Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T06:47:18.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Retrieving important mass-balance model parameters from AWS measurements and high-resolution mesoscale atmospheric modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Thomas Mölg
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany E-mail: thomas.moelg@uibk.ac.at
Dieter Scherer
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany E-mail: thomas.moelg@uibk.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2012

Physically based distributed mass-balance models (e.g. Reference Kayastha, Ohata and AgetaKayastha and others, 1999; Reference Klok and OerlemansKlok and Oerlemans, 2002; Reference Mölg, Cullen, Hardy, Winkler and KaserMölg and others, 2009) are our most important tools for understanding observed glacier mass change and attributing this change to particular causes. Like all process-oriented models, they require many parameters that control the specific processes simulated. Among these, two critical but poorly constrained parameters are the density, ρsp, and the temperature threshold, TTsp, of solid precipitation on glaciers. The latter specifies at what ambient air temperatures precipitation turns from solid into liquid water. In the literature, both parameters are usually associated with fresh snowfall, although, precisely speaking, they also need to incorporate other solid forms of precipitation, such as graupel, which occurs frequently during convective precipitation events on glaciers (e.g. Reference Mölg and KaserMölg and Kaser, 2011). These two parameters exert a major control on the accumulation term in a mass-balance model, and on ablation as well through the snowfall-albedo link. Typically ρsp can only be measured on special occasions, i.e. when solid precipitation occurs during fieldwork. Measurements of TTsp from remote sites are for the most part unavailable. Unfortunately, uncertainty in these two parameters may significantly affect model results (e.g. Reference Reijmer and HockReijmer and Hock, 2008; Reference Mölg, Cullen, Hardy, Winkler and KaserMölg and others, 2009).

In a recent paper, Reference Mölg and KaserMölg and Kaser (2011) showed for the first time that the atmospheric surface layer over a small mountain glacier can be explicitly resolved in a numerical limited-area atmospheric model (LAM), which captures synoptic-scale atmosphere-ocean dynamics in its computational domain. They also showed that the simulated surface layer conditions can be applied successfully as input to a physically based distributed mass-balance model, eliminating the need for statistical downscaling. This approach opens many prospects for questions on multi-scale linkages in the climate system and on climate-glacier relations. Apart from these big topics, however, we argue that the output from such high-resolution LAMs also serves as a valuable addition to glaciological field programs, in order to improve local cryospheric modeling. In this brief note we demonstrate the determination of the parameters ρsp and TTsp from a fully physical framework as represented by a LAM, in combination with routine field measurements. Thus, we aim to introduce a new approach for constraining uncertain parameters more objectively in future mass-balance modeling studies, which is of potential interest whenever automatic weather station (AWS) and LAM data are available.

Data Sources

In contrast to rare measurements of ρsp, glacier surface height change is nowadays recorded continuously on most AWSs at remote glacier sites, using an ultrasonic ranging sensor (e.g. Reference Hardy, Vuille and BradleyHardy and others 2003; Reference Van den Broeke, Reijmer and Van de WalVan den Broeke and others, 2004). Interpreting its data - the actual height change - is not trivial, but usually reliable on a daily or greater timescale (Reference Hardy, Vuille and BradleyHardy and others, 2003). Here we use the quality-controlled daily sonic ranger data from the top of Kersten Glacier, Kilimanjaro, East Africa, where processes other than precipitation (e.g. snowdrift) have little and infrequent impact on the sensor’s accumulation signal (Reference Mölg, Cullen, Hardy, Winkler and KaserMölg and others, 2009). Using the short interval of 1 day helps to ensure that measured surface-height increases primarily reflect precipitation, rather than net accumulation over time (cf. Fig. 6 in Reference Hardy, Vuille and BradleyHardy and others, 2003).

We also consider the output from LAM runs for the same mountain from Reference Mölg and KaserMölg and Kaser (2011) who achieved a spatial resolution of 812 m by multiple grid nesting. This setup adequately resolves the glacierized altitudes on Kilimanjaro, and successfully reproduces the high-altitude meteorological conditions recorded by an AWS on Kersten Glacier. Reference Mölg and KaserMölg and Kaser (2011) discuss the quality of the LAM output in detail. Their assessment includes simulated precipitation at the AWS, which was found to perform well in mass-balance calculations. LAM data are available for a month of the region’s rainy season, April 2006, which is the only simulation period with frequent precipitation events on the glacier. To account for LAM errors and uncertainties, three further runs with slightly changed settings (two concerning initial soil moisture, one a different land surface model) are considered in the present study and were conducted by Reference Mölg, Grosshauser, Hemp, Hofer and MarzeionMölg and others (2012). Therefore, we analyze in total four April 2006 simulations, henceforth LAM-1 to LAM-4.

Density Of Solid Precipitation

In mass-balance models, ρsp is required to convert sonic ranger-derived input data to mass or, vice versa, to convert water equivalent input to actual height changes. Assuming that cumulative precipitation is reliably simulated by the LAM, which is justified here (see ‘Data sources’ above), and therefore that the total accumulation height recorded by the sonic ranger reflects total LAM precipitation, the mean monthly ρsp can be determined (Fig. 1a). Accounting for four LAM runs and assuming ±10% uncertainty in the sonic ranging sensor, which is more pessimistic than its nominal accuracy of 0.01m, yields 269 ± 23kgm-3 (1σ). This estimate is in good agreement with the ˜250kg m-3 obtained by 2 year long measurements on tropical Glaciar Zongo, Bolivia (Reference Sicart, Ribstein, Chazarin and BerthierSicart and others, 2002). These measurements represent one of the few datasets where a sonic ranger and a precipitation gauge were operated simultaneously, in order to determine the density of the actual precipitation height directly from field data. Precipitation at relatively high air temperatures (Reference Sicart, Ribstein, Chazarin and BerthierSicart and others, 2002) and significant amounts of graupel in addition to snow (Reference Mölg and KaserMölg and Kaser, 2011) may cause the high mean ρsp at low latitudes. At mid- and high latitudes, mean ρsp can be <100 kg m-3 (e.g. Reference Judson and DoeskenJudson and Doesken, 2000).

Fig. 1. Actual accumulation recorded by the sonic ranging sensor (black), and water equivalent precipitation simulated by the atmospheric model (gray, here LAM-1), in April 2006 near the summit of Kilimanjaro. (a) Accumulated daily data. (b) Daily precipitation non-dimensionalized by the respective mean value; numbers in the plot indicate selected daily events, and horizontal bars below the x-axis localize wet spells.

As the typical rainy-season pattern appears in both the sonic ranger record and LAM output, i.e. a succession of wet and dry spells (slopes and plateaus in Fig. 1a, respectively), we can also explore the possibility of inferring ρsp on an event basis. For this exercise, we only consider days where the non-dimensional difference between the two data sources (Fig. 1b) is <20%. LAM-1 contributes 3 days (indicated in Fig. 1b), and eight more qualify from the other three LAM runs. The resultant daily ρsp ranges between 230 and 329 kg m-3, and obvious correlations exist with simulated mean daily wind speed at 10m (V10) and air temperature at screen level (T2m) on Kersten Glacier, -0.44 and 0.47 respectively. In a multiple linear regression, these two variables explain 36% of the variance in daily ρsp. Due to the small data sample (n = 11 days) the correlations are not significant, but they indicate the potential to develop parameterizations of ρsp from variables readily measured by an AWS (near-surface wind speed and air temperature) in the future, when longer-term high-resolution LAM simulations will be available. Performing the same exercise with clusters of wet days as events (horizontal bars below x-axis in Fig. 1b), or with anomalies of ρsp , V10 and T2m, did not lead to other insights.

Temperature threshold of solid precipitation

For distributed mass-balance modeling, the input record of total precipitation is usually distributed across the glacier by an air-temperature threshold that separates solid from liquid precipitation (e.g. Reference Klok and OerlemansKlok and Oerlemans, 2002) or by two such thresholds between which the solid vs liquid fraction is linearly interpolated (e.g. Reference Reijmer and HockReijmer and Hock, 2008). The input should therefore always be all-phase precipitation. Some authors have also incorporated relative humidity in the distribution algorithm (e.g. Reference Kayastha, Ohata and AgetaKayastha and others, 1999). In general, the methodology and choice of thresholds vary widely between studies. LAM output provides a physical constraint for the temporal resolutions at which process- based mass-balance models are run (≤1 hour). Although the simulated hydrometeor species in LAMs are a three-dimensional field, we only look at the lowest layer directly above the terrain (here ˜58 m) since the altitude separating rain and snow can be hundreds of meters higher in the free air upwind than on the mountainside (Reference Minder, Durran and RoeMinder and others, 2011).

In Figure 2 we consider the mountain section from 4000 ma.s.l. to the peak of Kilimanjaro (5573 ma.s.l. in the LAM), to ensure the temperature range for the analysis is large enough. The hourly relation between T2m and the fraction of solid precipitation shows expected scatter (Fig. 2a), but also reveals that values are concentrated near 100% or at 0% (81% of all points lie above the 90% or below the 10% fraction). The analysis by temperature bins (Fig. 2b) suggests that linear interpolation is reasonable if mean values are considered, here in a T2m range from -4°C to +4°C for the full transition from solid to liquid precipitation. This range is larger than what is considered in most mass-balance model studies. It should not be regarded as site-specific, though, but rather representative of convective precipitation events. For example, the transition zone at mid-latitude shows a similarly broad range during convective events (e.g. Reference Liu and MoncrieffLiu and Moncrieff, 2007).

Fig. 2. (a) Hourly 2 m air temperature versus the fraction of solid precipitation (snow + graupel + hail) on the lowermost atmospheric model layer in the April 2006 simulation (LAM-1). (b) Different statistics of the data in (a) for air-temperature bins of 0.5°C width. Analysis for altitudes above 4000 ma.s.l. in the innermost LAM domain.

However, Figure 2b also demonstrates that for temperature bins -2_C to 1.5_C the mean is not a good representation of the data sample, since the distributions are strongly U-shaped (the percentiles 25 and 75 closely approximate the y-axis minimum and maximum, respectively). A step-like transition from solid to liquid precipitation, here at -1°C where the mode switches (Fig. 2b), could therefore also be argued for. For this approach the T2m interval with the U-distribution is problematic, but we find that relative humidity at screen level is an effective predictor for the actual tail of the distribution at the resolved timescale (Fig. 3). Thus the parameterization of precipitation phase from T2m alone is not straightforward, which is consistent with the complexity of mesoscale dynamical processes that control the snow-rain transition in mountains (Reference Minder, Durran and RoeMinder and others, 2011). Hence, different approaches and their sensitivity characteristics should be considered in mass- balance model uncertainty determinations. Figures 2 and 3 are from LAM-1 output, but LAM-2 to LAM-4 outputs provide a consistent result.

Fig. 3. Histogram of solid precipitation fraction in the 2 m air- temperature interval -2 to 1.5°C. Numbers inside bars show percentile 20 and 80 of the 2 m relative humidity (RH2m) for the two dominant classes at the tails, which suggests a separation threshold of 97% relative humidity.

Concluding remarks and outlook

Running mesoscale atmospheric models at high spatial resolutions (order 101-102m) is common in weather research and dynamic meteorology, but not established in glaciological research. One exception is the use of high- resolution LAMs in ‘local’ set-up (i.e. one domain and forcing by local atmospheric profiles from the upstream zone) for studying local winds and snow distribution (Reference Lehning, Lowe, Ryser and RadeschallLehning and others, 2008). Resolving mountain glaciers and their atmospheric surface layer explicitly in LAMs that downscale large-scale climate dynamics to local meteorological conditions, on the other hand, is a recent development and can drastically improve our understanding of multi-scale linkages in the climate system (Reference Mölg and KaserMölg and Kaser, 2011). Besides this, the output from such simulations provides a great opportunity to constrain glacier model parameters in a way that is consistent with the region’s synoptic-scale dynamics and governing physical processes across the scales.

Here we have demonstrated the potential of this approach for the density and temperature threshold of solid precipitation on glaciers, which are often ‘best-guess’ values in mass-balance studies. Other candidate parameters include altitudinal gradients of meteorological variables (Reference Mölg and KaserMölg and Kaser, 2011). For our chosen parameters, the sonic ranger measurements must primarily reflect precipitation and not other processes like wind drift or avalanche activity. Therefore, field experience is indispensable to evaluate what the sonic ranger signal is recording (Reference Hardy, Vuille and BradleyHardy and others, 2003). If this experience exists, however, routine measurements together with high-resolution atmospheric modeling are a powerful combination for improving cryospheric studies in all climate zones of the Earth. We should therefore increasingly run atmospheric models in addition to on-site measurements, or seek expert collaboration, as one way of reducing parameter uncertainty in glacier mass-balance models.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. The comments of Regine Hock and an anonymous reviewer helped to clarify the paper.

4 March 2012

References

Hardy, DR, Vuille, M and Bradley, RS (2003) Variability of snow accumulation and isotopic composition on Nevado Sajama, Bolivia. J. Geophys. Res, 108(D22), 4693 (doi: 10.1029/ 2003JD003623)Google Scholar
Judson, A and Doesken, N (2000) Density of freshly fallen snow in the central Rocky Mountains. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc, 81(7), 1577-1587 (doi: 10.1 175/1520-0477(2000)081<1577: DOFFSI>2.3.CO;2)2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayastha, RB, Ohata, T and Ageta, Y (1999) Application of a mass-balance model to a Himalayan glacier. J. Glaciol., 45(151), 559-567 Google Scholar
Klok, EJ and Oerlemans, J (2002) Model study of the spatial distribution of the energy and mass balance of Morteratsch- gletscher, Switzerland. J. Glaciol., 48(163), 505-518 (doi: 10.3189/172756502781831133)Google Scholar
Lehning, M, Lowe, H, Ryser, M and Radeschall, N (2008) Inhomogeneous precipitation distribution and snow transport in steep terrain. Water Resour. Res., 44(W7), W07404 (doi: 10.1029/ 2007WR006545)Google Scholar
Liu, C and Moncrieff, MW (2007) Sensitivity of cloud-resolving simulations of warm-season convection to cloud microphysics parameterizations. Mon. Weather Rev, 135(8), 2854-2868 (doi: 10.1175/MWR3437.1)Google Scholar
Minder, JR, Durran, DR and Roe, JH (2011) Mesoscale controls on the mountainside snow line. J. Atmos. Sci., 68(9), 2107-2127 (doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-10-05006.1)Google Scholar
Mölg, T and Kaser, G (2011) A new approach to resolving climate- cryosphere relations: downscaling climate dynamics to glacier-scale mass and energy balance without statistical scale linking. J. Geophys. Res., 116(D16), D16101 (doi: 10.1029/ 2011JD015669)Google Scholar
Mölg, T, Cullen, NJ, Hardy, DR, Winkler, M and Kaser, G (2009) Quantifying climate change in the tropical midtroposphere over East Africa from glacier shrinkage on Kilimanjaro. J. Climate, 22(15), 4162-4181 (doi: 10.1175/2009JCLI2954.1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mölg, T, Grosshauser, M, Hemp, A, Hofer, M and Marzeion, B (2012) Limited forcing of glacier loss through land-cover change on Kilimanjaro. Nature Climate Change (doi: 10.1038/ nclimate1390)Google Scholar
Reijmer, CH and Hock, R (2008) Internal accumulation on Storglaciaren, Sweden, in a multi-layer snow model coupled to a distributed energy- and mass-balance model. J. Claciol., 54(184), 61-72 (doi: 10.3189/002214308784409161)Google Scholar
Sicart, JE, Ribstein, P, Chazarin, JP and Berthier, E (2002) Solid precipitation on a tropical glacier in Bolivia measured with an ultrasonic depth gauge. Water Resour. Res., 38(10), 1189 (doi: 10.1029/2002WR001402)Google Scholar
Van den Broeke, MR, Reijmer, CH and Van de Wal, RSW (2004) A study of the surface mass balance in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, using automatic weather stations. J. Claciol., 50(171), 565-582 (doi: 10.3189/172756504781829756)Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Actual accumulation recorded by the sonic ranging sensor (black), and water equivalent precipitation simulated by the atmospheric model (gray, here LAM-1), in April 2006 near the summit of Kilimanjaro. (a) Accumulated daily data. (b) Daily precipitation non-dimensionalized by the respective mean value; numbers in the plot indicate selected daily events, and horizontal bars below the x-axis localize wet spells.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Hourly 2 m air temperature versus the fraction of solid precipitation (snow + graupel + hail) on the lowermost atmospheric model layer in the April 2006 simulation (LAM-1). (b) Different statistics of the data in (a) for air-temperature bins of 0.5°C width. Analysis for altitudes above 4000 ma.s.l. in the innermost LAM domain.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Histogram of solid precipitation fraction in the 2 m air- temperature interval -2 to 1.5°C. Numbers inside bars show percentile 20 and 80 of the 2 m relative humidity (RH2m) for the two dominant classes at the tails, which suggests a separation threshold of 97% relative humidity.