Introduction
At present, only two minerals whose type locality is in Galicia, Spain are recognised by the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) as unquestionable minerals. These minerals are morenosite from Cabo Ortegal, A Coruña (Martínez Alcíbar, Reference Martínez1850, Reference Martínez1851) and cervantite from Cervantes, Lugo (Dufrénoy, Reference Dufrénoy1845). Therefore, ermeloite (Erm) is of great historical and social relevance as it is the first well-characterised mineral discovered in Galicia for more than 150 years. Furthermore, our understanding of the isostructural kieserite group is enhanced by the discovery of ermeloite.
The new mineral was found in a pegmatite outcrop in granodiorites of the Morrazo peninsula (Moaña, Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain). It was found in the southern part of a place known as ‘As Chans de Ermelo’ (42°17’47”N, 8°45’12”W, ETRS89). The mineral and the name ermeloite have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the IMA (IMA2021–017a, Zaragoza Vérez et al., Reference Zaragoza Vérez, Rodríguez Vázquez, Fernández Cereijo, González del Tánago, Jiménez Martínez, Dacuña Mariño, Barreiro Pérez, Vázquez Fernández, Gómez Dopazo and Lantes-Suárez2022). The type specimen (CMG4083) is kept in the Museo de Historia Natural of the University of Santiago de Compostela as part of the Galician Mineral Collection. The test sample used in the electron microprobe analyses (EMPA) (N° 21610) is kept in the Museo Geominero (CN IGME-CSIC, Madrid, Spain).
Experimental methods
Wavelength-dispersive EMPA for ermeloite were obtained using a Jeol JXA-8900 instrument at the Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. Standard operating conditions were: accelerating voltage 15 kV, intensity probe current 20 nA, peak counting time 10 s, background counting time 5 s and beam diameter 5 μm. The standards used were almandine (FeKα), microcline (KKα), fluorapatite (PKα, FKα) (Jarosevich et al., Reference Jarosevich, Nelen and Norberg1980) and albite (AlKα) (McGuire et al., Reference McGuire, Francis and Dyar1992). The results were processed with an on-line ZAF programme. The elemental analyses expressed as element wt.% are presented in Supplementary Table S1.
The presence of lithium was excluded by optical inductively coupled plasma (ICP) using a PerkinElmer Optima 4300 DV ICP-OES spectrometer equipped with PerkinElmer AS-93plus autosampler. The sample was digested with HCl, HF and HNO3 in a microwave reactor, for 45 minutes at 250°C.
The Raman spectrum of ermeloite was collected on a randomly oriented crystal using a WITec alpha300 R confocal Raman microscope operated with an ultra-high throughput spectrometer (UHTS300), coupled by fibre to a 532 nm, 6.8 mW solid-state laser and a charge-coupled device (CCD) back-illuminated detector operating at –60°C. A Zeiss EC Epiplan Neofluar 50x/0.8 objective was used. Automatic autofocus and a monochromator grating of 600 grooves/mm were used.
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were obtained using a Philips PW1710 powder diffractometer with a Philips PW1820/00 vertical goniometer and a FR590 Enraf Nonius X-ray generator. The instrument was equipped with a graphite-diffracted beam monochromator and copper radiation source (λ (CuKα1) = 1.5406 Å), operating at 40 kV and 30 mA. Diffraction data were collected using a scintillation counter for a range of 2–65° in 2θ with a step size of 0.02° and counting time of 1 s/step. The powdered sample was spread over a low-background plate sample holder (Si 511) to minimise the background noise and the effect of preferred orientation. The sample was spun during the data collection to improve the measurement statistics.
Unit cell parameters indexed by single-crystal XRD were refined using experimental data from a polycrystalline sample by the Pawley method using the HighScorePlus software [v. 3.0d (3.0.04), © PANalytical B. V.; Degen et al., Reference Degen, Sadki, Bron, König and Nénert2014]. Peak assignments and intensities for the observed and calculated patterns are shown in Table 1, and a graphical interpretation in Supplementary Fig. S1.
Powder X-ray diffraction data (d in Å) for ermeloite. (8 strongest lines in bold). Calculated unit cell parameters: monoclinic C2/c with a = 6.5393(32), b = 7.5716(32), c = 7.1200(34) Å, β = 115.337(1)°. Rp= 8.91, Rwp = 11.57, Rexp = 10.97 and GoF = 1.05.
A light-blue crystal suitable for single-crystal XRD (0.05 × 0.04 × 0.03 mm) was carefully selected, using cross-polarised light on an optical microscope with 90× magnification. The measurements were carried out at ambient temperature.
Single-crystal XRD studies were performed on a Bruker D8 Venture Photon III-14 diffractometer using Incoatec multilayer mirror monochromated MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) from a microfocus sealed tube source at 298 K. Data for crystal-structure determination were collected by omega and phi scans. Data reduction was performed using the APEX3 v2018.7-2 software package. An empirical absorption correction was applied using the SADABS 2016/2 program. The structure was solved using SHELXT 2018/2 (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2015) and finally refined by full-matrix least-squares method based on F2 by SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2015). Neutral atom-scattering curves were used. All non-hydrogen atoms were anisotropically refined. Hydrogen atom positions were included in the model based on difference-Fourier electron density maps and refined without geometric constrains. Experimental details and cell parameters are given in Table 2. The crystallographic information file has been deposited with the Principal Editor of Mineralogical Magazine and is available as Supplementary material (see below). The bond valence analysis was performed using the most recent values of the bond valence parameters included in the ‘bvparm2020.cif’ data set from the International Union of Crystallography [https://www.iucr.org/], following the methodology of Witzke et al. (Reference Witzke, Wegner, Doering, Pöllmann and Schuckmann2000) and Brown (Reference Brown2006).
Single-crystal XRD experimental details for ermeloite.
R int = Σ|F o2 –F o2 (mean)|/Σ[F o2]. GoF = S = {Σ[w(F o2 –F c2)2]/(n–p)}½. R 1 = Σ||F o|–|F c|| / Σ|F o|. wR 2 = {Σ[w(F o2 –F c2)2]/Σ[w(F o2)2]}½; w = 1/[σ2(F o2)+(aP)2+bP] where a is 0.0057, b is 1.0188 and P is [F o2+2F c2]/3.
Occurrence
The intrusive suite of granodiorites of the Morrazo peninsula are part of the Bayo–Vigo Massif. At the centre of this area is the Festiñazo granodiorite (Fig. 1), which consists of potassium feldspar megacrystals (3–4 cm) inside a matrix of fine- to medium-grained plagioclase, quartz, biotite and muscovite (Gallastegui Suárez, Reference Gallastegui2005). Within these granodiorites, decimetric to metric pegmatitic dykes occur, which are probably associated genetically to nearby two-mica granites (Rubio Navas, Reference Rubio1981; Gallastegui Suárez, Reference Gallastegui2005).
Geographical location and geological context of ermeloite. Top right: Galicia (black area) in Europe. Top left: Galicia and its geology. Below: magnified area showing the Morrazo peninsula and its geology. Orange: granodiorite with feldspar megacrystals (pegmatite with the ermeloite). Brown: biotitic gneiss. Green: mica-schists and paragneiss with plagioclase and biotite. Pale green: schists and quartzites. Red: alkaline feldspar granite. Grey: quaternary deposits. White: Atlantic Ocean. White dot: ermeloite location.
The pegmatite in which the ermeloite appears does not present miarolitic cavities or textural zonation. The main rock-forming minerals include quartz, microcline, albitic plagioclase, biotite, muscovite and occasionally some primary Fe/Mn phosphates. Hydrothermal alteration has produced secondary minerals with variable contents of (OH) and H2O (heterosite, trolleite, crandallite, fluorapatite, rockbridgeite–frondelite, jahnsite-(CaMnMn), wardite, burangaite, mitridatite, phosphosiderite–strengite and cacoxenite). The sample of ermeloite studied is an ovoid nodule measuring 17.5 × 11.1 mm, embedded in albitic plagioclase.
The mineral occurs as short-prismatic crystals with a maximum size of 0.05 mm (Fig. 2). The colour of the mineral ranges from light blue to white and the streak is white. The crystals have a vitreous to pearly lustre and are transparent in thin fragments. Ermeloite is brittle and shows a conchoidal fracture. Mohs hardness is 3.5–4. The calculated density is 2.923 g/cm3. No fluorescence was detected under ultraviolet light. Optical properties could not be measured due to the microgranular nature of the specimen (Supplementary Fig. S2).
(a) Light blue aggregated crystals of ermeloite embedded in albitic plagioclase. Museo de Historia Natural of the University of Santiago de Compostela registration number (CMG4083). (b) Scanning electron microscope image of ermeloite crystalline mass.
Results and discussion
Composition
The results of the EMPA of ermeloite are presented in Table 3. The empirical formula obtained from the chemical analysis is Al1.022Fe0.002K0.003P0.950F0.055H2.120O4.950. The simplified formula is Al1.02P0.95F0.06O3.88⋅1.06H2O (elements present in amounts <0.01 apfu have not been included in the simplified formula). This simplified formula is close to the ideal formula AlPO4⋅H2O. The water content has been calculated by difference, and it is in agreement with crystallographic data.
Compositional data (n = 18) for ermeloite expressed as oxides wt.%.
S.D. – standard deviation; *by difference.
1Jarosewich et al. (Reference Jarosevich, Nelen and Norberg1980); 2McGuire et al. (Reference McGuire, Francis and Dyar1992).
Raman spectroscopy
The Raman spectrum of ermeloite was recorded between 100 and 3700 cm–1 (Fig. 3). In the region above 1200 cm–1, it shows a weak intensity band at 1542 cm–1, trapezoidal bands in the 2100–2800 cm–1 region, and broad bands centred at 3150 and 2996, cm–1. These bands were tentatively assigned on the basis of literature data for related compounds. For example, in Kieserite-type compounds, bands at 1500 cm–1 and 3100–3400 cm–1 are reported as ν2 bending and ν1, ν3 stretching modes of H2O (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Freeman, Jolliff and Chou2006; Talla and Widner, Reference Talla and Wildner2019 or Chio, Reference Chio, Sharma and Muenow2007). Bands around 2800 cm–1 in the IR spectrum were assigned to ν(MnO–H) or ν(H3O+) in serrabrancaite (Aranda and Bruque, Reference Aranda and Bruque1990) and (Boonchom et al., Reference Boonchom, Youngme, Maensiri and Danvirutai2008), but these Raman spectroscopy techniques are highly sensitive to organic impurities, which result in characteristic C–H bond vibrations in the 2800–3000 cm–1 and 1400–1500 cm–1 regions, (Redkov et al, Reference Redkov, Melehin and Zhurikhina2019 and references cited therein). Therefore, the assignment of these bands for cases involving natural systems is a matter of debate in the specialised literature.
Raman spectrum of ermeloite using a randomly oriented crystal.
In the region below 1200 cm–1, the Raman shift is in good agreement with spectral bands obtained by other authors (Breitinger et al., Reference Breitinger, Belz, Hajba, Komlósi, Mink, Brehm, Colognesi, Parker and Schwab2004; Frost et al., Reference Frost, Weier, Erickson, Carmody and Mills2004, Reference Frost, Scholz, López, Lana and Xi2014) for different phosphate minerals such as variscite, phosphosiderite, or wardite. Three bands at 1126, 1080 and 1008 cm–1 are present in the Raman ν1 symmetric and ν3 antisymmetric stretching region (900–1200 cm–1) of PO43–. Bands at 617, 514 and 427 cm–1 can be assigned to ν4 out-of-plane and ν2 in-plane bending modes of phosphates. Finally, the Raman spectrum of ermeloite in the 180–350 cm–1 region shows a strong intense band near 317 cm–1, and two others at 257 and 187 cm–1. Raman bands below 300 cm–1 reported in the literature are related to the O–M–O skeleton vibrational modes, such as the Al–O stretching mode at 326 cm–1 in variscite or metavariscite or the O–M–O symmetric bending mode of strengite at 193 cm–1 and variscite at 230 cm–1 (Frost et al., Reference Frost, Scholz, López, Lana and Xi2014).
Crystal structure
Single-crystal XRD shows that ermeloite crystallises in the monoclinic space group C2/c with cell parameters a = 6.5371(4) Å, b = 7.5670(5) Å, c = 7.1146(5) Å; β = 115.335(2)°, V = 318.08(4) Å3 and Z = 4. Atomic positions are given in Table 4.
Atomic coordinates and displacement parameters.
Ermeloite presents a kieserite-type structure constructed of kinked chains of corner-sharing AlO6 elongated octahedrons along [101], where the shared O3 oxygen atom is part of an H2O molecule. These chains are further connected by regular PO4 tetrahedra through the O2 oxygen atoms, forming chains described by Moore (Reference Moore1970) as ‘7 Å chains’, (Fig. 4a). The tetrahedral vertices not directly linked to the central octahedral chain cross-link with adjacent chains, to form a mixed tetrahedral–octahedral framework through O1 atoms (Fig. 4b). These structural arrangements are stabilised by hydrogen bonds between O3 and adjacent O2 atoms along the a axis (Fig. 4d).
Structure of ermeloite: (a) corner-sharing (AlO6)-octahedral chain along [101] direction; (b) mixed tetrahedral- octahedral (PO4–AlO6) framework; (c) cation octahedral detail; (d) H-bond interactions. Drawn using CCDC Mercury software.
Bond distances and angles for octahedral and tetrahedral units are reported in Table 5. The average <P–O> bond lengths (1.5303 Å) and <O–P–O> angles (109.47°) indicate that the phosphate tetrahedron is quite regular, in good agreement with the value obtained by Baur (Reference Baur1974) (<P–O> = 1.537 Å) and confirmed by Huminicki and Hawthorne (Reference Huminicki and Hawthorne2019) for minerals containing (Pɸ4) tetrahedra. The observed P–O2 distance (1.5454(14) Å) is typical of a single P–O bond (1.546 Å), whereas the P–O1 distance (1.5152(14) Å) is significantly shorter than a single bond and slightly longer than a double P=O bond (1.504 Å), thereby indicating a delocalisation of the charge along O1–P–O1.
Selected interatomic distances (Å) and angles (°) for [AlPO4⋅H2O].
aplus 2× corresponding obtuse angles. Symmetry codes: (i) x,y,z; (ii) x−½, −y+½, z−½; (iii) −x+½, y+½, −z+½; (iv) −x, −y+1, −z; (v) −x, y, −z+½; (vi) −x+½, y−1/2, −z+½.
The aluminium atoms are [2+2+2] coordinated with four phosphates in an equatorial plane (through O1 and O2) and two H2O molecules (O3) in axial positions (Fig. 4c). According to Schindler and Hawthorne (Reference Schindler and Hawthorne1999), the only way to stabilise [M 3+ (T 5+O4) (H2O)] structures in the kieserite group arrangement, and for the M 3+–O3–M 3+ linkage to occur, require an elongation of the M 3+–O3 bonds to make the incident bond valence sums around the bridging anion compatible. The Al3+ cation has a 3d0 electronic configuration, like Mg2+, but the required elongation, is greater in trivalent compounds than in divalent ones, as is evidenced in Supplementary Fig. S3. Mn3+ and V3+ have M–O3 bond lengths similar to bulkier M 2+ cations, and at least 0.1 Å greater than would be expected for a divalent cation with the same ionic radius. This large elongation requirement makes it surprising that the AlPO4⋅H2O species crystallises in a Kieserite-type structure, as the cation lacks a specific electron mechanism to induce the required elongation.
The compatibility of this Al3+–O3–Al3+ arrangement in the kieserite-type structure, with bond valence sums in the ermeloite, can be observed in Table 6. The structure compensates for the deficiencies in the formal incident bond valence sums mainly by shortening the bonds to O1 and lengthening those to O3. This can be observed in the largest Al–O3 distance (2.0509(9)Å) compared to Al–O2 (1.8662(13) Å) and Al–O1 (1.8158(13) Å). These values differ significantly from the Al–O bond distances recorded in the CCDC database (Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/) for AlO6 (Supplementary Fig. S4). The corresponding bond angles, O1–Al–O2, O1–Al–O3 and O2–Al–O3, are 87.13(6)°, 88.13(4)° and 87.14(6)°, respectively. These angles represent deviations of less than 2.9° from the ideal angles. Interestingly, the elongation of the Al–O3 bond occurs without significant alterations in the octahedral angles. This phenomenon may be facilitated by the presence of a square-plane in the equatorial position, formed by four different phosphates (Fig. 4d), resulting in a relatively low-tension octahedral configuration, which is further evidenced by a high quadratic elongation value (1.008), despite the relatively low variance in octahedral angles (7.23 deg2). Similar trends were also observed for other isostructural phosphates (Supplementary Fig. S5). This behaviour differs from the general observations reported by Robinson et al. (Reference Robinson, Gibbs and Ribbe1971) for different cations in different families of minerals, such as olivines, humites, garnets, amphiboles, pyroxenes, etc. For divalent kieserites (sulfates and selenates) an intrinsic value of the elongation is observed but the octahedral distortion is lower than for phosphates (Supplementary Fig. S5).
Bond valence analysis (valence units) for ermeloite.*
* Bond valence analysis was made with latest values of bond valence parameters included in ‘bvparm2020.cif’ data set from the International Union of Crystallography [https://www.iucr.org/], following the methodology of Witzke et al. (Reference Witzke, Wegner, Doering, Pöllmann and Schuckmann2000) and Brown (Reference Brown2006).
The corner-sharing octahedral chains have an angular relationship of 126.25(10)° between consecutive octahedrons (M–O3–M). In addition, they feature angles of 141.98(9)° and 131.30(8)° with respect to adjacent chains, as determined by the Al–O1–P and Al–O2–P angles, respectively. Finally, the refined bond distances O3–H = 0.84(3)Å and the dihedral angle H–O3–H = 104(4)° of the water molecule present appropriate values, and the strong hydrogen bonding interactions are evidenced by the short O3⋅⋅⋅O2 distance (2.6356(17) Å).
Relationship with isostructural phosphates
The new mineral ermeloite is isostructural with kieserite-type compounds of general stoichiometry [M(TO4)⋅(H2O)] (M = Mg2+, Fe2+, Ni2+, Co2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+; T = S and Se) (Leonhardt and Weiss, Reference Leonhardt and Weiss1957; Bregeault et al., Reference Bregeault, Herpin, Manoli and Pannetier1970, Wildner and Giester, Reference Wildner and Giester1991) and two other phosphates(M = Mn3+ and V3+; T = P): serrabrancaite MnPO4⋅H2O (Lightfoot et al., Reference Lightfoot, Cheetham, Sleight, Tayal, Khandelwal, Bist, Redkov, Melehin, Zhurikhina, Frost, Weier, Erickson, Carmody, Mills, Petruševski, Aleksovska, Pluth and Smith1987; Witzke et al., Reference Witzke, Wegner, Doering, Pöllmann and Schuckmann2000) and synthetic VPO4⋅H2O (Vaughey et al., Reference Vaughey, Harrison, Jacobson, Goshorn and Johnson1994).
For better comparison with ermeloite, a unit cell transformation was performed to orientate the structure like kieserite, with octahedral chains along [001] (Fig. S6). New crystallographic settings (á, b́, ć, β́) will be used, to refer to this new orientation.
Influence of the ionic radius of cations
The influence of the ionic radius of divalent cations on structural parameters (bond distances and angles) and cell dimensions (volume, axial lengths, or cell angles) has been analysed previously for kieserite-group sulfates (T = S) (Hawthorne et al., Reference Hawthorne, Groat, Raudsepp and Ercit1987; Wildner and Giester, Reference Wildner and Giester1991) and isostructural selenates (T = Se) (Giester and Wildner, Reference Giester and Wildner1992).These works provided evidence of a gradual variation in the crystallographic axes á and ć, while the b́ axis and the β́ angle showed only minor deviations.
In the phosphates examined, notably distinct values were observed for the b́ axis, together with significant variations in all the cell parameters in the case of serrabrancaite. However, when analysing Fig. 5a,b, in particular the cases of V3+ and Mn3+ (with similar ionic radius), the data suggest that all the variations in cell dimensions are produced so that the overall volume of the unit cell adapts to the ionic radius of the cation. Significant differences in the Mn–O bond distances were also observed in the case of serrabrancaite (Fig. 5d), possibly stemming from an increased M–O3 elongation due to the well-known Jahn-Teller effect (high-spin t2g3 eg1 configuration) in Mn3+ (Burns et al., Reference Burns, Cooper and Hawthorne1994), but overall, an increase in ionic radius leads to a linear rise in the average <M–O> bond lengths, in agreement with Kuppuraj et al. (Reference Kuppuraj, Dudev and Lim2009). Consequently, this increase is reflected in the polyhedral volume, as depicted in Fig. 5c. The pronounced elongation of the O3 direction in phosphates is counterbalanced by a reduction in M–O2 and (especially) M–O1 distances to maintain an appropriate octahedral volume.
Influence of cation ionic radius on the cell and structural parameters for ermeloite and isostructural phosphates, (a) cell volume, (b) cell axis, (c) polyhedral volume, (d) bond lengths, (e) P–O–M and M–O3–M angles. Ermeloite (open symbol).
The P–O–M bond angles between adjacent chains range from 137° (M = V3+) to 142° (M = Al3+) for O1 and from 129° (M = V3+) to 135° (M = Mn3+) for O2. This implies greater variations in bond angles compared to sulfates and selenates, which show variations of ~1° for O1 and 3° for O2. Furthermore, these angles do not increase smoothly with the size of the cation, as observed for divalent compounds, except for Mg2+ (Fig. 5e). In contrast, the M–O3–M angle decreases with the ionic radius of the cations, aligning with expected behaviour.
Relationship between cell axis lengths and geometric parameters
Factors that influence the length of cell parameters are difficult to identify in the case of the isostructural phosphates ermeloite, serrabrancaite, and synthetic VPO4⋅H2O, as only three compounds can be compared. Hence, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. However, those that might have a logical relationship and a reasonable trend have been analysed. The main characteristic of these compounds is their long M–O3 bond. This elongation occurs along the ć axis. It is therefore reasonable to infer that the ć axis parameters observed in phosphates are associated with the significant elongation of the M–O3 bonds, as depicted in Fig. 6a. Similarly, the á axis also appears to exhibit an almost linear behaviour with the elongation of M–O3 (Fig. 6b). This could be due to the relative positions of the phosphate anion and the H2O molecule involved in the H-bonds between O3 and O2 along the á axis. Finally, a reverse effect on the b́ axis is observed with increasing M–O–P angle (Fig 6c). Giester and Wildner (Reference Giester and Wildner1992) attributed differences in cell axis dimensions between sulfates and selenates to a variation in M–O–T angles caused by anion rotations around the b́ axis. Interestingly, a linear relationship between these angular values is maintained in the three phosphates studied.
Relationship between cell axis lengths and geometric parameters for ermeloite and isostructural phosphates, (a) ć axis vs. M–O3 bonds, (b) á axis vs. M–O3 bonds, (c) average P–O–M angle vs. b́. Ermeloite (open symbol).
Conclusions
Ermeloite, a new phosphate mineral with the ideal formula AlPO4⋅H2O, has been discovered in Chans de Ermelo, Galicia, Spain. It is the third new mineral species discovered in Galicia. It is monoclinic and crystallises in the C2/c space group with cell parameters a = 6.5371(4) Å, b = 7.5670(5) Å, c = 7.1146(5) Å; β = 115.335(2)°, V = 318.08(4) Å3 and Z = 4. The mineral has a kieserite-type structure, showing that cations such as Al3+ with the formula [M 3+ (T 5+O4) (H2O)] and without d orbitals or the Jahn-Teller effect, can be present in members of this structural type.
Comparisons of crystallographic data show significant variations between serrabrancaite MnPO4⋅H2O and the isostructural phosphates ermeloite and VPO4⋅H2O. However linear relationships were observed for the two unit cell parameters (oriented as kieserite) á and ć with M–O3 bond lengths, while b́ showed an inverse linear relationship with increasing M–O–P angle. Unfortunately, with only three data points, these trends cannot be truly established.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Moisés Núñez and Manuel Cerviño for their contribution to this discovery and Dr. Antonio L. Llamas-Saiz and Prof Lionel Delaude for revising the manuscript. This research was funded by the Área de Infraestruturas de Investigación of the Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC). All the analyses were carried out at the Área de Infraestructuras de Investigación (USC) except for the EMPA, which was done with the assistance of Alfredo Fernández Larios, at the Centro de Microscopia Electrónica, Universidad Complutense (Madrid, Spain). We appreciate the efforts of the reviewers and editors to improve this article.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2024.33.
Competing interests
The authors declare none.
Open access
