Element contents
Series: Elements in Political Psychology
Perceptions of Danger
How Risk Assessments Underpin Attitudes on Crime and Intimate Partner Violence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2026
Summary
This Element explores how citizens understand general crime and violence against women, especially intimate partner violence (IPV). Drawing on interdisciplinary literature, this Element makes the case that cognitive heuristics and risk assessments, in particular, shape the way people see crime versus IPV. The central argument is that cognitive heuristics that generate risk perceptions help us understand why the public worries excessively about crime, with important political consequences, while downplaying IPV. This fosters distinct attitudes toward IPV and general crime. Accordingly, this Element sheds light on why victim-blaming is so prevalent in the context of IPV. Using original survey experiments from Brazil and Mexico, the study shows that respondents attribute more responsibility for prevention to the victim for IPV than for general crimes, display optimism bias with acquaintance victimization, and approve different types of policy remedies to deal with general crime and IPV.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Political PsychologyOnline ISBN: 9781009537001Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 09 July 2026
References
Abrams, Dominic, Viki, Tendayi G., Masser, Barbara, and Bohner, Gerd. 2003. “Perceptions of Stranger and Acquaintance Rape: The Role of Benevolent and Hostile Sexism in Victim Blame and Rape Proclivity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(1): 111–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aguilar, Rudy J., and Nightingale, Narina N.. 1994. “The Impact of Specific Battering Experiences on the Self-esteem of Abused Women.” Journal of Family Violence 9(1): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrete, Mariana. 2024. “Femicide in Mexico: Who Are the Slain Women According to News Media? A Quantitative Study of Social Representations of Victims and Perpetrators.” Violence against Women 30(12–13): 3297–3319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alicke, Mark D. 2000. “Culpable Control and the Psychology of Blame.” Psychology Bulletin 126: 556–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altamirano, Melina, Berens, Sarah, and Ley, Sandra. 2024. “Security or Social Spending? Perceptions of Insecurity, Victimization, and Policy Priorities in Mexico and Brazil”. Political Studies, 72(1), 134–157.Google Scholar
Applegate, Brandon K., Cullen, Francis T., Turner, Michael G., and Sundt, Jody L.. 1996. “Assessing Public Support for Three-Strikes-and-You’re-Out Laws: Global versus Specific Attitudes.” Crime and Delinquency 42: 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araújo, Victor, and Gatto, Malu A. C.. 2022. “Can Conservatism Make Women More Vulnerable to Violence?” Comparative Political Studies 55(1): 122–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, Enrique D., and Barnes, Nicholas. 2017. “Crime and Plural Orders in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.” Current Sociology 65(3): 448–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, Eric. 2019. “How Does Media Influence Social Norms? Experimental Evidence on the Role of Common Knowledge.” Political Science Research and Methods 7(3): 561–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkin-Plunk, Cassandra A. 2020. “Should All Violent Offenders Be Treated Equally? Perceptions of Punishment and Rehabilitation for Violent Offenders with Varying Attributes.” Victims & Offenders 15(2): 218–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagley, Bruce. 2013. “The Evolution of Drug Trafficking and Organized Crime in Latin America.” Sociologia 71(71):99–123.Google Scholar
Baker, Thomas, Metcalfe, Christi Falco, Berenblum, Tamar, Aviv, Gali, and Gertz, Marc. 2015. “Examining Public Preferences for the Allocation of Resources to Rehabilitative Versus Punitive Crime Policies.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 26(5): 448–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barba, Daniel, Lupu, Noam, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2023. “Public Opinion on Lethal Violence Against Women in Mexico: A Mismatch between Preferences and Expectations of Justice.” Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública 12(1): 93–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., Beaulieu, Emily, and Saxton, Gregory W.. 2020. “Sex and Corruption: How Sexism Shapes Voters’ Responses to Scandal.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8(1): 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bareket, Orly, and Fiske, Susan T.. 2023. “A Systematic Review of the Ambivalent Sexism Literature: Hostile Sexism Protects Men’s Power; Benevolent Sexism Guards Traditional Gender Roles.” Psychological Bulletin 49(11–12): 637–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreto, Manuela, and Ellemers, Naomi. 2005. “The Burden of Benevolent Sexism: How it Contributes to the Maintenance of Gender Inequalities.” European Journal of Social Psychology 35: 633–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth. 2019. “‘No One Would Ever Believe Me’: An Exploration of the Impact of Intimate Partner Violence Victimization on Men.” Psychology of Men and Masculinities 21(4): 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, Jennifer, and Butler, H. Daniel. 2024. “The Realities of Stranger Danger across Violent Crimes.” Victims & Offenders 20(3): 1–19.Google Scholar
Beauregard, Katrine, Holman, Mirya, and Sheppard, Jill. 2022. “Sexism and Attitudes toward Policy Speeding in Australia and the United States.” Frontiers in Political Science 4:892111: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begany, Joseph J., and Milburn, Michael A.. 2002. “Psychological Predictors of Sexual Harassment: Authoritarianism, Hostile Sexism, and Rape Myths.” Psychology of Men & Masculinity 3(2): 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, Michele A., and Bolger, Collin. 2019. “Predicting Fear of Crime: Results from a Community Survey of a Small City.” American Journal of Criminal Justice 44, 334–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, Michelle D. 2019. Tough on Crime: The Rise of Punitive Populism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydstun, Amber E. 2013. Making the News: Politics, the Media, and Agenda Setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Stephanie, and Rudden, Marie. 2020. “A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Victims of Domestic Violence and Coercive Control.” International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 17: 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenneman, Robert E. 2011. Homies and Hermanos: God and Gangs in Central America. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysk, Alison. 2018. The Struggle for Freedom from Fear: Contesting Violence against Women at the Frontiers of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buil-Gil, David, Moretti, Angelo, Shlomo, Natalie, and Medina, Juanjo. 2021. “Worry about Crime in Europe: A Model-Based Small Area Estimation from the European Social Survey.” European Journal of Criminology 18(2): 274–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea L. 2012. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15(1): 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsmith, Kevin M., Darley, John M., and Robinson, Paul H.. 2002. “Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(2): 284–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsmith, Kevin M. 2006. “The Roles of Retribution and Utility in Determining Punishment.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42(4): 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, Miguel. 2013. “The Impact of Criminal Violence on Regime Legitimacy in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 48(3): 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2019. “Playing the Woman Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Race.” Political Psychology 40(1): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccato, Vania, and Moreira, Gustavo. 2021. “The Dynamics of Thefts and Robberies in São Paulo’s Metro, Brazil.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 27: 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceobanu, Alin M., Wood, Charles H., and Ribeiro, Ludmila. 2010. “Crime Victimization and Public Support for Democracy: Evidence from Latin America.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 23(1): 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cizmar, Anne, and Kalkan, Kerem Ozan. 2023. “Hostile Sexism and Abortion Attitudes in Contemporary American Public Opinion.” Politics & Gender 19(4): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, Christopher, and Magalhães, Pedro C.. 2022. “Effective Government and Evaluations of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 55(5): 869–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, Scott, and Piston, Spencer. 2017. “Explaining Public Support for Counterproductive Homelessness Policy: The Role of Disgust.” Political Behavior 39(2): 503–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, Scott, Jewell, Ryan M., and Waggoner, Phillip D.. 2015. “Are Samples Drawn from Mechanical Turk Valid for Research on Political Ideology?” Research & Politics 2(4): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Mark A., Rust, Roland T., and Steen, Sara. 2006. “Prevention, Crime Control or Cash? Public Preferences toward Criminal Justice Spending Priorities.” Justice Quarterly 23(3): 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Córdova, Abby, and Kras, Helen. 2020. “Addressing Violence against Women: The Effect of Women’s Police Stations on Police Legitimacy.” Comparative Political Studies 53(5): 775–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Córdova, Abby, and Kras, Helen. 2022. “State Action to Prevent Violence against Women: How Women’s Police Stations Affect Men’s Attitudes toward Gender-Based Violence.” The Journal of Politics 84(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, Molly J., Özdemir, Yagiz, and Fehr, Ernst. 