Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-lqwgf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-03T06:58:17.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Copper connections: coordinating transport, sensing and systemic signalling in plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2025

Ju-Chen Chia
Affiliation:
Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University , USA
Tetiana-Olena Zavodna
Affiliation:
Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University , USA
Hanna Shatokhina
Affiliation:
Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University , USA
Yana Kavulych
Affiliation:
Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University , USA
Olena K. Vatamaniuk*
Affiliation:
Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University , USA
*
Corresponding author: Olena K. Vatamaniuk; Email: okv2@cornell.edu

Abstract

Copper is an essential micronutrient that plays critical roles in plant metabolism, development and stress responses through its unique redox properties. While tightly regulated to prevent toxicity, labile copper also functions as a dynamic signalling molecule mediating developmental and environmental cues. Copper bioavailability in soils is influenced by complex physicochemical factors, posing challenges for plant acquisition and homeostasis. Plants have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to regulate copper uptake, long-distance transport, intracellular trafficking and storage, balancing its essentiality with potential toxicity. This review summarizes current knowledge on copper homeostasis in plants, discusses uptake strategies in dicots and non-grass monocots, the coordination of internal copper transport and tissue distribution, and the emerging evidence for systemic copper signalling. Understanding these processes is important for improving crop nutrient use efficiency and resilience in mineral-deficient soils.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with John Innes Centre
Figure 0

Figure 1. Cu uptake, transport and intracellular trafficking in dicots.Top panel: Cu uptake and long-distance transport. At the root surface, Cu(II) is reduced to Cu(I) by AtFRO4 and AtFRO5, then imported into cells via AtCOPT1 and AtCOPT2, members of the CTR/COPT transporter family. AtZIP2 serves as an alternative Cu(II) uptake route. Once inside root cells, Cu is loaded into the xylem via AtHMA5, a member of the HMA family of P-type ATPases. Nicotianamine (NA), synthesized in the cytoplasm, is transported into secretory vesicles by AtNAET1/2, then secreted into the xylem apoplast, where it chelates Cu to form Cu-NA complexes. These complexes are carried to the shoot with the transpiration stream. Cu or Cu-NA may be reabsorbed from the xylem apoplast into xylem parenchyma cells via AtCOPT6 and possibly AtYSL2, both expressed in the vasculature and proposed to mediate lateral mineral movement. In the phloem apoplast, Cu or Cu-NA is taken up by AtYSL1/3 or directly by AtOPT3, which mediates Cu loading into phloem companion cells. Although AtFRO4/5 are expressed in the shoot, their role in Cu(II) reduction in the shoot remains unconfirmed. Once in the phloem, Cu transport to sink tissues may involve metallothioneins (MTs), glutathione (GSH) and the Cu chaperone CCH.Bottom panel: Intracellular Cu trafficking. After entering the cytosol, Cu is buffered and distributed by chaperones, ligands, MTs and GSH. At the chloroplast membrane, AtPCH1 delivers Cu to AtHMA1 and AtHMA6, which import Cu into the stroma. There, AtCCS loads Cu onto Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase (AtCSD2). AtHMA8 then transfers Cu into the thylakoid lumen, where plastocyanin (PC) acquires it. AtPHT3 family transporters may deliver Cu to the mitochondria, and AtCOX11, AtCOX17 and AtHCC1 facilitate its insertion into COX. AtCCS also delivers Cu to CSD1 and CSD3, Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase isoforms in the cytosol and peroxisomes, respectively. In the vacuole, excess Cu is stored and exported to the cytosol by AtCOPT5, a tonoplast-localized transporter. ATX1 and CCH deliver Cu to RAN1/AtHMA7 on the ER membrane. RAN1/AtHMA7 interacts with AtSPL7; this interaction is speculated to modulate Cu transfer to ETR via RAN1. AtCCP is proposed to be a nuclear Cu chaperone required for plant immunity. Finally, AtCOPT3 associates with secretory vesicles and may participate in Cu mobilization during reproduction.In the schematic, Cu(I/II) ions are indicated by cyan circles unless otherwise noted. Transporter families are color-coded: CTR/COPT in pink, HMA in green and YSL in yellow. Abbreviations: CC, companion cells; TC, phloem companion cells that de-differentiated into transfer cells; NA, nicotianamine, ER, endoplasmic reticulum; CCS, Cu chaperone for superoxide dismutase; ATX1, antioxidant protein 1; CCH, ATX1-like Cu chaperone; MT, metallothionine; GSH, glutathione; PCH, plastid chaperone 1; PC, plastocyanin. COX, cytochrome c oxidase. ETR1, ethylene response 1. CCP, copper chaperone protein. The figure was created with BioRender.com.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Speculative model for Cu uptake and transport in grass species.This model illustrates potential mechanisms of Cu uptake and internal transport in grasses. Cu(II) uptake from the rhizosphere may involve as-yet unidentified ZIP-like transporters and/or YS1/YSL family members. Cu uptake may also occur via secretion of phytosiderophores, primarily 2′-deoxymugineic acid (DMA), and possibly nicotianamine (NA), through the TOM1-like transporters. The resulting Cu-DMA or Cu-NA complexes can then be imported into root cells via ZmYS1/YSL transporters. A low-affinity Cu uptake system, potentially involving BdCOPT3/4, OsCOPT1/5 and an FRO-type reductase, may also contribute to Cu acquisition directly from the rhizosphere.Once inside the root, Cu is loaded into the xylem by HMA family transporters, including OsHMA5 and possibly OsHMA9 and OsCOPT7. OsHMA4 was identified as a vacuolar Cu importer in rice. The transfer of Cu from xylem to phloem is mediated by BdYSL3 and OsYSL16, both of which facilitate Cu redistribution towards sink tissues. Although the precise mechanisms of Cu unloading into sink organs remain to be elucidated, available evidence suggests that YSL transporters and components of the low-affinity Cu uptake pathway may play a role in this process as well. The figure was created with BioRender.com.

