Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-9nbrm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T15:36:51.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Redress of Law – A rejoinder – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2023

Emilios Christodoulidis
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Corrigendum
Information
European Law Open , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2023 , pp. 882
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

The Author would like to clarify a statement made in the above article. On page 220, footnote 4 is corrected to:

As the reader would have realised, I am referring to the interventions by Steininger, Nicola and Golia published in this issue, namely S Steininger, ‘Where is the l(ove)? Excavating law and labour in The Redress of Law’, FG Nicola, ‘Failures of comparability in global governance: Exploring the practical dimension of the redress of law’ and A Golia, ‘ ‘A Few Practical Things’: The Redress of Law and the Irritation of (Critical) Constitutional Theory.’

The article has been updated to reflect this.

References

Christodoulidis, E. (2023). The Redress of Law – A rejoinder. European Law Open, 2(1), 219–232. doi: 10.1017/elo.2023.21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar