1. Introduction
Cyanobacteria represent ‘arguably the most important group of organisms ever to appear on our planet’ (Knoll, Reference Knoll, Herrero and Flores2008). They have dominated prokaryotic primary production in diverse marine and terrestrial environments since they originated in the Archean eon. They were instrumental in oxygenating the atmosphere, oceans and groundwater in the Proterozoic, and continue to play a major role in Earth’s carbon, nitrogen and oxygen cycles; they were also the endosymbionts that engendered the plastids of all phototrophic eukaryotes (Demoulin et al. Reference Demoulin, Lara, Cornet, François, Baurain, Wilmotte and Javaux2019). Thus, the cyanobacterial fossil record is primary evidence for the evolution of the Earth-life system over time. This archive is more remarkable as a record of stasis than one of change. Among the oldest unequivocal fossil cyanobacteria that can be directly related to a modern equivalent is a colonial coccoid with gelatinous extracellular envelopes from the ∼2 Ga-old Belcher Group of Nunavut, Canada, which was formally described by Hofmann (Reference Hofmann1976) as Eoentophysalis belcherensis. Its morphology, pattern of growth and even pigmentation are indistinguishable from the modern genus Entophysalis (family Entophysalidaceae, order Chroococcales) (Golubic & Hofmann, Reference Golubic and Hofmann1976; Schopf, Reference Schopf1994), a fact which has often been cited in work on the tempo of evolution (e.g. Knoll, Reference Knoll, Cohen and Rosenberg1989; Schopf, Reference Schopf, Schopf and Klein1992, Reference Schopf1994).
Most cyanobacterial fossils with established taxonomic names come from the Precambrian (Sergeev et al. Reference Sergeev, Sharma and Shukla2012). Of these, the majority are known from three-dimensional carbonaceous fossils silicified within chert, a transparent matrix that can be thin-sectioned for optical microscopy. The decline of shallow-marine silicification at the end of the Precambrian (a function of falling silica concentrations in the oceans) greatly restricts our view of later cyanobacterial diversity. Many Phanerozoic cyanobacteria are auto-mineralised calcifiers that lack the fine detail necessary for a close comparison with modern forms (Riding, Reference Riding1982; Golubic & Seong-Joo, Reference Golubic and Seong-Joo1999). The highly diverse microbiota of the ∼407 Ma-old Rhynie chert (including the original Rhynie chert and the nearby, coeval Windyfield chert) of Scotland provides an important counterexample. Located near the village of Rhynie in Aberdeenshire, this deposit is formed by the precipitation of silica from hydrothermal spring waters (Rice et al. Reference Rice, Trewin and Anderson2002; Trewin & Kerp, Reference Trewin, Kerp, Fraser and Sues2017; Wellman, Reference Wellman2019). The silica, now transformed into transparent chalcedony with a slight amber colouration, encased and permineralized diverse early land plants, fungi and many protists, meiofauna and bacteria in their life positions, commonly with intact cellular and some subcellular details (see the papers in Edwards et al. Reference Edwards, Dolan and Kenrick2018; Garwood et al. Reference Garwood, Oliver and Spencer2020). In addition to the exceptional quality of preservation, the assemblage is notable for capturing our earliest near-complete view of a fully non-marine ecosystem (Strullu-Derrien et al. Reference Strullu-Derrien, Kenrick and Knoll2019; Wellman, Reference Wellman2019). As such, it provides important insight into the Early Devonian ‘greening of the land’ by plants, a transition which shifted the balance of Earth’s biomass from prokaryotic to eukaryotic dominance and permanently altered the planet’s atmosphere, soil and climate (Lenton et al. Reference Lenton, Dahl, Daines, Mills, Ozaki, Saltzman and Porada2016; McMahon & Parnell, Reference McMahon and Parnell2018)
Previous studies have identified more than a dozen distinct cyanobacterial morphologies in the Rhynie chert. Two forms, of which one is coccoid and Gloeocapsa- and Chroococcidiopsis-like, the other filamentous, allegedly heterocystous, and suggested to belong to the Nostocales, occur as photobionts of the putative cyanolichen Winfrenatia reticulata (Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Hass and Kerp1997; Karatygin et al. Reference Karatygin, Snigirevskaya and Vikulin2009). A further eight forms are filamentous, including Archaeothrix oscillatoriformis and A. contexta (Kidston & Lang, Reference Kidston and Lang1921; Krings et al. Reference Krings, Hass, Kerp, Taylor, Agerer and Dotzler2009; Krings, Reference Krings2021 a); Kidstoniella fritschii, Langiella scourfieldii and Rhyniella vermiformis (Croft & George, Reference Croft and George1959; recently merged into one taxon, L. scourfieldii, by Strullu-Derrien et al. Reference Strullu-Derrien, Fercoq, Gèze, Kenrick, Martos, Selosse, Benzerara and Knoll2023); Croftalania venusta (Krings et al. Reference Krings, Kerp, Hass, Taylor and Dotzler2007; Krings, Reference Krings2021 b); Palaeolyngbya kerpii (Krings, Reference Krings2019) and the complex, Stigonema-like Rhystigonema obscurum (Krings, Reference Krings2021 c). Loron et al. (Reference Loron, Rodriguez Dzul, Orr, Gromov, Fraser and McMahon2023) illustrate what may be another Stigonema-like form. Four forms are coccoidal and colony-forming. Rhyniococcus uniformis produces unistratose colonies resemblant of the modern Merismopedia (Edwards & Lyon, Reference Edwards and Lyon1983; Krings & Harper, Reference Krings and Harper2019), while colonies of Rhyniosarcina devonica are cuboidal, spheroidal or irregular sarcinoid and resemble modern chroococcaceans such as Cyanosarcina (Taylor & Krings, Reference Taylor and Krings2015). Rhyniotaxillus devonicus and Rhyniotaxillus minutulus both occur as solitary cells and packages of cells arranged within prominent gelatinous envelopes or sheaths (Krings & Sergeev, Reference Krings and Sergeev2019; Krings, Reference Krings2021 d). Cells of R. minutulus are only 0.6–1.2 μm in diameter whereas those of R. devonicus are larger (2.5–3.5 μm). Rhyniotaxillus resembles to a certain extent both Eucapsis (Synechococcales) and Entophysalis (Chroococcales), but the true affinities are uncertain.
Here, we describe a new colony-forming coccoidal cyanobacterium from the Rhynie chert that can safely be assigned to the fossil genus Eoentophysalis. To our knowledge, this fossil is the first post-Cambrian entophysalid and the first unambiguously non-marine entophysalid in the rock record (modern entophysalids occur in both marine and freshwater environments).
2. Material and Methods
The fossils described in this study were identified in a single standard polished, ∼100 µm thick thin-section (labelled GCCR7) obtained from a block of Rhynie chert supplied by the National Museums of Scotland (accession number NMS G.2015.33.11.1). The section was studied (a) in Edinburgh, using a Leica DM2700 P petrographic microscope (configured for Koehler illumination with a 100× oil-immersion objective), and photographed in transmitted light with a Leica DFC 420c camera and (b) in Munich, using a Leica DM LB2 microscope with a Jenoptik Gryphax Naos camera. Images obtained were processed in the Leica Application Suite v. 4.0 software with additional enhancement of brightness and contrast in Adobe Photoshop (for details of microscopy and image optimisation, refer to Krings et al. Reference Krings, Serbet and Harper2021). Cell unit diameters were measured with the freeware ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) images were acquired at 512 x 512 pixel resolution with a Zeiss LSM880 CLSM equipped with an Airyscan detector (Zeiss, Germany). Z-stacking was not successful. We used a 40× oil-immersion objective and 1.3 numerical aperture in Airyscan mode. Autofluorescence of the sample was excited with 488 nm and 561 nm lasers, and emission was collected with a long pass 605 nm emission window. CLSM Images were processed using ImageJ to convert from CZI to TIF with minor brightness and contrast adjustment (no noise removal).
3. Results
Thin section GCCR-7 was obtained from a hand sample of dark, massive chert (‘texture (1)’ of Trewin, Reference Trewin1994) and contains organic-rich laminae studded with grains of quartz and mica (Figure 1a). These laminae are draped and compressed around irregular inclusions (here called ‘fenestrae’) of clear chert containing uncompressed fossils, mostly plant material and fungi in a variable state of decay. The fossil material described in the paragraph below occurs in only one such fenestra (Figure 1a). The chert in this fenestra is pervaded by brown fossil organic matter of variable density, interspersed with clearer regions containing black clots presumably composed of organic matter.
Figure 1. Eoentophysalis sp. in the Rhynie chert (a) Nested photomicrographs showing silicified fenestra between clay- and organic-rich laminae, with location of Eoentophysalis formation highlighted. Note diffuse brown colour surrounding cells. (b) Stipple drawing of colony. (c) Confocal laser-scanning micrograph of Eoentophysalis colonies. Arrow shows a region where fluorescing organic material (likely the remains of the actual cells, perhaps augmented by residues of pigment) is consistently oriented on one side of the cell units, creating a ‘fish-scale’ pattern. (d) Close-up showing colony boundaries (arrowed) interpreted as mucilaginous; these appear dark in photomicrographs (left) and bright in confocal laser-scanning micrographs (right). (e–h) Dyads, possible tetrads and dividing cells in shared and in part stratified envelopes suggestive of encapsulation. Dark intracellular inclusions in (f) and (h) suggest contraction of the actual cells during decay. Scale bars: 25 μm (a,b), 20 μm (c,d), 10 μm (e) and 5 μm (f–h).