Figure 2

Table 1 A list of FRO-like genes in monocot and dicot model plants. The accession numbers of the FRO-homologs were retrieved from the Arabidopsis Plant Membrane Protein database (Aramemnon) (Schwacke et al., 2003; Schwacke & Flügge, 2018).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Summary of transcriptional Cu deficiency response based on studies in A. thaliana.(A) Cu deficiency responses are triggered by fluctuations in environmental Cu availability and/or developmental cues. The master regulator SPL7 is translocated from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane to the nucleus, where it activates a Cu deficiency response cascade. This includes the induction of CITF1, CITF2, and downstream genes involved in Cu acquisition and Cu economy. CITF1 expression is partially dependent on SPL7 and may also be regulated by yet unidentified transcription factors. SPL7 and CITF1 co-regulate several Cu uptake-related genes, including COPT2, FRO4 and FRO5. The Cu economy is primarily governed by SPL7, and potentially by CITF1. Under Cu-deficient conditions, FeSOD (FSD1) expression is upregulated to substitute for Cu/Zn-SOD, CSD1/2. A set of Cu-responsive microRNAs is also activated to degrade mRNAs encoding Cu-dependent proteins, such as CSD1/2, COX, CSS, Laccases, ARPN and a pair of interacting plantacyanin proteins (plantacyanin [PCY] and senescence-associated gene 14 [SAG14]), thereby reducing overall Cu consumption.(B) Speculative models for AtSPL7/Crr1 Cu status sensing (based on Gayomba et al., 2013; Kropat et al., 2005). Under Cu sufficiency, Cu may replace Zn in the SBP domain in Crr1 and AtSPL7 and/or bind the C-terminal Cys-rich region in Crr1, altering the transcription factor’s structure to prevent binding to the Cu response element (CuRE). Under Cu deficiency, Zn may replace Cu in the SBP domain and/or induce structural changes that promote CuRE binding. Excess of other divalent metal ions (e.g., Cd2+, Ni2+ and Co2+) may mimic Zn function and also facilitate interaction with CuRE. While the Crr1’s Cys-rich domain is not conserved in AtSPL7, the C-terminal half of AtSPL7 contains four potential metal-binding (PMB) sites in addition to multiple Cys and His residues. Their role in metal binding and Cu sensing is yet to be determined. A grey box labelled (TM) in SPL7 indicates the transmembrane domain. The figure was created with BioRender.com.

Author comment: Copper connections: coordinating transport, sensing and systemic signalling in plants — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Dale and Ingo,

Thank you very much for inviting my group to submit a review on copper homeostasis to be included in the special edition on Plant Ion Homeostasis in Quantitative Plant Biology. I apologize for the late submission and would like to thank you for your patience! I also apologize that the review turned out to be lengthier than intended. I hope this is OK. Please find attached our documents for the review entitled “Copper Connections: Coordinating Transport, Sensing, and Systemic Signaling in Plants”. I hope you find the review stimulating, as it not only overviews the existing literature but also taps into less-studied aspects of copper transport in grasses as well as emerging avenues for copper signaling.

Thank you very much,

With kind regards,

Olena

Review: Copper connections: coordinating transport, sensing and systemic signalling in plants — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The authors have made a great effort in summarizing the latest advances in this hot topic; and also, in comparing the differences in the regulation of the Cu homeostasis in dicots and monocots.

I have not found any major mistakes. I would just suggest reviewing the manuscript looking for minor typos.

The figures are specially well selected and designed, with clear and understandable illustrations.

Review: Copper connections: coordinating transport, sensing and systemic signalling in plants — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The review summarizes research on copper homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Despite a few possible improvements, the review is thorough and interesting to the field. However, authors claim in the abstract that they cover Cu homeostasis in grasses, as well as iron and copper interactions. This is not entirely true for the current version. Important literature from rice is missing, such as papers describing OsSPL9 function, the ortholog of AtSPL7 (10.1111/nph.70074 and 10.1093/jxb/erae273); the possible existence of Cu economy in rice (10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.051); papers on transporters involved in Cu homeostasis (10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135245, 10.1038/ncomms12138, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128063), and others. Also, extensive literature on Fe and Cu interaction also exists, and was reviewed elsewhere, but not here. For example, IMA1 and CITF1 are linked to Fe/Cu crosstalk, and mechanistic insight is available for that (10.1111/nph.19439). Transcription factors involved in crosstalk have also been described (10.1093/jxb/erad439). I suggest authors either narrow the scope of the review, or add to these topics.

