Element contents
Reading Shakespeare through Drama
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2022
Summary
Reading Shakespeare through Drama arises out of case study research which focuses on reading as a socio-cultural practice. Underpinned by theories of reading, learning, drama and play, it is, nevertheless, rooted in the everyday work of secondary English classrooms. Utilising the dialogic ambiguities inherent in Shakespeare's playscripts, this collaborative approach to reading pays particular attention to adolescent readers as meaning-makers and cultural producers. The authors examine different iterations of 'active Shakespeare' pedagogies in the UK, the USA and Australia, drawing a distinction between 'reading through drama' as an approach and the theatre inflected practices promoted by well-known arts-based institutions. Observational and interview data highlight the importance of addressing issues concerning identity and representation that are inevitably raised by the study of canonical literature. Importantly, this Element situates teachers' practice within broader ideological contexts at institutional and national policy level, particularly from the perspective of England's highly regulated system of schooling.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009004268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 07 July 2022
References
ATL, ATM and NATE. (1998). An Evaluation of the 1998 Key Stage 3 Tests in English and Mathematics, London: Association of Teachers and Lecturers.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson and M. Holquist, trans.), Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ball, S. J. (1993). Education, majorism and ‘the curriculum of the dead’. Curriculum Studies, 1(2), 195–214.Google Scholar
Ball, S. J. (2004). Education for Sale! The Commodification of Everything? Presented at the Annual Education Lecture, King’s College, London.Google Scholar
Banaji, S. (2011). Mapping the rhetorics of creativity. In Sefton-Green, J., Thomson, P., Jones, K. and Bresler, L., eds., The Routledge International Handbook of Creative Learning, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 36–44.Google Scholar
Banks, F. (2014). Creative Shakespeare: The Globe Education Guide to Practical Shakespeare, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Radio, BBC 4. (2019, May 6). Start the Week with Andrew Marr: Icons of English Literature – Chaucer, Shakespeare and Dickens, London.Google Scholar
Benton, M. (1979). Children’s responses to stories. Children’s Literature in Education, 10(2), 68–85.Google Scholar
Bolton, G. (2010). Towards a conceptual framework for classroom acting behaviour. In Davis, D., ed., Gavin Bolton: Essential Writings, Stoke on Trent: Trentham, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
Bolton, G., and Heathcote, D. (1999). So You Want to Use Role Play: A New Approach in How to Plan, London: Trentham.Google Scholar
Bowell, P. (2006). The drama teacher in time plays many parts. Drama: One Forum – Many Voices, 13(2), 24–9.Google Scholar
Brady, L. (2009). ‘Shakespeare Reloaded’: Teacher professional development within a collaborative learning community. Teacher Development, 13(4), 335–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bryer, T. (2020). ‘What are the Affordances of Role in Learning through Transmedia Forms of Pedagogy?’ (PhD), University College London.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2011). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Coles, J. (1994). Enough was enough: The teachers’ boycott of National Curriculum testing. Changing English, 1(2), 16–31.Google Scholar
Coles, J. (2003). Alas, poor Shakespeare: Teaching and testing at Key Stage 3. English in Education, 37(3), 3–12.Google Scholar
Coles, J. (2009). Testing Shakespeare to the limit: Teaching Macbeth in a Year 9 classroom. English in Education, 43(1), 32–49.Google Scholar
Coles, J. (2013). ‘Every child’s birthright’? Democratic entitlement and the role of canonical literature in the English National Curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 24(1), 50–66.Google Scholar
Coles, J. (2020). Wheeling out the big guns: The literary canon in the English classroom. In Davison, J. and Daly, C., eds., Debates in English Teaching, 2nd ed., Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 103–17.Google Scholar
Coles, J., and Bryer, T. (2018). Reading as enactment: Transforming ‘Beowulf’ through drama, film and computer game. English in Education, 52(1), 54–66.Google Scholar
Colnan, S., and Semler, L. (2009). Shakespeare Reloaded (2008–10): A school and university literature research collaboration. Australian Literary Studies for Schools, 1, 1–17.Google Scholar
Cox, B. (1991). Cox on Cox: An English Curriculum for the 1990s, London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Daly, C. (2004). Trainee English teachers and the struggle for subject knowledge. Changing English, 11(1), 189–204.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. (1996). Introduction: Psychology in a social world. In Daniels, H., ed., An Introduction to Vygotsky, London: Routledge, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Daniels, H., and Downes, E. (2015). Identity and creativity: The transformative potential of drama. In Davis, S., Ferholt, B., Grainger-Clemson, H., Jansson, S. M. and Marjanovic-Shane, A., eds., Dramatic Interactions in Education: Vygotskian and Sociocultural Approaches to Drama, Education and Research, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 97–113.Google Scholar
Davis, D. (1998). An appreciation of Gavin Bolton’s ‘Acting in Classroom Drama’: By way of a foreword. In Davis, D., ed., Acting in Classroom Drama, Stoke on Trent: Trentham, pp. ix–xiv.Google Scholar
Davison, J., and Daly, C. (eds). (2019). Learning to Teach English in the Secondary School, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DES/Welsh Office. (1989). English for Ages 5–16 (‘The Cox Report’), London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
DfE. (1993). English for Ages 5 to 16: Proposals of the Secretary of State for Education for England and Wales, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
DfE. (2014). The National Curriculum in England: English Programmes of Study. www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-english-programmes-of-studyGoogle Scholar
DfES. (2003). Key Stage 3 National Strategy Drama Objectives Bank, London: DfES Publications.Google Scholar
Doecke, B. (2015). Storytelling and professional learning. Changing English, 22(2), 142–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doecke, B., and McClenaghan, D. (2011). Confronting Practice: Classroom Investigations into Language and Learning, Putney, NSW: Phoenix Education.Google Scholar
Doecke, B., and Mead, P. (2018). English and the knowledge question. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 26(2), 249–64.Google Scholar
Dollimore, J., and Sinfield, A. (eds.). (1985). Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Dyches, J. (2017). Shaking off Shakespeare: A white teacher, urban students, and the mediating powers of a canonical counter-curriculum. The Urban Review, 49(2), 300–25.Google Scholar
Dyches, J. (2018). Critical canon pedagogy: Applying disciplinary inquiry to cultivate canonical critical consciousness. Harvard Educational Review, 88(4), 538–64.Google Scholar
Elliott, V. (2014). The treasure house of a nation? Literary heritage, curriculum and devolution in Scotland and England in the twenty-first century. Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 282–300.Google Scholar
Evans, E. (1987). Readers recreating texts. In Corcoran, B. and Evans, E., eds., Readers, Texts, Teachers, Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook/Heinemann, pp. 22–40.Google Scholar
Evans, M. (1989). Signifying Nothing: Truth’s True Contexts in Shakespeare’s Text, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Fleming, M., and Stevens, D. (2015). English Teaching in the Secondary School, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franks, A. (1996). Drama education, the body and representation (or, the mystery of the missing bodies). Research in Drama Education, 1(1), 105–19.Google Scholar
Franks, A., Thomson, P., Hall, C. and Jones, K. (2014). Teachers, arts practice and pedagogy. Changing English, 21(2), 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, S., and Strand, S. (2010). Creating a Community of Practice: Final Report to the Royal Shakespeare Company’s Learning and Performance Network, University of Warwick: CEDAR: Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research.Google Scholar
Gibb, N. (2010). Speech to the Reform Conference. www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-to-the-reform-conferenceGoogle Scholar
Gibb, N. (2017). The Importance of Knowledge-Based Education. www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-the-importance-of-knowledge-based-educationGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. (ed.). (1986). Shakespeare and Schools, Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. (ed.). (1990). Secondary School Shakespeare, Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. (1993). ‘A black day will it be to somebody’. Key Stage 3 Shakespeare. Cambridge Journal of Education, 23(1), 77–88.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1984). Shakespeare through performance. Shakespeare Quarterly, 35(5), 601–8.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2009). A test of character. In Shand, G. B., ed., Teaching Shakespeare: Passing It On, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 91–104.Google Scholar
Gillham, G. (1974). Report on Condercum School Project (unpublished), Newcastle Upon Tyne LEA.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, M., and Mason, J. (2018). Reading, readers and English: Editors’ introduction. English in Education, 52(1), 2–4.Google Scholar
Gove, M. (2010). Speech to the Conservative Party Conference. https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/601441Google Scholar
Guillory, J. (1993). Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neo-liberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haughey, J. (2012). ‘What’s past is prologue’: ‘English Journal’ roots of a performance-based approach to teaching Shakespeare. English Journal, 101(3), 60–65.Google Scholar
Heathcote, D. (1980). Drama As Context, Sheffield: National Association for the Teaching of English.Google Scholar
Heathcote, D. (1991). Role-taking. In Johnson, L. and O’Neill, C., eds., Dorothy Heathcote: Collected Writing on Education and Drama, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 49–53.Google Scholar
Heathcote, D. (2015). Thresholds of security. In O’Neill, C., ed., Dorothy Heathcote on Education and Drama: Essential Writings, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. (1987). Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. (2007). The Knowledge Deficit: Closing the Shocking Educational Gap for American Children, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Holderness, G. (2014). ‘Thirty Year Ago’: The complex legacy of political shakespeare. Shakespeare Association of America, St Louis. https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/15830/6_Holderness.pdf?sequence=4Google Scholar
Holzman, L. (2010). Without creating ZPDs there is no creativity. In Connery, M. C., John-Steiner, V. and Marjanovic-Shane, A., eds., Vygotsky and Creativity: A Cultural-historical Approach to Play, Meaning Making and the Arts, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 27–39.Google Scholar
Hornbrook, D. (1988). ’Go play, boy, play’: Shakespeare and educational drama. In Holderness, G., ed., The Shakespeare Myth, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 145–159.Google Scholar
Irish, T. (2008). Teaching Shakespeare: A History of the Teaching of Shakespeare in England. https://cdn2.rsc.org.uk/sitefinity/education-pdfs/articles-and-reports/rsc-education-history-of-teaching-shakespeare.pdf?sfvrsn=e5025b21_2Google Scholar
Irish, T. (2011). Would you risk it for Shakespeare? A case study of using active approaches in the English classroom. English in Education, 45(1), 6–19.Google Scholar
Irish, T. (2016). ‘Possible Shakespeares: The Educational Value of Working with Shakespeare through Theatre-based Practice’ (PhD), University of Warwick. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b3111834~S15Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1989). Prospecting: From Reader Response to Literary Anthropology, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. (2007). Theatre, Education and the Making of Meanings: Art or Instrument? Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C., and Jones, K. (2008). Multimodal discourse analysis: The case of ‘ability’ in UK secondary school English. In Bhatia, V. K., Flowerdew, J., and Jones, R. H., eds., Advances in Discourse Studies, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 149–160.Google Scholar
Johnson, L., and O’Neill, C. (eds.). (1991). Dorothy Heathcote: Collected Writings on Education and Drama, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (ed.). (1992). English and the National Curriculum: Cox’s Revolution? London: Kogan Page in association with the Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (2003). Culture reinvented as management: English in the new urban school. Changing English, 10(2), 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. (2016). Education in Britain: 1944 to the Present, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kok, S. M. (2017). ‘What’s past is prologue’: Post-colonialism, globalisation, and the demystification of Shakespeare in Malaysia. SARE: Southeast Asian Review of English, 54(1), 36–52.Google Scholar
Kress, G. R., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J. et al. (2005). English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning, London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
Lester, J. A. (1926). The active English class: A visit to Caldwell Cook’s ‘Mummery’ at the Perse School, in Cambridge, England
. The English Journal, 15(6), 443–9.Google Scholar
Lindsay, G., Winston, J., Franks, A., and Lees, D. (2018). The Work of Royal Shakespeare Company Education in the First Year of the Associate Schools Programme, Warwick:Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research.Google Scholar
LoMonico, M. (2009). Shakespearean ruminations and innovations. English Journal, 99(1), 21–8.Google Scholar
McLaren, P. (1988). Culture or canon? Critical pedagogy and the politics of literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 58(2), 213–34.Google Scholar
McLuskie, K. (2009). Dancing and thinking: Teaching ‘Shakespeare’ in the twenty-first century. In Shand, G. B., ed., Teaching Shakespeare: Passing It On, Chichester: Blackwell, pp. 123–41.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (1995). Trick or treat? The autobiography of the question. English Quarterly, 27(3), 22–6.Google Scholar
Moll, L. C. (1990). Introduction. In Moll, L. C., ed., Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Montgomerie, D., and Ferguson, J. (1999). Bears don’t need phonics: An examination of the role of drama in laying the foundations for critical thinking in the reading process. Research in Drama Education, 4(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
Neelands, J. (2008). Common culture: Diversity and power in English/drama/media classrooms. English Drama Media, 11, 9–15.Google Scholar
Neelands, J. (2009). Acting together: Ensemble as a democratic process in art and life. Research in Drama Education, 14(2), 173–89.Google Scholar
Neelands, J. (2010). The meaning of drama. In O’Connor, P., ed., Creating Democratic Citizenship through Drama Education: The Writings of Jonothan Neelands, London: Trentham, pp. 67–78.Google Scholar
Neelands, J., and Goode, T. (2000). Structuring Drama Work: A Handbook of Available Forms in Theatre and Drama, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neelands, J., and O’Hanlon, J. (2011). There is some soul of good: An action-centred approach to teaching Shakespeare in schools. In Holland, P., ed., Shakespeare Survey 64, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–50.Google Scholar
Newbolt, H. (1921). The Teaching of English in England (‘The Newbolt Report’), London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
O’Brien, P. (ed.). (1993). Shakespeare Set Free: Teaching Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, P. (2019). The Folger Method: The what and how of teaching any literature. https://teachingshakespeareblog.folger.edu/2019/10/18/folger-method-eight-principlesGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, P. (ed.). (2010). Creating Democratic Citizenship through Drama Education: The Writings of Jonothan Neelands, London: Trentham.Google Scholar
Olive, S. (2015). Shakespeare Valued: Education Policy and Pedagogy 1989–2009, Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
O’Neill, C. (2015a). Introduction. In O’Neill, C., ed., Dorothy Heathcote on Education and Drama: Essential Writings, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
O’Neill, C. (2015b). Part III Mantle of the Expert: Introduction. In O’Neill, C., ed., Dorothy Heathcote on Education and Drama: Essential Writings, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 37–41.Google Scholar
O’Neill, C., Lambert, A., Linnell, R., and Warr-Wood, J. (1976). Drama Guidelines, London: Heinemann Educational Books/London Drama.Google Scholar
O’Neill, C., and Rogers, T. (1994). Drama and literary response: Prying open the text. English in Australia, (108), 47–51.Google Scholar
Pitfield, M. (2006). Making a crisis out of a drama: The relationship between English and drama within the English curriculum for ages 11–14. Changing English, 13(1), 97–109.Google Scholar
Pitfield, M. (2013). The impact of curriculum hierarchies on the development of professional self in teaching: Student teachers of drama negotiating issues of subject status at the interface between drama and English. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21(3), 403–26.Google Scholar
Pitfield, M. (2020). ‘Reading through Drama: The Contribution That Drama Makes to Teaching and Learning in English’ (PhD), University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2007). The National Curriculum 2007, London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2002). Standards at Key Stage 3: English, London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar
Rosen, H. (2017). The democratic mode. In Richmond, J., ed., Harold Rosen: Writings on Life, Language and Learning 1958 to 2008. London: UCL Institute of Education Press, pp. 314–29.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Royal Shakespeare Company (2016). The Learning and Performance Network: Final Impact Report 2016, Stratford: Royal Shakespear Company. https://cdn2.rsc.org.uk/sitefinity/education-pdfs/lpn-10-years-of-transforming-experiences-of-shakespeare/the-learning-and-performance-network-final-impact-evaluation-report-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=e3b42921_2Google Scholar
Schechner, R. (1985). Between Theater and Anthropology, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Schupak, E. B. (2018). Shakespeare and performance pedagogy: Overcoming the challenges. Changing English, 25(2), 163–79.Google Scholar
Sinfield, A. (2004). Literature, Politics and Culture in Postwar Britain, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Stredder, J. (2009). The North Face of Shakespeare: Activities for Teaching the Plays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, J. (2006). An ethnographic approach to researching children in junior school. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(3), 199–213.Google Scholar
The English Association. (1908). The Teaching of Shakespeare in Schools, Oxford: The English Association.Google Scholar
Thomson, P., Hall, C., Jones, K., and Sefton-Green, J. (2012). The Signature Pedagogies Project: Final Report, Creativity, Culture and Education. www.creativitycultureeducation.org//wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Signature_Pedagogies_Final_Report_April_2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Thomson, P., Hall, C., Thomas, D., Jones, K., and Franks, A. (2010). A Study of the Learning and Performance Network: An Education Programme of the Royal Shakespeare Company, Newcastle: Creativity, Culture and Education.Google Scholar
Trivedi, P. (2011). ‘You taught me language’: Shakespeare in India, In P. Holland, ed., Shakespeare Survey: Volume 64: Shakespeare As Cultural Catalyst, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–9.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1931). Imagination and creativity of the adolescent. www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1931/adolescent/ch12.htmGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1933). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1933/play.htmGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). Consciousness as a problem of psychology of behaviour. Soviet Psychology, 17, 5–35.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (1983). Drama in a dramatized society. In Writing in Society, London: Verso, pp. 11–21.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1985). Afterword. In Dollimore, J. and Sinfield, A., Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 231–9.Google Scholar
Winston, J. (2015). Transforming the Teaching of Shakespeare with the Royal Shakespeare Company, London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., and Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.Google Scholar
Yandell, J. (1997). Reading Shakespeare, or Ways with Will. Changing English, 4(2), 277–94.Google Scholar
Yandell, J. (2016). The Social Construction of Meaning: Reading Literature in Urban English Classrooms, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yandell, J. (2017). Knowledge, English and the formation of teachers. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 25(4), 583–99.Google Scholar
Yandell, J. (2019). English teachers and research: Becoming our own experts. Changing English, 26(4), 430–41.Google Scholar
Yandell, J., and Brady, M. (2016). English and the politics of knowledge. English in Education, 50(1), 44–59.Google Scholar
Yandell, J., Coles, J., and Bryer, T. (2020). Shakespeare for all? Some reflections on the Globe Theatre’s Playing Shakespeare with Deutsche Bank project. Changing English, 27(2), 208–28.Google Scholar
Young, M. (2008). Bringing Knowledge Back In: From Social Contructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 13
- Cited by