Asteriornis: long-sought insight into the origin of crown birds from the Maastrichtian type area

As one of the few uncontroversial representatives of the avian crown group (Neornithes) yet recovered from Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, Asteriornis has outsized potential to inform numerous longstanding questions related to the evolutionary origins of crown birds. Such insights range from anatomical to ecological and to temporal and biogeographical.

Anatomically, Asteriornis exhibits a range of character states optimising as synapomorphies of crown group birds, including a toothless beak, a fused mandibular symphysis, and a proportionally large premaxilla (Field et al., Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b). Additional character states optimise as synapomorphies of the more exclusive subclades Neognathae (i.e. contact between the palatine and premaxilla; incisure between the otic and squamosal cotylae) and Galloanserae (i.e. a dorsoventrally deep and lateromedially compressed maxillary process of the premaxilla; palatines that are long, narrow, and widely separated rostrally; a bicondylar mandibular process of the quadrate; a long, dorsally oriented internal articular process of the mandible). Indeed, virtually all discernible character states suggest that Asteriornis provides some of the clearest evidence yet of a fossil phylogenetically proximal to the most recent common ancestor of crown Galloanserae, the extant avian clade uniting ‘waterfowl’ (Anseriformes) and ‘gamebirds’ (Galliformes). Certain attributes of the skull of Asteriornis are reminiscent of the condition observed in many crown anseriforms, such as the rostrally projecting postorbital process, while others are reminiscent of extant Galliformes, such as the contralateral frontal processes remaining unfused along their entire length, and the unfused tomial and narial contacts of the premaxillae and nasals. Notably, however, these ‘galliform’ features could also be indicative of an early ontogenetic status for the holotype of Asteriornis maastrichtensis (Parker, Reference Parker1868; Jollie, Reference Jollie1957; Field et al., Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b), necessitating the investigation of the skeletal maturity of the specimen undertaken herein.

Notably, an important aspect of galloanseran cranial morphology cannot be confirmed in the holotype specimen of Asteriornis maastrichtensis despite originally being interpreted as present by Field et al. (Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b). Long, dorsally deflected retroarticular processes are a well-established synapomorphy of Galloanserae (Cracraft, Reference Cracraft and Benton1988; Livezey, Reference Livezey1997; Cracraft & Clarke, Reference Cracraft, Clarke, Gauthier and Gall2001), and a retroarticular process virtually indistinguishable from those of both stem anseriforms (e.g. Nettapterornis, Presbyornis) and crown anseriforms was interpreted as being clearly discernible in the holotype skull of Asteriornis maastrichtensis (Field et al., Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b). However, examination of digital models of the caudal mandible under rendering settings with enhanced shadow contrast reveals unmistakable impressions corresponding to the quadrate cotylae on the supposed retroarticular process (Crane et al., Reference Crane, Benito, Chen, Musser, Torres, Clarke, Lautenschlager, Ksepka and Field2023), illustrating that the process must instead correspond to the medial process of the same mandible that was taphonomically displaced and twisted from a mediolaterally elongate, medial position into a dorsoventrally elongate, caudodorsal position (Fig. 10). The shape of the retroarticular and medial processes in some pan-galloanserans can be remarkably similar, as illustrated by the pan-anseriform Conflicto (Tambussi et al., Reference Tambussi, Degrange, De Mendoza, Sferco and Santillana2019), and we hypothesise that this may have been the case in Asteriornis as well.

Figure 10.

Mandible of the holotype of Asteriornis maastrichtensis in dorsal and ventral views. LMP: left medial process; RMP: right medial process. The right medial process was originally identified as the right retroarticular process by Field et al. (Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b). Subsequently, this structure was reidentified as the twisted and displaced medial process of the right mandible. Scale bar equals 10 mm. Figure modified from Crane et al. (Reference Crane, Benito, Chen, Musser, Torres, Clarke, Lautenschlager, Ksepka and Field2023).

In light of the potential phylogenetic influence of pronounced retroarticular processes being coded as present in the original phylogenetic investigation of Asteriornis, Crane et al. (Reference Crane, Benito, Chen, Musser, Torres, Clarke, Lautenschlager, Ksepka and Field2023) re-examined the caudal ends of the mandible of Asteriornis maastrichtensis to assess the potential presence or absence of these structures and evaluate resultant phylogenetic implications. Crane et al. (Reference Crane, Benito, Chen, Musser, Torres, Clarke, Lautenschlager, Ksepka and Field2023) concluded that the caudal extremities of both the left and right mandibular rami extend to the surface of the fossil block containing the holotype skull, where the caudal ends have eroded away. However, anatomical comparisons with a wide phylogenetic sample of extant birds illustrate that the possibility of retroarticular processes having originally been present cannot be excluded; as such, the presence/absence of retroarticular process for Asteriornis is best treated as unknown at present.

Using an updated version of the phylogenetic matrix from Field et al. (Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b) in which the presence and shape of the retroarticular were scored as unknown in Asteriornis, a phylogenetic position within total-clade Galloanserae was still obtained (Crane et al., Reference Crane, Benito, Chen, Musser, Torres, Clarke, Lautenschlager, Ksepka and Field2023), with Asteriornis resolving as a stem galliform under both Parsimony and Bayesian optimality criteria. Thus, these updated results support the initial interpretation of Asteriornis as a member of total-group Galloanserae, and potentially as a member of total-group Galliformes (Field et al., Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b).

While the caudal ends of the mandibles of Asteriornis have proved to be less well preserved than originally interpreted, other aspects of the cranial osteology of Asteriornis are sufficiently complete and well preserved to be incorporated into three-dimensional investigations of avian skeletal evolution. For instance, the quadrate of Asteriornis (Fig. 11) was pivotal for constraining anatomical reconstructions in a macroevolutionary investigation of Galloanserae (Kuo et al., Reference Kuo, Benson and Field2023), demonstrating that the quadrate morphology of the ancestral crown galloanseran would have been substantially more similar morphologically and functionally to that of extant galliforms than to extant anseriforms, conflicting with reconstructions based on extant taxa alone. Those results demonstrate the necessity of incorporating fossil taxa into ancestral state reconstructions of skeletal geometry whenever possible – a conclusion applicable well beyond Galloanserae. Moreover, subsequent work by Kuo et al. (Reference Kuo, Navalón, Benson and Field2024) has illustrated widespread decoupling between quadrate morphology and feeding specialisation across the avian tree of life, emphasising the potential value of quadrate morphology in assessments of fossil phylogenetic affinities. As such, the morphological similarity of the quadrate of Asteriornis to those of extant Galliformes is likely to reflect genuine phylogenetic proximity.

Figure 11.

Detailed morphology of the quadrate of the holotype of Asteriornis maastrichtensis (NHMM 2013 008), modified from Kuo et al. (Reference Kuo, Benson and Field2023).

Histological implications for age and maturity of Asteriornis maastrichtensis

The galliform-like nature of several features exhibited by Asteriornis, particularly the unfused nature of the contacts between the premaxillary contralateral processes, the tomial and narial contacts of the premaxillae and nasals, and the unfused splenial in the lower jaw could also be related to an early ontogenetic age. The contacts between these cranial and lower jaw bones usually fuse or obliterate during post-hatchling development in Neornithes (Plateau et al., Reference Plateau, Green, Gignac and Foth2024) however, they remain unfused or poorly fused in adult galliforms (Parker, Reference Parker1868; Jollie, Reference Jollie1957; Field et al., Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b). As such, to clarify the ontogenetic stage of the Asteriornis maastrichtensis holotype NMMH 2013 008 is of utmost importance in order to fully evaluate the extent of its galliform affinities. Overall, the histology observed in the studied femoral section of Asteriornis is comparable to that of similarly sized extant birds. The femoral histology suggests that growth was slowing and that this bird had either reached its growth asymptote (i.e. skeletal maturity) or was close to it. Features that support this hypothesis include the marked transition from disorganised, moderately well-vascularised parallel-fibered bone in the inner cortex to more organised and less vascular tissue in the outer cortex, the presence of true primary osteons in the inner cortex, and the presence of a thin ICL and OCL along the inner and outer margins of the bone, respectively.

The degree of organisation of collagen fibres in primary bone matrix inversely correlates with bone deposition rate (Newell-Morris & Sirianni, Reference Newell-Morris, Sirianni, Dixon and Sarnat1982; de Buffrénil & Pascal, Reference De Buffrénil and Pascal1984), with more organised tissues deposited at slower rates. In NMMH 2013 008, the more disorganised parallel-fibered bone of the inner cortex would have been deposited at higher rates than the more organised parallel-fibered bone of the outer cortex. Absolute rates of bone deposition (μm/day) are likely taxon-specific (Werning & Nesbitt, Reference Werning and Nesbitt2016) and, in the absence of LAGs or annuli, cannot be reliably estimated. Vascular canal density correlates with bone deposition rate in a broad range of taxa (Montes et al., Reference Montes, Castanet and Cubo2010; Cubo et al., Reference Cubo, Le Roy, Martinez-Maza and Montes2012); therefore, the lower vascular density in the more organised tissues of the outer cortex is also consistent with an ontogenetic decrease in overall growth rate.

The bones of living and fossil birds commonly form three distinct layers within the cortex (Enlow and Brown, Reference Enlow and Brown1957), and the relative thickness of these can be indicative of ontogenetic stage. The innermost is the ICL, a band of circumferential lamellar or parallel-fibered bone that forms the endosteal margin. In extant taxa, the ICL is often moderately vascularised by radial canals. The OCL forms along the periosteal margin. It is also composed of circumferentially oriented lamellae or parallel-fibered bone but is nearly always avascular. The OCL is homologous to the external fundamental system (EFS) of other tetrapods. However, unlike the EFS of reptiles and mammals, the OCL of extant birds usually forms over a period of weeks or months, rather than years (Chinsamy-Turan, Reference Chinsamy-Turan2005). Between these regions is a middle layer of periosteally deposited bone, usually reported as woven-fibered in extant taxa and always vascularised. Ornithuran birds do not generally produce growth marks in the middle, woven-fibered layer, because most reach full body size within a year, and often in a matter of weeks or months (Chinsamy-Turan, Reference Chinsamy-Turan2005). In many neognaths, a line of arrested growth (LAG) marks the boundary between the middle layer and the OCL, but this becomes less common as body mass increases. When growth marks are present, they almost always occur in the OCL, with birds that continue to grow after a year constituting a notable exception (Chinsamy-Turan, Reference Chinsamy-Turan2005; Turvey et al., Reference Turvey, Green and Holdaway2005; Bourdon et al., Reference Bourdon, Castanet, Ricqlès, Scofield, Tennyson, Lamrous and Cubo2009; Heck & Woodward, Reference Heck and Woodward2021). LAGs in the OCL are not annual like those of the primary cortex, but they are more numerous in taxa with longer periods of ‘residual’ growth as the individual approaches their size/growth asymptote or after reaching sexual maturity (Ponton et al., Reference Ponton, Elzanowski, Castanet, Chinsamy, Margerie, Ricqlès and Cubo2004).

As such, the presence of both an ICL and an OCL in NHMM 2013 008 provides additional evidence that this individual had either reached skeletal maturity or was close to the end of its most active growth phase when it died. Both layers are very thin in terms of numbers of lamellae (3–5 in the ICL and 7–9 in the OCL), so it is possible that these regions were just beginning to form at the time of death and some growth remained. The ICL is inconsistently preserved in both slides. Incomplete preservation of the ICL is known among extant taxa, such as the galliform Crax rubra (e.g., tibiotarsus of specimen USNM 19918), and the extant alcid Alca torda (Drozdowska & Meissner, Reference Drozdowska and Meissner2014). Inconsistent preservation of the ICL around the endosteal margin may be one reason that age estimates based on layers in the ICL are unreliable (Drozdowska & Meissner, Reference Drozdowska and Meissner2014).

Neither slide shows LAGs within the OCL. LAGs are present in the OCL of extant galliforms, including species with larger body sizes than this individual; for example, in the tibiotarsus of Crax rubra (USNM 19918), a LAG marks the boundary between the middle layer of primary cortical bone and the OCL, and a second LAG lies within the OCL (pers. obs). The absence of LAGs in the OCL of NHMM 2013 008 may represent a more rapid truncation of growth compared to some extant galliforms, or it may reflect that NHMM 2013 008 had yet to finish depositing a complete OCL at the time of its death.

Cortical LAGs are fairly common in Mesozoic avialans (e.g. Chinsamy et al., Reference Chinsamy, Chiappe and Dodson1994; Chinsamy & Elzanowski, Reference Chinsamy and Elzanowski2001; de Ricqlès et al., Reference Ricqlès, Padian, Horner, Lamm and Myhrvold2003; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Li and Zhou2017). Within crown birds, they are common in very large-bodied and often flightless species (e.g. Turvey et al., Reference Turvey, Green and Holdaway2005; Bourdon et al., Reference Bourdon, Castanet, Ricqlès, Scofield, Tennyson, Lamrous and Cubo2009; Angst et al., Reference Angst, Chinsamy-Turan, Steel and Hume2017) but are otherwise rare. As such, the absence of LAGs and other growth lines in the middle layer of primary cortical bone in NMMH 2013 008 might be indicative of Asteriornis reaching full body size in less than a year, similar to most extant birds.

Phylogenetic, ecological and biogeographical implications of Asteriornis maastrichtensis

Phylogenetic analyses undertaken by Field et al. (Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b) and Crane et al. (Reference Crane, Benito, Chen, Musser, Torres, Clarke, Lautenschlager, Ksepka and Field2023) have recovered Asteriornis either as the sister taxon to crown Galloanserae or as the sister taxon to the remainder of total-group Galliformes. Mayr (Reference Mayr2022), referencing aspects of skull morphology originally noted by Field et al. (Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b) such as elongate, rostrally projecting postorbital processes, suggested that a phylogenetic position for Asteriornis among total-clade Anseriformes might be the most plausible, noting similarities with screamer-like birds from the Eocene London Clay Formation of south-east England. Mayr (Reference Mayr2022) additionally hypothesised that Asteriornis could be an early representative of the lineage ultimately giving rise to the large-bodied flightless Gastornithidae of the lower Palaeocene. This latter hypothesis is weakly justified at present, so much the more so given that the phylogenetic position of gastornithids among total-clade Galloanserae may be in need of re-evaluation (Worthy et al., Reference Worthy, Degrange, Handley and Lee2017, Benito et al., Reference Benito, Chen, Wilson, Bhullar, Burnham and Field2022a).

