Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-l4t7p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T03:23:06.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Retrieving important mass-balance model parameters from AWS measurements and high-resolution mesoscale atmospheric modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Thomas Mölg
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany E-mail: thomas.moelg@uibk.ac.at
Dieter Scherer
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany E-mail: thomas.moelg@uibk.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Actual accumulation recorded by the sonic ranging sensor (black), and water equivalent precipitation simulated by the atmospheric model (gray, here LAM-1), in April 2006 near the summit of Kilimanjaro. (a) Accumulated daily data. (b) Daily precipitation non-dimensionalized by the respective mean value; numbers in the plot indicate selected daily events, and horizontal bars below the x-axis localize wet spells.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Hourly 2 m air temperature versus the fraction of solid precipitation (snow + graupel + hail) on the lowermost atmospheric model layer in the April 2006 simulation (LAM-1). (b) Different statistics of the data in (a) for air-temperature bins of 0.5°C width. Analysis for altitudes above 4000 ma.s.l. in the innermost LAM domain.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Histogram of solid precipitation fraction in the 2 m air- temperature interval -2 to 1.5°C. Numbers inside bars show percentile 20 and 80 of the 2 m relative humidity (RH2m) for the two dominant classes at the tails, which suggests a separation threshold of 97% relative humidity.