Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-5ngxj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T10:25:06.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constructing the Rights of Nature: Constitutional Reform, Mobilization, and Environmental Protection in Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Maria Akchurin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2008, Ecuador became the first country to grant legal rights to nature. In this article, I examine how this happened. I show that while proponents of nature's rights acted during a key political moment, their efforts were successful due to the presence of environmentalist social movements that elevated the environmental agenda at the national level during prior decades, and due to the power of indigenous organizations and their call to recognize Ecuador as a “plurinational” polity, demanding respect for indigenous territories and ways of life and incorporating politicized versions of indigenous beliefs about the environment. The study considers the consequences of mobilization for legal innovation and institutional change, and shows the complexity of struggles over the environment in the global South. It is based on research at the Ecuadorian National Legislative Assembly archive, semistructured interviews with respondents involved in the politics of nature and the constitutional assembly, and secondary historical sources.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , Fall 2015 , pp. 937 - 968
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Acosta, Alberto. 1982. Rasgos dominantes del crecimiento ecuatoriano en las últimas décadas. In Ecuador: El mito del desarrollo, ed. Acosta, A., Bocco, A., Chiriboga, M., Fernández, I., Moncayo, P., and Rosales, M., 23–60. Quito, Ecuador: Editorial el Conejo/ILDIS.Google Scholar
Acosta, Alberto. 2008a. Discurso final [resignation speech]. 23 June. Montecristi, Manabí, Ecuador: Asamblea Constituyente.Google Scholar
Acosta, Alberto. 2008b. La Naturaleza como sujeto de derechos. February. Montecristi, Manabí, Ecuador: Asamblea Constituyente.Google Scholar
Acosta, Alberto. 2008c. Tienen derechos los animales? La Insignia, January.Google Scholar
Acosta, Alberto, and Gudynas, Eduardo, eds. 2004. Libre comercio, mitos y realidades: Nuevos desafíos para la economía política de la integración latinoamericana. Quito, Ecuador: Abya‐Yala/ILDIS/D3e.Google Scholar
Albán, María Amparo. 2009. El tema ambiental en el nuevo Derecho Constitucional Ecuatoriano. In La Constitución Ciudadana: Doce visiones sobre un documento revolucionario, ed. Pérez Ordóñez, D., 151–76. Quito, Ecuador: Taurus.Google Scholar
País, Alianza. 2006. Plan de Gobierno del Movimiento PAIS 2007–2011. Quito, Ecuador: Alianza País.Google Scholar
Almeida, Ileana. 2012. El Estado plurinacional y la interculturalidad. La Tendencia 13:120–23.Google Scholar
Almeida, José. 1993. Sismo Étnico en el Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador: Abya‐Yala and CEDIME.Google Scholar
Anaya, S. James. 1996. Indigenous Peoples in International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andolina, Robert. 2003. The Sovereign and its Shadow: Constituent Assembly and Indigenous Movement in Ecuador. Journal of Latin American Studies 35:721–50.Google Scholar
Asamblea Constituyente. 2008a. Conocimiento de los informes de mayoría y minoría, presentados por la mesa constituyente No. 5 de recursos naturales y biodiversidad, para el primer debate de los textos constitucionales referentes a “de la naturaleza y el ambiente.” Acta 040. 29 April. Montecristi, Manabí, Ecuador: Asamblea Constituyente.Google Scholar
Asamblea Constituyente. 2008b. Informe de Mayoría sobre los Derechos de la Naturaleza. Mesa No. 1 de Derechos Fundamentales y Garantías Constitucionales. 30 May. Document C‐ANC‐M1‐109‐08. Montecristi, Manabí, Ecuador: Asamblea Constituyente.Google Scholar
Asamblea Constituyente. 2008c. Conocimiento de los informes de mayoría y minoría, presentados por la mesa constituyente No. 1 de derechos fundamentales y garantías constitucionales, para el primer debate de los textos constitucionales, referentes a derechos de la naturaleza. Acta 058. 6 June. Montecristi, Manabí, Ecuador: Asamblea Constituyente.Google Scholar
Asamblea Constituyente. 2008d. Informe Segundo Debate: Derechos de la Naturaleza. Mesa No. 1 de Derechos Fundamentales y Garantías Constitucionales. 17 June. Document C‐ANC‐M1‐119‐08. Montecristi, Manabí, Ecuador: Asamblea Constituyente.Google Scholar
Asamblea Constituyente. 2008e. Votación de los textos constitucionales presentados para segundo debate referentes a: derechos de la comunicación y derechos de la naturaleza. Acta 078. 7 July. Montecristi, Manabí, Ecuador: Asamblea Constituyente.Google Scholar
Asamblea Nacional Ambiental (ANA). 2008. Hacia una Sociedad Equitativa y Sostenible [Constitutional proposal]. January. Quito, Ecuador: ANA.Google Scholar
Banco Central del Ecuador. 1979. Boletín‐Anuario No. 2. Quito, Ecuador: Banco Central del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Banco Central del Ecuador. 1997. Setenta Años de Información Estadística: 1927–1996. Quito, Ecuador: Banco Central del Ecuador.Google Scholar
