No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Let's talk about trees: Genetic relationships of languages and their phylogenetic representation
Review products
Let's talk about trees: Genetic relationships of languages and their phylogenetic representation Edited by RitsukoKikusawa and Lawrence A.ReidOsaka: Senri Ethnological Studies 98, National Museum of Ethnology. 2018. Pp. 176. Maps, Plates, Tables, Figures.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 September 2019
Extract
This volume contains an introduction and eight papers presented at an international symposium ‘Let's Talk about Trees’, which was organised by Ritsuko Kikusawa and hosted by the National Museum of Ethnology of Osaka, Japan, in February 2013. The stated purpose of the meeting was to evaluate the pros and cons of the classic tree model of historical linguistics in describing the order of splits within a language family. Because the problem of modelling relationships of descent is common to other disciplines, contributors were invited from a range of academic disciplines, including not only linguistics, but also what is described on page one as ‘cladistics’, ‘biology’ and ‘genetics’, although cladistics is clearly a part of biological taxonomy, and not an independent discipline.
Information
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The National University of Singapore 2019
References
1 Weinberg, Steven, The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the universe (New York: Basic Books, 2015 [1977])Google Scholar.
2 Gould, Stephen Jay, Hen's teeth and horse's toes: Further reflections in natural history (New York: W.W. Norton, 1984), pp. 355–65Google Scholar.
3 Brugmann, Karl, ‘Zur Frage nach den Verwantschaftsverhältnissen der indogermanischen Sprachen’, Internationale Zeitschrift für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (1884): 226–56Google Scholar; Hennig, Willi, Phylogenetic systematics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1966 [1950])Google Scholar.
4 Holman, Eric W., Wichmann, Søren, Brown, Cecil H., Velupillai, Viveka, Müller, Andre and Bakker, Dik, ‘Explorations in automated language classification’, Folia Linguistica 42, 3–4 (2008): 331–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Blust, Robert, ‘Why lexicostatistics doesn't work: The “universal constant” hypothesis and the Austronesian languages’, in Time depth in historical linguistics, ed. Renfrew, Colin, McMahon, April and Trask, Larry (Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2000), pp. 311–31Google Scholar.
6 Dyen, Isidore, A lexicostatistical classification of the Austronesian languages, Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics, and Memoir 19 of the International Journal of American Linguistics (Baltimore: The Waverly Press, 1965)Google Scholar; Grace, George W., ‘Austronesian lexicostatistical classification: A review article’, Oceanic Linguistics 5 (1966): 13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Blust, Robert, ‘The Austronesian homeland: A linguistic perspective’, Asian Perspectives 26, 1 (1984/1985): 45–67Google Scholar; Blust, ‘Why lexicostatistics doesn't work’.
7 Greenhill, Simon J., ‘Levenshtein distances fail to identify language relationships accurately’, Computational Linguistics 37 (2011): 689–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Blust, Robert, ‘Language, dialect and riotous sound change: The case of Sa'ban’, in Papers from the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 1999, ed. Thurgood, Graham W. (Tempe: Arizona State University, Program for Southeast Asian Studies, 2001), pp. 249–359Google Scholar.
9 Alexander D. Smith, ‘The languages of Borneo: A comprehensive classification’ (PhD diss., University of Hawai‘i).
10 Thurgood, Graham, From ancient Cham to modern dialects: Two thousand years of language contact and change, Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication No. 8 (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1999)Google Scholar.
11 Tsuchida, Shigeru, Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic phonology, Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa Monograph Series No. 5 (Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, 1976)Google Scholar; Blust, Robert, ‘Palauan historical phonology: Whence the intrusive velar nasal?’, Oceanic Linguistics 48 (2009): 307–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Blust, Robert, ‘Central and Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian’, Oceanic Linguistics 32 (1993): 241–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Blust, Robert, ‘Eastern Malayo-Polynesian: A subgrouping argument’, in Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings, ed. Wurm, S.A. and Carrington, Lois, Fascicle 1: 181–234 (Canberra: Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University [ANU], 1978Google Scholar).
14 Reid, Lawrence A., ‘The early switch hypothesis: Linguistic evidence for contact between Negritos and Austronesians’, Man and Culture in Oceania 3 (1987): 41–59Google Scholar.
15 Zorc, R. David, ‘The genetic relationships of Philippine languages’, in FOCAL II: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. Geraghty, Paul, Carrington, Lois, and Wurm, S.A. (Canberra: Dept. of Linguistics, ANU, 1986), pp. 147–73Google Scholar.
16 Ross, Malcolm, ‘The Batanic languages in relation to the early history of the Malayo-Polynesian subgroup of Austronesian’, Journal of Austronesian Studies 1, 2 (2005): 12–13Google Scholar.
17 Reid, ‘The early switch hypothesis’, p. 96.
18 Blust and Trussel, ongoing.
19 Norman, Jerry and Tsu-lin, Mei, ‘The Austroasiatics in ancient South China: Some lexical evidence’, Monumenta Serica 32 (1976): 274–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Schrader, Otto, Zur Geschichte und Methode der linguistisch-historischen Forschung (Eschborn: H. Costenoble, 1907)Google Scholar; Schmidt, Johannes, Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen (Weimar: Hermann Böhlau, 1872)Google Scholar.
21 Reland, Hadrian, Dissertationum miscellanearum, 3 vols. (Trajecti ad Rhenum, 1708)Google Scholar.
22 Hervas y Panduro, Lorenzo, Catalogo delle lingue, vol. 17 of Idea dell'Universo, 21 vols. (Cesena, 1784)Google Scholar; Blust, Robert, The Austronesian languages, rev. ed., Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access Monographs (Canberra: College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU, 2013 [2009])Google Scholar.