Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T14:32:10.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2026

Sohrab Amiri*
Affiliation:
Spiritual Health Research Center, Lifestyle Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Jannat Mashayekhi
Affiliation:
Spiritual Health Research Center, Lifestyle Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Sohrab Amiri; Email: amirysohrab@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study focuses on the national and subnational estimation of prevalence, incidence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) related to self-harm and suicide mortality in Iran. These indicators of disease burden were analyzed over the period from 1990 to 2021, with stratifications based on sex, age and geographic location. Additionally, the percentage change observed between 1990 and 2021 was documented. The age-standardized prevalence rate (per 100,000) of self-harm decreased from 173.92 (95% UI: 146.13–208.75) in 1990 to 131.2 (95% UI: 110.55–156.67) in 2021, reflecting a percentage change of −0.25% over the period. In terms of self-harm prevalence in 2021, males had a higher rate (137.62 per 100,000) compared to females (124.82 per 100,000). The findings of the current study revealed that, despite significant challenges such as demographic shifts, economic instability and the impacts of war, the trends in self-harm incidents and suicide mortality rates in Iran have generally been on the decline. Additionally, it was observed that suicide-related deaths were more prevalent among males when compared to females. However, when examining self-harm behaviors over previous decades, these acts appeared to be more frequent among females.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. All-ages counts and age-standardized rate (per 100,000) prevalence of self-harm in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021

Figure 1

Figure 1. Trend in prevalence of self-harm in Iran, 1990–2021.

Figure 2

Table 2. All-ages counts and age-standardized rate (per 100,000) incidence of self-harm in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021

Figure 3

Figure 2. Trend in incidence of self-harm in Iran, 1990–2021.

Figure 4

Table 3. All-ages counts and age-standardized rate (per 100,000) DALYs of self-harm in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021

Figure 5

Figure 3. Trend in DALYs of self-harm in Iran, 1990–2021.

Figure 6

Table 4. All-ages counts and age-standardized rate (per 100,000) of suicide mortality in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021

Figure 7

Figure 4. Trend in suicide mortality in Iran, 1990–2021.

Figure 8

Table 5. Sex-specific prevalence, incidence, and DALYs of self-harm in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021

Figure 9

Figure 5. Sex-specific prevalence of self-harm in Iran, 1990–2021.

Figure 10

Figure 6. Sex-specific incidence of self-harm in Iran, 1990–2021.

Figure 11

Table 6. Sex-specific suicide mortality in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021

Figure 12

Figure 7. Sex-specific suicide mortality in Iran, 1990–2021.

Figure 13

Table 7. Age-specific suicide mortality in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021

Figure 14

Figure 8. Age-specific suicide mortality in Iran, 1990–2021.

Figure 15

Figure 9. Age-standardized rate (per 100,000) prevalence of self-harm in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021.

Figure 16

Figure 10. All-ages prevalence of self-harm in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021.

Figure 17

Figure 11. Age-standardized suicide mortality rate (per 100,000) in Iran, stratified by provinces, 1990–2021.

Author comment: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R0/PR1

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Percentage change was use for establishing trend. While percentage change is great for doing the trend in the data. I encourage adding a moving average as the data seem to be noisy. There were instance that the percentage change was negative and some positive. The trends in the data seems to have a lot of noise even though it is from the Global survey.

If this comment is not deemed relevant, will accept the paper as it is still well discussed.

Review: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Advantages: Relevance and Importance: This study offers a thorough national and subnational overview of suicide and self-harm in Iran, a region with distinct social and political factors influencing mental health. Suicide and self-harm are serious public health issues worldwide. Use of GBD Data: To ensure methodological rigor and comparability with other studies, the manuscript makes appropriate use of the large and standardized GBD dataset. Detailed Stratification: For policymakers and healthcare planners, the stratification by sex, age, and location improves the specificity and usefulness of the results. Clear Trend Presentation: In spite of sociopolitical obstacles, the manuscript highlights significant epidemiological changes over the course of three decades. Opportunities for Development: Flow and Clarity: Repetitive sentences or ideas that could be shortened for clarity and conciseness can be found in some sections, particularly the abstract and introduction. For instance, the abstract contains two repetitions of methods and results. To improve readability, make sure that the transitions between sections are more seamless. Interpretation of Data: According to the manuscript, the absolute number of self-harm cases rose while the age-standardized prevalence of self-harm declined. For readers who are not familiar with these metrics, the discussion should highlight and provide a clearer explanation of this significant epidemiological phenomenon (population growth and demographic changes affecting counts). It would be helpful to clarify whether the reported "-0.25" change in the prevalence of self-harm is a percentage, annual rate, or rate ratio. Units that are clear are crucial. Statistical Information: The manuscript would benefit from more detailed explanations of how uncertainty was managed and the implications of overlapping intervals on statistical significance, even though the use of 95% uncertainty intervals is appropriate. Statistical Detail: While the use of 95% uncertainty intervals is appropriate, the manuscript would benefit from clearer explanations on how uncertainty was handled and implications of overlapping intervals on statistical significance. Details about data quality, potential biases in the GBD estimates for Iran, and limitations inherent to modeling self-harm and suicide mortality data (such as underreporting due to stigma or misclassification) should be elaborated. Discussion and Context: The discussion briefly mentions demographic changes, economic turmoil, and war but could be expanded to interpret how these factors might influence the observed trends and what interventions might address the burden effectively. Comparison with neighboring countries or global trends could contextualize Iran’s situation better. Formatting and Minor Corrections: There are some formatting issues, such as repeated abstract text and abrupt line breaks, which need correction before publication. The use of citations in the text needs to be consistent and formatted according to journal guidelines. Minor grammatical improvements are needed for clarity (e.g., “self-harm harm” in the introduction should be “self-harm”). Additional Suggestions: Including visual aids such as trend graphs and maps would enhance the manuscript’s impact, especially for the subnational analysis. Consider adding a brief policy recommendation section based on findings to guide future mental health interventions in Iran.

Comments

The manuscript is very important and timely, as there is more attention to the issue of mental health and prevention of suicide, globally and also in the area. The GBD 2021 data were employed to analyze long-term trends and estimated national and subnational burden of self-harm and suicide in Iran, it is a solid foundation for future studies.

The authors succinctly point to important trends, such as an overall reduction in the prevalence of self-harm across each time period (31 years) and gender inequalities in the rates of both self-harm and suicide This manuscript does a good job of identifying some of the clear findings such as the decline in the prevalence of self-harm across the 31-y time frame and enduring disparities in both the rates of self-harm and suicide mortality by gender. Sex, age and.isSuccessful.Patient sex, age and

location adds significant depth to the analysis and allows for more targeted interpretation. However, I believe the paper could be further strengthened by elaborating on some contextual factors that may have influenced these trends, such as changes in health service availability, sociopolitical developments, stigma, or policy shifts in Iran.

The observed increase in absolute suicide deaths, despite a reduction in age-standardized rates, is an important point that reflects population growth and demographic transitions. Including more interpretation of this dynamic would add value to the discussion.

Overall, the manuscript makes a valuable contribution to the literature on mental health and mortality in the Eastern Mediterranean region. With a few additions related to contextual interpretation and policy implications, the paper would be even more impactful for public health professionals and decision-makers.

Recommendation: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R1/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Line 34, 35: As the population increases, the need for mental health care will also increase.

Who said this, what made you say this, while suicide is mental health related indicator of a country, the quick assumption that increasing population has an increase ot the needs of mental health care is too quick to jump without reference to the data. Also the data is nto even talking about mental health care needs. The article premise may be coming from suicide population but it should not be said in an academic article. This may be said in an opinion piece, but in an academic article, it is best to cite or try to make an appropriate and coherent discussion as to why you say this. Because after this line you proceed to say that the population needs will also increase, indicating education, employment, welfare service etc. While there are papers highlighting its relationship, your paper just bluntly says it. It would be best to cite at this point. Also, that’s not your topic.

I’m not sold out on the highlighted part. it feels an opinion piece rather than an academic discussion on the implications of the data. It gives an idea what could be its effect and cause but it feels lacking, maybe an article specifying this things you’ve said.

In addition, the highlighted part again, "Of course, less access to mental

health care alone is not the determining factor, the stigma associated with mental

disorders is very important in Iranian culture, and the burden of this stigma causes

many individuals and families to not seek mental health care despite the need for

mental health professionals and mental health care providers. Especially in cases of suicide, many families try to hide the cause of death to avoid the stigma it

causes"

what made you say this, was there a qualitative study that explored those cases of suicide where the family had stigma about it and failed to seek help or assistance with regards to it.

I agree that this things are true but the thing is, it feels more of an opinion rather than an academic discussion. To improve it, I suggest find papers or articles that explore these things you have said and this would allow you explain it properly and have you backed up.

Recommendation: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R1/PR8

Comments

The interpretation of demographic effects is important, especially the observation that absolute suicide deaths increased despite declining age-standardized rates, due to population growth and demographic transition. This point deserves deeper quantitative illustration, for example by presenting population growth alongside mortality trends in a supplementary figure. The discussion mentions war, economic turmoil, sanctions, and stigma, but these factors could be integrated more systematically, perhaps in a subsection linking major socio-political events to observed changes in self-harm and suicide. Although the introduction references global suicide rates, the discussion could benefit from direct comparison with other Middle Eastern countries to clarify whether Iran’s trends are unique or consistent with regional patterns. While the manuscript follows the GBD protocol, readers unfamiliar with the framework may struggle with terminology such as YLDs, YLLs, and DALYs. A brief paragraph simplifying these terms would improve accessibility.

The results are thorough but at times repetitive. Multiple sections restate that age-standardized rates decreased while absolute counts increased. This point could be consolidated to avoid redundancy. Figures are informative but could be enhanced with clearer labeling of years, uncertainty intervals, and inflection points such as the 2005 peak in incidence. Tables 5–7 on sex- and age-specific differences could be more impactful if the main message was summarized graphically, for example with a ratio of male-to-female suicide mortality over time.

The discussion section situates findings in historical and cultural context but could be more structured. It would help to first summarize key findings, then provide interpretation in relation to demographics, conflict, and economic pressures, and finally highlight policy implications. The role of religion is mentioned briefly but could be supported with empirical studies. The limitations section should more explicitly acknowledge that GBD estimates rely on modeled data in contexts where surveillance quality is limited.

The abstract could state more clearly the public health significance of findings. Currently it emphasizes descriptive trends but does not fully connect to policy relevance. The impact statement repeats several elements of the abstract and should instead focus on how the findings could inform interventions or health system planning. References need careful correction as some are inconsistently formatted, for example “Bank, T. W. (2 .(021GDP per capita …”. Multiple WHO references list “Regional Office for the Eastern” rather than “World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean.” Figure captions should be expanded to include sample size, data source, and a one-sentence interpretation.

The manuscript is understandable but requires substantial language polishing for clarity and professionalism. Grammar and syntax should be corrected, for example “The number of suicide mortality in 2021 was 3,708 individuals” should be “The number of suicide deaths in 2021 was 3,708,” and “percentage change from 1990-2021 was -0.25” should be “The percentage change from 1990 to 2021 was -25%.” Repetition should be reduced, for example the phrase “prevalence, incidence, disability, and mortality rates” is overused. Typos include “compeletly teransperant” instead of “completely transparent” and “Demographic translation” instead of “demographic transition.” Some references are truncated or inconsistently capitalized. Formatting errors such as missing spaces before parentheses (for example “world(Knipe…”) should be fixed. Many sentences are too long and should be split for clarity, for example the sentence on population increase and suicide deaths in the discussion could be shortened into two simpler sentences.

Decision: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R2/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R2/PR11

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

line 127 and 128 “This manuscript was produced as part of the GBD Collaborator Network and following the GBD Protocol.”

It would make the paper better if this summarized rather than referred.

Case definitions (line 142 to 152)

In the title, it states self-harm and suicide, however, in the case definition, it lacks definition on what suicide is and how suicide and self-harm differentiates from each other. To improve, I suggest adding discussion on its difference in the case definition.

This is great work; I look forward to having it done published. Iran’s mental health (suicide and self-harm statistics) trend has to be in the journals. Goodluck and keep it up! You’re doing a great work!

Recommendation: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R2/PR12

Comments

Thanks for addressing all concerns, the manuscript is of great value.

Decision: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R2/PR13

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R3/PR14

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Recommendation: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R3/PR15

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Sex- and age-specific burden of self-harm and suicide mortality: A national and subnational study in Iran — R3/PR16

Comments

No accompanying comment.