This phylogenetic uncertainty is as expected for a fossil whose topological position sits close to a phylogenetic divergence; regardless of whether Asteriornis represents a crownward stem galloanseran, a stemward stem galliform, or a stemward stem anseriform, internal branch lengths between Asteriornis and any of these alternative phylogenetic positions are expected to be extremely short, limiting the potential for unambiguous phylogenetic resolution. Nonetheless, other alternative phylogenetic hypotheses that have been put forward for Asteriornis seem less tenable. For instance, Torres et al. (Reference Torres, Norell and Clarke2021) included Asteriornis in a matrix focused on the crownward stem bird Ichthyornis. In their analyses under parsimony, Asteriornis resolved as the sister taxon to Palaeognathae with weak support, attributable to a single inferred synapomorphy: ‘deeply caudally forked dentary with dorsal and ventral forks of approximately equal caudal extent’. However, the coding for this character in the Torres et al. (Reference Torres, Norell and Clarke2021) dataset is dubious, as a caudally forked mandible is exhibited by many Galliformes, wherein the dorsal ramus is considerably shortened relative to the ventral ramus. The dentary of Asteriornis thus more closely resembles the condition in most galliforms than the condition in palaeognaths, in which the dorsal and ventral rami are of roughly equal length (Crane et al., Reference Crane, Benito, Chen, Musser, Torres, Clarke, Lautenschlager, Ksepka and Field2023). It is worth noting that the updated version of the Torres et al. (Reference Torres, Norell and Clarke2021) dataset analysed by Benito et al., (Reference Benito, Chen, Wilson, Bhullar, Burnham and Field2022a, b) also recovered Asteriornis as sister to Palaeognathae under maximum parsimony, but as a total-clade galloanseran when the same dataset was analysed under Bayesian inference. However, these results should be viewed with caution, as the construction of the Torres et al. (Reference Torres, Norell and Clarke2021) dataset was primarily focused on reconstructing relationships among non-crown avialans, with a very limited sample of crown birds (Benito et al., Reference Benito, Chen, Wilson, Bhullar, Burnham and Field2022a).

While the incomplete nature of the skeleton of Asteriornis precludes detailed insights from being drawn regarding its ecological habits, preliminary hypotheses regarding both its foraging ecology and substrate preferences can be drawn from its cranial and hindlimb remains. For instance, the overall morphology of the bill of Asteriornis resembles that of generalist galloanseran foragers such as anhimids and some phasianids – perhaps reflecting a degree of dietary generalism that may have characterised at least some K/Pg boundary-crossing bird lineages. Seed-based (Larson et al., Reference Larson, Brown and Evans2016) and insect-based diets (Field et al., Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b) have been hypothesised to have been selectively favoured among avian survivors across the K/Pg boundary, as these resources may have remained comparatively abundant in the aftermath of the end-Cretaceous asteroid impact. Indeed, the relatively small size of Asteriornis, estimated at ∼394 g from hindlimb-based scaling equations (Field et al., Reference Field, Lynner, Brown and Darroch2013, Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b), may have been compatible with a predominantly insect-based diet, a foraging strategy generally restricted to relatively small-bodied extant terrestrial vertebrates due to its energy-intensive nature (Cooke et al., Reference Cooke, Gearty, Chapman, Dunic, Edgar, Lefcheck, Rilov, McClain, Stuart-Smith, Kathleen Lyons and Bates2022). Furthermore, if Asteriornis is representative of the ancestral condition for Galloanserae, its body mass of 394 g (less than 50 per cent of the median body size of known latest Maastrichtian avialans; Longrich et al., Reference Longrich, Tokaryk and Field2011; Berv & Field, Reference Berv and Field2018), might also be compatible with the hypothesis that filtering for reduced body size may have contributed to patterns of extinction and survivorship across the K/Pg boundary (Berv & Field, Reference Berv and Field2018; Field et al., Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b). Strong directional selectivity for reduced body size among surviving crown bird lineages across the K/Pg boundary has been hypothesised on the basis of fossil data and has been associated with a potential transient increase in avian nucleotide substitution rates as a result of the negative relationship between body size and nucleotide substitution rates in extant birds (Berv & Field, Reference Berv and Field2018; Field et al., Reference Field, Berv, Hsiang, Lanfear, Landis, Dornburg, Pittman and Xing2020a).

The hindlimb elements of the holotype of Asteriornis maastrichtensis are incomplete, yet appear to represent portions of the tarsometatarsus, tibiotarsus, and femur, enabling minimum estimates of hindlimb proportions to be generated (Fig. 12). In fact, the three-dimensional reconstruction of the skeleton of Asteriornis undertaken here (Fig. 4) allows fuller insights into its postcranial anatomy and proportions than have previously been possible. By mirroring and digitally combining remains from the left and right sides, more complete reconstructions of the femur and tibiotarsus have been generated. These reconstructions show that both the femur and tibiotarsus were longer than previously appreciated. The complete femoral head is missing, yet the regions preserved on both femora enable an almost complete reconstruction of the distal femur, with a minimum length for this element of 47.97 mm. The upper bound estimate on femur length from Field et al. (Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b), 53.4 mm, therefore may actually represent an underestimate as the complete proximal region of the element is missing, and the newly reconstructed composite femur appears to be missing much of its proximal end. The tibiotarsus was reconstructed by precisely matching portions of the midshaft of identical width from both tibiotarsi, yielding a minimum length of the tibiotarsus of 86.13 mm, 31 per cent longer than the previous estimate from Field et al. (Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b), based on the preserved right tibiotarsus and its contiguous impression (65.38 mm). Together with the long (62.54 mm), yet incomplete tarsometatarsus reported by Field et al. (Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b), these new measurements yield a minimum ‘hindlimb index’ (HI) [(length of tibiotarsus+length of tarsometatarsus)/(length of femur)] (Field & Hsiang, Reference Field and Hsiang2018) of 2.78 (vs a previous estimate of 2.41). This value, surely an underestimate given the incompleteness of the tarsometatarsus and tibiotarsus (both consisting exclusively of diaphyseal remains), falls within the range of predominantly ground-dwelling representatives of some major extant avian clades such as Otidimorphae, in which neomorphine ground-cuckoos, small bustards, and the presumed ground-dwelling stem turaco Foro panarium yield HI estimates in the range of 2.7– 2.8 (Field & Hsiang, Reference Field and Hsiang2018). These estimates highlight the elongate hindlimb proportions of Asteriornis, consistent with its inferred ecology as a long-legged ground-dwelling bird. Similarly elongated hindlimbs are widespread across total-group galloanserans, including fossil representatives such as Presbyornis (Feduccia, Reference Feduccia1976; Ericson, Reference Ericson2000), Telmabates (Howard, Reference Howard1955), and Conflicto (Tambussi et al., Reference Tambussi, Degrange, De Mendoza, Sferco and Santillana2019), which have long been proposed to have exhibited a wading ecology, as well as deeply diverging aquatic or semi-aquatic crown anseriforms such as anhimids, Anseranas and Dendrocygna. The presence of such elongate hindlimbs in Asteriornis, perhaps also indicative of a wading ecology (Field et al., Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b), may provide further support for the possibility that these could be plesiomorphic for Galloanserae.

Figure 12.

Hindlimb elements from the holotype of Asteriornis maastrichtensis (NHMM 2013 008). Scale bar equals 10 mm. Modified from Field et al. (Reference Field, Benito, Chen, Jagt and Ksepka2020b).

Relatively narrow and relatively long hindlimb proportions like those of Asteriornis are generally associated with predominantly ground-dwelling lifestyles in extant non-passerines (Norberg, Reference Norberg1979; Field et al., Reference Field, Bercovici, Berv, Dunn, Fastovsky, Lyson, Vajda and Gauthier2018a; Field & Hsiang, Reference Field and Hsiang2018). The early Cenozoic fossil record of crown birds supports a survivorship model whereby avian taxa crossing the K/Pg boundary would have been predominantly non-arboreal (i.e. expected to exhibit relatively long hindlimbs; Field et al., Reference Field, Bercovici, Berv, Dunn, Fastovsky, Lyson, Vajda and Gauthier2018a), and ancestral state reconstructions suggest that hindlimbs exhibiting specialisations for arboreal perching may have arisen numerous times among higher landbirds (Telluraves) in the aftermath of the K/Pg mass extinction (Ksepka et al., Reference Ksepka, Stidham and Williamson2017), indicative of non-arboreal antecedents repeatedly giving rise to arboreal descendants (Field et al., Reference Field, Bercovici, Berv, Dunn, Fastovsky, Lyson, Vajda and Gauthier2018a). As such, the relatively elongate and gracile hindlimbs of Asteriornis maastrichtensis may capture the general morphology of K/Pg-surviving bird clades. Palaeoecological reconstructions of the Type Maastrichtian generally indicate a nearshore marine environment, suggesting that the elongate hindlimbs of Asteriornis may have been associated with shore-dwelling habits. This latter interpretation recalls earlier hypotheses of a ‘transitional shorebird’ morphology being ancestral for several bird lineages and key for bird survival through the K/Pg (Feduccia, Reference Feduccia1995). Indeed, although the phylogenetic basis for this hypothesis may be incompatible with an up-to-date understanding of crown bird phylogeny (e.g. Jarvis et al., Reference Jarvis, Mirarab, Aberer, Li, Houde, Li, Ho, Faircloth, Nabholz, Howard and Suh2014; Prum et al., Reference Prum, Berv, Dornburg, Field, Townsend, Lemmon and Lemmon2015), the ecological basis for this hypothesis may prove prescient. Indeed, stem group representatives of Anseriformes such as Presbyornis and Conflicto were generally long-legged (Tambussi et al., Reference Tambussi, Degrange, De Mendoza, Sferco and Santillana2019), and Mirandornithes, which may represent the extant sister taxon to all other extant Neoaves (Jarvis et al., Reference Jarvis, Mirarab, Aberer, Li, Houde, Li, Ho, Faircloth, Nabholz, Howard and Suh2014; Braun & Kimball, Reference Braun and Kimball2021; Kuhl et al., Reference Kuhl, Frankl-Vilches, Bakker, Mayr, Nikolaus, Boerno, Klages, Timmermann and Gahr2021), may have been plesiomorphically long-legged, an attribute that has been elaborated in crown group flamingos (Phoenicopteridae) and reversed in crown group grebes (Podicipedidae) (Mayr, Reference Mayr2014, Reference Mayr2022).

Temporally and phylogenetically, Asteriornis contributes to bolstering particularly sparsely populated intervals of the neornithine fossil record. At roughly 66.7 million years old, Asteriornis is among the oldest uncontroversial crown bird fossils yet discovered, occurring within 700,000 years of the end-Cretaceous asteroid impact. Its apparent phylogenetic position within total-group Galloanserae – one of the three most deeply diverging crown bird subclades – is consistent with the hypothesis of a limited degree of crown bird diversification prior to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction event, with the corollary that much of the deep diversification among crown birds took place in the early Cenozoic, following the end-Cretaceous mass extinction event and potentially related to competitive release following the extinction of non-neornithine dinosaurs and pterosaurs. Although the temporal origins of Neornithes remain controversial, the striking concentration of all compelling Mesozoic fossil material attributable to Neornithes near the K/Pg boundary is suggestive of a limited degree of crown bird diversification prior to the Cretaceous-Palaeogene transition.

Biogeographically, the provenance of Asteriornis from the northern hemisphere is extraordinary in light of other purported crown bird remains from the uppermost Cretaceous. Indeed, other than Asteriornis, the best evidence of crown birds from the Cretaceous is provided by Vegavis iaai (Noriega & Tambussi, Reference Noriega and Tambussi1995; Clarke et al., Reference Clarke, Tambussi, Noriega, Erickson and Ketcham2005, Reference Clarke, Chatterjee, Li, Riede, Agnolin, Goller, Isasi, Martinioni, Mussel and Novas2016; Acosta Hospitaleche & Worthy, Reference Acosta Hospitaleche and Worthy2021), which has alternatively been interpreted as a crown anseriform, a stem anseriform, a neoavian-like neognath and a near-crown stem bird (Clarke et al., Reference Clarke, Tambussi, Noriega, Erickson and Ketcham2005; O’Connor et al., Reference O’Connor, Chiappe, Bell, Dyke and Kaiser2011; Clarke et al., Reference Clarke, Chatterjee, Li, Riede, Agnolin, Goller, Isasi, Martinioni, Mussel and Novas2016; Agnolín et al., Reference Agnolín, Egli, Chatterjee, Marsà and Novas2017; Worthy et al., Reference Worthy, Degrange, Handley and Lee2017; Mayr et al., Reference Mayr, De Pietri, Scofield and Worthy2018; Álvarez-Herrera et al., Reference Álvarez-Herrera, Rozadilla, Agnolín and Novas2023). Vegavis derives from Vega Island, Antarctica, and, along with other early crown bird fossils from high latitude sites in the southern hemisphere, such as the early Palaeocene stem anserifom Conflicto (Tambussi et al., Reference Tambussi, Degrange, De Mendoza, Sferco and Santillana2019) and the late Palaeocene stem penguin Waimanu (Slack et al., Reference Slack, Jones, Ando, Harrison, Fordyce, Arnason and Penny2006), seemingly bolsters biogeographic reconstructions favouring a Cretaceous origin of crown birds in the southern hemisphere (Cracraft, Reference Cracraft2001; Claramunt & Cracraft, Reference Claramunt and Cracraft2015). However, a more in-depth assessment of the early Cenozoic fossil record of crown birds challenges assumptions regarding the geographic origins of many major crown bird clades in the southern hemisphere, suggesting that Cenozoic climate shifts have obfuscated the biogeographic centres of origin for many bird groups (Blondel and Mourer-Chauviré, Reference Blondel and Mourer-Chauviré1998; Mayr, Reference Mayr2011; Saupe et al., Reference Saupe, Farnsworth, Lunt, Sagoo, Pham and Field2019). Thus, the recovery of Asteriornis – a well-supported crown bird – in the Upper Cretaceous of Europe emphasises that much remains unknown regarding the biogeographic origins of crown group birds. Further discoveries of crown-grade Cretaceous birds from the Maastrichtian of North America (Brownstein, Reference Brownstein2024) have provided further support for a more complex biogeographic early evolutionary history for Neornithes than previously appreciated, and future discoveries may therefore be just as likely to derive from the northern hemisphere as the southern hemisphere.

Janavis: unexpected information on the origin of crown bird features from one of the youngest toothed avialans

The specimen that eventually became the holotype of Janavis finalidens, NHMM RD/271, was originally reported by Dyke et al. (Reference Dyke, Dortangs, Jagt, Mulder, Schulp and Chiappe2002), although limited mechanical preparation of the specimen at the time led to several skeletal elements being originally misidentified or unreported. As a stem group bird, Janavis finaldens has potential to cast light on the pattern and timing of the origin of features that today characterise crown group birds. Phylogenetic analyses recover Janavis as the sister taxon to Ichthyornis (Fig. 13; Benito et al., Reference Benito, Chen, Wilson, Bhullar, Burnham and Field2022a), an iconic Late Cretaceous fossil taxon that is among the morphologically best-understood members of Avialae (Marsh, Reference Marsh1880; Clarke, Reference Clarke2004; Benito et al., Reference Benito, Kuo, Widrig, Jagt and Field2022b). However, Ichthyornis mainly derives from Santonian deposits within the Niobrara Formation of central North America, and the lower Campanian strata of the Mooreville Formation of Alabama. By contrast, the provenance of Janavis from the Maastrichtian type area implies at least a 20-million-year temporal extension of the clade, corroborating its persistence into the latest Cretaceous as hypothesised by Longrich et al. (Reference Longrich, Tokaryk and Field2011), albeit on the basis of scant evidence.