2014. “The Value of Vengeance and the Demand for Deterrence.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 143(6): 2279–2286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz, José Miguel, and Kloppe-Santamaría, Gema. 2019. “Determinants of Support for Extralegal Violence in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Latin American Research Review 54(1): 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, José Miguel. 2022. “Police, Non-State Actors, and Political Legitimacy in Central America.” Policing and Society 3(32): 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, Francis T., Fisher, Bonnie S., and Applegate, Brandon K.. 2000. “Public Opinion about Punishment and Corrections.” Crime and Justice 27: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, Francis T., Vose, Brenda A., Jonson, Cheryl N. Lero, and Unnever, James D.. 2007. “Public Support for Early Intervention: Is Child Saving a ‘Habit of the Heart’?” Victims & Offenders 2: 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, Fiery. 2008. “Crime and Punishment: Distinguishing the Roles of Causal and Intentional Analyses in Moral Judgment.” Cognition 108: 353–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, Fiery, Dreber, Anna, Wang, Ying, and Costa, Jay. 2009. “Accidental Outcomes Guide Punishment in a ‘Trembling Hand’ Game.” PloS ONE 4(8): e6699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folha, Data. 2023. “Após 10 Anos, Violência Volta a ser Maior Problema da Cidade.” Após 10 anos, violência voltar a ser maior problema da cidade – 04/09/2023 – Opinião e sociedade – Datafolha (uol.com.br).Google Scholar
DataSenado, . 2021. “Violência Doméstica e Familiar contra a Mulher.” Relatório_Pesquisa Violência Doméstica e Familiar contra a Mulher_v9 (senado.leg.br).Google Scholar
Dillard, Amanda J., Midboe, Amanda M., and Klein, William M.. 2009. “The Dark Side of Optimism: Unrealistic Optimism about Problems with Alcohol Predicts Subsequent Negative Event Experiences.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35: 1540–1550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dow, David A., Levy, Gabriella, Romero, Diego, and Tellez, Juan F.. 2024. “State Absence, Vengeance, and the Logic of Vigilantism in Guatemala.” Comparative Political Studies 57(1): 147–181.Google Scholar
Durán-Martínez, Angélica. 2015. “To Kill and Tell? State Power, Criminal Competition, and Drug Violence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59(8): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edin, Kerstin E., Lalos, Ann, Högberg, Ulf, and Dahlgren, Lars. 2008. “Violent Men Ordinary and Deviant.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 23(2): 225–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eigenberg, Helen, and Policastro, Christina. 2016. “Blaming Victims in Cases of Interpersonal Violence: Attitudes Associated with Assigning Blame to Female Victims.” Women & Criminal Justice 26(1): 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsberg, Mary, Pena, Rodolfo, Herrera, Andres, Liljestrand, Jerker, and Winkvist, Anna. 2000. “Candies in Hell: Women’s Experiences of Violence in Nicaragua.” Social Science & Medicine 51: 1595–1610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esparza, Diego, and Ugues, Antonio Jr. 2020. “The Impact of Law Enforcement Centralisation and Professionalisation on Public Opinion of the Mexican Police.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 12(1): 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, Kenneth F. 1996. “Women’s Fear of Victimization: Shadow of Sexual Assault?” Social Forces 75: 667–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer, Rebecca A., and Klein, William M.. 2015. “Risk Perceptions and Health Behavior.” Current Opinion in Psychology 5: 85–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, Eli J., Slotter, Erica B., DeWall, C. Nathan, Oaten, Megan, and Foshee, Vangie A.. 2009. “Self-Regulatory Failure and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97(3): 483–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flood, Michael, and Pease, Bob. 2009. “Factors Influencing Attitudes to Violence against Women.” Trauma, Violence, and Abuse 10(2): 125–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fondevila, Gustavo, Vilalta-Perdomo, Carlos, Perez, Mateo Carlos Galindo, Cafferata, Fernando G.. 2021. “Crime Deterrent Effect of Police Stations.” Applied Geography 134: 102518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenstein, Frederik, Croft, Rodney. J., Weidemann, Peter. M., Adam, Verrender, Cristoph, Böhmert, 2020 Sarah, P. Loughran. “Framing Effects in Risk Communication Messages: Hazard identification vs. Risk assessment.” Environmental Research 190: 109934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frías, Sonia, and Ríos-Cázares, Alejandra. 2019. “After Rape: Mexican Women’s Help-Seeking and Access to Emergency Health Care in Public Prosecutor’s Offices.” Feminist Criminology: 14(1):1–24.Google Scholar
