Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T10:29:12.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultra Small-Mass Graphitization by Sealed Tube Zinc Reduction Method for AMS 14C Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Xiaomei Xu ,
Pan Gao  and
Eric G Salamanca
Xiaomei Xu*
Affiliation:
Keck Carbon Cycle AMS Laboratory, Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3100, USA
Pan Gao
Affiliation:
Keck Carbon Cycle AMS Laboratory, Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3100, USA Department of Geography, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Eric G Salamanca
Affiliation:
Keck Carbon Cycle AMS Laboratory, Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3100, USA
*
2 Corresponding author. Email: xxu@uci.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A modified sealed tube Zn reduction method based on Khosh et al. (2010) has been developed to graphitize ultra small-mass samples ranging from 4–15 μg carbon (C) for accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon measurements. In this method, the reagent TiH2 is removed from the previous method while the amounts of Zn and Fe powder remain the same. The volume of the sealed reactor is further reduced by ∼40% to ∼0.75 cm3 and the graphitization temperature is lowered to 450 °C. Graphite targets produced by this method generally yield 12C+1 currents of about 0.5 μA per 1 μg C, similar to the small mass (15–100 μg C) sealed tube Zn reduction method previously reported by Khosh et al. (2010) when measured on the same AMS system at KCCAMS, University of California, Irvine. Change of Fe powder to Sigma-Aldrich (400-mesh) has yielded further improved backgrounds over Fe powder of Alfa Aesar (325-mesh). Modern C background from combustion and graphitization is estimated to be 0.2–0.8 μg C, and dead-C background to be 0.1–0.4 μg C. The accuracy and precision of ultra small-mass samples prepared by this method are size and 14C content dependent, but is usually ±4–5% for the smallest sample size of ∼4–5 μg C with modern 14C content. AMS on-line δ13C measurement that allows for correction of both graphitization and machine-induced isotopic fractionation is the key for applying the sealed tube Zn reduction method to ultra small-mass sample graphitization.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 55 , Issue 2: Proceedings of the 21st International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 1 of 2) , 2013 , pp. 608 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Fahrni, SM, Gäggeler, HW, Hajdas, I, Ruff, IM, Szidat, S, Wacker, L. 2010. Direct measurements of small 14C samples after oxidation in quartz tubes. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):787–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Q, Zoppi, U, Williams, AA, Smith, AM. 2004. Small-mass AMS radiocarbon analysis at ANTARES. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:284–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khosh, MS, Xu, X, Trumbore, SE. 2010. Small-mass graphite preparation by sealed tube zinc reduction method for AMS 14C measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):927–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichol, AP, Gagnon, AR, Jones, GA, Osborne, EA. 1992. Illumination of a black box: analysis of gas composition during graphite target preparation. Radiocarbon 34(3):321–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ognibene, TJ, Bench, G, Vogel, JS. 2003. A high-throughput method for the conversion of CO2 obtained from biochemical samples to graphite in septa-sealed vials for quantification of 14C via accelerator mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 75(9):2192–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salehpour, M, Possnert, G, Bryhni, H. 2008. Subattomole sensitivity in biological accelerator mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 80(10):3515–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, GM, Southon, JR, Griffin, S, Beaupre, SR, Druffel, ERM. 2007a. Ultra small-mass AMS 14C sample preparation and analyses at KCCAMS/UCI Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Mazon, M, Southon, JR, Rifai, S, Moore, R. 2007b. Evaluation of iron and cobalt powders as catalysts for 14C-AMS target preparation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):308–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Moore, RB, Southon, JR, Griffin, S, Hinger, E, Zhang, D. 2007c. AMS 14C sample preparation at the KCCAMS/UCI Facility: status report and performance of small samples. Radiocarbon 52(2):255–69.Google Scholar
Santos, GM, Southon, JR, Drenzek, NJ, Ziolkowski, LA, Druffel, ERM, Xu, X, Zhang, D, Trumbore, SE, Eglinton, TI, Hughen, KA. 2010. Blank assessment for ultra-small radiocarbon samples: chemical extraction and separation versus AMS. Radiocarbon 52(3):1322–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slota, PJ Jr, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southon, JR, Santos, GM. 2004. Ion source development at KCCAMS, University of California, Irvine. Radiocarbon 46(1):33–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southon, JR, Santos, GM. 2007. Life with MC-SNICS. Part II: Further ion source development at the Keck carbon cycle AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steier, P, Shah, SR, Drosg, R, Pearson, A, Fedi, M, Kutschera, W, Schock, M, Wagenbach, D, Wild, EM. 2006. Radiocarbon determination of particulate organic carbon in non-temperated, Alpine glacier ice. Radiocarbon 48(1):69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkouteren, RM, Klinedinst, DB, Currie, LA. 1997. Iron-manganese system for preparation of radiocarbon AMS targets: characterization of procedural chemical-isotopic blanks and fractionation. Radiocarbon 39(3):269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X, Trumbore, SE, Zheng, S, Southon, JR, McDuffee, KE, Luttgen, M, Liu, JC. 2007. Modifying a sealed tube zinc reduction method for preparation of AMS graphite targets: reducing background and attaining high precision. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):320–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoyama, Y, Koizumi, M, Matsuzaki, H, Miyairi, Y, Ohkouchi, N. 2010. Developing ultra small-scale radiocarbon sample measurement at the University of Tokyo. Radiocarbon 52(2):310–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar