No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Investment Without Return? Individual Out-of-State Contributions to US Direct Democracy Campaigns
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 September 2025
Abstract
Existing scholarship investigates the influence of out-of-state donors in state-level candidate politics; however, comparatively little attention is given to out-of-state contributions in direct democracy campaigns, such as ballot initiatives and referenda. This study is the first to investigate out-of-state donations to direct democracy campaigns, focusing on the scope and characteristics of individual out-of-state donors across the United States. Utilizing an original dataset of contributions to direct democracy committees from 2006 to 2022, I present three key findings. First, out-of-state contributions to direct democracy campaigns have increased over time, with notable spikes in recent election cycles. Second, a large majority of out-of-state individual contributions total $100 or less, primarily to measures related to social issues and substance use regulation. Third, out-of-state contributions to direct democracy campaigns tend to share certain characteristics. A significant portion of these contributions comes from zip codes with lower to average incomes and states without direct democracy processes of their own. Finally, based on these characteristics, I develop a potential theory for why these donors contribute, arguing that individual out-of-state donors to direct democracy campaigns are primarily motivated by a combination of ideological and consumption-oriented considerations.
Information
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the State Politics and Policy Section of the American Political Science Association
References
Ansolabehere, Stephen, De Figueiredo, John M., and Snyder, James M.. 2003. “Why Is There So Little Money in Politics?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(1): 105–30.10.1257/089533003321164976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F. 2013. Timing and Turnout: How Off-Cycle Elections Favor Organized Groups. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226086958.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aranson, Peter H., and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1979. “Some Aspects of the Political Economy of Election Campaign Contribution Laws.” Public Choice 34(3): 435–61.10.1007/BF00225679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1995. “Campaign Contributions and Access.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 566–81.10.2307/2082974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy E. 2016. “Getting Short-Changed? The Impact of Outside Money on District Representation.” Social Science Quarterly 97(5): 1096–107.10.1111/ssqu.12279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy E. 2020. “The Partisan and Policy Motivations of Political Donors Seeking Surrogate Representation in House Elections.” Political Behavior 42(4): 1035–54.10.1007/s11109-019-09531-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Michael J. 2016. “Donation Motivations: Testing Theories of Access and Ideology.” Political Research Quarterly 69(1): 148–59.10.1177/1065912915624164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Michael J., Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Thrower, Sharece. 2017. “Ideologically Sophisticated Donors: Which Candidates Do Individual Contributors Finance?” American Journal of Political Science 61(2): 271–88.10.1111/ajps.12275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldt, Allie. 2023. “Direct Democracy in the States: A 50-State Survey of the Journey to the Ballot.” State Democracy Research Initiative, University of Wisconsin Law School.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2016. “Avenues of Influence: On the Political Expenditures of Corporations and Their Directors and Executives.” Business and Politics 18(4): 367–94.10.1515/bap-2016-0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton, Laurent, Castanheira, Micael, and Drazen, Allan. 2024. “A Theory of Small Campaign Contributions.” The Economic Journal 134(662): 2351–90.10.1093/ej/ueae021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2000. Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 1998. Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Miller, Kenneth M.. 2022. “Out-of-District Donors and Representation in the US House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47(2): 361–95.10.1111/lsq.12336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Dick M. 2009. “Mandatory Disclosure for Ballot-Initiative Campaigns.” Independent Review 13(4): 567–83.Google Scholar
Clark, Sherman J. 1998. “A Populist Critique of Direct Democracy.” Harvard Law Review 112: 434–82.10.2307/1342426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culberson, Tyler, McDonald, Michael P., and Robbins, Suzanne M.. 2019. “Small Donors in Congressional Elections.” American Politics Research 47(5): 970–99.10.1177/1532673X18763918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Elizabeth, and Smith, Daniel A.. 2005. “Veiled Political Actors and Campaign Disclosure Laws in Direct Democracy.” Election Law Journal 4(4): 295–328.10.1089/elj.2005.4.295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garry, Patrick M., Nelsen, Derek A., and Spurlin, Candice J.. 2010. “Raising the Question of Whether Out-of-State Political Contributions May Affect a Small State’s Political Autonomy: A Case Study of the South Dakota Voter Referendum on Abortion.” South Dakota Law Review 55: 35–64.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James G., Lee, Frances E., and Kaminski, Joshua. 2006. “The Political Geography of Campaign Contributions in American Politics.” Journal of Politics 68(3): 626–39.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00450.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G., Lee, Frances E., and Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna. 2008. “The Check Is in the Mail: Interdistrict Funding Flows in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 373–94.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00318.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C., Hafer, Catherine, and Landa, Dimitri. 2007. “Consumption or Investment? On Motivations for Political Giving.” Journal of Politics 69(4): 1057–72.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00607.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenzke, Janet. 1988. “Comparing Contributions to U.S. House Members from Outside Their Districts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13(1): 83–103.10.2307/439946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 1994. “Foreign Investment with Endogenous Protection.” In National Bureau of Economic Research (No. 4876). https://doi.org/10.3386/w4876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2019. State Capture: How Conservative Activists, Big Businesses, and Wealthy Donors Reshaped the American States—and the Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Seth J., and Huber, Gregory A.. 2017. “Representativeness and Motivations of the Contemporary Donorate: Results from Merged Survey and Administrative Records.” Political Behavior 39(1): 3–29.10.1007/s11109-016-9343-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226530406.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Nicholas, and Imboywa, Wasike Gil. 2024. “The Nationalization of Individual Campaign Contributions in US Senate Elections, 1984–2020.” American Politics Research 52(3): 239–48.10.1177/1532673X231220639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keena, Alex, and Knight-Finley, Misty. 2019. “Are small donors polarizing? A longitudinal study of the senate.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 18(2): 132–144.10.1089/elj.2018.0498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keena, Alex. 2024. “Out-of-State Donors and Legislative Surrogacy in the US Senate.” Political Research Quarterly 77(3): 880–90.10.1177/10659129241249171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Raja, J. Raymond, and Wiltse, David L.. 2012. “Don’t Blame Donors for Ideological Polarization of Political Parties: Ideological Change and Stability among Political Contributors, 1972–2008.” American Politics Research 40(3): 501–30.10.1177/1532673X11429845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2020. Let the People Rule: How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas, and Bergan, Daniel. 2006. “Contributions and Contributors in the 2004 Presidential Election Cycle.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(2): 155–71.10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.00296.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul, and Schickler, Eric. 2020. “Madison’s Constitution Under Stress: A Developmental Analysis of Political Polarization.” Annual Review of Political Science 23: 37–58.10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piott, Steven L. 2003. Giving Voters a Voice: The Origins of the Initiative and Referendum in America. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Jesse H., Schaffner, Brian F., and La Raja, Raymond J.. 2018. “Detecting and Understanding Donor Strategies in Midterm Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 71(3): 503–16.10.1177/1065912917749323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Michael. 2009. “Show Me the Money! The Geography of Contributions to California’s Proposition 8.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 1(1): 1–24.10.5070/P20P4FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sievert, Joel, and Mathiasen, Stefan. 2023. “Out-of-State Donors and Nationalized Politics in US Senate Elections.” Forum 21(2): 233–56.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel A., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 2007. “The Instrumental and Educative Effects of Ballot Measures: Research on Direct Democracy in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7(4): 416–45.10.1177/153244000700700404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James M. 1990. “Campaign Contributions as Investments: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1980–1986.” Journal of Political Economy 98(6): 1195–227.10.1086/261731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7CrossRefGoogle Scholar