Dedication
In deep sorrow, we dedicate this paper to the memory of the primary author, who sadly passed away as the manuscript was being resubmitted to the Journal of Helminthology. Professor John Lewis was the inspiration for this, and many other studies in the field, and was one of the pioneers of helminth ecology in wild rodents. Despite his serious illness throughout the year, John participated in all stages of analysis and completion of this manuscript.
Introduction
Helminths of the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, have been studied extensively in host populations throughout mainland Europe (Tenora, Reference Tenora2004; Tenora et al., Reference Tenora, Meszaros and Wiger1977; Mészáros & Murai, Reference Mészáros and Murai1979; Genov, Reference Genov1984; Feliu et al., Reference Feliu, Renaud, Catzeflis, Hugot, Durand and Morand1997; Galán-Puchades et al., Reference Galán-Puchades, Fuentes, Cerezuela, Fons and Mas-Coma1998; Milazzo et al., Reference Milazzo, Aloise, Cagnin, Di Bella, Geraci, Feliu and Casanova2005; Eira et al., Reference Eira, Torres, Vingada and Miquel2006; Miljević et al., Reference Miljević, Čabrilo, Budinski, Rajičić, Bajić, Bjelić-Čabrio and Blagojević2022) and the British Isles, the first comprehensive study in the latter region being undertaken by Elton et al. (Reference Elton, Ford, Baker and Gardiner1931) in A. sylvaticus and also the bank vole, Myodes (Clethrionomys) glareolus britannicus (Miller) from Bagley Wood near Oxford. Elton and his co-workers studied seasonal variation in infection levels, but the biology of hosts and parasites were treated separately as the life histories of parasites were then unknown. Apart from the work of Thomas (Reference Thomas1953), James (Reference James1954), Sharpe (Reference Sharpe1964), Lewis (Reference Lewis1964, Reference Lewis1968), Lewis & Twigg (Reference Lewis and Twigg1972) and Lewis & Bryant (Reference Lewis and Bryant1976), it is surprising that few studies of this nature, demonstrating predictable features of infracommunities and component communities, were made in the British Isles between 1953 and 1976. Nevertheless, these and subsequent studies on the population dynamics of helminth parasites in wild and laboratory rodents (Scott & Lewis, Reference Scott and Lewis1987) have shown that highly predictable intrinsic and extrinsic factors have a profound effect on parasite burdens and also species richness within these communities.
Arguably, the most important extrinsic factor has been shown to be the geographical locality in which mice are trapped. Helminth infracommunities of wood mice, as well as those of other rodents, for example, bank voles, are known to differ between host subpopulations living in close proximity to one another but in different localities, among habitats that are ecologically very similar, as well as among those that differ radically (Kisielewska, Reference Kisielewska1970a, Reference Kisielewskab; Montgomery & Montgomery, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1989;Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert1998, Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Barnard, Bajer, Bray, Dinmore, Frake, Osmond, Race and Siński2001; Bordes et al., Reference Bordes, Ponlet, de Bellocq, Ribas, Krasnov and Morand2012; Grzybek et al., Reference Grzybek, Bajer and Bednarska2015a; Loxton et al., Reference Loxton, Lawton, Stafford and Holland2017; Babayan et al., Reference Babayan, Liu, Hamilton, Kilbride, Rynkiewicz, Clerc and Pedersen2018; Sweeny et al., Reference Sweeny, Albery, Venkatesan, Fenton and Pederson2021a). Moreover, some authors have even observed differences in the distribution of rodent pathogens between subpopulations trapped in different areas of a discrete locality (leptospirosis in Twigg et al., Reference Twigg, Cuerden and Hughes1968; helminth infracommunities in Lewis & Twigg, Reference Lewis and Twigg1972; Krasowska, Reference Krasowska1974). Lewis (Reference Lewis1968) clearly showed that Apodemus sylvaticus sampled from Skomer Island off the Pembrokeshire coast in West Wales were primarily and heavily infected with Syphacia stroma in juvenile and mature mice (mean values of 123.2 and 238.7, respectively), which appeared to prevent establishment of the more frequent and dominant nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus occurring in mainland mice. Seasonal changes in helminth burdens are also well recognized, although most such studies have been conducted over very short time spans, usually just 1–2 years (Lewis, Reference Lewis1968; Langley & Fairley, Reference Langley and Fairley1982; O'Sullivan et al., Reference O'Sullivan, Smal and Fairley1984; Montgomery & Montgomery, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1988, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1989, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1990; Gregory, Reference Gregory1992; Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert1998, Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999). More recently, attention has shifted to perturbation experiments in wild mice (Ferrari et al., Reference Ferrari, Cattadori, Nespereira, Rizzoli and Hudson2004; Pederson & Grieves, Reference Pederson and Grieves2008; Knowles et al., Reference Knowles, Fenton, Petchey, Jones, Barber and Pedersen2013; Pederson & Antonovics, Reference Pederson and Antonovics2013) and to monitoring long-term changes (Grzybek et al., Reference Grzybek, Bajer and Bednarska2015a: Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Bajer and Behnke-Borowczyk2019, Reference Behnke, Rogan, Craig, Jackson and Hide2021; Sweeny et al., Reference Sweeny, Albery, Venkatesan, Fenton and Pederson2021a; Hayward et al., Reference Hayward, Behnke and Childs2022; Wood et al., Reference Wood, Welicky, Preisserv, Leslie, Mastick, Greene, Maslenikov, Tornabene, Kinsella and Essington2023) Both approaches have revealed remarkable stability of some helminth species, usually the core species, as well as marked fluctuations in others reflecting between year cycles and responses to perturbation, temporally declining worm burdens, as well as complete loss and acquisition of new species.
Perhaps intuitively, we might expect intrinsic factors to play a major role in determining parasite burdens but few such factors have emerged as critical. Host age ranks highly among those intrinsic factors that are consistently reported as having a marked influence on parasite burdens (Elton et al., Reference Elton, Ford, Baker and Gardiner1931; Kisielewska, Reference Kisielewska1971; Montgomery & Montgomery, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1988, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1989; Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert1998; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999; Loxton et al., Reference Loxton, Lawton, Stafford and Holland2016, Reference Loxton, Lawton, Stafford and Holland2017). In studies where the age of mice was assessed and the mice were subsequently allocated to different age classes, helminth species richness has been found to increase significantly with increasing host age (Montgomery & Montgomery, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1989; Sáez-Durán et al., Reference Sáez-Durán, Debenedetti, Sainz-Elipe, Sabater-Tena, Galán-Puchades and Fuentes2021). The same has been found for the worm burdens of some, but not all individual helminth species (Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999). Helminth burdens accumulate with age because most species form chronic infections by employing effective strategies for evading host immunity (Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Barnard and Wakelin1992; Maizels et al., Reference Maizels, Balic, Gomez-Escobar, Nair, Taylor and Allen2004). Nevertheless, some studies have reported convex age-prevalence and age-abundance curves indicative of increasing age-dependent loss of worms from hosts, likely from acquired immunity to infection or increased mortality and loss of heavily infected aging hosts (Elton et al., Reference Elton, Ford, Baker and Gardiner1931; Pascala & Dobson, 1984; Gregory et al., Reference Gregory, Montgomery and Montgomery1992; Vandegrift & Hudson, Reference Vandegrift and Hudson2009a).
The second most often-assessed intrinsic factor is host sex, but while differences between the sexes in susceptibility and resistance to infections in mammals are generally well established (Poulin, Reference Poulin1996a; Zuk & McKean, Reference Zuk and McKean1996; Moore & Wilson, Reference Moore and Wilson2002), studies based on wild rodents have been less consistent in this respect (Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999; Bordes et al., Reference Bordes, Ponlet, de Bellocq, Ribas, Krasnov and Morand2012). While male-biased helminth burdens in rodents have been reported in some studies (Lewis, Reference Lewis1968; Lewis & Twigg, Reference Lewis and Twigg1972; Gregory et al., Reference Gregory, Keymer and Clarke1990), other studies have failed to find any evidence for sex-bias (Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert1998; Ferrari et al., Reference Ferrari, Cattadori, Nespereira, Rizzoli and Hudson2004; Lo & Shaner, Reference Lo and Shaner2015; Babayan et al., Reference Babayan, Liu, Hamilton, Kilbride, Rynkiewicz, Clerc and Pedersen2018), and some have reported female bias (Grzybek et al., Reference Grzybek, Bajer, Behnke-Borowczyk, Alsarraf and Behnke2015b; Miljević et al., Reference Miljević, Čabrilo, Budinski, Rajičić, Bajić, Bjelić-Čabrio and Blagojević2022). Generally, sexual dimorphism in helminth burdens appears to be extremely context dependent (i.e. often seasonal, varying between years and locality specific; Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert1998, Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999; Sáez-Durán et al., Reference Sáez-Durán, Debenedetti, Sainz-Elipe, Sabater-Tena, Galán-Puchades and Fuentes2021; Sweeny et al., Reference Sweeny, Albery, Venkatesan, Fenton and Pederson2021a). Despite this, evidence has been provided through a perturbation study that male mice (Apodemus flavicollis) are more important than females in driving H. polygyrus infections in host populations (Ferrari et al., Reference Ferrari, Cattadori, Nespereira, Rizzoli and Hudson2004, Reference Ferrari, Rosa, Pugliese and Hudson2007; see also Luong et al., Reference Luong, Grear and Hudson2009, for a similar outcome in Peromyscus leucopus infected wih Pterygodermatites peromysci). Finally, some recent studies have also considered factors such as host weight, as a proxy for age but possibly reflective of body condition (Vandegrift et al., Reference Vandegrift, Raffel and Hudson2008; Sweeny et al., Reference Sweeny, Albery, Venkatesan, Fenton and Pederson2021a; Miljević et al., Reference Miljević, Čabrilo, Budinski, Rajičić, Bajić, Bjelić-Čabrio and Blagojević2022), availability of food (Vandegrift & Hudson, Reference Vandegrift and Hudson2009b; Sweeny et al., Reference Sweeny, Clerc, Pontifes, Venkatesan, Babayan and Pederson2021b) and reproductive status (Sweeny et al., Reference Sweeny, Albery, Venkatesan, Fenton and Pederson2021a), also often with context dependent effects on/relationships with parasite prevalence and abundance.
Compared with helminth species richness and diversity of wood mice from continental Europe (Feliu et al., Reference Feliu, Renaud, Catzeflis, Hugot, Durand and Morand1997; Fuentes et al., Reference Fuentes, Saez, Trelis, Galan-Puchades and Esteban2004; Milazzo et al., Reference Milazzo, Aloise, Cagnin, Di Bella, Geraci, Feliu and Casanova2005; Eira et al., Reference Eira, Torres, Vingada and Miquel2006; Bordes, 2012), those from localities in the British Isles have been found to be severely depauperate (Sharpe, Reference Sharpe1964; Lewis, Reference Lewis1968; Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000), likely a legacy of their isolation since the late Quaternary about half a million years ago (Gupta et al., Reference Gupta, Collier and Garcia-Moreno2017). Although all helminth species recorded in wood mice from the British Isles have also been recorded in various geographical localities throughout the European mainland, many of those found abroad have never been recorded in wood mice from the British Isles, for example, Mastophorus muris, Rictularia proni and Heligmosomum spp.
Nevertheless, in host populations carrying several different helminth species, occupying overlapping sites in the intestine and characterized by shared features of their life cycles, modes of nutrition, effects on host physiology, immune system etc., we might expect to see some evidence of interactions between species (Haukisalmi & Henttonen, Reference Haukisalmi and Henttonen1998; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Gilbert, Abu-Madi and Lewis2005, Reference Behnke, Eira, Rogan, Gilbert, Torres, Miquel and Lewis2009; Poulin, Reference Poulin2005). Interactions between species, resulting in positive or negative changes in the abundance of concurrently residing species and co-occurrence of species suggesting interdependence, are expected features of animal communities (Margolis et al., Reference Margolis, Esch, Holmes, Kuris and Schad1982; Morin, Reference Morin2011), but often these have proved difficult to identify and verify quantitatively with appropriate statistical support (Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Gilbert, Abu-Madi and Lewis2005; Poulin, Reference Poulin2005). For this reason, parasitologists have often preferred to refer to parasite assemblages, rather than communities (Poulin, Reference Poulin2007, Reference Poulin2019; Levy et al., Reference Levy, Canel, Rossin, González-Castro and Timi2021).
At the level of interactions between species, we have recently shown that the two dominant helminth species of wood mice in the British Isles appear to interact in the host intestine such that in concurrent infections, S. stroma worms are encountered more posteriorly when the anterior of the intestine is also occupied by H. polygyrus (Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Morley and Behnke2021). Moreover, some evidence for associations between helminth species influencing the likelihood of being infected and for interactions that result in worm burdens being affected, has also been provided for helminth species of wood mice based on destructive sampling in cross-sectional and yearly repeated surveys (Montgomery & Montgomery, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1990; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Gilbert, Abu-Madi and Lewis2005). However, such studies have been criticized as unreliable for a variety of reasons (Knowles et al., Reference Knowles, Fenton, Petchey, Jones, Barber and Pedersen2013), and repeated non-invasive sampling of marked hosts has been proposed as a more robust approach for quantifying associations and interactions between species (Fenton et al., Reference Fenton, Knowles, Petchey and Pedersen2014; Sweeny et al., Reference Sweeny, Albery, Venkatesan, Fenton and Pederson2021a).
Despite the limitations of cross-sectional studies, if associations and/or interactions exist between parasites infecting a host species, some evidence of these should be apparent in large scale destructive sampling. In the present study the helminth burdens of five populations of wood mice from Southern England, comprising 440 animals in total, were sampled at various times over a period of 25 years (1965–1989). First, we provide a quantitative analysis of the factors that significantly influenced prevalence and abundance of helminth species in order to identify confounding effects that need to be taken into account when seeking evidence for associations/interactions between species. Then, we seek evidence for associations between species at the level of prevalence and for quantitative interactions affecting worm burdens.
Materials and methods
Databases
This analysis uses existing datasets based on surveys of the helminth parasites of wood mice collected from woodland and grassland sites in Southern England in early autumn months (late August to late October). Parts of these datasets have been utilized in earlier papers (Lewis & Twigg, Reference Lewis and Twigg1972; Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Morley and Behnke2021), but have not been analysed as extensively, nor with the same objectives, as reported herein. Three woodland sites were located north of Virginia Water, Surrey, and include: the Great Wood (Global Positioning System (GPS) 51.417286 – 0.567032) a flat, dry area of mainly oak and birch woodland with bracken and bramble ground flora sampled in 1965, 1968 and 1969, Alderhurst (GPS 51.41877, −0.56872), an area made up of copses and strips of deciduous woodland and brambles separated by small areas of grassland, sampled in 1966–67, 1982 and 1985–1989, and Ulverscroft (GPS 51.4189, –0.57077), an area of mixed woodland and brambles surrounding a cultivated grassland area with domestic buildings, sampled in 1987. These woodland sites are within one mile of each other but separated by a road and a stream. Great Wood is on the valley floor and Alderhurst is on the upper slope of the valley. A stream separates the two sites. Soil moisture content/water drainage is possibly different between these two sites. Ulverscroft is at the top of the valley separated from the other sites by a road and domestic buildings along the road. Grassland sites were at Rogate Field Station, Rogate in Hampshire (GPS 51.006610 – 0.853225; more than 30 miles distant from Great Wood), an overgrown meadow of uncut and ungrazed grasses flanked by substantial woody hedgerows, sampled in 1982, 1985–86 and 1988; and at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire (GPS 51.411781 – 0.641590, approximately five miles distant from Great Wood), a ploughed and cultivated grassland site sampled in 1987 and 1989.
Laboratory procedures
Mice were captured over a period of ten trapping nights each month using Longworth traps provided with hay and food. The maturity of males was determined by the position and size of the testes. In mature males, large testes descend into the scrotal sacs whereas males with small testes situated within the body cavity were considered juvenile and incapable of breeding, which was also confirmed by examination of the epididymis for spermatozoa. For analysis, juvenile male mice weighed between 6.9 to 18.8 g with a range of 19.00 to 33.4 g in mature males. In female mice, the weight of the lightest pregnant female during the period of maximum number of pregnancies was taken and mice of this particular weight and above were considered to be mature, ranging from 18.9 to 36.45 g compared with 9.5 to 18.5 g in juvenile females. Prior to post-mortem examination mice were killed by exposure to chloroform-soaked cotton wool. The alimentary canal and associated organs (liver, pancreas, kidneys and bladder) were removed and examined for helminths.
Nomenclature
We refer to Microsomacanthus crenata (= Hymenolepis murisylvatici (Rudolphi, 1819) = Variolepis crenata (Goeze, 1782)), since Prokopic (Reference Prokopic1967) synonymized H. murissylvatici with Passerilepis crenata, followed by reallocation of the species to the genus Microsomacanthus (Khalil et al., Reference Khalil, Jones and Bray1994). We also refer to Aonchotheca murissylvatici (= Capillaria murissylvatici (Diesing, 1851) following Moravec (Reference Moravec1982) and to Hydatigera taeniaeformis (=Taenia taeniaeformis (Batsch, 1786) Lamarck, 1816) following Nakao et al., Reference Nakao, Lavikainen, Iwaki, Haukisalmi, Konyaev, Oku, Okamoto and Akira Ito2013 and Lavikainen et al., Reference Lavikainen, Iwaki and Haukisalmi2016, but see also Verster, Reference Verster1969.
Statistical analysis
For data subsets, prevalence values (% of mice infected with helminth species referred to) are given with 95% confidence limits (CL95) in the text and 95% confidence intervals (CI95) illustrated in figures, and calculated in bespoke software based on the tables of Rohlf & Sokal (Reference Rohlf and Sokal1995). For quantitative data (i.e. abundance as reflected in worm burdens), mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM) are provided and we refer to abundance as defined by Margolis et al. (Reference Margolis, Esch, Holmes, Kuris and Schad1982) and Bush et al. (Reference Bush, Lafferty, Lotz and Shostak1997), and derived for all mice in a data subset, including those uninfected by the parasite in question.
Prevalences were analysed using maximum likelihood techniques based on log-linear analysis of contingency tables in the software package IBM SPSS (version 28). Full factorial models included sex (two levels, male and female mice), age (two levels, juvenile and mature mice), geographical locality (five levels, five sites as specified above) and presence/absence of infection (hereafter referred to as INFECTION) with the parasite being investigated. This approach is based on categorical values of factors of interest, which are used not only to fit hierarchical log-linear models to multidimensional cross-tabulations using an iterative proportional-fitting algorithm but also to detect associations between factors, one of which is INFECTION. Multi-factorial models were fitted as described previously (Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Boughattas, Al-Thani, Doiphode and Deshmukh2016), beginning with the full factorial model. Then, by employing the backward selection procedure in SPSS, we simplified the model until only significant terms remained. For each level of analysis in turn, beginning with the most complex model, involving all possible main effects and interactions, those combinations that did not contribute significantly to explaining variation in the data were eliminated in a stepwise fashion beginning with the highest level interaction (backward selection procedure). A minimum sufficient model was then obtained, for which the likelihood ratio of Chi-square was not significant, indicating that the model was sufficient in explaining the data. The importance of each term in interactions involving INFECTION in the final model was assessed by the probability that its exclusion would alter the model significantly and these values are given in the text, assessed by a likelihood ratio test between models with and without each term of interest.
For quantitative data we first fitted full factorial generalized linear statistical models in R (version 4.1.0, R Core Development Team), testing models that were based on negative binomial or Poisson error structures, as relevant. Full factorial models as specified in the text were then simplified by a step-wise deletion of non-significant terms until only significant main effects and interactions, and also main effects that were components of interactions but not significant in their own right, remained (minimum sufficient models referred to as MSM). The significance of each of the remaining terms was then assessed by comparison of models with and without that effect. Values of likelihood ratios (LR) for models based on negative binomial errors and deviances (Dev) for models with Poisson errors are provided. These procedures are fully described by Behnke et al. (Reference Behnke, Rogan, Craig, Jackson and Hide2021).
In some cases we used the model selection procedure in R comparing all relevant models with different combinations of variables by the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc; Burnham & Anderson, Reference Burnham and Anderson2002), and using the AICcmodavg package in R. For these we provide AICcWt values (=total amount of predictive power provided by the full set of models contained in the model referred to), AICcDelta values (difference in AIC score between the model referred to and the best model) and ER values (evidence ratio which is a measure of how much more likely the best model is compared to the model being referred to) (Symonds & Moussalli (Reference Symonds and Moussalli2011). We also used the covariance distribution test described by Haukisalmi & Henttonen (Reference Haukisalmi and Henttonen1998), compared species density distributions to the null model of Janovy et al. (Reference Janovy, Clopton, Clopton, Snyder, Efting and Krebs1995), both using our bespoke software, and in some cases implemented the non-parametric Spearman's test of correlation, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests in IBM SPSS.
Results
Summary statistics for mice and helminth species in the combined dataset
The dataset comprised records for 440 wood mice, of which 62.0% were males and 38% females. Overall, there were more mature mice (65.9%) compared with juveniles (34.1%), and although there was a mature host bias among both sexes, this was more marked among male mice with 29.7% being juveniles and 70.3% mature mice, whereas among females 41.3% were juveniles and 58.7% were mature (for host sex × age, χ 21 = 6.2, P = 0.013). The majority of mice were trapped from the Great Wood (58.2%) and Alderhurst (23.0%) compared with Rogate (7.5%), Silwood (9.3%) and Ulverscroft (2.0%). The proportion of juvenile to mature mice varied significantly between sites (locality × age, χ 24 = 33.8, P < 0.001), and to a lesser degree between male and female mice (locality × sex χ 24 = 9.9, P = 0.042).
Seven helminth species were recorded overall (table 1), with 407 (92.5%) of the mice being infected with at least one of these species. The most prevalent were H. polygyrus and S. stroma, with the capillariid A. murissylvatici being the rarest and recorded in just one mouse. The oxyurid nematode S. stroma showed the highest mean worm burden with a maximum of 1174 being recorded. Up to 94.2% of 28,540 helminths recovered were nematodes with S. stroma accounting for 73.7% of helminths and 78.3% of nematodes. Heligmosomoides polygyrus accounted for 20.5% of helminths and 21.7% of nematodes, while other helminths were rarer.
Prevalence and abundance of helminth species in the combined data set with a host sample of 440.
a 95% confidence limits.
b maximum worm burden.
Prevalence of helminth species
Although there was no significant difference in the prevalence of H. polygyrus between the sexes (table 2; sex × INFECTION, χ 21 = 0.061, P = 0.81) or between juvenile and mature mice (age × INFECTION, χ 21 = 1.90, P = 0.168), there was a significant but weak interaction between these two factors (age × sex × INFECTION, χ 21 = 4.47, P = 0.034). Prevalence was higher among mature male mice compared with juveniles (83.3% [74.82–89.48] and 71.6% [59.27–81.67], respectively) but lower among mature female mice compared with juveniles (75.5% [61.78–85.74] and 81.2% [70.58–88.63], respectively). With host age and sex taken into account, there was a highly significant effect of locality (χ 24 = 15.94, P = 0.003), with prevalence being high at Ulverscroft and the Great Wood, but relatively lower in mice from Rogate (table 2). Prevalence values of S. stroma varied significantly between the sexes (table 2, higher in male mice; for sex × INFECTION, χ 21 = 8.55, P = 0.003) and prevalence was higher in mature mice (table 2; for age × INFECTION, χ 21 = 6.31, P = 0.012) However, S. stroma prevalence values did not vary between mice from the five localities (locality × INFECTION, χ 24 = 2.31, P = 0.68).
Prevalence of helminth species by host sex, age and geographical locality.
The trematode Corrigia vitta showed very similar prevalences among the sexes (table 2, sex × INFECTION, χ 21 = 0.19, P = 0.66) and between localities (locality × INFECTION, χ 24 = 5.21, P = 0.27), but significantly higher among mature relative to juvenile mice (age × INFECTION, χ 21 = 4.35, P = 0.037). Prevalence values of the cestode Catenotaenia pusilla were not significantly different between sexes (sex × INFECTION, χ 21 = 1.452, P = 0.23), age classes (age × INFECTION, χ 21 = 1.81, P = 0.18) nor localities (locality × INFECTION, χ 24 = 4.14, P = 0.39). However, it is noteworthy that none of the nine mice sampled from Ulverscroft were infected with this cestode species, nor with any trematode species.
Prevalence values of H. taeniaeformis were lower than those of the above-mentioned species and this larval cestode was absent from the mice caught at both Ulverscroft and Silwood (table 2; locality × INFECTION, χ 24 = 16.511, P = 0.002). There was no independent effect of either sex (χ 21 = 0.33, P = 0.57) or age (χ 21 = 0.86, P = 0.35), but there was a significant interaction between these factors and the prevalence of H. taeniaeformis (χ 21 = 4.432, P = 0.035). This interaction arose because prevalence was higher among juvenile compared with mature males (7.4% [2.85–16.76] and 2.1% [0.43–7.19], respectively) whereas among female mice, prevalence was lower among juveniles (2.9% [0.63–9.68] and 6.1% [1.77–16.65], respectively. Microsomacanthus crenata was the least prevalent cestode species overall but was most prevalent among mice from Silwood (table 2; locality × INFECTION, χ 24 = 9.722, P = 0.045), and among mature mice (age × INFECTION, χ 21 = 4.225, P = 0.040). Prevalences were not significantly different between the sexes (sex × INFECTION, χ 21 = 1.36, P = 0.24).
Abundance of helminth species
Quantitative analyses were only appropriate for H. polygyrus, S. stroma and C. vitta, each of which occurred in more than 10% of the wood mouse population, although C. pusilla had an overall prevalence of 8.4%. Mean abundances of H. polygyrus infections varied significantly between host ages, (table 3) being higher in mature mice (generalized linear model (GLM) with negative binomial errors, LR 1,433 = 18.876, P < 0.0001) and also between sites with the highest abundance in mice from Great Wood, and the lowest in those from Alderhurst (LR 4,433 = 17.839, P = 0.0013). There was also a significant two-way interaction (locality × sex; LR 4,429 = 11.793, P = 0.019) arising from a higher, although differing abundance of H. polygyrus in male mice compared with females from Ulverscroft, Silwood, Alderhurst and Great Wood. The reverse occurred in Rogate where abundance was greater in female mice (fig. 1A).
Two-way interactions between factors affecting the abundance of Heligmosomoides polygyrys (A, locality × host sex; females in filled columns and males in open columns; n for Ulverscroft, Silwood, Rogate, Alderhurst and Great Wood females = 2, 14, 12, 50 and 89, respectively, and for males = 7, 27, 21, 51 and 167, respectively) and Syphacia stroma (B, locality × host age; mature mice in filled columns and juveniles in open columns; n for sites as above and mature mice = 1, 38, 18, 71 and 162, respectively, and for juveniles = 8, 3, 15, 30 and 94, respectively).
Abundance (mean worm burden) of helminth species by host sex, age and geographical locality.
The abundance of S. stroma was significantly higher in mature mice (table 3; GLM with negative binomial errors, LR 1,434 = 3.880, P = 0.049) and differed significantly between sites (LR 4,434 = 11.876, P = 0.018), being higher among mice from Great Wood and Rogate and lowest among those from Ulverscroft. Model selection favoured one that also included the two-way interaction between site and age (fig. 1B), although this was just the wrong side of the cut-off for significance in the deletion approach (LR 4,430 = 8.913, P = 0.063). Abundance did not vary significantly between the sexes (LR 1,433 = 0.69, P = 0.41).
Mean helminth species richness by site (n for Ulverscroft, Silwood, Rogate, Alderhurst and Great Wood females = 9, 41, 33, 101 and 256, respectively).
The only factor affecting the abundance of C. vitta was locality (table 3; GLM with negative binomial errors, LR 4,435 = 17.247, P = 0.0017). This species was most abundant among mice from Great Wood, and totally absent in those from Ulverscroft. Although present in the other three sites, abundances were low compared with mice from Great Wood. In contrast, the abundance of C. pusilla only differed significantly between the two age classes (table 3; LR 1,438 = 4.360, P = 0.037).
Helminth species richness and species density distribution
The mean helminth species richness (mean number of helminth species per host) in male and female mice was very similar (males = 1.70 ± 0.052 and females = 1.55 ± 0.068), although species richness was higher among mature (1.75 ± 0.050) compared with juvenile mice (1.43 ± 0.070) (GLM with Poisson errors, Dev 1,438 = 6.54, P = 0.011). Species richness by site (fig. 2) showed very close values for mice from Silwood, Alderhurst and Great Wood, but somewhat lower for those from Ulverscroft and Rogate. There was on the other hand no significant difference between sites (Dev 4,433 = 3.05, P = 0.549).
The majority of mice harboured two species of helminths (43.6%), and the second most frequent category included mice with just one species (fig. 3). At this level in the combined dataset, the species density distribution (i.e. the distribution of data subsets comprising number of mice with no helminth species, one helminth species, two helminth species etc. following Janovy et al., Reference Janovy, Clopton, Clopton, Snyder, Efting and Krebs1995) conformed well (χ 25 = 9.66, P = 0.086) to predictions of the null model of Janovy et al. (Reference Janovy, Clopton, Clopton, Snyder, Efting and Krebs1995), suggesting no marked interactions between species in this dataset. We also examined species density distributions of mice from four of the study sites including Great Wood (χ 24 = 6.59, P = 0.16), Silwood (χ 23 = 0.60, P = 0.90) and Alderhurst (χ 25 = 8.63, P = 0.125) independently. All mice conformed well to the model, except those from Rogate (χ 23 = 8.16, P = 0.043) where there was a significant difference between observed numbers and those expected from the null model. At Rogate there were more uninfected hosts and those with four species than expected, but fewer than expected with a single or three helminth species.
Helminth species richness in the combined dataset and in four of the study sites (observed, open columns). The expected values (filled columns) are from the null model for ecologically significant interactions of Janovy et al. (Reference Janovy, Clopton, Clopton, Snyder, Efting and Krebs1995) and are based on prevalences of individual species.
Associations based on the presence/absence of helminth species
H. polygyrus
Since H. polygrus and S. stroma were the species with the highest prevalences we first fitted models with these two species, taking into account both intrinsic (age and sex) and extrinsic (geographical locality) factors. There was no independent association of these two species (χ 21 = 0.032, P = 0.86), but there was a significant association of these species with locality (χ 24 = 15.88, P = 0.003). The prevalence of S. stroma was higher in mice without H. polygyrus among those trapped in Great Wood (fig. 4A), but the situation was reversed in Rogate, and there was essentially no difference in prevalence in mice from Alderhurst and Silwood.
Locality-dependent association of Syphacia stroma with Heligmosomoides polygyrus (A, open columns, H. polygyrus absent [n for Ulverscroft, Silwood, Rogate, Alderhurst and Great wood = 8, 31, 19, 74 and 216, respectively]; filled columns, H. polygyrus present, [n = 1, 10, 14, 27 and 40, respectively]) and Catenotaenia pusilla with Corrigia vitta (B, open columns C. vitta absent [Silwood, Rogate, Alderhurst and Great wood n = 36, 30, 88 and 212, respectively]; filled in columns C. vitta present [n = 5, 3, 13 and 44, respectively]).
Although prevalence of C. vitta was numerically higher among mice with H. polygyrus (15.8% [12.05–20.37]) compared to those without (10.9% [4.80–22.02]), this was not a significant difference (χ 21 = 1.50, P = 0.22), and neither was there any evidence of significant associations of both species confounded by intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Similarly there was no direct association between H. polygyrus and C. pusilla (prevalence of C. pusilla in mice with H. polygyrus = 8.9% [6.16–12.77] and without 6.5% [2.12–16.58]; (χ 21 = 0.57, P = 0.45)). However, there was a significant association between these species in a model with host age (age × presence/absence of H. polygyrus × presence/absence of C. pusilla, χ 21 = 4.74, P = 0.030). There were no cases of C. pusilla among juvenile mice without H. polygyrus (prevalence = 0% [0.00–8.59]), but prevalence was 10.7% [5.58–18.94] among mature mice without H. polygyrus. Conversely, in mice infected with H. polygyrus prevalences were similar both in juvenile (7.9% [4.70–12.92]) and mature mice (9.4% [6.97–12.54]).
S. stroma and C. vitta
Prevalences of C. vitta were virtually identical in mice with (14.7% [11.63–18.37]) and without S. stroma (14.9% [11.94–18.25]; χ 21 = 0.002, P = 0.97), and these were not influenced significantly by other factors. Similar trends were evident for S. stroma and C. pusilla (prevalences of C. pusilla =9.1% [6.81–12.14] with S. stroma and 9.2% [4.90–16.20] without S. stroma; χ 21 < 0.001, P = 0.99).
One of the strongest associations between species in the dataset was between the presence/absence of C. vitta and C. pusilla. In mice without C. vitta, the prevalence of C. pusilla was 6.4% [4.04–9.94], although if mice were infected with C. vitta, prevalence increased to 20.0% [12.21–30.41]. With other factors such as host sex, age and locality taken into account, this was also a significant effect and independent of other fitted factors (χ 21 = 10.583, P = 0.001). The bias for higher prevalences of C. pusilla in the presence of C. vitta was not only evident in both sexes (males without C. vitta = 6.0% [4.09–8.67], with C. vitta = 15.0% [6.43–30.04]; females without C. vitta = 7.0% [3.84–12.51], with C. vitta = 28.0% [13.37–47.97]) but also in both age classes (juveniles without C. vitta = 4.4% [2.03–9.03], with C. vitta = 20.0% [5.69–46.57]; mature mice without C. vitta = 7.5% [5.32–10.42], with C. vitta = 20.0% [10.06–32.36]), and in all four sites where mice were infected with these species (Fig 4B).
Associations based on quantitative (abundance) data
Analysis of quantitative data was largely restricted to four species (H. polygyrus, S. stroma, C. vitta and C. pusilla) which had overall prevalences exceeding 8%. If species interact negatively to lower worm burdens in one species when both are present, or positively if one species lowers the host's resistance to the second species, we might expect to see a difference in the mean worm burden of one species in the presence or absence of another. To test this in the presence or absence of species 1, we calculated the mean worm burden of species 2, first for data restricted to all mice that carried species 2, and then to all the 440 mice in the study (table 4). Only in four cases was a significant difference between mice with and without species 1 evident. In data restricted to mice carrying H. polygyrus, mean worm burdens were significantly higher in mice also carrying S. stroma (Mann–Whitney U 159,189 = 17,851, P = 0.002). This was also the case when the test was repeated on all mice (Mann–Whitney U 202,238 = 27,031.5, P = 0.024). Furthermore, in the full dataset the mean worm burden of C. pusilla was higher in the presence of C. vitta (Mann–Whitney U 375,65 = 13,785.5, n = 440, P < 0.001) and conversely the worm burden of C. vitta was higher in the presence of C. pusilla (Mann–Whitney U 403,37 = 9007.5, n = 440, P < 0.001).
Mean worm burdens of species 2 (in all mice carrying that species and in all the mice in the study) in mice with or without species 1.
a Significantly different. See text for details.
* indicating standard error of the mean.
Covariance of helminth species with and without subset groups
The analyses above did not take into account possible variations between data subsets, such as geographical localities, age classes, sexes, and to repeat the analyses on each subgroup would entail extensive Bonferroni corrections to the cut-off for significance. Instead we implemented the covariance distribution method described by Haukisalmi & Henttonen (Reference Haukisalmi and Henttonen1998), using bespoke software. Based on log (x + 1) transformed data and 1000 randomizations, the strongest covariance (0.192) was between H. polygyrus and S. stroma, but this was just the wrong side of the cut-off for significance in the whole dataset (P = 0.058), and hence significance was lost when the subset grouping was taken into account (P = 0.661). Covariance between C. vitta and C. pusilla (0.0466) was weaker but significant in the whole dataset (P = 0.050), and also lost significance when subset grouping was taken into account (P = 0.082).
Correlation between helminth species in mice using raw data and after correction for subset groupings
Correlations in worm numbers between two helminth species, in each case confining analyses to mice that carried both helminths, proved to be significant for H. polygyrus and C. pusilla (r s = 0.362, n = 31, P = 0.046) and C. vitta and C. pusilla (r s = 0.607, n = 13, P = 0.028), but neither indicated a robust relationship between the species involved, accounting for relatively little of the variation in each model (R 2 = 0.146 and 0.067, respectively). Correlations exploiting the whole dataset, revealed only one to be significant (C. vitta and C. pusilla, r s = 0.157, n = 440, P < 0.001). Correlations between worm numbers were also undertaken after correcting these for subset groupings using residuals from the best fit GLMs described above. Again, we tested correlations between sets of two species in the entire dataset and in datasets confined to mice carrying at least one worm of each species. Of 12 possible permutations (six on complete datasets and six on datasets limited to species carrying the two species), only one proved to be significant (H. polygyrus × C. pusilla, r s = 0.360, n = 31, P = 0.047).
Prevalence of other helminth species in the presence/absence of H. polygyrus
In an earlier paper by Behnke et al. (Reference Behnke, Eira, Rogan, Gilbert, Torres, Miquel and Lewis2009) the prevalence of other helminths and their species richness were reported to have increased with a rise in the worm burdens of H. polygyrus. Consistent with this finding, Sweeny et al. (Reference Sweeny, Albery, Venkatesan, Fenton and Pederson2021a) also found that the presence of hymenolepid infections was occasionally associated with higher numbers of H. polygyrus. The data summarized in table 5 show that as the worm burden of H. polygyrus increased, the likelihood of additional helminth species becoming established also increased (χ 25 = 18.0, P = 0.003). An upward trend in prevalences of other helminth species was also apparent when data were linked by either host sex (χ 25 = 18.0, P = 0.003) or age (χ 25 = 14.2, P = 0.015). However, an independent trend was less clear in the case of locality because of the much smaller numbers of mice in each data subset with resulting greater confidence intervals and some inconsistencies that generated a significant interaction (locality × H. polygyrus burden class × presence/absence of other helminth species, χ 220 = 36.5, P = 0.014). However, when H. polygyrus worm burdens were corrected for host sex, age and locality by fitting residuals from the MSM, the relationship with additional species of helminths was lost (H. polygyrus residuals class × presence/absence of other helminth species, χ 25 = 7.58, P = 0.181).
Prevalence of other helminth species in mice without Heligmosomoides polygyrus and in mice with increasing worm burdens of H. polygyrus in the combined dataset relative to host sex, age and by geographical locality.
Number of other helminth species
The data in table 6 show that in the entire dataset, and with the exception of uninfected mice, as worm burdens of H. polygyrus increased, so too did the species richness of other helminths (Kruskal–Wallis, H 5 = 14.52, P = 0.013). However, when H. polygyrus worm burdens were corrected for host sex, age and locality by fitting residuals from the MSM, the relationship with other helminth species was lost (H 5 = 9.94, P = 0.077). Adjusting species richness of other helminths for the only significant factor, host age (GLM with Poison errors, for main effect of age Dev 1, 438 = 9.371, P = 0.0022), and repeating both approaches above, made little difference to these results (H 5 = 8.72, P = 0.121 and H 5 = 9.84, P = 0.080, respectively).
Species richness of other helminth species (excepting Heligmosomoides polygyrus) in relation to increasing worm burden classes of H. polygyrus and based on residuals from minimum sufficient generalized linear models.
a mean worm burden in class.
As an alternative test, a GLM with Poisson errors was undertaken with helminth species richness of other helminths as the dependent variable and host sex, age and locality as explanatory factors, together with the number of H. polygyrus worms (Hpburden) as a covariate. Model selection in R identified a model with just host age and Hpburden as the preferred model (model 1, AICcWt = 0.49), although the stepwise deletion approach only found host age as a significant factor (for age Dev 1,437 = 7.78, P = 0.0053; for Hpburden Dev 1,437 = 2.486, P = 0.115). The next best model was very similar (AICcDelta in relation to model 1 = 0.46, ER = 1.26) with just host age (model 2, AICcWt = 0.39). Fitting the residuals of MSM for H. polygyrus, instead of the H. polygyrus worm burdens, resulted in host age as the only significant explanatory factor (Dev 1,438 = 9.37 P = 0.0022). Finally, regression of residuals of MSM for species richness of other helminths on the residuals of MSM for H. polygyrus showed that the slope was not significant (ß = 0.0484 ± 0.04325, t = 1.12, P = 0.264)
Discussion
Much as expected based on previous studies of the helminth parasites in wood mice from the British Isles (Sharpe, Reference Sharpe1964; Lewis, Reference Lewis1968; Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert1998), and other regions of Europe (Eira et al., Reference Eira, Torres, Vingada and Miquel2006; Miljević et al., Reference Miljević, Čabrilo, Budinski, Rajičić, Bajić, Bjelić-Čabrio and Blagojević2022), H. polygyrus and S. stroma were the two dominant helminths in this dataset. Heligmosomoides polygyrus showed the highest prevalence, while S. stroma, although less prevalent, accounted for more than three times as many helminths recovered, primarily due to extremely high worm burdens in some of the mice. As expected, the present data showed some evident locality-dependent effects in both prevalence (H. polygyrus H. taeniaeformis and M. crenata), and abundance (H. polygyrus, S. stroma and C. vitta) of helminth species. Mean worm burdens for H. polygyrus and C. vitta were higher in mice from Great Wood, compared with the other four sites. While there was no site effect for prevalence of S. stroma, varying only from 44.4% (Ulverscroft) to 57.0% (Great Wood), abundance of this species did vary significantly between localities, with the highest worm burdens in mice from Rogate, and only marginally lower in those from Great Wood. Ecological differences between habitats have been proposed as contributing factors explaining differences in prevalence and/or abundance of H. polygyrus (Lewis, Reference Lewis1968; Montgomery & Montgomery, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1989; Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert1998) and S. stroma (Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000) between geographical localities. For heteroxenous species, such as C. vitta, H. taeniaeformis and M. crenata, locality-dependent variation in worm burdens (Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000) may be primarily linked with varying densities of intermediate hosts in woodland compared with grassland sites. In the present study the relatively high degrees of infection of C. vitta in mice from Great Wood are likely to be related to an increase in consumption of invertebrate intermediate hosts present in the ground fauna of Great Wood and to a lesser extent in Alderhurst, also a woodland site, but not at Ulverscroft where none of the sampled mice were infected with this species, although the sample size in the latter was very low. The remaining two sites are mainly grassland and likely to harbour lower densities of invertebrates.
We had also expected to detect some host age effects on the prevalence and abundance of species, because helminths are mostly long-lived parasites, and accumulate in hosts with increasing age (Pascala & Dobson, Reference Pascala and Dobson1988). Consistent with this concept, helminth species richness, prevalence of S. stroma, C. vitta and M. crenata and abundances of H. polygyrus, S. stroma and C. pusilla were all significantly higher in mature relative to juvenile mice. Prevalences of H. polygyrus, C. pusilla and abundance of C. vitta were also numerically higher in mature mice, but differences between age classes in these cases were insufficient to achieve statistical significance. Of the species identified in the present study, C. vitta has the longest generation time, and a known host age effect (Lewis, Reference Lewis1968; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999; Loxton et al., Reference Loxton, Lawton, Stafford and Holland2017). In addition, older wood mice have been found also to be more heavily infected with H. polygyrus (Sharpe, Reference Sharpe1964; Lewis, Reference Lewis1968, 1992; Gregory et al., Reference Gregory, Montgomery and Montgomery1992; Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert1998; Loxton et al., Reference Loxton, Lawton, Stafford and Holland2017), S. stroma (Lewis, Reference Lewis1968; Loxton et al., Reference Loxton, Lawton, Stafford and Holland2017; Stuart et al., Reference Stuart, Paredis, Henttonen, Lawton, Ochoa Torres and Holland2020), M. crenata (Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999) and deer mice with H. taeniaeformis (Theis & Schwab, Reference Theis and Schwab1992).
Differences in the prevalence and abundance of helminths between the sexes were rare in this dataset, there being only one case, the prevalence of S. stroma. Consistent with our previously published finding (Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999), the prevalence of S. stroma was higher in male mice, although a sex difference in abundance of this species was not found in the current study. While some researchers have reported a difference between the sexes in prevalence and/or abundance of S. stroma (male bias in Lewis & Twigg, Reference Lewis and Twigg1972; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999; Stuart et al., Reference Stuart, Paredis, Henttonen, Lawton, Ochoa Torres and Holland2020), others have failed to detect an overall difference between the sexes (Lewis, Reference Lewis1968) and have noted that sex differences in this species are highly context dependent (Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999; Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000). Although there was no sex-difference in either prevalence or abundance of H. polygyrus, interactions with age (prevalence) and locality (abundance) indicate inconsistent sex-bias that was context dependent in this species also. Male biased infections with H. polygyrus have been reported previously (Lewis, Reference Lewis1968; Lewis & Twigg, Reference Lewis and Twigg1972), although not in all studies (Gregory, Reference Gregory1992; Gregory et al., Reference Gregory, Montgomery and Montgomery1992; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999; Babayan et al., Reference Babayan, Liu, Hamilton, Kilbride, Rynkiewicz, Clerc and Pedersen2018), and when detected, sex-bias has been found to be context dependent (Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert1998; Sweeney et al., Reference Sweeny, Albery, Venkatesan, Fenton and Pederson2021a). No host sex-difference in infections with C. vitta was seen in wood mice by Lewis (Reference Lewis1968), Behnke et al. (Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999) and Abu-Madi et al. (Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000), but Loxton et al. (Reference Loxton, Lawton, Stafford and Holland2017) found evidence of female sex-bias, the extent of which varied between years of the study. The lack of host sex-dependent bias in infections with H. taeniaefomis concurs with the findings of Theis & Schwab (Reference Theis and Schwab1992) in Peromyscus maniculatus in California, although Lewis & Twigg (Reference Lewis and Twigg1972) found male bias in abundance of this cestode in wood mice.
Associations between parasites, and especially those indicating competitive interactions are difficult to detect in field data acquired through destructive sampling or typically in cross-sectional surveys such as those conducted in the present work (Fenton et al., Reference Fenton, Knowles, Petchey and Pedersen2014). Nevertheless, with over 400 records we felt justified in examining our data for evidence of associations in prevalence data and quantitative interactions based on abundance levels. One species of particular interest was H. polygyrus. This species is known to generate long-lasting chronic infections in its hosts (Robinson et al., Reference Robinson, Wahid, Behnke and Gilbert1989; Gregory et al., Reference Gregory, Keymer and Clarke1990), for which there is some evidence of interactions with other species, and whose laboratory maintained congener is known to secrete immunomodulatory factors that interfere with local mucosal immune responses (Hewitson et al., Reference Hewitson, Harcus and Murray2011), making the host more susceptible to other infections in laboratory experimental studies (Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Wakelin and Wilson1978). Indeed, consistent with this idea, prevalence of S. stroma was higher in mice with concurrent infections with H. polygyrus in Rogate, but this was not a consistent trend as in mice from Great Wood the prevalence of S. stroma was lower in mice infected with H. polygyrus. Interestingly, the abundance of S. stroma was higher in mice with H. polygyrus when possible confounding factors were not considered, but lost significance when subset grouping was taken into account in covariance distributions tests.
Although prevalences of both C. vitta and C. pusilla were numerically higher in mice with H. polygyrus, in neither case did this prove to be statistically significant. However, there was a significant correlation between H. polygyrus and C. pusilla worm burdens when analysis was restricted to the 31 mice that carried both species, and although this retained significance when host sex, age and locality were considered, this was a weak relationship. Nevertheless, this result supports the findings of Behnke et al. (Reference Behnke, Gilbert, Abu-Madi and Lewis2005), who also reported a significant quantitative association between these two species, even after controlling for quantified extrinsic and intrinsic factors. In an earlier study, it was shown that the species richness of other helminths increased in the presence of H. polygyrus and did so in a dose-dependent manner (Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Eira, Rogan, Gilbert, Torres, Miquel and Lewis2009). While in the raw data of the current study both prevalence and species richness of other species were consistent with Behnke et al. (Reference Behnke, Eira, Rogan, Gilbert, Torres, Miquel and Lewis2009), in both cases when host sex, age and locality were controlled for, the effect was lost. Perhaps the strongest evidence for a positive association between species was seen in concurrent infections with the trematode C. vitta and the cestode C. pusilla. In the entire dataset, based on prevalence, a significant association indicating co-occurrence was evident in both sexes and age classes, and in each locality. The abundance of C. pusilla was higher in mice infected with C. vitta and vice versa. Covariance of these two species in the entire dataset was just significant but lost significance when other factors were taken into consideration. Nevertheless, the heteroxenous life cycles of both of these parasites, exploiting invertebrate intermediate hosts (molluscs and ants, and mites, respectively), which are likely to co-occur in the woodland litter, may partially explain their association in wood mice in the localities where they occurred.
Taken together the results of our analyses are not consistent with the existence of a highly interactive helminth community in the wood mice from the five subpopulations sampled. In several cases, promisingly significant effects in raw datasets were lost when controlled for intrinsic and extrinsic factors, and this is consistent with the conclusions of Haukisalmi & Henttonen (Reference Haukisalmi and Henttonen1998). Therefore, while the data support the existence of significant differences in helminth communities between different localities (i.e. different populations of hosts), and are consistent with marked host age effects (in all significant cases prevalence and worm burdens increasing with host age), differences in both parameters between the sexes, and associations and interactions between species appear to be highly context dependent, and at best moderate in their magnitude. While there is evidence that in the presence of H. polygyrus, S. stroma aggregate more posteriorly in the small intestine, indicating some interaction between these species at this level (Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Morley and Behnke2021), analysis of our prevalence and abundance data by a variety of different approaches failed to find strong support for associations or interaction between these species. Since animal communities are defined by associations, correlations, interactions and interdependence between species (Margolis et al., Reference Margolis, Esch, Holmes, Kuris and Schad1982; Morin, Reference Morin2011; Leaper et al., Reference Leaper, Dunstan, Foster, Barrett and Edgar2014), this inevitably leads to the conclusions that the helminths of wood mice are largely non-interactive and hence, perhaps better referred to as assemblages, rather than communities (Poulin, Reference Poulin1996b).
Acknowledgements
We wish to extend our sincere thanks to Mrs Rosemary Doran, Royal Holloway University of London for invaluable laboratory and field support throughout the period of study and to Dr W.M. Hominick, Imperial College and Professor P. J. Whitfield King's College, University of London for much assistance in trapping wood mice from two of the five study sites.
Financial support
None.
Conflicts of interest
None
Ethical standards
The maintenance of animals conformed to local and Home Office Code of Practice (ISBN 9781474112390).
Authors’ contributions
J.W.L. conceived and designed the study. N.J.M. assisted and collated data from field sites and made a significant contribution to the text of the manuscript. J.M.B. analysed the results, all authors contributed to preparation of the manuscript and all authors approved the submitted version.
Open access