Other comments:

• Line 42: please make explicit the reason why the Irvine-Williams series explains that.

• Line 97-98: please make sure you check the recent paper by Rober et al (10.1371/journal.pgen.1011796), which shows more clearly a role of ZIP2 in Cu uptake.

• Line 107-109: please make sure you reference the literature on NA having a role in long distance internal transport by binding Fe(II) (maybe you can combine with the next paragraph). The mentioning of chloronerva seems detached, so maybe authors can give more context.

• Line 119-121: the phrasing is not clear. “loss of function phenotype” is not a phenotype – the mutant is a loss of function one (i.e., knockout mutant), but you need to tell which specific phenotype you are referring to (e.g., constitutive chlorosis? High/low Fe or Cu accumulation? Etc). Otherwise “intermediate phenotype” has no meaning (as it would imply “intermediate loss of function”). Please correct.

• Line 168-171: this small paragraph also seems out of context. Please detail a bit more about the chaperones and metallothioneins roles in Cu transport.

• Line 183: please correct brachypodium to italics. Please check other instances as well.

• Line 196-197: please make sure you check the recent paper by Rober et al (10.1371/journal.pgen.1011796), which shows more clearly a role of ZIP2 in Cu uptake.

• Line 279: there is one OsHMA6 described (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2020.01.005). Is it an ortholog of AtHMA6? If yes, please discuss that in this section.

• Line 308: you did not mention OsHMA4, a known vacuolar Cu transporter well characterized in rice (10.1038/ncomms12138 and 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128063).

• Line 335: “the essentiality” should be “and the essentiality” maybe?

• Line 362: “ensure Cu redistribution among essential cellular functions” is unclear. Please rephrase to make clear that this is the Cu economy mode, and that these functions are non-essential, for example.

Recommendation: Copper connections: coordinating transport, sensing and systemic signalling in plants — R0/PR4

Comments

Dear Olena,

your manuscript has now been seen by two reviewers. I apologize for the delay, but reviewers were busy with conferences. Both reviewers are very positive and think that the MS makes a substantial contribution to the field. One reviewer mentioned a few points that might help to polish the MS in a minor revision. Please have a look at their comments and see how you can implement their suggestions. Thank you very much for your valuable contribution to the Research Topic “Quantitative approaches to cellular aspects of plant ion homeostasis”.

Best wishes, Ingo

Decision: Copper connections: coordinating transport, sensing and systemic signalling in plants — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Copper connections: coordinating transport, sensing and systemic signalling in plants — R1/PR6

Comments

Dr. Olivier Hamant

Editor-in-Chief, Quantitative Plant Biology

Dr. Ingo Dreyer

Associate Editor, Quantitative Plant Biology

Dear Olivier and Ingo,

On behalf of my co-authors, I am pleased to submit the revised version of our manuscript entitled “Copper Connections: Coordinating Transport, Sensing, and Systemic Signaling in Plants” for consideration to be included in the special edition on Plant Ion Homeostasis in Quantitative Plant Biology.

We are grateful to both reviewers for their constructive and insightful feedback, which has helped us significantly improve the manuscript. In response:

• We carefully revised the manuscript to incorporate extensive new content on copper homeostasis in rice and other grasses, including recent findings on OsSPL9, Cu economy responses, and several Cu transporters (OsCOPT7, OsHMA4/5/6/9).

• We clarified our scope by removing references to Cu/Fe crosstalk in the abstract and introduction, focusing this review on Cu homeostasis in dicots and monocots. A separate review on Fe/Cu crosstalk is in preparation.

• We addressed all additional specific comments, including clarifying the Irving-Williams series, expanding the discussion of NA in Cu and Fe transport, providing more detail on metallothioneins and Cu chaperones, and updating the manuscript with recent literature.

• Figures were revised accordingly, and the entire text was carefully proofread to correct minor typos and inconsistencies.

• To further strengthen the review, we also expanded the section on Cu in ethylene receptor function and included a new section on Cu in peroxisomal enzymes.

We believe these changes have substantially strengthened the manuscript, making it a more accurate and comprehensive resource for researchers studying copper homeostasis in plants. Point-by-point responses to reviewers' comments are attached.

We thank you for considering our revised submission, and we look forward to your response.

With kind regards,

Olena

Recommendation: Copper connections: coordinating transport, sensing and systemic signalling in plants — R1/PR7

Comments

Dear Olena,

thank you for the careful revision of your manuscript and thanks again for your valuable contribution to the Research Topic “Quantitative approaches to cellular aspects of plant ion homeostasis”. It is highly appreciated.

Best regards, Ingo

Decision: Copper connections: coordinating transport, sensing and systemic signalling in plants — R1/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.