BBC. 2008. Ecuadorian President Says He Is a “Leftist Humanist Christian.” BBC Monitoring Latin America, 18 June. Original text from Notimex news agency, Mexico City, 15 June 2008.Google Scholar
Bebbington, Anthony. 2007. Minería, movimientos sociales y respuestas campesinas. Lima, Peru: IEP/CEPES.Google Scholar
Becker, Marc. 2008. Indians and Leftists in the Making of Ecuador's Modern Indigenous Movements. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Marc. 2010. Pachakutik: Indigenous Movements and Electoral Politics in Ecuador. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Burbach, Roger. 2007. Ecuador's Popular Revolt: Forging a New Nation. NACLA Report on the Americas 40 (5): 4–9.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul, and Linton, April. 2002. The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy: Some Recent Evidence and Theoretical Concerns. Social Forces 81:381–408.Google Scholar
Capek, Stella. 1993. The “Environmental Justice” Frame: A Conceptual Discussion and an Application. Social Problems 40:5–24.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, José Corsino. 1995. Ensayo histórico de la economía ecuatoriana. Quito, Ecuador: Banco Central del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Carter Center. 2008. Report on the Constituent Assembly of the Republic of Ecuador. Final Report. 5 September. Quito, Ecuador: Carter Center.Google Scholar
Chicaiza, Gloria. 2010. El enclave minero de la cordillera del Cóndor. Quito, Ecuador: Acción Ecológica.Google Scholar
Chiriboga, Manual. 1987. Movimiento campesino e indígena y participación política en Ecuador: La construcción de identidades en una sociedad heterogénea. Ecuador Debate 13:87–121. Quito, Ecuador: Centro Andino de Acción Popular.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1945. The Idea of Nature. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CONAIE (Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador). 2004. Propuesta de Ley de Biodiversidad. Quito, Ecuador: CONAIE.Google Scholar
CONAIE (Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador). 2007. Propuesta de la CONAIE frente a la Asamblea Constituyente: Principios y Lineamientos para la Nueva Constitución del Ecuador [Constitutional proposal]. Quito, Ecuador: CONAIE.Google Scholar
CONAIE, CONFENIAE, SAIIC, ECUARUNARI, and ONIC. 1990. Declaración de Quito y Resolución del Encuentro Continental de Pueblos Indígenas. Pamphlet. Quito, Ecuador: CONAIE, CONFENIAE, SAIIC, ECUARUNARI, and ONIC.Google Scholar
Crespo, Ricardo. 2008. La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos: símbolo o realidad jurídica? November. Quito, Ecuador: CEDA.Google Scholar
Cronon, William. 1996. The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature. In Uncommon Ground, ed. Cronon, W., 69–90. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Cuesta, Agustín. 1972. El primer barril de petróleo 1972 [movie]. Cinemateca Nacional.Google Scholar
Cuvi, Nicolás. 2005. La institucionalización del conservacionismo en el Ecuador (1949–1953): Misael Acosta Solis y el Departamento Forestal. Procesos, Revista Ecuatoriana de Historia 22:107–29.Google Scholar
Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Devall, Bill, and Sessions, George. 1985. Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered. Layton, UT: Peregrine Smith Books.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48:147–60.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, Simmons, Beth, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2007. The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning? Annual Review of Sociology 33:449–72.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2005. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Leachman, Gwendolyn, and McAdam, Doug. 2010. On Law, Organizations, and Social Movements. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6:653–85.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson. 1998. The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Favre, David F. 1979. Wildlife Rights: The Ever‐Widening Circle. Environmental Law 9:241–81.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 2001. Social Skill and the Theory of Fields. Sociological Theory 19:105–25.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Guillaume. 2007. Verde y negro: ecologismo y conflictos por petróleo en el Ecuador. In Políticas ambientales y gobernabilidad en América Latina, ed. Fontaine, G., Van Vliet, G., and Pasquis, R., 223–56. Quito, Ecuador: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Guillaume, and Narváez, Iván. 2007. Yasuní en el siglo XXI: El estado ecuatoriano y la conservación de la Amazonía. Quito, Ecuador: FLACSO/CEDA/Abya‐Yala.Google Scholar
Gedicks, Al. 1993. The New Resource Wars: Native and Environmental Struggles Against Multinational Corporations. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Gudynas, Eduardo. 1999. Concepciones de la naturaleza y desarrollo en América Latina. Persona y Sociedad 13:101–25.Google Scholar
Gudynas, Eduardo. 2002. Ecología, economía, y ética del desarrollo sostenible. Montevideo, Uruguay: CLAES.Google Scholar
Gudynas, Eduardo. 2011. Buen Vivir: Today's tomorrow. Development 54 (4): 441–47.Google Scholar
Guerrero, Rafael, Ibarra, Hernán, Ospina, Pablo, and Unda, Mario. 2008. Una caracterización del gobierno y la Asamblea Constituyente. Diálogo sobre la coyuntura. In Ecuador Debate 73, ed. Vélez, F. R., 7–22. Quito, Ecuador: Centro Andino de Acción Popular.Google Scholar
Guerrero Cazar, Fernando, and Peralta, Pablo Ospina. 2003. El poder de la comunidad: Ajuste estructural y movimiento indígena en los Andes ecuatorianos. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
Raymond, Hames. 2007. The Ecologically Noble Savage Debate. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:177–90.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel. 1978. Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harkin, Michael Eugene, and Rich Lewis, David. 2007. Native Americans and the Environment: Perspectives on the Ecological Indian. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hays, Samuel P., and Hays, Barbara D. 1987. Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrera, Stalin. 2003. El proceso de construcción de la identidad política del movimiento indígena ecuatoriano. Informe final del concurso: Movimientos sociales y nuevos conflictos en América Latina y el Caribe. Buenos Aires: Programa Regional de Becas CLACSO.Google Scholar
Houtart, Francois. 2011. El concepto de Sumak kawsay (buen vivir) y su correspondencia con el bien común de la humanidad. Revista de Filosofía 69:7–33.Google Scholar
Jameson, Kenneth P. 2011. The Indigenous Movement in Ecuador: The Struggle for a Plurinational State. Latin American Perspectives 38:63–73.Google Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Krech, Shepard III. 1999. The Ecological Indian: Myth and History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Krech, Shepard III. 2005. Reflections on Conservation, Sustainability, and Environmentalism in Indigenous North America. American Anthropologist 107:78–86.Google Scholar
LaDuke, Winona. 1999. All Our Relations: Native Struggles for Land and Life. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Latorre Tomás, Sara. 2009. El ecologismo en el Ecuador: Pasado y presente. Unpublished paper. Quito, Ecuador.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., and Knoke, David. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo. [1949] 1981. The Land Ethic. In A Sand County Almanac with Other Essays on Conservation from Round River, 201–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucero, José Antonio. 2008. Struggles of Voice: The Politics of Indigenous Representation in the Andes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Macas, Luis. 2010. Sumak Kawsay: La vida en plenitud. América Latina en Movimiento 452:14–16.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martínez, Esperanza, and Boedt, Piet. 2007. Keep Oil Underground. Bali: Oilwatch.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1998. How Does Law Matter for Social Movements? In How Does Law Matter? ed. Garth, B. G. and Sarat, A., 76–108. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Melo, Mario, and Greene, Natalia. 2008. Argumentos para fundamentar el derecho de la naturaleza. 2 February. Quito, Ecuador: Fundación Pachamama.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O. 1997a. World Society and the Nation‐State. American Journal of Sociology 103:144–81.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Frank, David John, Hironaka, Ann, Schofer, Evan, and Tuma, Nancy Brandon. 1997b. The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870–1990. International Organization 51:623–51.Google Scholar
Mol, Arthur P. J., and Spaargaren, Gert. 2000. Ecological Modernization Theory in Debate: A Review. Environmental Politics 9:17–49.Google Scholar
Mora, Enrique Ayala. 1991. Ecuador Since 1930. In Latin America Since 1930: Spanish South America, vol. VIII. The Cambridge History of Latin America, ed. Bethell, L. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moya, Alba. 1999. Ethnos: Atlas mitológico de los pueblos indígenas del Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador: Proyecto EBI.Google Scholar
Muñoz Jaramillo, Francisco. 2008. Análisis: Nueva Constitución. Quito, Ecuador: ILDIS.Google Scholar
Nadasdy, Paul. 2002. Property and Aboriginal Land Claims in the Canadian Subarctic: Some Theoretical Considerations. American Anthropologist 104:247–61.Google Scholar
Narváez Quiñónez, Iván. 2004. Derecho ambiental y temas de sociología ambiental. Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones Fausto Reinoso y Librería Jurídica Cevallos.Google Scholar
Nash, Roderick Frazier. 1989. The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Pacari, Nina. 1996. Ecuador Taking on the Neoliberal Agenda. NACLA Report on the Americas 29:23–30.Google Scholar
Paucar, Angel M. 1980. Composición política y ecológica del sistema de áreas naturales del Ecuador. Turrialba, Costa Rica: Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Programa de Recursos Naturales Renovables.Google Scholar
Pedriana, Nicholas. 2004. Help Wanted NOW: Legal Resources, the Women's Movement, and the Battle Over Sex‐Segregated Job Advertisements. Social Problems 51:182–201.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. 2000. The Structural Context of Novel Rights Claims: Southern Civil Rights Organizing, 1961–1966. Law & Society Review 34:367–406.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R. 1993. Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life. In Law in Everyday Life, ed. Sarat, A. and Kearns, T. R., 21–61. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schnaiberg, Allan, and Gould, Kenneth A. 1994. Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Seibold, Katharine, and McDowell, John Holmes. 1992. Andean Cosmologies Through Time: Persistence and Emergence. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98:1–29.Google Scholar
Simbaña, Floresmilo. 2009. El movimiento indígena ecuatoriano y la construcción de la plurinacionalidad. In Repensar la política desde América Latina: Cultura, estado, y movimientos sociales, ed. Hoetmer, R., 153–68. Lima, Peru: Programa Democracia y Transformación Global/UNMSM.Google Scholar
Skrentny, John D. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric Alden, and Wishnie, Mark. 2000. Conservation and Subsistence in Small‐Scale Societies. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:493–524.Google Scholar
Solis, Misael Acosta. 1939. Protección a la naturaleza. Revista de la Cámara de Agricultura de la Primera Zona 3:42–43.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. 2008. Las paradojas de nuestro tiempo y la. plurinacionalidad. March. Montecristi, Manabí, Ecuador: Asamblea Constituyente.Google Scholar
Southgate, Douglas, and Whitaker, Morris. 1994. Economic Progress and the Environment: One Developing Country's Policy Crisis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, Mark David. 1999. Dispossessing the Wilderness: Indian Removal and the Making of the National Parks. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher [1972] 2010. Should Trees Have Standing?: Law, Morality, and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tamayo, Eduardo. 1996. Movimientos sociales: La riqueza de la diversidad. Quito, Ecuador: ALAI.Google Scholar
Varea, Anamaría, Barrera, Carmen, Maldonado, Ana María, Endara, Lourdes, and Real, Byron. 1997. Ecologismo Ecuatorial. Quito, Ecuador: CEDEP and Abya‐Yala.Google Scholar
Verdezoto, Nancy. 2014. Régimen busca neutralizar crítica antipetrolera. El Comercio, 11 January.Google Scholar
Vivanco, Karina, and Rodas, Paola. 2012. Galápagos, prisión de basalto: Terror y lágrimas en la Isla Isabela (1946–1959). Quito, Ecuador: Fondo Editorial Ministerio de Cultura del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1992. From the Enemy's Point of View: Humanity and Divinity in an Amazonian Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. Exchanging Perspectives: The Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Perspectives. Common Knowledge 10:463–84.Google Scholar
Wall, Derek. 1999. Earth First! and the Anti‐Road Movement: Radical Environmentalism and Comparative Social Movements. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walsh, Catherine. 2010. Development as Buen Vivir: Institutional Arrangements and (De)colonial Entanglements. Development 53 (1): 15–21.Google Scholar
Weaver, Jace. 1996. Defending Mother Earth: Native American Perspectives on Environmental Justice. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
York, Richard, Rosa, Eugene A., and Dietz, Thomas. 2003. Footprints on the Earth: The Environmental Consequences of Modernity. American Sociological Review 68:279–300.Google Scholar
Zamosc, León. 1994. Agrarian Protest and the Indian Movement in the Ecuadorian Highlands. Latin American Research Review 29:37–68.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc., Dkt. No. 93 Civ. 7527 (SDNY filed Nov. 3, 1993).Google Scholar
Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc., Case No. 2003‐0002, Provincial Court of Sucumbíos (2003).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Agrarian Development Law (1994).Google Scholar
Convention on Nature Protection and Wildlife Preservation in the Western Hemisphere. Department of International Law, Organization of American States, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Law on Forests and Conservation of Natural Areas and Wildlife (1978).Google Scholar
Law on National Parks and Reserves (1971).Google Scholar
Law on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution (1976).Google Scholar
1945 Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador.Google Scholar
1978 Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador.Google Scholar
1998 Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador.Google Scholar
2008 Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador.Google Scholar