Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T13:32:40.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Presenting search strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2011

Karin van der Hoorn
Affiliation:
Email: CAMvanderHoorn@LUMC.nl
Josepha Plevier
Affiliation:
Email: plevier@lumc.nl
Jan W. Schoones
Affiliation:
Email: j.w.schoones@lumc.nl
Jessica M. Langenhoff
Affiliation:
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Walaeus Library, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Email: j.m.langenhoff@lumc.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In their article, Niederstadt and Droste (1) suggest a clear representation of all search strategies for each database to be important. We agree but would like to suggest an even more robust representation of search strategies: a search strategy should be displayed as a string, rather than as a table. The advantage of this method of display is three-fold: it is clearer, it is less ambiguous, and it is easier to reproduce, adapt and apply in a database. Niederstadt and Droste also suggest to indicate the number of results per query. We deem this to be irrelevant. An indication of the number of results for each aspect would be more useful. Likewise, we consider the inclusion of a field code behind each term to be important as well. This will prevent ambiguity regarding the interpretation of the search by the search engine.

Information

Type
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011