Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-tq7bh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T01:15:24.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soil organic carbon dynamics and crop yield for different crop rotations in a degraded ferruginous tropical soil in a semi-arid region: a simulation approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2011

C. M. TOJO SOLER*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, The University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
V. B. BADO
Affiliation:
Africa Rice Center (WARDA), 01 B.P. 2031, Cotonou, Benin
K. TRAORE
Affiliation:
Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), 04 BP:8645, Ouagadougou 04, Burkina Faso
W. MCNAIR BOSTICK
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611,USA
J. W. JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611,USA
G. HOOGENBOOM
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, The University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: cecilia.tojosoler@wsu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In recent years, simulation models have been used as a complementary tool for research and for quantifying soil carbon sequestration under widely varying conditions. This has improved the understanding and prediction of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and crop yield responses to soil and climate conditions and crop management scenarios. The goal of the present study was to estimate the changes in SOC for different cropping systems in West Africa using a simulation model. A crop rotation experiment conducted in Farakô-Ba, Burkina Faso was used to evaluate the performance of the cropping system model (CSM) of the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) for simulating yield of different crops. Eight crop rotations that included cotton, sorghum, peanut, maize and fallow, and three different management scenarios, one without N (control), one with chemical fertilizer (N) and one with manure applications, were studied. The CSM was able to simulate the yield trends of various crops, with inconsistencies for a few years. The simulated SOC increased slightly across the years for the sorghum–fallow rotation with manure application. However, SOC decreased for all other rotations except for the continuous fallow (native grassland), in which the SOC remained stable. The model simulated SOC for the continuous fallow system with a high degree of accuracy normalized root mean square error (RMSE)=0·001, while for the other crop rotations the simulated SOC values were generally within the standard deviation (s.d.) range of the observed data. The crop rotations that included a supplemental N-fertilizer or manure application showed an increase in the average simulated aboveground biomass for all crops. The incorporation of this biomass into the soil after harvest reduced the loss of SOC. In the present study, the observed SOC data were used for characterization of production systems with different SOC dynamics. Following careful evaluation of the CSM with observed soil organic matter (SOM) data similar to the study presented here, there are many opportunities for the application of the CSM for carbon sequestration and resource management in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011. The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Figure 0

Table 1. Crops planted by year for the different crop rotations

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Total precipitation for the cropping season (May–October) in Farakô-ba, Burkina Faso.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Simulated and observed yield expressed as s.d. from the mean for the different rotations without N fertilizer (control).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Simulated and observed yield expressed as s.d. from the mean for the different rotations with N fertilizer.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Simulated and observed yield expressed as s.d. from the mean for the different rotations with manure applications.

Figure 5

Table 2. Observed and simulated average yields for different crop rotations

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Simulated and observed yield expressed as cumulative deviation from the mean (cumulative normalized yield) for the different rotations without N fertilizer (control).

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Simulated and observed yield expressed as cumulative deviation from the mean (cumulative normalized yield) for the different rotations with N fertilizer.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Simulated and observed yield expressed as cumulative deviation from the mean (cumulative normalized yield) for the different rotations with manure applications.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Simulated average aboveground biomass incorporated into the soil for the different rotations with N fertilizer and manure applications.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Simulated and observed SOC for the different crop rotations and different managements.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Simulated average SOC change per year (0–0·2 m depth) for different rotations and management practices from 1993 to 2004.

Figure 12

Table 3. Simulated average SOC for the three components SOM1 (microbial), SOM2 (intermediate) and SOM3 (passive) for all treatments at a depth of 0–0·2 m for 2004 after 11 years of crop rotation simulation