Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-h5th4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T18:27:18.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Organic-walled microphytoplankton from the West Midlands, England, following the end-Triassic mass extinction: palynological evidence from the Prees 2 borehole, Cheshire Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2026

Joana C. F. Rosin
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Bas van de Schootbrugge*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Stephen P. Hesselbo
Affiliation:
Camborne School of Mines, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK
Thijs R. A. Vandenbroucke
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
*
Corresponding author: Bas van de Schootbrugge; Email: b.vanderschootbrugge@uu.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The end-Triassic mass extinction (ETME) was one of the most severe biotic crises of the Phanerozoic, driven by environmental changes linked to Central Atlantic Magmatic Province volcanism. While the ETME is a well-studied event, its expression in organic-walled phytoplankton, particularly acritarchs, remains relatively unexplored. Palynological analysis of the Prees 2 borehole, NW England (West Midlands), spanning from the upper Rhaetian to the lower Sinemurian, reveals exceptionally diverse aquatic palynomorph assemblages. The aquatic palynological assemblages, in the context of ammonite, miospore and lithostratigraphic data, show how phytoplankton communities responded to stress and subsequent stabilization. In the upper Rhaetian, the dominance of xerophytic coniferous pollen reflects warm, semi-arid palaeoenvironmental conditions, while euryhaline palynomorphs are in a nearshore environment. Subsequent phases show increased terrestrial humidity as evidenced by the palynoflora, coinciding with reduced aquatic diversity in an assemblage adapted to low-oxygen conditions. The base of the Hettangian is marked by sustained Cheirolepidiaceae dominance and a transition from short-spined Micrhystridid occurrences (reflecting low-oxygen conditions) progressing to an increased aquatic morphological diversity phase. This latter phase includes alterations in acritarch assemblages and the proliferation of dinoflagellate cysts, indicating a shift from a proximal shallow-water to a shelf palaeoenvironmental setting. Our findings demonstrate that acritarchs are valuable indicators of palaeoenvironmental change, capturing transient ‘bloom’ phases linked to post-extinction instability and offering new insights into Early Jurassic palaeoecology and recovery following the ETME.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Palaeogeographic map illustrating: (a) A detailed view of southern UK, indicating the location of Prees 2 in the Cheshire Basin during the Early Hettangian. The modern UK outline and the extent of Jurassic–Cretaceous sedimentary basins follow Hesselbo et al. (2023), which is adapted from the BGS 1:1,500,000 series tectonic map. The palaeogeographic features are adapted from Bradshaw et al. (1992), with inferred boundaries shown as dashed lines. (b) Palaeogeographic map of NW Europe during the Triassic–Jurassic transition, and (c) global palaeogeographic reconstruction showing continental configuration and the positions of the Panthalassa and Tethys Oceans after Bos et al. (2023) and references therein. Rectangles in (b) and (c) are the areas of panels (a) and (b) respectively.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Overview of palynomorph abundances for Prees 2. This figure presents palynological sampling data, samples in bold underwent oxidative treatment. Geochemical measurements (TOC and δ13C) for the studied section are from Hesselbo et al., (2023). mccd = metres corrected core depth. Detailed lithostratigraphy and ammonite biozonation were produced by the JET project team (see Hesselbo et al. (2023) for full documentation). Dashed line represents uncertain boundary, and shaded interval indicates there is no ammonite evidence. Additionally, the figure presents the total percentage of each palynomorph group. The median raw counts contributing to these totals are: pollen (154), acritarchs (104), spores (15.5), and dinoflagellate cysts (12). The spore-to-pollen ratio, defined as total spores divided by the sum of total pollen and spores (Σspores / (Σpollen + Σspores)), and plotted absolute abundance curves of polygonomorphs acritarchs, and dinoflagellate cysts. Absolute abundances of the total palynomorph assemblage were calculated using Lycopodium markers. Pale red squares indicate the CIEs present. X indicates samples with observed malformations in acritarchs.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Quantitative stratigraphic distribution: focusing on the aquatic palynomorphs. The diameter and shading of the dots represent the relative abundance (%) of a given species. The symbol X indicates identifiable taxa in samples that underwent oxidative treatment but were too damaged for counting.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Quantitative stratigraphic distribution: focusing on pollen and spores. The diameter and shading of the dots represent the relative abundance (%) of a given species. The symbol X indicates identifiable taxa in samples that underwent oxidative treatment but were too damaged for counting.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Microphotographs of acritarchs. Following the taxon name is the sample number, followed by depth in brackets. Scale bar 20 µm, unless otherwise noted. (a) Micrhystridium fragile, SSK 116447 (469.18 mccd); (b) Micrhystridium fragile, SSK 116447 (469.18 mccd); (c) Micrhystridium fragile, SSK 116460 (482.42 mccd); (d) Micrhystridium stellatum, SSK 116527 (549.28 mccd), morphotype approximate to M. fragile; (e) Micrhystridium stellatum, SSK 116463 (485.33 mccd); (f) Micrhystridium fragile/stellatum, SSK 116447 (469.18 mccd), this specimen contains one process with an expanded base as is typical for M. stellatum, showing a possible transition between morphotypes; (g) Micrhystridium fragile/stellatum, SSK 116463 (485.33 mccd), this specimen contains one process with an expanded base as is typical for M. stellatum, showing a possible transition between morphotypes; (h) Micrhystridium stellatum, SSK 116530 (552.36 mccd); (i) Micrhystridium stellatum, SSK 116538 (559.53 mccd); (j) Micrhystridium stellatum, SSK 116444 (466.21 mccd); (k) Stellinium? sp., SSK 116527 (549.28 mccd); (l) Stellinium? sp., SSK 116434 (456.28 mccd); (m) Dorsennidium? simplex, SSK 116530 (552.36 mccd), distal focus; (n) Dorsennidium? simplex, SSK 116530 (552.36 mccd), proximal focus; (o) Dorsennidium? simplex, SSK 116536 (558.42 mccd); (p) Dorsennidium? simplex, SSK 116447 (469.18 mccd); (q) Dorsennidium formosum, SSK 116530 (552.36 mccd); (r) Dorsennidium formosum, SSK 116532 (554.36 mccd); (s) Dorsennidium formosum, SSK 116530 (552.36 mccd); (t) Dorsennidium formosum, SSK 116527 (549.28 mccd); (u) Dorsennidium rhombodinium, SSK 116527 (549.28 mccd); (v) Dorsennidium rhombodinium, SSK 116438 (459.84 mccd); (w) Dorsennidium rhombodinium, SSK 116527 (549.28 mccd); (x) Dorsennidium rhombodinium, SSK 116447 (469.18 mccd).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Microphotographs of non-pollen palynomorphs. Following the taxon name is the sample number, followed by depth in brackets. Scale bar 20 µm, unless otherwise noted. (a) Baltisphaeridium infulatum var. macroinfulatum, SSK 116438 (459.84 mccd), focusing on the base of the process; (b) Baltisphaeridium infulatum var. macroinfulatum, SSK 116434 (456.28 mccd); showing medial split; (c) Baltisphaeridium infulatum var. macroinfulatum, SSK 116444 (466.21 mccd); showing medial split; (d) Baltisphaeridium infulatum var. macroinfulatum, SSK 116438 (459.84 mccd), degraded shagrinated wall; (e) Micrhystridium setasessitante, SSK 116548 (568.53 mccd), close focus on the short hyaline process; (f) Micrhystridium setasessitante, SSK 116463 (485.33 mccd); (g) Micrhystridium setasessitante, SSK 116566 (584.46 mccd); (h) Micrhystridium setasessitante, SSK 116556 (575.18 mccd); (i) Micrhystridium lymensis, SSK 116542 (564.55 mccd); (j) Micrhystridium lymensis, SSK 116489 (511.47 mccd); (k) Micrhystridium lymensis, SSK 116559 (577.9 mccd); (l) Micrhystridium lymensis, SSK 116566 (584.46 mccd); (m) Tasmanites sp., SSK 116517 (539.39 mccd); (n) Crassosphaera hexagonalis, SSK 116550 (570.51 mccd); (o) Cymatiosphaera sp. 01, SSK 116438 (459.84 mccd); (p) Cymatiosphaera sp. 02, SSK 116438 (459.84 mccd); (q) Scabrate cyst, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (r) Scabrate cyst, SSK 116447 (469.18 mccd); (s) Leiosphaeridia sp., SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (t) Leiosphaeridia sp., SSK 116532 (554.36 mccd); (u) Leiosphaeridia sp., SSK 116438 (459.84 mccd); (v) Foraminiferal test lining – trochospiral type, SSK 116572 (549.28 mccd); (w) Foraminiferal test lining – biserial type, SSK 116472 (494.43 mccd); (x) Halosphaeropsis liassica, SSK 116564 (581.76 mccd).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Microphotographs of acritarchs and malformed palynomorphs. Following the taxon name is the sample number, followed by depth in brackets. Scale bar 20 µm, unless otherwise noted. (a) Micrhystridium malformed, SSK 116566 (584.46 mccd); (b) Micrhystridium malformed, SSK 116463 (485.33 mccd); (c) Leiofusa jurassica, SSK 116538 (559.53 mccd); (d) Leiofusa jurassica, SSK 116538 (559.53 mccd); (e) Metaleiofusa diagonalis, SSK 116557 (575.93 mccd); (f) Dorsennidium europaeum, SSK 116434 (456.28 mccd), proximal focus; (g) Dorsennidium europaeum, SSK 116434 (456.28 mccd), distal focus; (h) Dorsennidium europaeum, SSK 116456 (478.43 mccd); (i) Dorsennidium irregulare, SSK 116553 (572.5 mccd); (j) Dorsennidium irregulare, SSK 116438 (459.84 mccd); (k) Dorsennidium irregulare, SSK 116484 (486.33 mccd); (l) Acritarch indet. reworked, SSK 116438 (459.84 mccd); (m) Micrhystridium fragile malformed, SSK 116560 (578.91 mccd); (n) Micrhystridium fragile malformed, SSK 116465 (487.33 mccd); (o) Micrhystridium fragile malformed, SSK 116447 (469.18 mccd); (p) Dorsennidium irregulare malformed, SSK 116447 (469.18 mccd); (q) Classopollis malformed, SSK 116550 (570.51 mccd); (r) Classopollis classoides malformed, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (s) Malformed spore, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (t) Malformed spore, SSK 116501 (523.28 mccd).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Microphotographs of dinoflagellate cysts. Following the taxon name is the sample number, followed by depth in brackets. Scale bar 20 µm, unless otherwise noted. (a) Rhaetogonyaulax rhaetica, SSK 116582 (600.18 mccd); (b) Beaumontella langii, SSK 116542 (564.55 mccd); (c) Beaumontella langii, SSK 116444 (466.21 mccd); (d) Beaumontella langii, SSK 116452 (474.44 mccd); (e) Valvaeodinium hirsutum?, proximal view, SSK 116489 (511.47 mccd); (f) Valvaeodinium hirsutum?, distal view, SSK 116489 (511.47 mccd); (g) Beaumontella? caminuspina, SSK 116570 (588.08 mccd); (h) Multiplicisphaeridium dendroideum?, SSK 116558 (576.92 mccd); (i) Umbriadinium mediterraneense, SSK 116542 (564.55 mccd); (j) Umbriadinium mediterraneense, SSK 116542 (564.55 mccd); (k) Umbriadinium mediterraneense, SSK 116438 (459.84 mccd); (l) Dapcodinium priscum, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (m) Beaumontella? delicata, SSK 116509 (531.04 mccd); (n) Beaumontella? delicata, SSK 116509 (531.04 mccd); (o) Gen. et sp. indet. 02, SSK 116471 (493.43 mccd); (p) Gen. et sp. indet. 02, SSK 116476 (498.37 mccd); (q) Gen. et sp. indet. 01, SSK 116457 (479.43 mccd); (r) Gen. et sp. indet. 01, SSK 116452 (474.44 mccd); (s) Gen. et sp. indet. 01, SSK 116452 (474.44 mccd); (t) Gen. et sp. indet. 01, SSK 116452 (474.44 mccd).

Figure 8

Figure 9. Microphotographs of pollen. Following the taxon name is the sample number, followed by depth in brackets. Scale bar 20 µm, unless otherwise noted. (a) Ricciisporites tuberculatus, SSK 116582 (600.18 mccd); (b) Ovalipollis pseudoalatus, SSK 116582 (600.18 mccd); (c) Quadraeculina anellaeformis, SSK 116515 (537.39 mccd); (d) Cycadopites sp., SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (e) Chasmatosporites sp., SSK 116542 (564.55 mccd); (f) Chasmatosporites hians, SSK 116566 (584.46 mccd); (g) Perinopollenites elatoides, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (h) Alisporites robustus, SSK 116516 (538.39 mccd); (i) Pinuspollenites minimus, SSK 116444 (466.21 mccd); (j) Alisporites sp., SSK 116553 (572.5 mccd); (k) Granuloperculatipollis rudis, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (l) Chasmatosporites apertus, SSK 116542 (564.55 mccd); (m) Rhaetipollis germanicus, SSK 116582 (600.18 mccd); (n) Araucariacites australis, SSK 116530 (552.36 mccd); (o) Sciadopityspollenites macroverrucosus, SSK 116444 (466.21 mccd); (p) Sciadopityspollenites thiergartii, SSK 116546 (566.97 mccd); (q) Classopollis classoides tetrad, SSK 116516 (538.39 mccd); (r) Classopollis simplex, SSK 116434 (456.28 mccd).

Figure 9

Figure 10. Microphotographs of spores. Following the taxon name is the sample number, followed by depth in brackets. Scale bar 20 µm, unless otherwise noted. (a) Deltoidospora toralis, SSK 116530 (552.36 mccd); (b) Deltoidospora sp., SSK 116516 (538.39 mccd); (c) Dictyophyllidites mortonii, SSK 116566 (584.46 mccd); (d) Dictyophyllidites mortonii, SSK 116489 (511.47 mccd); (e) Osmundacidites wellmanii, SSK 116528 (550.36 mccd); (f) Calamospora tener, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (g) Kraeuselisporites reissingerii, SSK 116542 (564.55 mccd); (h) Acanthotriletes varius, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (i) Conbaculatisporites spinosus, SSK 116527 (549.28 mccd); (j) Concavisporites jurensis, SSK 116566 (584.46 mccd); (k) Punctatisporites sp., SSK 116515 (537.39 mccd); (l) Todisporites minor, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (m) Densoisporites fissus, SSK 116472 (494.43 mccd); (n) Polypodiisporites polymicroforatus, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (o) Retusotriletes mesozoicus, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (p) Triancoraesporites sp., SSK 116580 (598.18 mccd); (q) Foraminisporis jurassicus, SSK 116503 (525.24 mccd); (r) Anapiculatisporites spiniger, SSK 116526 (548.28 mccd); (s) Kyrtomisporis sp., SSK 116534 (556.44 mccd); (t) Lycopodiacidites rugulatus, SSK 116471 (493.43 mccd); (u) Retitriletes austroclavatidites, SSK 116470 (492.44 mccd); (v) Baculatisporites sp., SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (x) Trachysporites asper, SSK 116575 (593.18 mccd); (w) Striatella seebergensis, SSK 116541 (563.55 mccd).

Figure 10

Figure 11. Idealized depositional model illustrating palaeoenvironmental changes and highlighting the distribution of acritarchs and dinoflagellate cysts in the Cheshire Basin (not to scale). Green represents coastal plain deposits; reddish-brown the Permian–Triassic continental clastic deposits; greys are the marine deposits. Sequence-stratigraphic interpretations follow Hesselbo et al. (2004). (a). Rhaetian terrestrial-dominated interval with abundant conifer pollen (xerophytic traits), reflecting warm, semi-arid conditions. Euryhaline aquatic palynomorphs in a shallow environment. (b). Heterolithic facies with erosional features and microbial facies. Spores indicate increased moisture. Low diversity aquatic palynomorphs indicating stressed conditions and suggesting marine incursions in a proximal environment at the onset of the Hettangian. (c). Dominance of xerophytic pollen (Cheirolepidiaceae) and cosmopolitan acritarchs in a low-oxygen shallow water setting with (relative) high TOC. Opportunistic taxa blooming under stressful conditions. (d). Higher aquatic diversity and reduced terrestrial input indicate a more distal, shelf environment. Declining short-spined acanthomorph acritarchs, alongside rising polygonomorph acritarchs and dinoflagellate cysts, signify a shift to a relative deeper inner-shelf condition.

Supplementary material: File

Rosin et al. supplementary material 1

Rosin et al. supplementary material
Download Rosin et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 749.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Rosin et al. supplementary material 2

Rosin et al. supplementary material
Download Rosin et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 166 KB