Figure 13.

Phylogenetic interrelationships of Pygostylia, illustrating the inferred phylogenetic position of Janavis finalidens (NHMM/RD 271) as the sister taxon of Ichthyornis. Collectively, Janavis and Ichthyornis comprise the only valid representatives of Ichthyornithes, inferred to represent the sister group to the rest of Ornithurae. Illustration for Neornithes is a life reconstruction of Asteriornis maastrichtensis. Illustrations courtesy of Roc Olivé, used with permission. Topology simplified from Benito et al. (Reference Benito, Kuo, Widrig, Jagt and Field2022b).

While even the heaviest mean body mass estimates for Ichthyornis top out at less than 500 g (Benito et al., Reference Benito, Chen, Wilson, Bhullar, Burnham and Field2022a), body mass estimates for Janavis based on humeral least shaft circumference (Field et al., Reference Field, Lynner, Brown and Darroch2013) exceed 1,500 g, falling within the adult body size range of the Great Black-backed Gull (Larus marinus), the world’s largest gull species (Olsen & Larson, Reference Olsen and Larsson2004). This exceptionally large size contrasts with body size estimates for the co-occurring Asteriornis (mean body size estimate 394 g), which may be representative of the body size of early galloanserans. While data remain limited, the apparent contrast in size between crownward stem birds and early crown birds in the Maastrichtian Type Locality is in line with the hypotheses that size selectivity may have contributed to patterns of survival and extinction across the K/Pg boundary.

A trove of recent descriptions has supplemented the original material known from Ichthyornis and rendered it among the most thoroughly understood Mesozoic avialans (Clarke, Reference Clarke2004; Field et al., Reference Francillon-Vieillot, de Buffrénil, Geraudie, Meunier, Sire, Zylberberg, de Ricqlès and Carter2018b; Torres et al., Reference Torres, Norell and Clarke2021; Benito et al., Reference Benito, Chen, Wilson, Bhullar, Burnham and Field2022a), with virtually the entirety of its cranial and postcranial osteology now well understood. Only a small number of skeletal elements remain unreported from Ichthyornis, including the vomers and pterygoids from the skull, and the pygostyle from the postcranial skeleton. Serendipitously, the comparatively incomplete osteology of Janavis preserves a complete and essentially undistorted pterygoid, casting light on the palate morphology of ichthyornithine avialans and crownward stem birds more generally. When scaled to the body size of Ichthyornis, the pterygoid of Janavis fits well within the reconstructed Ichthyornis palate from Field et al. (Reference Francillon-Vieillot, de Buffrénil, Geraudie, Meunier, Sire, Zylberberg, de Ricqlès and Carter2018b) and Torres et al. (Reference Torres, Norell and Clarke2021) (Fig. 14; see Benito et al., Reference Benito, Kuo, Widrig, Jagt and Field2022b). On the rostral end of the pterygoid, a synovial socket accommodates the rounded caudal end of the Ichthyornis hemipterygoid, while on the caudal end of the pterygoid a single concave facet connects to the rostrally protruding pterygoid condyle on the quadrate. Strikingly, this configuration closely matches the condition of the palate in neognathous birds, in which a mobile joint connects the caudally positioned pterygoid and rostrally positioned hemipterygoid-palatine complex, providing a degree of flexibility within the palate, contributing to an improved capacity for cranial kinesis via dorsally directed upper jaw movements (Fig. 14; Simonetta, Reference Simonetta1960; Bout & Zweers, Reference Bout and Zweers2001; Gussekloo & Bout, Reference Gussekloo and Bout2005). This revelation challenges long-held assumptions regarding the nature of the ancestral crown bird palate, which for over a century was assumed to have been palaeognathous (that is, lacking a mobile connection between the pterygoid and the hemipterygoid-palatine complex; Pycraft, Reference Pycraft1901). Janavis has therefore revised our understanding of avian palatal evolution, suggesting that a mobile palatal configuration had already arisen among crownward stem birds, and therefore that the ‘neognathous’ palate of extant Galloanserae and Neoaves reflects the retention of the plesiomorphic crown bird condition. In this scenario, the comparatively rigid palates of Palaeognathae reflect an apomorphic loss of palatal mobility along the palaeognath stem lineage.

Figure 14.

Reconstructed palate of Janavis based on the pterygoid of J. finalidens and several specimens of Ichthyornis (Field et al., Reference Francillon-Vieillot, de Buffrénil, Geraudie, Meunier, Sire, Zylberberg, de Ricqlès and Carter2018b; Torres et al., Reference Torres, Norell and Clarke2021), compared with an extant neognath and palaeognath. Scale bar equals 10 mm.

Geometric morphometric comparisons of pterygoids from across the avian crown group illustrate that extant Neognathae (i.e. the large clade uniting Galloanserae and Neoaves) fall closely in morphospace, whereas the pterygoids of extant palaeognaths are peripherally distributed (Fig. 15; Benito et al., Reference Benito, Kuo, Widrig, Jagt and Field2022b). The pterygoid of Janavis clusters with neognaths, close to galliforms and anseriforms, providing quantitative affirmation that the pterygoid of Janavis was morphologically, and presumably functionally, similar to that of extant neognathous birds, and of Galloanserae in particular, in which enlarged, sessile, ovoid basipterygoid processes are present towards the rostral end of the element, as in Janavis. As such, extant galloanserans such as chickens and ducks most likely provide useful analogues of ancestral crown bird palate development and function – a convenient realisation as these taxa remain common avian model organisms.

