Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-6mz5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T00:46:51.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geophysical analysis of transverse ridges and internal structure at Lone Peak Rock Glacier, Big Sky, Montana, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

Caitlyn Florentine
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA E-mail: caitlyn.florentine@gmail.com
Mark Skidmore
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA E-mail: caitlyn.florentine@gmail.com
Marvin Speece
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysical Engineering, Montana Tech, University of Montana, Butte, MT, USA
Curtis Link
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysical Engineering, Montana Tech, University of Montana, Butte, MT, USA
Colin A. Shaw
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA E-mail: caitlyn.florentine@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rock glaciers are periglacial alpine landforms that are found in many locations worldwide. Whereas well-developed models of deformation are established for traditional alpine glaciers, rock glacier deformation is poorly understood. Geophysical data from Lone Peak Rock Glacier (LPRG), southwest Montana, USA, are paired with lidar bare-earth 1 m digital elevation model (DEM) analysis to explore potential genetic relationships between internal composition, structure and regularly spaced arcuate transverse ridges expressed at the rock glacier surface. The internal composition of LPRG is heterogeneous, with frozen debris and clean ice overlain by an unconsolidated talus mantle. Upslope-dipping, clearly distinguished reflectors in the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) longitudinal survey at LPRG correspond to transverse ridges. The spacing and slope of individual features at the surface and in the subsurface were measured and compared and are found to be similar. The structures observed at LPRG and other rock glaciers are similar to structures detected in glaciotectonically altered sediment, ice-cored moraines and other rock glacier settings. This finding suggests that transverse ridges on rock glaciers may be used as geomorphic indicators of internal deformation. This study contributes to the body of research on the application of GPR to rock glaciers, and is the first to directly pair and analyze individual surface topographic features with internal structures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2014
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Study area in southwest Montana; arrow indicates the site of LPRG. (b) Hillshade lidar bare-earth 1 m DEM featuring northeast cirque of Lone Peak. Tram not visible due to bare-earth lidar. LPRG extends 1.7 km valleyward; the uppermost active segment is the focus of this study. (c) Uppermost active segment of LPRG illustrated by slope-characterized lidar data with geophysical transects. Longitudinal transect west-southwest to east-northeast; transverse transect south-southeast to north-northwest. The base station of Big Sky Resort tram and excavation site are indicated. Slope scale in degrees. (d) Transverse ridges on LPRG surface. Ridges trend across the field of view. View is toward rock glacier toe.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Two rock glaciers in southwest Montana. Arrows indicate regularly spaced transverse ridges at each site. (a) LPRG prior to tram construction. Aspect is northeast. (b) Absaroka Mountains. Photograph credits: (a) Taylor Middleton and (b) Christina Carr.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Aerial view of LPRG taken during summer in the 1980s. (Photograph credit: Dave Lageson.) (b) Excavation pit ~2 m deep. Excavated material consisted of unconsolidated talus. (c) Clean bubble-rich ice encountered directly beneath unconsolidated talus. Upslope-dipping amber ice band illustrated. (d) Frozen debris encountered directly beneath clean ice.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a) Longitudinal and (b) transverse seismic refraction results. Top curve is surface elevation. Triangles represent discrete elevations of V1/V2 transition along the profile where V1 is unconsolidated talus velocity and V2 is frozen substrate velocity. Smoothed elevations represented by the solid line. (c) Longitudinal and (d) transverse 100 MHz GPR results.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (a) Longitudinal surface elevation data with individual ridges (i.e. surface features) labeled 1–14. Lines illustrate upslope dip of each ridge. Ridges illustrated with dotted lines (1, 11–14) are not included in slope and distance statistics. Slopes and spacing of each feature are noted. (b) Longitudinal seismic refraction data illustrating surface and subsurface features. (c) Longitudinal GPR data with individual subsurface features labeled 1–14 to match surface features. Slopes and spacing of each feature are noted.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. (a) Spacing, (b) distance along longitudinal profile and (c) slope of surface and subsurface features 2–10.

Figure 6

Table 1 Summary of selected studies on rock glacier internal composition, structure and transverse ridges