2. Simulation Parameters

Two-dimensional and three-dimensional numerical simulations of the interaction between laser and under-dense plasma were carried out by particle-in-cell (PIC) code EPOCH [Reference Arber, Bennett and Brady19]. In 2D simulations: the size of simulation box is $100{\lambda }_0\times 100{\lambda }_0,$ and the mesh number is 1600 × 800, where ${\lambda }_0=1\mu m$ is the wavelength of incident laser in vacuum. The number of macroparticles is 5120000. The fully ionized plasma is located at $20{\lambda }_0\le x\le 100{\lambda }_0,$ and the density is $n_e=1.2\times {10}^{18}{\text{cm}}^{-3}\times \left(1\mu m/\lambda \right)$ . The initial intensity of the laser pulse is $I=\left(6\times {10}^{19}W/{\text{cm}}^2\right)\times \left({\left(1\mu m/{\lambda }_0\right)}^2\right)$ , corresponding to the dimensionless amplitude $a=e{E}_0/\omega m_{e}c=6.62,$ which propagates forward along the x-axis and is linearly polarized along the y-axis, the full width at half maximum of the transverse focal spot is 10μm, and the FWHM of the pulse width is $35fs=10.5T_0$ . $\omega$ is the laser frequency, e and m_e denote the charge and mass of the electron, E ₀ is the amplitude of the laser electric field, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and T ₀ is the laser period. The ions are assumed as stationary, that is, the mass ratio of ion to electron is $m_i/m_e⟶\infty .$

The wakefield and bow wave can be observed in a wide range of parameters. Parameters in the three-dimensional simulation are as follows: the size of the simulation box is $22{\lambda }_0\times 30{\lambda }_0\times 30{\lambda }_0,$ and the mesh number is 660 × 900 × 900. The number of macroparticles is $5.35\times {10}^8$ . The fully ionized plasma is distributed in the whole simulation space with the density of $n_e=5.7\times {10}^{18}{\text{cm}}^{-3}\times \left(1\mu m/\lambda \right).$ The initial intensity of the laser pulse is $I=\left(9\times {10}^{19}W/{\text{cm}}^2\right)\times \left({\left(1\mu m/{\lambda }_0\right)}^2\right)$ , corresponding to the dimensionless amplitude $a=e{E}_0/\omega m_{e}c=8.1,$ which propagates forward along the x-axis and is linearly polarized along the y-axis, the FWHM transverse focal spot is 6.7μm, and the FWHM pulse duration is $16.65fs=5T_0$ .

3. Simulation Results and Analysis

When the laser pulse enters the plasma region, a strong wakefield will be excited. Under the ponderomotive force and electromagnetic force of the laser field, electrons will be expelled to all directions to form a bubble structure without electrons inside, as shown in the electron density distribution in Figure 1. The electric field not only pushes the electrons in the longitudinal direction but also pushes the electrons in the transverse direction, forming bow waves on both sides of the wakefield.

Figure 1:

The electron density distribution at 24T ₀.

For the wakefield and bow wave, two-dimensional simulation is launched for further analysis. The electron density distribution is shown in Figures 2(a)–2(d). Figures 2(b) and 2(c) show the distribution of electron density along the dotted line x = 63μm and y = 14μm in Figure 2(a), respectively. The electron number density at the bow wave reaches $9\times {10}^{18}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ . The electron density of the bow wave increases gradually along the +x direction and reaches the maximum at the joining part of the bow wave and the wakefield. At this time $\left(78T_0\right),$ the peak electron number density is about $4\times {10}^{19}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ , which is much higher than the density at the bottom of the wakefield, reaching more than 30 times the initial electron density. The ultra-dense electron layer at the joining part of the bow wave and wake wave has a velocity close to the speed of light. It can be used as a creative “flying mirror” to reflect laser pulses. According to the coherent Doppler effect, the frequency of the reflected laser pulse will be upshifted by 4γ ², where $\gamma =1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}$ , v is the velocity of the electron layer, and c is the speed of light in vacuum [Reference Bulanov, Esirkepov, Kando, Pirozhkov and Rosanov20–Reference Mu, Li, Zeng, Chen, Sheng and Zhang22]. As shown in Figures 2(e) and 2(f), the distribution area of longitudinal electric field E_x is much larger than that of wakefield cavity. Thus, the potential is not limited by the wake cavity size.

Figure 2:

2D simulation results at 78T ₀. (a)–(d) Electron density distribution in the (x, y) plane, (b) and (c) are the distributions along the dashed lines x = 63 μm and y = 14 μm in (a), (d) is the distribution with the number density shown in z-axis, and (e) and (f) are the longitudinal transverse electric fields, respectively, in the (x, y) plane.

The longitudinal and transverse electron momentum is shown in Figure 3. Due to transverse wave breaking, the electrons move outwards transversely, increasing the potential in the wakefield. Therefore, wake breaking is mainly aroused by the self-generated electrostatic field in the wakefield caused by the tightly focused laser [Reference Bulanov, Pegoraro, Pukhov and Sakharov23]. The bow wave is piled up by the electrons directly accelerated by the laser ponderomotive force. When the laser enters the plasma, the electrons move forward and at the same time transversely to both sides continuously, gradually increasing the area of bow wave. Unlike the wake wave cavity easily being destroyed by electron injection, the properties of the bow wave are usually stable, as the laser propagates.

Figure 3:

Longitudinal (a, c) and transverse (b, d) electron momentum at 42T ₀ and 78T ₀.

The structures of the wake waves and bow waves produced by different laser and plasma parameters are shown in Figure 4. The laser with higher intensity generates stronger ponderomotive force $F_p=-e^2/4m_e{\omega }^2\nabla E^2$ . Therefore, with more intense laser, larger number of electrons will be expelled to the transverse sides, under larger ponderomotive force. As a result, the angle θ between the bow wave and the wake wave boundary is larger. The longitudinal length of the wake wave cavity is larger due to stronger electrostatic field and ponderomotive force, as shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b). Denser plasma will repress the effect of ponderomotive force, resulting in shorter wake wave cavity and larger angle θ, as shown in Figures 4(c) and 4(d).

Figure 4:

Electron density distribution with respect to laser intensity of (a) $3\times {10}^{19}W/c{m}^2$ and (b) $1.2\times {10}^{20}W/{\text{cm}}^2$ , plasma density of (c) $6\times {10}^{17}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ and (d) $2.4\times {10}^{18}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ , and laser focal spot size of (e) 8μm and (f) 20μm (g) without preplasma and (h) with preplasma at 78T ₀.

The laser focal spot size is 8μm and 20μm, and the latter is closer to the matched spot size of a self-focused laser $w_0=2\sqrt{a_0}/k_p=25\mu m$ . Here $k_p=\sqrt{n_e{e}^2/m_e\epsilon }/c$ , where ε is the vacuum dielectric constant. The laser intensity hardly decays during the simulation with spot size of 20μm [Reference Lu, Tzoufras and Joshi24]. The electrostatic field is stronger and ponderomotive force is smaller, as shown in Figures 4(e) and 4(f). The preplasma can restrain the wave breaking and increase the energy of transverse ponderomotive force, so the distribution range of the bow wave in transverse direction is larger.

Laser and plasma parameters play important roles in the structure and distribution of wake wave and bow wave, as well as the electron momentum. The transverse momentum distribution of electrons is shown in Figure 5. Increasing laser intensity will directly enhance the laser ponderomotive force and thus increase the transverse momentum of electron in wakefield and bow wave. Increasing electron density will lead to immature electron injection. The longitudinal momentum of the injected electron increases sharply, while the transverse and longitudinal momentum of the electron at the bow wave decreases. The focal spot size of the laser increases from 8μm to 20μm, closer to the matched laser self-focusing radius. The laser with larger spot size makes the normalized electric field amplitude increase from $a_0=4.58$ to $a_0=6.58$ , enhancing the wakefield and bow wave, as well as the electron momentum.

Figure 5:

Electron momentum distribution with respect to laser intensity of (a) $3\times {10}^{19}W/{\text{cm}}^2$ and (b) $1.2\times {10}^{20}W/{\text{cm}}^2$ , plasma density of (c) $6\times {10}^{17}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ and (d) $2.4\times {10}^{18}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ , and laser focal spot size of (e)8μm and (f)20μm (g) without consideration of preplasma and (h) linear increasing preplasma at 78T ₀.

By changing the laser intensity, plasma density, laser focal spot size, and length of preplasma, the effects of laser and plasma parameters on the structure, density, and electron momentum of the bow wave are further studied. The bow wave can be produced within a wide range of parameters, but sometimes it is difficult to distinguish because it is located near the wake wave. It is found that the angle θ of the bow wave to the boundary of wake wave cavity is closely related to laser parameters such as laser intensity and focal spot radius. With higher laser intensity, θ increases obviously and the bow wave structure is easier to observe, as shown in Figures 4(a), 4(b), and 6(a). When the laser focal spot radius increases from 8μm to 20μm, it is closer to the matched radius of the wakefield acceleration, and the wakefield energy and electron momentum are enhanced, but the angle θ between the bow wave and the wakefield wall decreases, as shown in Figures 4(e), 4(f), and 6(c). When the laser focal spot is reduced to 5μm, with the propagation of the laser, the laser will be defocused. With a ₀ becoming smaller, θ decreases sharply and the shape of the bow wave becomes irregular. With increasing plasma density from $6\times {10}^{17}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ to $2.4\times {10}^{18}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ , the angle θ decreases gradually, as shown in Figures 5(c), 5(d), and 6(b). When the preplasma is introduced, the angle θ is increased, as shown in Figures 5(g), 5(h), and 6(d).

Figure 6:

The evolution of the angle between the wake wave cavity wall and the bow wave with respect to the laser and plasma parameters. (a)–(d) correspond to the influence of laser intensity, plasma density, laser spot size, and the length of preplasma.

As the laser interacts with the plasma, the electrons pile up to form the wake wave, and the electron transverse momentum increases. After the whole laser pulse entered the plasma and the wake wave cavity is completely formed, the transverse momentum of the electron decreases slowly, as shown in Figure 7. With the increase of laser intensity and focal spot radius, the transverse momentum of electrons increases significantly, enlarging the bow wave area. When the plasma density increases from $6\times {10}^{17}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ to $2.4\times {10}^{18}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ , the transverse momentum and longitudinal momentum of electron decrease correspondingly until electron injection occurs. When the laser focal spot increases, the transverse momentum of electron decreases more slowly. With a FWHM focal spot size of w ₀ = 20μm, approximately equal to self-focusing matched size, the electron transverse momentum does not decay with time. The preplasma makes the laser interact with plasma earlier, and after the whole laser pulse entered the plasma, the electron transverse momentum is no longer influenced.

Figure 7:

The evolution of the electron transverse momentum with respect to the laser and plasma parameters.

The electron density of the bow wave increases near the front and central area. A density peak is generated at the joining part of the bow wave and the wake cavity wall. The peak density fluctuates with time, but the overall trend is positively correlated with laser intensity and plasma density, as shown in Figures 8(a) and 8(b). This effect gets saturated when the laser intensity is over $1.2\times {10}^{20}\text{W}/\text{c}{\text{m}}^{-2}$ and when the density exceeds $2.4\times {10}^{18}{\text{cm}}^{-3}$ . The peak density of the bow wave has no correlation with the size of the laser focal spot and the length of the preplasma, but when the laser focal spot is too small for the self-focusing effect, laser defocusing causes the density peak to decrease, as shown in Figures 8(c) and 8(d).

Figure 8:

The evolution of the electron peak density of the bow wave with respect to the laser and plasma parameters.