1. Introduction
The political relevance of labor market insecurity has been questioned because (a) insider-outsider divides were considered to be a divide within the low-skilled and politically less active working class (Berger and Piore Reference Berger and Piore1980; Rueda and King Reference Rueda and King2008) and (b) labor market insecurity runs through the middle of the household (Pierson Reference Pierson and Pierson2001; Emmenegger Reference Emmenegger2010). Outsiders might therefore align their preferences with those of insiders. Building on previous research (Schwander and Häusermann Reference Schwander and Häusermann2013; Häusermann et al. Reference Häusermann, Kurer and Schwander2015; Schwander Reference Schwander, Wulfgramm, Bieber and Leibfried2017, Reference Schwander2018), this contribution shows that these claims do not hold true. I provide evidence that labor market insecurity extends well into the higher-skilled middle class, in particular to high-skilled young adults and high-skilled women. Responsible for this spread of labor market insecurity is a dual transformation of post-industrial labor markets. First, labor markets have become less stable and dualized. Second, the growth of the middle class resulted in more heterogeneous work conditions within the middle class. The spread of labor market insecurity into the middle class and in particular its gendered nature bear relevance for the “household question”, that is the question whether mixed households dampen the political relevance of labor market insecurity. If labor market insecurity is concentrated in specific social groups (young adults, women) that tend to cohabit with secure insiders, the political relevance of labor market insecurity might depend on whether or not outsiders align their preferences with those of the household. In this contribution, I will discuss recent work on the relevance of the household in translating labor market divides into preferences divides.
2. The dual transformation of post-industrial labor markets
The first transformation of post-industrial labor market, the increase in labor market insecurity and its unequal distribution represents the motivation of this symposium. Besides the re-emergence of unemployment in labor market statistics again, we also witness the emergence of “new” labor market risks such as temporary or part-time employment, agency work or pseudo self-employment (Palier and Thelen Reference Palier and Thelen2010; Emmenegger et al. Reference Emmenegger, Häusermann, Palier and Seeleib-Kaiser2012). Some scholars even speak of a “new social divide not based on earning differentials, but based on access to good jobs” (Oesch Reference Oesch, Beramendi, Häusermann, Kitschelt and Kriesi2015).
The insider-outsider literature has developed different conceptualizations of insiders and outsiders to get at this new divide (see the contribution by Georg Picot and Paul Marx to this symposium, as well as Schwander and Häusermann Reference Schwander and Häusermann2013). Here, I rely on the concept of labor market vulnerability that identifies a situation where an individual is permanently exposed to high labor market risks (see Schwander and Häusermann Reference Schwander and Häusermann2013). Such a continuous and risk-based understanding of insiders and outsiders is best suited to capture the implications of labor market insecurity for politics (see the contribution by Tim Vlandas).
An equally important change in post-industrial labor markets is the growth of the middle class, which is the result of three structural and interlinked trends: the tertiarization, feminization and educational up-grading of the employment structure (Oesch Reference Oesch, Beramendi, Häusermann, Kitschelt and Kriesi2015). It is well known that the employment structure has become more service oriented over the last decades. Most important for this contribution's question, these service jobs are characterized by a greater heterogeneity of work conditions. The second trend, the educational revolution, was both a driver and consequence of the tertiarization of the employment structure. When the educational attainment of younger cohorts increased, firms adapted their production strategies to the abundant supply of highly skilled professionals and semi-professionals and offered jobs in the expanding sectors of health, education and social services but also in business and financial services (Wren et al. Reference Wren, Fodor, Theodoropoulou and Wren2013; Ansell and Gingrich Reference Ansell, Gingrich, P, B and H2018). Many of these new jobs were taken by women, although with considerable variation with regard to timing and extent (Estévez-Abe Reference Estévez-Abe2006; Esping-Andersen Reference Esping-Andersen2009). This third trend, the feminization of the workforce, has accelerated since the 1990s and contributed substantially to the occupational upgrading when women's educational catch-up translated in higher occupational attainment and their share in high-paid and high skilled jobs expanded (Oesch Reference Oesch, Beramendi, Häusermann, Kitschelt and Kriesi2015).
Taken together, the structural transformations resulted in increasingly heterogeneous work conditions of a growing middle class giving way to new divides within the middle class.
3. Why parts of the middle class have become more vulnerable
I want to emphasize that this is not to argue that skills or educational attainment are irrelevant for success in the labor market. Quite in contrast, higher education pays a higher wage premium than ever in the post-war period and is essential for a stable career. Yet, not all high-skilled groups do equally well in post-industrial labor markets. Women and young adults face different labor market prospects than men and elderly labor market participants and constitute highly skilled but vulnerable groups (see Schwander and Häusermann Reference Schwander and Häusermann2013, Häusermann et al. Reference Häusermann, Kurer and Schwander2015, Schwander Reference Schwander, Wulfgramm, Bieber and Leibfried2017).
Young adults encounter a variety of risks when entering the labor market and require time to acquire a stable position in the labor market. Some of this insecurity represents the normal transition from education to work, however, the transition period has become prolonged in post-industrial labor markets and many young adults move from one temporary job to another. Rigid employment protection or the importance of internal labor markets hamper the integration of young adults, keeping them in temporary jobs or unemployment and exacerbating their labor market vulnerability (Müller and Gangl Reference Müller and Gangl2003, Ansell and Gingrich Reference Ansell, Gingrich, P, B and H2018). The “selective” flexibilization at the margins of labor markets (Toharia and Malo Reference Toharia, Malo, G and Regini2000) which left the privileges of the core workers untouched but introduced flexible forms of employment for those at the margins is another reason for the difficulties of young adults (Polavieja Reference Polavieja2005). In this context, the deregulation of labor markets engenders a dualization of labor market chances even among the high-skilled.
Similarly, female employment rates are still lower and unemployment rates are higher than men's. This is often related to their still lower educational attainment or the function of female employees as “employment buffer’. In addition to these risks, women face additional employment risks due to their biological role as birth-giver and social role as care-giver (Estévez-Abe Reference Estévez-Abe2006). Consequently, atypical employment is the employment reality of many women regardless of their skill level, in particular if national labor market, welfare state and tax institutions acerbate difficulties to combine family and employment demands as in continental and southern Europe (Esping-Andersen Reference Esping-Andersen2009; Hook Reference Hook2015).
4. Atypical employment as employment reality for high-skilled women or young adults
The following section provides evidence for the arguments put forward. Based on pooled data from the European Labor Force Survey, Figure 1 presents rates of temporary and part-time employment for the workforce and for the two high-skilled segments that are particularly likely to be affected by labor market risks. The corresponding figures for unemployment as well as the individual country patterns can be found in the Supplementary Material (Figures A.1–A.4).
The spread of atypical employment to the middle class in Western Europe.
Figure 1 confirms that high-skilled women and younger workers are not spared from atypical employment. The left-hand side of Figure 1 shows the steady rise of part-time employment in Western Europe (solid line). This trend does not stop short before the group of high-skilled women as the parallel movement of the dotted line shows. High-skilled women are even more likely to work part-time than the average member of the workforce, a pattern valid in all countries. While high-skilled young adults are less likely to work in part-time employment than the average worker, their rate of part-time employment raises in parallel with the general trend, indicating that part-time employment spreads to the segment of high-skilled young adults as well.
Just as part-time employment is a highly gender-biased labor market risk, temporary employment is strongly age-biased and employment reality increasingly also for high-skilled young adults the right-hand side of Figure 1 shows. The rate of temporary employment of young adults exceeds the average rate of temporary employment in all countries but temporary employment is also biased against higher skilled women in approximately half the countries. During the Great Recession (2008–2012) temporary employment in general and among high skilled young adults came to a halt and was even receding among high-skilled women. Considering that temporary employed are among the first to lose their job during economic downturns, this does not come as a surprise but emphasizes the precarity of these jobs also for high-skilled. To conclude, substantial segments of the high-skilled population were exposed to labor market risks. Middle class vulnerability is mainly a result of new labor market risks for atypical work rather than unemployment risk, although the Great Recession increased unemployment risks for high-skilled young adults too (see Figure A.1).
The feminization of the workforce and the gendered nature of labor market insecurity lead to “mixed households”, when female outsiders live with male insiders. This raises questions about the role of the household in translating labor market divides into political divides. For those outsiders, the household represents a “safety net” (Pierson Reference Pierson and Pierson2001; Emmenegger Reference Emmenegger2010). The argument goes that outsiders will base their political behavior of the situation of the household, rather than on their personal situation. The household issue touches the old question whether the individual or the household represents the adequate unit of analysis, a question also vivid in the voting literature (Strøm Reference Strøm2014), in political economy (Iversen and Rosenbluth Reference Iversen and Rosenbluth2006) and sociology (Graaf and Heath Reference Graaf and Heath1992). A recent study tackled this question explicitly and tested the relevance of the household in the translation of labor market divides into preference-divides (Häusermann et al. Reference Häusermann, Kurer and Schwander2016). Based on cross-section data from 13 European countries, the study found that the household does indeed represent a safety net for outsiders, but only for a minority (between 2 and 13 percent of the working population). For most individuals (men, secure women, insecure women living with a reasonably stable or instable partner, those without household), however, their personal situation remains crucial for their political preferences. Hence, the household does not constitute an obstacle for a politicization of the labor market insecurity. Further research is needed to investigate the relevance of the parental household for the political behavior of young outsiders.
5. Conclusion
The main argument put forward in this contribution is that education and labor market insecurity are not collinear phenomena. The reason for this lies in the dual transformation of post-industrial labor markets: not only have labor markets become more unstable and atypical work more prevalent but a growing middle class has become more heterogeneous in terms of working conditions and job prospects. Hence, the contribution points to the importance of treating labor market insecurity and education as two distinct dimensions in the discussion of labor market inequality, stratification and dualization (see Philip Rehm's contribution for a similar argument regarding income inequality).
So far, the main political implication of labor market divides lies in their political alienation expressed by non-voting or casting a protest-vote (Häusermann and Schwander Reference Häusermann, Schwander, Emmenegger, Häusermann, Palier and Seeleib-Kaiser2012; Emmenegger et al. Reference Emmenegger, Marx and Schraff2015; Rovny and Rovny Reference Rovny and Rovny2017; Schwander Reference Schwander2018) but as labor market insecurity affects increasingly the politically active middle class, so might the political consequences (see Bürgisser and Kurer Reference Bürgisser and Kurer2016). Relevant for a politicization is also the question of “mixed households”, when insecure female outsiders live with stable male insider. Based on recent evidence, the contribution concludes that the household is not an obstacle to a politicization of labor market inequality. Indeed, the recent erosion of men's secure labor market position in the wake of the Great Recession might lead to an intensified politicization of labor market insecurity as men base their political preferences on their personal situation and might act as a multiplicator if their dependent family members vote on the household situation (Häusermann et al. Reference Häusermann, Kurer and Schwander2016). The sweeping success of populist parties across Europe might be a sign of this (see Manow and Schwander Reference Manow and Schwander2019 and Silja Häusermann's contribution).
Supplementary Material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.11
Open access
