Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-fx4k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T01:10:18.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial patterns of surface hoar properties and incoming radiation on an inclined forest opening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Eric R. Lutz
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717-3480, USA E-mail: snowscience@gmail.com
Karl W. Birkeland
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717-3480, USA E-mail: snowscience@gmail.com USDA Forest Service National Avalanche Center, PO Box 130, Bozeman, Montana 59771, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Avalanche hazard evaluation relies in part on representative snowpack stability observations. Thus, understanding the spatial patterns of snowpack instabilities and their environmental determinants is crucial. This case study integrates intensive field observations with spatial modeling to identify associations between incoming radiation, surface hoar development and its subsequent shear strength across an inclined forest opening. We examined a buried surface hoar layer in southwest Montana, USA, over five sampling days, collecting 824 SnowMicroPen resistance profiles and performing 352 shear frame tests. Spatial models of incoming long- and shortwave radiation were generated for the surface hoar formation period using modeled hemispheric sky visibility, physically based parameters and the Bird Clear Sky Radiation Model in a Geographic Information System. Before burial, the surface hoar persisted despite moderate winds and relatively high air temperatures. The buried surface hoar layer thickness varied between 3 and 21 mm within a distance of 30 m. Modeled incoming radiation explained spatial variations in layer thickness and shear strength. In areas exposed to large amounts of radiation, the surface hoar layer was strong and thin, while areas with limited incoming radiation (due to high sky visibility and shading) possessed a thicker surface hoar layer that sheared more easily. This demonstrates the usefulness of microclimate modeling for slope-scale avalanche hazard evaluation. We also identify that over the 3 week sample period, strengthening occurred without thinning of the surface hoar layer.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sample layout. Dashed lines separate plots 1–5 (indicated by circled numbers). SMP profiles are circles; shear frame tests are black diamonds.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Map of tree locations proximal to the study site (large square). Tree crowns are represented proportionally as circles. Solid black lines separate plots 1–5.

Figure 2

Table 1. Eleven tested spatial trend surface models. β0−i are coefficients, x and y are sample coordinates, μ(z) is the predicted local mean and μ is the global mean

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a) Enlarged illustration of initial hollow columnarcrystal form with scrolling edges on one side, observed on 20 January. (b) Photograph of surface hoar crystal, taken 3 weeks after crystal formation and 10 days after burial; stem and plate structures are evident.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Meteorological conditions at the study site, 18 January–5 February 2005: (a) wind speed, (b) wind direction and (c) air temperature. Vertical dashed lines demark the first and second formation periods and the persistence period. Gap in coverage on 25 January is concurrent with field maintenance.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. GIS-distributed radiation estimates: (a) incoming longwave flux L (W m−2) (Ta = −1.7°C), and Bird-model derived estimates of (b) maximum global shortwave radiation Imax (W m−2), (c) cumulative global shortwave radiation ∑I (MJ m−2) and (d) cumulative exposure time to direct shortwave radiation ∑tI (hours). 1 m resolution. Black lines on scales show cumulative distribution of cell values.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Spatial interpolations of local mean hwl (mm) using SMP data (a) from individual plots separately and (b) combined, based on best-fit trend surfaces and semivariance information (Table 2). ‘+’ indicates locations where surface hoar was absent in SMP profiles. Black curves on scales show cumulative distribution of cell values.

Figure 7

Table 2. Spatial patterns of hwl. Estimates derived from SMP measurements (mm)

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Box plots compare hwl at initial conditions (plot 1) with adjacent subsets of subsequent plots, namely (a) plot 2, (b) plot 3, (c) plot 4 and (d) plot 5, indicating that surface hoar layer thinning did not occur during the 3 week sampling period. Black square represents the median, whiskers represent the range, and box limits delineate the interquartile range. Triangles on boxes represent approximate 95% non-parametric confidence intervals of the mean (McGill and others, 1978). The delta value is the difference in medians, accompanied by p-value when Wilcoxon rank sum was significant (p≤0.05). n is sample size.

Figure 9

Table 3. WLS regression fits between hwl and sky visibility and radiation estimates*

Figure 10

Table 4. WLS regression fits between τ and radiation estimates*

Figure 11

Table 5. WLS regression fits between τ and hwl*

Figure 12

Fig.8. Conceptual model of (a) night-time and (b) daytime patterns in surface temperature on a northeast-facing (right) slope in the Northern Hemisphere. Bold dashed lines represent approximate upslope extent of study site.