Gaissmaier, Wolfgang, and Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2012. “9/11, Act II: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Regional Variations in Traffic Fatalities in the Aftermath of the Terrorist Attacks.” Psychological Science 23(12): 1449–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, . 2018. “Global Law and Order.” Gain Global Perceptions of Security with the 2018 Global Law and Order report. – Gallup.Google Scholar
Garcia-Ponce, Omar, Young, Lauren E, and Zeitzoff, Thomas. 2023. “Anger and Support for Retribution in Mexico’s Drug War.” Journal of Peace Research 60(2): 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garzón Vergara, Juan. 2008. “Mafia & co. The Criminal Networks in Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia.” Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Gassen, Jeffrey, Nowak, Tomasz J., Henderson, Alexandria D. et al. 2021. “Unrealistic Optimism and Risk for COVID-19 Disease.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glick, Peter, and Fiske, Susan T.. 1996. “The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(3): 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Peter, and Fiske, Susan T.. 2001. “An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality.” American Psychologist 56(2): 109–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glick, Peter, Sakalli-Ugurlu, Nuray, Ferreira, Maria C., and Marcos A. de Souza. 2002. “Ambivalent Sexism and Attitudes toward Wife Abuse in Turkey and Brazil.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 26(4): 292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, Lim Thye, and Law, Siong Hook. 2022. “The Crime Rate and Income Inequality in Brazil: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach.” International Jorunal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies 15(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Yanilda María. 2017. “What Citizens Can See of the State: Police and the Construction of Democratic Citizenship in Latin America.” Theoretical Criminology 21(4): 494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorodzeisky, Anastasia, and Semyonov, Moshe. 2019. “Unwelcome Immigrants: Sources of Opposition to Different Immigrant Groups among Europeans.” Frontiers in Sociology 4: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108: 814–834.Google Scholar
Harris, Peter. 1996. “Sufficient Grounds for Optimism? The Relationship between Perceived Controllability and Optimism Bias.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 15: 9–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, Lori L. 1998. “Violence against Women: An Integrated, Ecological Framework.” Violence against Women 4(3): 262–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helweg-Larsen, Marie, and Shepperd, James A.. 2001. “Do Moderators of the Optimistic Bias Affect Personal or Target Risk Estimates? A Review of the Literature.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 5(1): 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de México, Heraldo. 2018. “Nace Policía de Género: Diez Agentes Femeninas Atienden a Mujeres que han Sido Víctimas de Violencia.”. https://heraldodemexico.com.mx/estados/nace-policia-de-genero/.Google Scholar
Hessick, Carissa B. 2007. “Violence between Lovers, Strangers, and Friends.” Washington University Law Review 85(2): 343–407.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2011. “Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 546–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipp, John R. 2007. “Income Inequality, Race and Place: Does the Distribution of Race and Class within Neighborhoods Affect Crime Rates?” Criminology 45: 665–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Alisha C. 2013. “Right on Crime? Conservative Party Politics and Mano Dura Policies in El Salvador.” Latin American Research Review 48(1): 44–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horstman, Nicole J., Bond, Christine E. W., and Eriksson, Li. 2021. “Sentencing Domestic Violence Offenders: A Vignette Study of Public Perceptions.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(21–22): NP11916–NP11939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Htun, Mala, and Jensenius, Francesca R.. 2020a. “Fighting Violence against Women: Laws, Norms & Challenges Ahead.” Dædalus 149(1): 144–159.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Jensenius, Francesca R.. 2020b. “Aspirational Laws as Weak Institutions: Legislation to Combat Violence against Women in Mexico.” In Daniel, Brinks, Steven, Levitsky, and Victoria Murillo, María (eds.) The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Jensenius, Francesca R.. 2022. “Expressive Power of Anti-Violence Legislation: Changes in Social Norms on Violence against Women in Mexico.” World Politics 74(1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute for Economics & Peace. “Global Terrorism Index 2024: Measuring the Impact of Terrorism.” Sydney, February 2024. http://visionofhumanity.org/resources.Google Scholar
Jackson, Jonathan. 2009. “A Psychological Perspective on Vulnerability in the Fear of Crime.” Psychology, Crime and Law 15(4): 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Jonathan. 2011. “Revisiting Sensitivity to Risk in the Fear of Crime.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 48(4): 513–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Sarah C., Lachlan, Robert F., and Osman, Magda. 2024. “An Integrative Framework for Mapping the Psychological Landscape of Risk Perception.” Scientific Reports 14: 10989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jewkes, Rachel. 2002. “Intimate Partner Violence: Causes and Prevention.” Lancet 359: 1423–1429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, Carol E., Campbell, Rebecca, and Follingstad, Diane. 2010. “Violence and Women’s Mental Health: The Impact of Physical, Sexual, and Psychological Aggression.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 6: 607–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, Carol E., and Pritchard, Adam J.. 2021. “Mandatory Reporting of Domestic Violence: What Do Abuse Survivors Think and What Variables Influence Those Opinions?” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(7–8): NP4170–NP4190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2015. “How Civil Wars Help Explain Organized Crime – and How They Do Not.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59(8): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karstedt, Susanne, and Endtricht, Rebecca. 2022. “Crime and Punishment: Public Opinion and Political Law-And-Order Rhetoric in Europe 1996–2019.” The British Journal of Criminology 62: 1116–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keel, Chloe, Wickes, Rebecca, Lee, Murray, Jackson, Jonathan, and Benier, Kathryn. 2023. “Vulnerability in the Neighborhood: A Study of Perceived Control over Victimization.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 61(4): 1–39.Google Scholar
Kelly, Ursula A. 2011. “Theories of Intimate Partner Violence: From Blaming the Victim to Acting Against Injustice: Intersectionality as an Analytic Framework.” Advances in Nursing Science 34(3): E29–E51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiani, Usama Bin Naseem, Najam, Fawad Ahmed, and Rana, Irfan Ahmad. 2022. “The Impact of Risk Perception on Earthquake Preparedness: An Empirical Study from Rawalakot, Pakistan.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 76(15): 102989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloppe-Santamaría, Gema, and Zulver, Julia. 2023. “Beyond Collateral Damage: Femicides, Disappearances, and New Trends in Gender-Based Violence in Mexico.” Woodrow Wilson Center, Mexico Institute Insights.Google Scholar
Kopetz, Catalina, and Woerner, Jacqueline I.. 2021. “People Downplay Health Risks to Fulfill Their Goals: A Motivational Framework for Guiding Behavioral Policy.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8(1): 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kras, Helen R. 2022. “The Politics of Private Violence: How Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Influences Political Attitudes.” Latin American Politics and Society 64(4): 119–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kras, Helen R. 2023. “Rearranging the News Agenda: State Action and News Media Reporting on Violence against Women in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 55(3): 425–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kras, Helen R. 2024. “Procedural Fairness and Political Attitudes: Unpacking the Experiences of Victims of Intimate Partner Violence with the Police.” Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública 13: e31356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Krystin. 2014. “Supporting the Iron Fist: Crime News, Public Opinion, and Authoritarian Crime Control in Guatemala.” Latin American Politics and Society 56(1): 98–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krulichová, Eva. 2019. “The Relationship between Fear of Crime and Risk Perception across Europe.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 19(2): 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, Sandra. 2018. “To Vote or Not to Vote: How Criminal Violence Shapes Electoral Participation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 62(9): 1963–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loader, Ian, and Walker, Neil. 2001. “Policing as a Public Good: Reconstituting the Connections between Policing and the State.” Theoretical Criminology 5: 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam, Rodríguez, Mariana, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. (eds.) 2021. Pulse of Democracy. Nashville: LAPOP.Google Scholar
Malle, Bertram F. 2021. “Moral Judgments.” Annual Review of Psychology 72: 293–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mancini, Christina, and Mears, Daniel P.. 2010. “To Execute or Not to Execute? Examining Public Support for Capital Punishment of Sex Offenders.” Journal of Criminal Justice 38(5): 959–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mears, Daniel P., Pickett, Justin T., and Mancini, Christina. 2015. “Support for Balanced Juvenile Justice: Assessing Views about Youth, Rehabilitation, and Punishment.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 31(3): 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Christine E. 2023. “Isolated Incidents: Media Reporting on Violence against Women in the German Press.” Journalism Practice 18(10), 2627–2646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menjívar, Cecilia, and Walsh, Shannon D.. 2016. “Subverting Justice: Socio-Legal Determinants of Impunity for Violence against Women in Guatemala.” Laws 5(31): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menjívar, Cecilia. 2011. Enduring Violence: Ladina Women’s Lives in Guatemala. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2025. Alcanza Sheinbaum 85 por ciento de aprobación. El Financiero. Alcanza Sheinbaum 85 por ciento de aprobación – El FinancieroGoogle Scholar
Murray, Joseph, Daniel Ricardo de Castro Cerqueira, and Kahn, Tulio. 2013. “Crime and Violence in Brazil: Systematic Review of Time Trends, Prevalence Rates and Risk Factors.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 18: 471–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novaes, Lucas. 2024. “The Violence of Law-and-Order Politics: The Case of Law Enforcement Candidates in Brazil.” American Political Science Review 118(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osorio, Javier. 2015. “The Contagion of Drug Violence: Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of the Mexican War on Drugs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59(8): 1403–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Nicole M., Willie, Tiara C., and Sullivan, Tami P.. 2019. “Stigmatizing Reactions versus General Negative Reactions to Partner Violence Disclosure as Predictors of Avoidance Coping and Depression.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 34(8): 1734–1752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paek, Hye-Jin, and Hove, Thomas. 2017. “Risk Perceptions and Risk Characteristics.” The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palazzolo, Kellie E., and Roberto, Anthony J.. 2011. “Media Representations of Intimate Partner Violence and Punishment Preferences: Exploring the Role of Attributions and Emotions.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 39(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark, Hutchison, Marc L, and Shamir, Michal. 2022. “Terrorism and Political Tolerance toward Fellow Travelers.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 66(8): 1208–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perova, Elizaveta, and Reynolds, Sarah Anne. 2017. “Women’s Police Stations and Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from Brazil.” Social Science & Medicine 174: 188–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Center, Pew Research. 2023. “Inflation, Health Costs, Partisan Cooperation among the Nation’s Top Problems.” Among Top US Problems: Inflation, Health Costs, Partisan Cooperation | Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Phillips, Brian. J. 2017. “Inequality and the Emergence of Vigilante Organizations: The Case of Mexican Autodefensas.” Comparative Political Studies 50(10): 1358–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, Justin T. 2019. “Public Opinion and Criminal Justice Policy: Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Criminology 2: 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, Justin T., Mancini, Christina, and Mears, Daniel P.. 2013. “Vulnerable Victims, Monstrous Offenders, and Unmanageable Risk: Explaining Public Opinion on the Social Control of Sex Crime.” Criminology 51(3): 729–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinciotti, Caitlin M., and Orcutt, Holly K.. 2021. “Understanding Gender Differences in Rape Victim Blaming: The Power of Social Influence and Just World Beliefs.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1–2): 255–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pion-Berlin, David, and Carreras, Miguel. 2017. “Armed Forces, Police and Crime-fighting in Latin America.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 3: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quillian, Lincoln, and Pager, Devah. 2010. “Estimating Risk: Stereotype Amplification and the Perceived Risk of Criminal Victimization.” Social Psychology Quarterly 73(1): 79–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, Vidal, Magaloni, Beatriz, and Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto. 2016. “Presidential Approval and Public Security in Mexico’s War on Crime.” Latin American Politics and Society 58(2): 100–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ropeik, David. 2010. How Risky Is It, Really? Why Our Fears Don’t Always Match the Facts. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jonathan D., and Cutrona, Sebastián. 2021. “Understanding Support for Mano Dura Strategies: Lessons from Brazil and Colombia.” Trends in Organized Crime 24: 324–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosling, Hans, Rosling, Ola, and Rönnlund, Anna Rosling. 2018. Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong About the World – and Why Things Are Better Than You Think. New York: Flatiron Books.Google Scholar
