Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T21:22:09.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rhinological interventions for obstructive sleep apnoea – a systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2019

S Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
J C R Wormald
Affiliation:
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK
J M Fishman
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK UCL Ear Institute, London, UK
P Andrews
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK UCL Ear Institute, London, UK
B T Kotecha*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Professor Bhik T Kotecha, Department of ENT, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, 330 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8EE, UK E-mail: Bhik.kotecha@uclh.nhs.uk

Abstract

Objectives

Obstructive sleep apnoea is a common chronic sleep disorder characterised by collapse of the upper airway during sleep. The nasal airway forms a significant part of the upper airway and any obstruction is thought to have an impact on obstructive sleep apnoea. A systematic review was performed to determine the role of rhinological surgical interventions in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea.

Methods

A systematic review of current literature was undertaken; studies were included if they involved comparison of a non-surgical and/or non-rhinological surgical intervention with a rhinological surgical intervention for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea.

Results

Sixteen studies met the selection criteria. The pooled data suggest that there are reductions in the apnoea/hypopnea index and respiratory disturbance index following nasal surgery. However, the current body of studies is too heterogeneous for statistically significant meta-analysis to be conducted.

Conclusion

Nasal surgery may have limited benefit for a subset of patients based on current evidence.

Information

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable