Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-15T18:26:46.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Kant on Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2025

Edited by
Claudia Brodsky
Claudia Brodsky
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Kant and Literary Studies , pp. 11 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bibliography

Adorno, T. W. “Minima Moralia: Reflections from the Damaged Life.” Trans. Dennis Redmond. www.marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1951/mm/ch01.htm.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. Minima Moralia: Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles. “Wordsworth’s ‘Preface’ as Literary Theory.” Criticism 18.2 (1976), 122–146.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Jay M. The Fate of Art: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Boyson, Rowan. Wordsworth and the Enlightenment Idea of Pleasure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. Words’ Worth: What the Poet Does. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “On the Key to Kant’s Critique of Taste.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 72.4 (1991), 290–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. Constituting Critique: Kant’s Writing as Critical Praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. W. S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2007.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. W. S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2002.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert. “Red Kant, or the Persistence of the Third ‘Critique’ in Adorno and Jameson.” Critical Inquiry 26.4 (2000), 682–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Kant’s Leading Thread in the Analytic of the Beautiful.” In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, ed. Kukla, Rebecca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital: Volume I. London: Penguin Books, 1976.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen ökonomie. Berlin: Dietz Verlag Berlin, 1962.Google Scholar
Weiskel, Thomas. The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prose Works of William Wordsworth, 3 vols. Ed. Owen, W. J. B. and Smyser, J. W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prose Works of William Wordsworth, 3 vols. Ed. Owen, W. J. B. and Smyser, J. W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Wu, Duncan. Wordsworth’s Reading, 1800–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “A New Look at Kant’s Theory of Pleasure.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60.3 (2002): 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bibliography

Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Anidjar, Gil. The Jew, the Arab: A History of the Enemy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. Genealogies of Religion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour, Ian. “The Abyss of Imagination and the Scandal of Example: Kant Writing the Sublime.” n.d., in press.Google Scholar
Battersby, Christine. The Sublime, Terror and Human Difference. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Bennington, Geoffrey. Kant on the Frontier: Philosophy, Politics, and the Ends of the Earth. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. The Imposition of Form. Studies in Narrative Representation and Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. The Linguistic Condition: Kant’s Critique of Judgment and the Poetics of Action. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. Ed. Boulton, J. T.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958.Google Scholar
Casanova, José. “The Secular and Secularisms.” Social Research 76.4 (2009): 1049–1066.Google Scholar
Courtine, Jean-François et al. Of the Sublime: Presence in Question. Trans. Jeffrey S. Librett. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul. Aesthetic Ideology. Ed. Warminski, Andrzej. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Truth in Painting. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Ian McLeod. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, Robert. The Theory of the Sublime: From Longinus to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lee. “De Man’s Negativity.” symplokē 26.1–2 (2018): 471–476.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Frances. “Review of Thomas Weiskel, The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence.” The Wordsworth Circle 8.3 (1977), 237–242.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Frances. Solitude and the Sublime: Romanticism and the Aesthetics of Individuation. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. The Honor of Thinking: Critique, Theory, Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant’s Aesthetics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, Neil. The End of the Line: Essays on Psychoanalysis and the Sublime. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgment. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Lewis White Beck. Indianapolis: The Library of Liberal Arts, 1956.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Trans. James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Trans. J. H. Bernard. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1914.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Erste Abtheilung: Werke. Berlin: Reimer, 1908, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2009.Google Scholar
Lloyd, David. Under Representation: The Racial Regime of Aesthetics. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. Reclaiming Wonder: After the Sublime. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Ed. Shapiro, Ian. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
[Longinus]. On Sublimity. Trans. D. A. Russel. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. “Answering the Question: What Is Postmodernism?” In Postmodernism: A Reader, ed. Docherty, Thomas. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Differend: Phases in Dispute. Trans. G. Van Den Abbeele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. L’enthousiasme: La critique kantienne de l’histoire. Paris: Galilée, 1986.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. “The Interest of the Sublime.” In Of the Sublime: Presence in Question, ed. Courtine, Jean-François et al. Trans. Jeffrey S. Librett. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime: Kant’s Critique of Judgment, §§23–29. Trans. Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Martin, Donougho. “Stages of the Sublime in North America.” MLN 115 (2000): 909–940.Google Scholar
Monk, Samuel H. The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England [1935]. With a new preface by the author. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Müller, Ernst. Ästhetische Religiosität und Kunstreligion in den Philosophien von der Aufklärung bis zum Ausgang des deutschen Idealismus. Berlin: Akademie, 2004.Google Scholar
Sahota, G. S. Late Colonial Sublime: Neo-epics and the End of Romanticism. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Hugh J. “Lyotard and the Events of the Postmodern Sublime.” In Lyotard: Philosophy, Politics, and the Sublime, ed. Silverman, Hugh J.. New York and London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Trottein, Serge. “Lyotard: Before and after the Sublime.” In Lyotard: Philosophy, Politics, and the Sublime, ed. Silverman, Hugh J.. New York and London: Routledge, 2002, 192–200.Google Scholar
Van den Abeele, Bart. “Aesthetic Solidarity ‘after’ Kant and Lyotard.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 42.4 (2008).Google Scholar
Wayne, Michael. Red Kant: Aesthetics, Marxism and the Third Critique. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Weidner, Daniel. Bibel und Literatur um 1800. Munich: Wilhlem Fink, 2011.Google Scholar
Weidner, Daniel. “Kants Säkularisierung der Philosophie, die politische Theologie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft und die Kritik der Bibel.” Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistegeschichte 59.2 (2007): 97–120.Google Scholar
Weiskel, Thomas. The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, John H. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Beaumarchais, Pierre. Théâtre complet, Lettres. Ed. Allem, M.. Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléïade, 1949.Google Scholar
Benardete, S. “On Greek Tragedy.” In The Argument of the Action: Essays on Greek Poetry and Philosophy, Benardete, S.. Ed. and intro. Ronna Burger and Michael Davis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, A. C. “Hegel on Tragedy.” In Hegel on Tragedy, ed. Paolucci, H.. New York: Harper, 1962, 246–325.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. “The Avoidance of Love. A Reading of King Lear.” In Must We Mean What We Say. A Book of Essays, Cavell, Stanley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, 267–353.Google Scholar
Cutrofello, Andrew. “Kant’s Debate with Herder about the Philosophical Significance of Shakespeare.” Philosophy Compass 3.1 (2008): 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawe, Roger, ed. Sophocles: Oedipus Rex, Greek and Roman Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian. “Tragedy, Morality and Metaphysics.” In Art and Morality, ed. Bermúdez, J. and Gardner, S.. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. 2 Vols. Trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Lectures on Natural Right and Political Science (1817–1818). Trans. J. Stewart and P. Hodgson. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. T. Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Conflict of the Faculties. Trans. M. Gregor. New York: Abaris Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judging. Ed. and Trans. P. Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Ed. and Trans. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften. 22 Bde. Hrsg. Wilhelm Windelbrand. Berlin: Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1902.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Common Saying: ‘That May Be True in Theory But It Does Not Apply in Practice.’” In Kant, Political Writings. Ed. Reiss, H. S., Trans. J. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Political Writings. Ed. Reiss, H. S., Trans. J. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. The Wheel of Fire: Interpretations of Shakespearean Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Lukács, György. “The Metaphysics of Tragedy.” In Soul and Form, ed. Lukács, György. Trans. A. Bostock. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. Does History Make Sense? Hegel on the Historical Shapes of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. Hegel’s Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. “Tragedy with and without Religion: Hegelian Thoughts.” In Tragedy and the Idea of Modernity, ed. Billings, J. and Leonard, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. Fatalism in American Film Noir: Some Cinematic Philosophy. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. Hollywood Westerns and American Myth: The Importance of Howard Hawks and John Ford for Political Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. “Love and Class in Douglas Sirk’s All That Heaven Allows.” In Filmed Thought: Cinema as Reflective Form, ed. Pippin, Robert. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. The Philosophical Hitchcock: Vertigo and the Anxieties of Unknowingness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Karl. Sophocles. Trans. H. and D. Harvey. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1979.Google Scholar
Salkever, Stephen. “Tragedy and the Education of the Demos: Aristotle’s Response to Plato.” In Greek Tragedy and Political Theory, ed. Eubens, P.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. The Philosophy of Art (1804–1805). Ed. and Trans. D. W. Stott. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Szondi, Peter. Versuch über das Tragische. Frankfurt: Insel Verlag, 1961.Google Scholar
Warda, A. Immanuel Kants Bücher. Berlin: Martin Breslauer, 1922.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Wood, Alan. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Kant on Literature
  • Edited by Claudia Brodsky, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Kant and Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 16 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071611.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Kant on Literature
  • Edited by Claudia Brodsky, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Kant and Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 16 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071611.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Kant on Literature
  • Edited by Claudia Brodsky, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Kant and Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 16 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071611.002
Available formats
×