Sandell, Tiffany, Sebar, Bernadette, and Harris, Neil. 2013. “Framing Risk: Communication Messages in the Australian and Swedish Print Media Surrounding the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 41(8): 860–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, Cecília MacDowell. 2005. Women’s Police Stations: Gender, Violence and Justice in São Paulo, Brazil. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Cecília M. 2010. From women’s police stations to the Maria da Penha law: The state’s absorption/translation of women’s demands. Revista Crítica de Ciências Socias, 89:153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarin, Arunima, and Cushman, Fiery. 2024. “One Thought Too Few: An Adaptive Rationale for Punishing Negligence.” Psychological Review 131(3): 812–824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saucier, Donald A., Stanford, Amanda J., Miller, Stuart S. et al. 2016. “Masculine Honor Beliefs: Measurement and Correlates.” Personality and Individual Differences 94: 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2016. “The Criminal Community of Victims and Perpetrators: Cognitive Foundations of Citizen Detachment from Organized Violence in Mexico.” Human Rights Quarterly 39(4): 1038–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Susanne, Baum, Matthew A., and Cohen, Dara Kay. 2022. “(Sex) Crime and Punishment in the #MeToo Era: How the Public Views Rape.” Political Behavior 44: 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, Pia-Johanna, Goble, Robert, and Renn, Ortwin. 2022. “Social Perception of Systemic Risks.” Risk Analysis 42(7): 1455–1471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, Hannah. 2003. “Stranger Danger: Explaining Women’s Fear of Crime.” Western Criminology Review 4(3): 203–214.Google Scholar
Serisier, Tanya. 2017. “Sex Crimes and the Media.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepperd, James A., Klein, William M. P., Waters, Erika A., and Weinstein, Neil D.. 2013. “Taking Stock of Unrealistic Optimism.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 8: 395–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepperd, James A., Waters, Erika A., Weinstein, Neil D., and Klein, William M. P.. 2015. “A Primer on Unrealistic Optimism.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 24(3): 232–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, , Luzi, , Yunmei, Lu, and Justin, T. Pickett. 2020. “The public salience of crime, 1960–2014: Age–period–cohort and time–series analyses.” Criminology 58:568–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirk, David, and Wallman, Joel. 2015. “Understanding Mexico’s Drug Violence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59: 1348–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegrist, Michael, and Árvai, Joseph. 2020. “Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research.” Risk Analysis 40(1): 2191–2206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, Alexa J., Chouhy, Cecilia, Lehmann, Peter S., N.Setevms, Jessica, and Gertz, Marc. 2020. “Economic Anxieties, Fear of Crime, and Punitive Attitudes in Latin America.” Punishment & Society 22(2): 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sleath, Emma, and Bull, Ray. 2010. “Male Rape Victim and Perpetrator Blaming.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 26(6): 969–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, and Lichtenstein, Sarah. 2000. “Rating Risks.” In Slovic, Paul (ed.), The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan Publishers Ltd. pp. 104–121.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa L., Peters, Ellen, and MacGregor, Donald G.. 2004. “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk and Rationality.” Risk Analysis 24: 311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Socia, Kelly M., Rydberg, Jason, and Dum, Christopher P.. 2019. “Punitive Attitudes Toward Individuals Convicted of Sex Offenses: A Vignette Study.” Justice Quarterly 38(6): 1262–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, Edinilsa Ramos, and Maria Luiza Carvalho de Lima. 2006. “The Panorama of Urban Violence in Brazil and its Capitals.” Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 11(2): 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Alexa, Poortinga, Wouter, and Pidgeon, Nick. 2012. “The Psychological Distance of Climate Change.” Risk Analysis 32(6): 957–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanner-Smith, Emily E., Wilson, Sandra Jo, and Lipsey, Mark W.. 2012. “Risk Factors and Crime.” In Francis, T. Cullen and Pamela, Wilcox (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminological Theory. New York: Oxford Handbooks. pp. 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thapar-Björkert, Suruchi, and Morgan, Karen. 2010. “But Sometimes I Think … They Put Themselves in the Situation: Exploring Blame and Responsibility in Interpersonal Violence.” Violence against Women 16(1): 32–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilly, Charles. 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.” In Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda (eds.) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielo, Angela J., Cullen, Francis T., Burton, Alexander L., Moon, Melissa M., and Velmer, S. Burton, Jr. 2019. “Prisons or Problem-Solving: Does the Public Support Specialty Courts?” Victims & Offenders 14(3): 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiscornia, Lucía, and Pérez Bentancur, Verónica. 2024. “Dilemmas of Substitution: Why the Urban Poor Support Punitive Policing in a Latin American City.” Journal of Urban Affairs 46(8): 1623–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trejo, Guillermo, and Ley, Sandra. 2018. “Why Did Drug Cartels Go to War in Mexico? Subnational Party Alternation, the Breakdown of Criminal Protection, and the Onset of Large-Scale Violence.” Comparative Political Studies 51(7): 900–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trope, Yaacov, and Liberman, Nira. 2010. “Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance.” Psychological Review 117(2): 440–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, Jacob R. 2024. “The People’s Captain: Understanding Police Officers as an Electoral Brand.” Political Research Quarterly 77(3): 992–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ugues, Antonio Jr., and Diego, Esparza. 2018. “The Relationship between Crime Victimization, Corruption, and Public Attitudes of Mexico’s Armed Forces.” Democracy and Security 4(3): 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnever, James D., Cullen, Francis T., and Jones, James D.. 2008. “Public Support for Attacking the ‘Root Causes’ of Crime: The Impact of Egalitarian and Racial Beliefs.” Sociological Focus 41: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnever, James D., Cochran, John K., Cullen, Frances T., and Applegate, Brandon K.. 2010. “The Pragmatic American: Attributions of Crime and the Hydraulic Relation Hypothesis.” Justice Quarterly 27: 431–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). 2020. “Killings of Women and Girls by their Intimate Partner or Other Family Members: Global Estimates 2020.”Google Scholar
UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). 2020. “Country Profiles.” Country List | dataUNODC.Google Scholar
Valor-Segura, Inmaculada, Expósito, Francisca, and Moya, Miguel. 2011. “Victim Blaming and Exoneration of the Perpetrator in Domestic Violence: The Role of Beliefs in a Just World and Ambivalent Sexism.” The Spanish Journal of Psychology 14(1): 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecina, Maria L., and Pinuela, Raul. 2017. “Relationships between Ambivalent Sexism and the Five Moral Foundations in Domestic Violence: Is It a Matter of Fairness and Authority?” The Journal of Psychology 151(3): 334–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ventura, Tiago, Ley, Sandra, and Cantú, Francisco. 2024. “Voting for Law and Order: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies 57(4): 551–583.Google Scholar
Viki, G. Tendayi, and Abrams, Dominic. 2002. “But She Was Unfaithful: Benevolent Sexism and Reactions to Rape Victims Who Violate Traditional Gender Role Expectations.” Sex Roles 47(6): 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Giancarlo. 2019. “Policy Preferences after Crime Victimization: Panel and Survey Evidence from Latin America.” British Journal of Political Science 50(4): 1481–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, Mark. 1984. “Fear of Victimization: Why Are Women and the Elderly More Afraid?” Social Science Quarterly 65(3): 681.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Neil D. 1980. “Unrealistic Optimism about Future Life Events.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 806–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Neil D. 1988. “The Precaution Adoption Process.” Health Psychology 7(4): 355–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, Nicholas. 2023. “Hostile Sexism, Benevolent Sexism, and American Elections.” Politics & Gender 19(2): 427–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Jane L., Kallis, Constantinos, and Coid, Jeremy W.. 2022. “Gang Members, Gang Affiliates, and Violent Men: Perpetration of Social Harms, Violence-Related Beliefs, Victim Types, and Locations.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37(7–8): NP3703–NP3727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worden, Alissa P., and Carlson, Bonnie E.. 2005. “Attitudes and Beliefs about Domestic Violence: Results of a Public Opinion Survey II. Beliefs about Causes.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 20(10): 1219–1243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamawaki, Niwako, Ochoa-Shipp, Monica, Pulsipher, Craig, Harlos, Andrew, and Swindler, Scott. 2012. “Perceptions of Domestic Violence: The Effects of Domestic Violence Myths, Victim’s Relationship with Her Abuser, and the Decision to Return to Her Abuser.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27(16): 3195–3212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Janet Z. 2019. “Whose Risk? Why Did the U.S. Public Ignore Information about the Ebola Outbreak?” Risk Analysis 39(8): 1708–1722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
Online Resources for this publication available here.