Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T08:11:25.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human–environment interactions at a short-lived Arctic mine and the long-term response of the local tundra vegetation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2021

Frigga Kruse*
Affiliation:
Kiel University, Institute for Ecosystem Research, Olshausenstr. 75, 24118 Kiel, Germany
Gary R. Nobles
Affiliation:
Koç University, Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations, İstiklal Cd. No: 181, 34433 Beyoğlu/İstanbul, Turkey
Martha de Jong
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, Wingerdhoek 10, 9713 NR, Groningen, Netherlands
Rosanne M. K. van Bodegom
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, Poststraat 6, 9712 ER Groningen, Netherlands
G. J. M. (Gert) van Oortmerssen
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, Poststraat 6, 9712 ER Groningen, Netherlands
Jildou Kooistra
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, Poststraat 6, 9712 ER Groningen, Netherlands
Mathilde van den Berg
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulo, Finland
Hans Christian Küchelmann
Affiliation:
Knochenarbeit, Speicherhof 4, 28217 Bremen, Germany
Mans Schepers
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Centre for Landscape Studies, Oude Boteringestraat 34, 9712 GK Groningen, Netherlands
Elisabeth H. P. Leusink
Affiliation:
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, Netherlands
Bardo A. Cornelder
Affiliation:
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, Netherlands
J. D. (Hans) Kruijer
Affiliation:
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, Netherlands
Michael W. Dee
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, Centre for Isotope Research, Nijenborgh 6, 9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands
*
Author for correspondence: Frigga Kruse, Email: fkruse@ecology.uni-kiel.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arctic mining has a bad reputation because the extractive industry is often responsible for a suite of environmental problems. Yet, few studies explore the gap between untouched tundra and messy megaproject from a historical perspective. Our paper focuses on Advent City as a case study of the emergence of coal mining in Svalbard (Norway) coupled with the onset of mining-related environmental change. After short but intensive human activity (1904–1908), the ecosystem had a century to respond, and we observe a lasting impact on the flora in particular. With interdisciplinary contributions from historical archaeology, archaeozoology, archaeobotany and botany, supplemented by stable isotope analysis, we examine 1) which human activities initially asserted pressure on the Arctic environment, 2) whether the miners at Advent City were “eco-conscious,” for example whether they showed concern for the environment and 3) how the local ecosystem reacted after mine closure and site abandonment. Among the remains of typical mining infrastructure, we prioritised localities that revealed the subtleties of long-term anthropogenic impact. Significant pressure resulted from landscape modifications, the import of non-native animals and plants, hunting and fowling, and the indiscriminate disposal of waste material. Where it was possible to identify individual inhabitants, these shared an economic attitude of waste not, want not, but they did not hold the environment in high regard. Ground clearances, animal dung and waste dumps continue to have an effect after a hundred years. The anthropogenic interference with the fell field led to habitat creation, especially for vascular plants. The vegetation cover and biodiversity were high, but we recorded no exotic or threatened plant species. Impacted localities generally showed a reduction of the natural patchiness of plant communities, and highly eutrophic conditions were unsuitable for liverworts and lichens. Supplementary isotopic analysis of animal bones added data to the marine reservoir offset in Svalbard underlining the far-reaching potential of our multi-proxy approach. We conclude that although damaging human–environment interactions formerly took place at Advent City, these were limited and primarily left the visual impact of the ruins. The fell field is such a dynamic area that the subtle anthropogenic effects on the local tundra may soon be lost. The fauna and flora may not recover to what they were before the miners arrived, but they will continue to respond to new post-industrial circumstances.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location map of Advent City in Adventfjorden in Svalbard. The distance between the site and the harbour of Longyearbyen is 4.4 km. Map: Norwegian Polar Institute & F. Kruse.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Historical photograph of Advent City, “the world’s northernmost town,” taken by A. B. Wilse in summer 1906. Reproduced with the permission of the Norwegian Polar Institute.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Site plan of Advent City. The modern hut (in orange) lies at 78.269° N 15.626° E. The numbering of the former buildings is used throughout the text. Of particular interest are the former stable (7b), piggery (7c) and workers’ barrack (5c) with the excavation trenches M1, M2 and Z1, respectively. Map: G. Nobles.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Photograph of trench M1 in the stable midden, fully excavated, showing the five contexts: 100 – topsoil, 101 – anthropogenic deposit comprising horse dung, 102 – anthropogenic construction layer, 103 – buried topsoil, and104 – natural soil. Photo: F. Kruse, 2016.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Location map of vegetation plots R1–R11 on an aerial photograph of Advent City. In addition to the modern hut and the remains of the former buildings, the winding cart track is clearly visible. The fell field is subject to ongoing slope processes, in particular solifluction and meltwater flooding. Map: Norwegian Polar Institute & G. Nobles.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Photograph of the range of materials excavated from trench Z1, after conservation. They include cork, probable pumice, leather, window glass, wood, metal wire, tin cans and slag. Iron nails pertaining to the same assemblage are not depicted. Photo: G. van Oortmerssen, 2016.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Pie charts of the preliminary quantification of the faunal assemblage (a–c) and the taxonomic abundance per mammalian species (d–f) per trench. L – undetermined large mammal (e.g. the size of cattle, horse and red deer), M–L – undet. medium to large mammal (e.g. wild pig to donkey and reindeer), M – undet. medium mammal (e.g. sheep to pig), S–M – undet. small to medium mammal (e.g. hare to dog), undet. – undetermined size category.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Photograph of the former cart track that was once dug out, removing the original vegetation. Plot R6 was positioned on the flank of the embankment of spoil, which had been recolonised by plants including Dryas octopetala, Salix polaris and various bryophyte species. The yellow flags in the background mark plot R5 on the track itself. The yellow-green moss growing on the track is Sanionia uncinata. Photo: L. Messingfeld, 2016.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Biplot of the isotopic results obtained on the Advent City samples compared to the average data of terrestrial ruminants and non-ruminants, marine fish and marine mammals.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Flowchart indicating the interdisciplinary methods used to investigate different aspects of past human–environment interactions at Advent City. 1 – historical sources, 2 – survey (visual, dGPS and photogrammetry), 3 – archaeological excavation, 4 – material studies, 5 – archaeozoology, 6 – archaeobotany, 7 – vegetation survey and 8 – stable isotope analysis.

Supplementary material: File

Kruse et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S6 and Figure S1
Download Kruse et al. supplementary material(File)
File 88.7 KB