Nb/La (Smith et al.1999) plot shows enriched mantle source for Bathani mafics. (b) Th/Sm versus Th/Ce diagrams of the Bathani mafics showing the involvement of subducted sediment in the depleted mantle. (c) Nb/Y versus Rb/Y (d) Nb/Zr versus Th/Zr, indicating melt addition in Bathani mafics.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. (Yb)N versus (Ce/Sm)N plot for Bathani basalt samples. Dashed black lines are melt curves at variable residual mineral modes, and filled circles represent the percent of partial melt fractions. Source rock is spinel lherzolite (Sample s_S-32; Carlson & Ionov, 2019). Residual mineral mode 0.55 ol, 0.20 opx, 0.23 cpx and 0.02 sp best represent Bathani basalt samples. Partition coefficients from McKenzie & O’Nions (1991). Normalizing chondrite values from Sun & McDonough (1989). Depleted mantle (DM) composition after Salter & Stracke (2004). ol – olivine; opx – orthopyroxene; cpx – clinopyroxene; sp – spinel.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. (a) Nb/Yb versus Th/Yb plot after Pearce (2008) for the studied samples of Bathani mafics showing compositional similarity to E-MORB. (b) Ti versus V plot of the Bathani mafics (Ti/V ratios: island arcs, 10–20; MORB, 20–50; mixed MORB and island arc, 20–30; back-arc basins, 10–50) and boninite field; diagram after Shervais (1982). (c) Discrimination of back-arc basalt affinity of the Bathani mafics rocks on Ti/Zr versus Zr (Woodhead et al. 1993). (d) Zr versus Zr/Y tectonic discrimination diagram (after Pearce & Norry, 1979) showing mixed signatures of island arc and MORB for Bathani mafics. IAT – island-arc tholeiite; MORB – mid-oceanic ridge basalt; WPB – within-plate basalt.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Various diagrams used for geochemical classification and tectonic discrimination of tectonic settings of ophiolitic crustal units after Pearce (2014) were adopted in this paper to compare our mafic rock data with Proterzoic ophiolitic mafics. (a) Zr/Ti–Nb/Y diagram from Floyd & Winchester (1975). (b) Th/Yb–Nb/Yb and (d) TiO2/Yb–Nb/Yb diagrams after Pearce (2008). (c) V–Ti/1000 diagrams after Shervais (1982) and modified by Pearce (2014). Data used for comparison are from Indian occurrences of Proterozoic ophiolites: Palaeoproterozoic Kandra Ophiolite Complex, Southern India and Proterozoic ophiolite melange Nellore–Khamman schist belt, SE, India: Saha et al. (2017); world occurrences of Proterozoic ophiolites: Rao & Reddy (2009); Neoproterozoic Wadi Ghadir ophiolite, Eastern desert, Egypt: El-Rahman et al. (2009); 1.95 Ga Jormua Ophiolite, North Eastern Finland: Peltonen et al. (1996); Neoproterozoic Wadi Ghadir Ophiolite, NE Africa, and Cretaceous Ophiolite: Basta et al. (2011); Cretaceous ophiolite volcanic suite, Ghayth area Oman: Shaikh et al. (2005); Late Cretaceous Makran ophiolite, SE Iran: Monsef et al. (2019).

Supplementary material: File

Ahmad et al. supplementary material

Ahmad et al. supplementary material

Download Ahmad et al. supplementary material(File)
File 8.1 MB