Figure 15.

Three-dimensional geometric morphospace of extant Palaeognathae (yellow), Galliformes (red), Anseriformes (pink), and Neoaves (blue), combined with selected fossils including Janavis (1), Dasornis (4), and Anatalavis/Nettapterornis (5). Extant taxa labelled are Struthio (2) and Rhea (3), Anas (6), Lophophorus (7), Scolopax (8), and Trogon (9). Modified from Benito et al. (Reference Benito, Kuo, Widrig, Jagt and Field2022b).

The postcranial osteology of Janavis also provides insight into the origin of key attributes of the modern bird skeleton. Although the postcranial skeleton of Janavis closely resembles a considerably larger version of Ichthyornis, the centra of the thoracic vertebrae and ribs of Janavis are extremely pneumatic, contrasting with the entirely apneumatic nature of the same structures in Ichthyornis. These elements exhibit extremely thin bone walls, and in the case of the anterior thoracic vertebral centra, exhibit large ventrally positioned pneumatic openings entirely unknown from other fossil or extant avialans. Otherwise, the skeletons of Janavis and Ichthyornis appear to be most clearly distinguished by the apparent absence of an acromion process on the scapula of Janavis, a feature otherwise only seen in extant screamers (Anhimidae; Clarke, Reference Clarke2004) and magpie geese (Anseranas semipalmata; pers. obvs.) among surveyed crown birds (Clarke, Reference Clarke2004). The degree of vertebral pneumaticity observed in Janavis is extreme, seemingly comparing with some of the most extensively pneumatised vertebrae observed among extant birds (e.g., frigatebirds), although thorough quantitative comparisons employing modern approaches for quantifying pneumaticity have yet to be applied to the skeleton of Janavis (Burton et al., Reference Burton, Benson and Field2023). The extensive pneumatisation of the vertebral column in Janavis presumably reflects an adaptation for weight reduction and flight efficiency as seen in many extant large-bodied soaring birds. In light of this presumed selection for mass reduction, the lack of any indication of appendicular pneumaticity in Janavis is notable, suggesting that the evolutionary origin of a developmental capacity for pneumatisation of the appendicular skeleton postdates the phylogenetic divergence between Ichthyornithes and more crownward avialans. Given that pneumatisation of the appendicular skeleton appears to be plesiomorphic for crown birds (Clarke, Reference Clarke2004; Turner et al., Reference Turner, Makovicky and Norell2012; Burton et al., Reference Burton, Benson and Field2023), the evolutionary acquisition of this developmental capacity must therefore have taken place along the crownward-most portion of the avian stem lineage.

New discoveries: the continued potential of the Maastrichtian type area for clarifying avian evolution

While Asteriornis and Janavis remain the most complete bird fossils from the Maastrichtian type area yet recovered, additional discoveries provide cause for optimism regarding the potential of the Maastrichtian type locality for providing further insight into avian evolutionary history during the latest Cretaceous. Previously recovered elements from the Maastricht Formation include a partial radius and tarsometatarsus, the latter of which is figured here (Fig. 7). Although fragmentary, the morphology of this element, including an elongate shaft that was reportedly destroyed during specimen collection, is consistent with that of early total-group anseriforms such as Presbyornis, and its similar size to the preserved tarsometatarsal shaft of Asteriornis raises the possibility that it might belong to Asteriornis or a closely related taxon. This tarsometatarsus originates from the Emael Member of the Maastricht Formation, contrasting with the older age of the Asteriornis holotype, which originates from the base of the Valkenburg member (Vellekoop et al., Reference Vellekoop, Kaskes, Sinnesael, Huygh, Déhais, Jagt, Speijer and Claeys2022), suggesting that Asteriornis or closely related taxa may have been relatively common faunal components of nearshore ecosystems during the deposition of much of the Maastricht Formation. However, more detailed morphological work on this and other Late Cretaceous isolated tarsal specimens will be necessary in order to fully establish the degree of phylogenetic and ecological information that can be gathered from such fragmentary fossil remains. Additionally, recent finds of an avialan-like pedal phalanx recovered in the summer of 2023 and a possible vertebral fragment (Figs. 7,8) indicate the continued and perhaps increasing potential of the Type Maastrichtian to yield avian fossil remains, even if the research insights to be gained from these elements are limited at present. Indeed, the recognition that small bone-bearing pieces of matrix can contain significant fossil bird remains, as exemplified by the holotype of Asteriornis, will hopefully encourage collectors to retain and donate promising specimens to natural history museums rather than jettisoning them in favour of more obviously aesthetic specimens. Hopefully, additional discoveries of more complete specimens of Asteriornis, Janavis, and indeed as-yet undiscovered fossil birds from the Maastrichtian type area will be forthcoming in future years.