Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-7lfxl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-20T16:20:25.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stepped care treatment delivery for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2014

A. van Straten*
Affiliation:
Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
J. Hill
Affiliation:
Mood Disorders Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
D. A. Richards
Affiliation:
University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
P. Cuijpers
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
* Address for correspondence: A. van Straten, Ph.D., VU University, FPP, Department of Clinical Psychology, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. (Email: a.van.straten@vu.nl)

Abstract

Background

In stepped care models patients typically start with a low-intensity evidence-based treatment. Progress is monitored systematically and those patients who do not respond adequately step up to a subsequent treatment of higher intensity. Despite the fact that many guidelines have endorsed this stepped care principle it is not clear if stepped care really delivers similar or better patient outcomes against lower costs compared with other systems. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized trials on stepped care for depression.

Method

We carried out a comprehensive literature search. Selection of studies, evaluation of study quality and extraction of data were performed independently by two authors.

Results

A total of 14 studies were included and 10 were used in the meta-analyses (4580 patients). All studies used screening to identify possible patients and care as usual as a comparator. Study quality was relatively high. Stepped care had a moderate effect on depression (pooled 6-month between-group effect size Cohen's d was 0.34; 95% confidence interval 0.20–0.48). The stepped care interventions varied greatly in number and duration of treatment steps, treatments offered, professionals involved, and criteria to step up.

Conclusions

There is currently only limited evidence to suggest that stepped care should be the dominant model of treatment organization. Evidence on (cost-) effectiveness compared with high-intensity psychological therapy alone, as well as with matched care, is required.

Information

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable