Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-xnzfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-25T17:23:13.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is it oncologically safe to leave the ipsilateral submandibular gland during neck dissection for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2011

A K Ebrahim ,
J W Loock ,
A Afrogheh  and
J Hille
A K Ebrahim*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stellenbosch/Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
J W Loock
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stellenbosch/Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
A Afrogheh
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stellenbosch/Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
J Hille
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stellenbosch/Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Abdul Kader Ebrahim, Registrar, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stellenbosch/Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa E-mail: akebrahim@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim:

To investigate the incidence of metastasis to the submandibular gland in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated histological reports of neck dissections for upper respiratory tract carcinoma (performed 2002–2009), recording: primary tumour site, tumour–node–metastasis stage, level Ib involvement, previous radiotherapy, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, extracapsular spread, and the presence of malignant disease in the submandibular gland.

Results:

We evaluated 107 cases. The most common primary site was the oral cavity (49 per cent) followed by the supraglottis (21 per cent), glottis (14 per cent), oropharynx (9 per cent) and hypopharynx (6 per cent). Forty-eight per cent of patients had advanced local disease, with 21 per cent at tumour stage 3 and 27 per cent at tumour stage 4. Fifty-six per cent had cervical lymph node metastasis, and 8 per cent received pre-operative radiotherapy. Forty-eight per cent had perineural invasion, 46 per cent lymphovascular spread, 27 per cent extracapsular spread and 8 per cent level Ib metastasis. Only one patient had submandibular gland involvement, due to direct spread (a case with prior radiotherapy and macroscopic submandibular gland involvement evident peri-operatively).

Conclusion:

Submandibular gland metastasis from head and neck primary squamous cell carcinoma is extremely rare. Preservation of the ipsilateral submandibular gland during neck dissection is oncologically safe, except in patients with prior surgery or radiotherapy, or a primary tumour in close relation to the gland.

Keywords

Submandibular GlandNeoplasm MetastasisPathologyXerostomiaSalivary Gland

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 125 , Issue 8 , August 2011 , pp. 837 - 840
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1Byeon, HK, Lim, YC, Koo, BS, Choi, EC. Metastasis to the submandibular gland in oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: Pathologic analysis. Acta Otolarygol 2009;129:96–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Bocca, E, Pignataro, A. A conservation technique in radical neck dissection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967;77:975–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Mercante, G, Bacciu, A, Oretti, G, Ferri, T. Involvement of level I neck lymph nodes and submandibular gland in laryngeal and/or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol 2006;35:108–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4DiNardo, LJ. Lymphatics of the submandibular space: an anatomic, clinical and pathologic study with applications to floor of mouth carcinoma. Laryngoscope 1998;108:206–14Google Scholar
5Vaidya Atul, M, Vaidya Abhay, M, Petruzellie, GJ, McClatchey, KD. Isolated submandibular gland metastasis from oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol 1999;20:172–5Google Scholar
6Jacob, RF, Weber, RS, King, GE. Whole salivary flow rates following submandibular gland resection. Head Neck 1996;18:242–73.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Jha, N, Seikaly, H, Harris, J, Williams, D, Lui, R, McGaw, T et al. Prevention of radiation induced xerostomia by surgical transfer of submandibular salivary gland into the submental space. Radiother Oncol 2003;66:283–9Google Scholar
8Spiegel, JH, Brys, AK, Bhakti, A, Singer, MI. Metastasis to the submandibular gland in head and neck carcinomas. Head Neck 2004;12:1064–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Razfar, A, Walvekar, RR, Melkane, A, Johnson, JT, Myers, EN. Incidence and patterns of regional metastasis in early oral squamous cell cancers: feasibility of submandibular gland preservation. Head Neck 2009;10:1619–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Chen, TC, Lo, WC, Ko, JY, Lou, PJ, Yang, TL, Wang, CP. Rare involvement of submandibular gland by oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2009;10:877–81Google Scholar
11Vessecchia, G, Di Palma, S, Giardini, R. Submandibular gland metastases of breast carcinoma; a case report and a review of literature. Virchows Arch 1995;427:349–351Google Scholar
12Saarilahti, K, Kouri, M, Collan, J, Kangasmaki, A, Atua, T, Joensuu, H et al. Sparing of the submandibular glands by intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of head neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2006;78:270–5Google Scholar