Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-r8qmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T09:28:31.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hedonic Vices: Fixing Inferences about Willingness to Pay in Recent House-Value Studies1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

John Yinger  and
Phuong Nguyen-Hoang
John Yinger*
Affiliation:
Economics and Public Administration, The Maxwell School, Syracuse University, NY 13244, USA, e-mail: jyinger@maxwell.syr.edu
Phuong Nguyen-Hoang
Affiliation:
School of Urban and Regional Planning, Public Policy Center, University of Iowa, IA 52242, USA
*
*e-mail: jyinger@maxwell.syr.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A key tool for studying the demand for neighborhood amenities and estimating the benefits from amenity improvements is a regression of house value on amenity levels, controlling for housing characteristics. Several scholars have developed methods to address the methodological challenges, such as endogeneity, faced by these “hedonic” regressions. Unfortunately, however, some recent studies neglect basic principles of hedonic estimation in Rosen [(1974). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82 (1), 34–55]. After providing conceptual background, this article explains these hedonic “vices” and how to avoid them. We focus on inappropriate functional forms, inappropriate control variables, and misinterpretation of hedonic regression results. Our analysis is supported using data from the Cleveland area in 2000 and a simulation model.

Keywords

H75R2capitalizationhedonicshouse valuesneighborhood amenitiesschool quality

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Summer 2016 , pp. 248 - 291
Copyright
© Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Soren T. & West, Sarah E. (2006). Open Space, Residential Property Values, and Spatial Context. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(6), 773–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselin, Luc & Lozano-Gracia, Nancy (2008). Errors in Variables and Spatial Effects in Hedonic House Price Models of Ambient Air Quality. Empirical Economics, 34(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajari, Patrick, Fruehwirth, Jane C., Kim, Kyoo I. & Timmins, Christopher (2012). A Rational Expectations Approach to Hedonic Price Regressions with Time-Varying Unobserved Product Attributes: The Price of Pollution. American Economic Review, 102(5), 1898–1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajari, Patrick & Kahn, Matthew E. (2005). Estimating Housing Demand with an Application to Explaining Racial Segregation in Cities. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 23(1), 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartik, Timothy J. (1988). Measuring the Benefits of Amenity Improvements in Hedonic Price Models. Land Economics, 64(2), 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Patrick, Casey, Marcus D., Ferreira, Fernando & McMillan, Robert(2012). Estimating Racial Price Differentials in the Housing Market. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 18069. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Patrick, Ferreira, Fernando & McMillan, Robert (2007). A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods. Journal of Political Economy, 115(4), 588–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Sandra E. (1999). Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogin, Alexander & Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong (2014). Property Left Behind: An Unintended Consequence of a No Child Left Behind ‘Failing’ School Designation. Journal of Regional Science, 54(5), 788–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasington, David M. (2002). The Demand for Local Public Goods: The Case of Public School Quality. Public Finance Review, 30(3), 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasington, David M. & Haurin, Donald R. (2006). Educational Outcomes and House Values: A Test of the Value-Added Approach. Journal of Regional Science, 46(2), 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasington, David M. & Hite, Diane (2005). Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(1), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasington, David M. & Hite, Diane (2008). A Mixed Index Approach to Identifying Hedonic Price Models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(3), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Richard V. (1982). The Specification of Hedonic Indexes for Urban Housing. Land Economics, 58(1), 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chay, Kenneth Y. & Greenstone, Michael (2005). Does Air Quality Matter? Evidence from the Housing Market. Journal of Political Economy, 113(2), 376–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, John M., Nanda, Anupam & Ross, Stephen L. (2008). Which School Attributes Matter? The Influence of School District Performance and Demographic Composition on Property Values. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropper, Maureen L., Deck, Leland B. & McConnell, Kenneth E. (1988). On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Functions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(4), 668–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhar, Paramita & Ross, Stephen L. (2012). School District Quality and Property Values: Examining Differences along School District Boundaries. Journal of Urban Economics, 71(1), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, Thomas A. & Zabel, Jeffrey E. (2002). The Impact of School Characteristics on House Prices: Chicago 1987–1991. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epple, Dennis (1987). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Estimating Demand and Supply Functions for Differentiated Products. Journal of Political Economy, 95(1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epple, Dennis, Peress, Michael & Sieg, Holger (2010). Identification and Semiparametric Estimation of Equilibrium Models of Local Jurisdictions. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(4), 195–220.Google Scholar
Epple, Dennis, Romer, Thomas & Sieg, Holger (2001). Interjurisdictional Sorting and Majority Rule: An Empirical Analysis. Econometrica, 69(6), 1437–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epple, Dennis & Sieg, Holger (1999). Estimating Equilibrium Models of Local Jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy, 107(4), 645–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fack, Gabrielle & Grenet, Julien (2010). When Do Better Schools Raise Housing Prices? Evidence from Paris Public and Private Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1–2), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figlio, David N. & Lucas, Maurice E. (2004). What’s in a Grade? School Report Cards and the Housing Market. American Economic Review, 94(3), 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Stephen & Machin, Stephen (2003). Valuing English Primary Schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(2), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Stephen & Machin, Stephen (2006). Paying for Primary Schools: Admission Constraints, School Popularity or Congestion? Economic Journal, 116(510), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Stephen, Machin, Stephen & Silva, Olmo (2013). Valuing School Quality Using Boundary Discontinuities. Journal of Urban Economics, 75(May), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Allen C. (2002). Estimating Equilibrium Housing Demand for ‘Stayers’. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, Philip E. (2012). Benefit-Cost Analysis of Environmental Projects: A Plethora of Biases Understating Net Benefits. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 3(3), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorsen, Robert & Pollakowski, Henry O. (1981). Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Equations. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(1), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, John P., Rosenthal, Stuart S. & Sirmans, C. F. (2003). Estimating Bargaining Power in the Market for Existing Homes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihlanfeldt, Keith & Mayock, Tom (2009). Price Discrimination in the Housing Market. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(2), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannides, Yannis M. (2004). Neighborhood Income Distributions. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(3), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Elena G. & Bockstael, Nancy E. (2001). The Problem of Identifying Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 698–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Thomas J., Riegg, Stephanie K. & Staiger, Douglas O. (2006). School Quality, Neighborhoods, and Housing Prices. American Law and Economics Review, 8(2), 183–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeler, Theodore E. (1974). Railroad Costs, Returns to Scale, and Excess Capacity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(2), 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Chong Won, Phipps, Tim T. & Anselin, Luc (2003). Measuring the Benefits of Air Quality Improvement: A Spatial Hedonic Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(1), 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krautmann, Anthony C. & Solow, John L. (1988). Economies of Scale in Nuclear Power Generation. Southern Economic Journal, 55(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuminoff, Nicolai V. & Jarrah, Abdul Salam (2010). A New Approach to Computing Hedonic Equilibria and Investigating the Properties of Locational Sorting Models. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(3), 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuminoff, Nicolai V., Parmeter, Christopher F. & Pope, Jaren C. (2010). Which Hedonic Models Can We Trust to Recover the Marginal Willingness to Pay for Environmental Amenities? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(3), 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuminoff, Nicolai V. & Pope, Jaren C. (2014). Do ‘Capitalization Effects’ for Public Goods Reveal the Public’s Willingness to Pay? International Economic Review, 55(4), 1227–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, Jeffrey T. (1986). The Structure of Constant Elasticity Demand Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(3), 543–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong & Yinger, John (2011). The Capitalization of School Quality into House Values: A Review. Journal of Housing Economics, 20(1), 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Raymond B. (1984). Estimating the Demand for the Characteristics of Housing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Raymond B. & Israngkura, Adis (1999). Valuing Air Quality With Hedonic and Discrete Choice Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(5), 1128–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ready, Richard C. & Abdalla, Charles W. (2005). The Amenity and Disamenity Impacts of Agriculture: Estimates from a Hedonic Pricing Model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 314–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, John & Somerville, Tsur (2010). School Quality and Residential Property Values: Evidence from Vancouver Rezoning. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 928–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robidoux, Benoît & Lester, John (1992). Econometric Estimates of Scale Economies in Canadian Manufacturing. Applied Economics, 24(1), 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Sherwin (1974). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Leslie (2003). The Value of Secondary School Quality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Stephen & Yinger, John (1999). Sorting and Voting: A Review of the Literature on Urban Public Finance. In Cheshire, Paul & Mills, Edwin S. (Eds.), Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 2001–2060). North Holland.Google Scholar
Rouwendal, Jan (1992). The Hedonic Price Function as an Envelope of Bid Functions: An Exercise in Applied Economic Theory. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 7(1), 59–80.Google Scholar
Smith, V. Kerry, Sieg, Holger, Spencer Banzhaf, H. & Walsh, Randall P. (2004). General Equilibrium Benefits for Environmental Improvements: Projected Ozone Reductions under EPA’s Prospective Analysis for the Los Angeles Air Basin. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(3), 559–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Laura (2008). Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Developments in Hedonic Modeling. In Baranzini, Andrea, Ramirez, José, Schaerer, Caroline & Thalmann, Philippe (Eds.), Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets: Pricing Environmental Amenities and Segregation (pp. 15–37). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, Geoffrey K. & Sirmans, C. F. (1993). Information, Search, and House Prices. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 23(4), 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yinger, John (2014). Hedonic Estimates of Neighborhood Ethnic Preferences. Public Finance Review, February. doi:10.1177/1091142113520562.Google Scholar
Yinger, John (2015a). Hedonic Equilibria in Housing Markets: The Case of One-to-One Matching. Journal of Housing Economics, 29, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yinger, John (2015b). Hedonic Markets and Sorting Equilibria: Bid-Function Envelopes for Public Services and Neighborhood Amenities. Journal of Urban Economics, 86, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabel, Jeffrey E.(2008). Using Hedonic Models to Measure Racial Discrimination and Prejudice in the U.S. Housing Market. In Andrea Baranzini, José Ramirez, Caroline Schaerer & Philippe Thalmann (Eds.), Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets: Pricing Environmental Amenities and Segregation. (1st ed.). (pp. 177–201). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Zabel, Jeffrey E. & Kiel, Katherine A. (2000). Estimating the Demand for Air Quality in Four U.S. Cities. Land Economics, 76(2), 174–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar