Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-mgxrv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-20T14:52:09.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Safeguarding seed longevity under genebank storage: Evidence based viability monitoring intervals for six tropical species at the Australian Grains Genebank (AGG)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2026

Katherine J. Baum*
Affiliation:
Australian Grains Genebank, Agriculture Victoria, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, Horsham, VIC, Australia
Sally L. Norton
Affiliation:
Australian Grains Genebank, Agriculture Victoria, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, Horsham, VIC, Australia School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
Gabriel Keeble-Gagnère
Affiliation:
Agriculture Victoria, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
Matthew Hayden
Affiliation:
School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia Agriculture Victoria, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Katherine J. Baum; Email: katherine.baum@agriculture.vic.gov.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Genebank Standards for Plant Genetic Resources recommend that genebanks periodically monitor the change in viability of their stored germplasm to ensure timely regeneration. The Australian Grains Genebank (AGG) has been recording germination data on orthodox seeds from tropical grain crops, stored under long-term storage (−20°C), for 40 years. Real-time viability data, collated from germination tests carried out on seedlots which had been in storage for a minimum of 20 years, from six agriculturally important grain crops (Sorghum bicolor, Phaseolus vulgaris, Glycine max, Vigna radiata, Cajanus cajan and Vigna angularis) was analysed by probit analysis. For each species independently, a common loss in viability was observed for all seedlots showing a consistent decline in viability during storage; with observed longevity estimates (σ; time for viability to fall by 1 NED/probit) of 17.4, 30.7, 33.2 49.6, 48.8, 63.5 and years for Vigna angularis, Cajanus cajan, Phaseolus vulgaris, Glycine max, Sorghum bicolor, and Vigna radiata, respectively. Common values of σ were subsequently used to determine species-specific viability monitoring intervals, based on the results of the last germination test. Dynamic monitoring intervals are a cost-efficient strategy that will avoid the over-use of seed through too frequent viability monitoring whilst still ensuring the timely regeneration of material. With funding shortfalls often reported as the main contributing factor to regeneration and viability testing backlogs, the ability for genebanks to maximise cost-efficiencies, where possible, is paramount to secure the genetic integrity of stored germplasm; particularly as collections continue to grow.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany.
Figure 0

Table 1. Total number of active accessions within each crop group, and the number represented by the six target species, currently conserved under long-term (−20°C) storage at the Australian Grains genebank (AGG). The remaining columns represent the total number of accessions conserved globally at both the crop and species level. Global data at the crop level was extracted through the World Information and Early Warning System on Plant genetic Resources (WIEWS) (FAO 2024) and global data at the species level was accessed through Genesys (https://www.Genesys-pgr.Org/)Table 1 long description.

Figure 1

Table 2. Summary of the historical viability monitoring data for six tropical crop species, including the number of the seedlots which had been in storage for a minimum of 20 years, and which showed multiple observations. Of the total number of seedlots, from each species, that were re-tested in 2024, the maximum storage period whereby seeds showed ≥90% viability is reportedTable 2 long description.

Figure 2

Figure 1. Proportion of seedlots showing a viability above (pattern) or below (solid) the viability threshold of 85% on their first (black/left) and most recent germination test result, carried out in 2024, (grey/right) for each species. The numbers represent the total number of seedlots tested from each species.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Variation in slope (1/σ) amongst the seedlots for each of the six target species. Estimates of σ were derived by fitting probit analysis simultaneously to successive germination results carried out during storage at the AGG, for each seedlot.Figure 2 long description.

Figure 4

Table 3. Total number of seedlots from each species whose viability monitoring data were analysed by probit analysis, and the pattern for change in the ability to germinate with storage period: no change detected, increase in the ability to germinate or a decline in the ability to germinate, identifiedTable 3 long description.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Historical viability data from seedlots of Vigna angularis, Cajanus cajan, Phaseolus vulgaris, Glycine max, Sorghum bicolor, and Vigna radiata which had been in storage for a minimum of 20 years, plotted against storage time. Only those seedlots which showed a decline in viability, across at least three observations (viability results) during storage, were analysed by probit analysis. The asterisk (*) represents the species where seedlots showing two observations (with the first test carried out within two years of storage and the subsequent test a minimum of 15 years later) were also included in the analyses. Probit analysis revealed the rate of loss in longevity (1/σ) did not significantly differ between seedlots (p > 0.05); thus, the survival curve represents the seedlot showing the greatest longevity (highest value of Ki and common value for σ−1). The arrows show the variation in Ki (initial quality) amongst the seedlots. The dashed line represents the 85% viability threshold, below which regeneration is triggered.Figure 3 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Observed, common values of sigma for each species (as presented in Table 4), derived by fitting the Ellis and Roberts (1980) viability equation through probit analysis to successive germination data (grey bars). Predicted values of sigma (σ; years) for the four species where the viability constants are known. These predictions were estimated using the species-specific viability constants for Sorghum bicolor (Kuo et al.1990), Glycine max (Dickie et al.1990) Vigna radiata (Ellis et al.1988), and Phaseolus vulgaris (Ellis et al.1990) on the Seed Information Database (SER/INSR/RBG Kew 2023). The numbers represent the level of ranking – from the highest (1) to the lowest (6) observed longevity.

Figure 7

Table 4. The results of fitting the viability equation (Ellis and Roberts 1980; equation 1) to those seedlots where a decline in viability during storage was detected. For all species, seedlots could be constrained to a common value of σ; without a significant increase in the residual deviance compared to the best-fit model (P > 0.05). The slope of the seed survival curve (1/σ) and the time it takes for viability to fall by 1 NED/probit (σ) are transformed in years, and the minimum and maximum Ki amongst contrasting seedlots is shown for each species, respectively. Of those seedlots analysed, the maximum storage period observed, as well as the maximum storage period after which seeds showed evidence of ≥90% viability, is reportedTable 4 long description.

Figure 8

Table 5. The recommended monitoring intervals (years) for each species, based on the viability result of the last germination test, and estimated using the common value of σ estimated from fitting the Ellis and Roberts (1980) viability equation to the observed germination data, by probit analysis. The monitoring intervals are calculated at a-third of the time it would take for viability to fall to 85%Table 5 long description.