The fossil material of interest is arranged in a continuous formation, approximately 260 μm in maximum dimension, which resembles a long cumulus cloud with a flat ‘base’ and a lobed and mammillated ‘top’ (Figure 1 a,b), oriented perpendicular to the prevailing lamination direction in the host chert (such that the mamillations face the centre of the fenestra). Within the lobes are more than 100 overlapping organic-walled spheres 3.6–6.4 μm in diameter (median = 4.7 μm; mean = 4.7; standard deviation = 0.6; n = 40; see online Supplementary Material at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo for histogram), interpreted as cell units (i.e. gelatinous polysaccharide envelopes faithfully preserving the shapes of the actual cells; for details, refer to Krings & Harper, Reference Krings and Harper2019), which are moderately well preserved in the centre of the colony but become increasingly faint and indistinct towards the margins (Figure 1a–c). Some of the cell units are disseminated randomly in the matrix within the fenestra but outside of the main lobes. The organic material is more faintly and diffusely preserved than in other cyanobacteria present in Rhynie chert thin sections prepared from the same block (see Loron et al. Reference Loron, Rodriguez Dzul, Orr, Gromov, Fraser and McMahon2023). As a result, resolution of fine structural features is generally impeded; the outer boundaries of many cell units are ambiguous and the cell contents are amorphous. Nevertheless, objects resembling paired cells (dyads), tetrads, and equatorially constricted, dividing cells can be distinguished in some areas (Figure 1e–h). Moreover, stratified envelopes either suggesting encapsulation or simply reflecting the sequence of cell divisions are visible in some of the dyads (Figure 1g). Dark inclusions probably representing the conglobated actual cells are common within the cell units (e.g. Figure 1f,h). The lobes of the formation are rimmed by organic shrouds with dark boundaries, interpreted as the remains of a colonial mucilage. Both the cell surfaces and surrounding envelopes appear dark in transmitted light but fluoresce strongly in confocal laser-scanning imagery (Figure 1c,d); the boundaries are especially fluorescent. Many of the cell units are darker on the mammillated side of the formation, and some regions of the envelopes are also pervasively stained.
4. Discussion
Recent additions to the inventory of cyanobacteria from the Lower Devonian Rhynie chert have greatly expanded our understanding of cyanobacterial paleobiodiversity in early non-marine ecosystems. The specimen described in this study further extends the list of interesting cyanobacterial fossils documented from the Rhynie chert.
4.1 Comparison with modern and other fossil Entophysalis
Several lines of morphological evidence suggest that the fossil described above is a representative of the family Entophysalidaceae (Chroococcales), of which the best-known modern genus is Entophysalis. Entophysalis is globally distributed in pools and intertidal zones, on rocky seashores, in inland lakes and in other marine and non-marine habitats (Kaštovský et al. Reference Kaštovský, Fučíková, Hauer and Bohunická2011; Hauer & Komárek, Reference Hauer and Komárek2022). Entophysalis forms gelatinous, irregular, granular, microscopic to macroscopic colonies that typically cover the substrate. Young colonies are polarised and attached to the substrate, whereas older ones are composed of sub-colonies, which are radially or serially arranged in aggregates (Komárek & Anagnostidis, Reference Komárek, Anagnostidis, Ettl, Gärtner, Heynig and Mollenhauer1998), or laterally interlinked to form pustulate laminae or mats, or stromatolites (e.g. Golubic, Reference Golubic, Westbroek and de Jong1983; Foster et al. Reference Foster, Reed and Wicander1989; Golubic & Abed, Reference Golubic, Abed, Seckbach and Oren2010). Cells or their groups within the colonies are arranged in radial or erect rows and possess their own gelatinous envelopes. Dissemination mainly occurs through groups of cells or small colonies that dislodge from the parental colony. The long, flat ‘base’ of the Rhynie chert fossil described here (Figure 1a, b) may correspond to the substrate to which the colony was attached and from which it grew towards the light. Such a growth pattern is typical of Entophysalis and distinguishes it from other envelope-forming coccoid cyanobacteria such as Gloeocapsa or Gloeothece (Golubic & Abed, Reference Golubic, Abed, Seckbach and Oren2010). Interpretation of the fossil as an entophysalid is also supported by the fact that many of the cell units appear to be richer in organic material on the side facing away from the base and towards what was presumably the light. This material is dark in transmitted light microscopy (Figure 1a) and fluoresces brightly in confocal imagery (Figure 1c, d). Its distribution may reflect the original distribution of a pigment secreted by the cells into their gelatinous envelopes; in modern Entophysalis, the UV-screening pigment scytonemin is similarly concentrated in the upper, illuminated side of the colony (Golubic & Abed, Reference Golubic, Abed, Seckbach and Oren2010).
Fossil cyanobacteria resembling modern Entophysalis are usually referred to as the fossil genus Eoentophysalis. Eoentophysalis is a major constituent of numerous Proterozoic Lagerstätten but has also been reported from a few Cambrian deposits (e.g. Sergeev, Reference Sergeev1989). The type species, E. belcherenesis, was initially described by Hofmann (Reference Hofmann1976) from the Belcher Group of Arctic Canada and was recently dated to 2016.5 Ma (Hodgskiss et al. Reference Hodgskiss, Dagnaud, Frost, Halverson, Schmitz, Swanson-Hysell and Sperling2019). As originally described, it consists of cells 3–5 μm in diameter organised into palmelloid colonies in which dyads and tetrads commonly occur within enveloping sheaths. In the revised taxonomy of Sergeev et al. (Reference Sergeev, Sharma and Shukla2012), E. belcherensis has been synonymised with several other proposed species, expanding the diameter range to 2–10 μm (e.g. Muir, Reference Muir1976; Knoll & Golubic, Reference Knoll and Golubic1979; Lo, Reference Lo1980; Mendelson & Schopf, Reference Mendelson and Schopf1982; McMenamin et al. Reference McMenamin, Kumar and Awramik1983). Sergeev et al. (Reference Sergeev, Sharma and Shukla2012) accept only one other Eoentophysalis species as valid, namely E. dismallakesensis, which was first reported in the Dismal Lakes Group of Arctic Canada by Horodyski & Donaldson (Reference Horodyski and Donaldson1980). The form resembles E. belcherensis in its patterns of cell division and colony formation but is somewhat larger (11–22 μm; Sergeev et al. Reference Sergeev, Sharma and Shukla2012).
There is also a relatively high level of morphological correspondence between the Rhynie entophysalid and a fossil formally described as Coccostratus dispergens, which occurs along with E. belcherensis in the cherts and silicified carbonates of the Mesoproterozoic Gaoyuzhuang Formation (1.4–1.5 Ga) of Hebei Province, China (Seong-Joo & Golubic, Reference Seong-Joo and Golubic1999). Cells of C. dispergens are ‘conspicuously spherical’ with a mean diameter of 2–6.5 μm, divide by binary fission following equatorial constriction, and form mats or mammillate formations of loosely attached cell units above which dispersed cells can be identified. All of these features are shared by the Rhynie fossil. Because C. dispergens lacks distinct sheaths and its cells are loosely attached and not apparently encapsulated, it is regarded by Seong-Joo & Golubic (Reference Seong-Joo and Golubic1999) as different from E. belcherenesis and indeed placed within the family Chroococcaceae rather than Entophysalidaceae. However, Sergeev et al. (Reference Sergeev, Sharma and Shukla2012) place C. dispergens within the Entophysalidaceae and remark that the supposed differences may be due to different ecological conditions in the respective habitats of growth. In any case, since the Rhynie fossil displays cells and cell groups suggestive of encapsulation (e.g. Fig 1e), there is no reason not to assign it to Entophysalidaceae. Additionally, the darkened envelopes on the outward-facing side of the cell units in the Rhynie chert fossil correspond well not only with the photoprotective adaptation described in Entophysalis but also with the characteristically darkened envelopes reported in Eoentophysalis belcherensis from the type locality and elsewhere (Hofmann, Reference Hofmann1976; Sergeev et al. Reference Sergeev, Knoll and Grotzinger1995; Knoll & Golubic, Reference Knoll, Golubic, Schidlowski, Golubic, Kimberley, McKirdy and Trudinger1992; Golubic & Abed, Reference Golubic, Abed, Seckbach and Oren2010).
The Rhynie chert fossil described here is the first post-Cambrian documented record of a cyanobacterial fossil that fits the definition of Eoentophysalis. All previous records of Eoentophysalis come from shallow-marine settings (Hofmann, Reference Hofmann1976; Knoll & Golubic, Reference Knoll and Golubic1979; Knoll et al. Reference Knoll, Swett and Mark1991; Sergeev et al. Reference Sergeev, Knoll and Grotzinger1995), whereas the Rhynie chert fossil lived in a non-marine, albeit not necessarily freshwater environment (for a discussion on salinity levels in the aquatic portions of the Rhynie ecosystem, refer to Channing, Reference Channing2018). Because of the striking similarities to Eoentophysalis, we feel confident in assigning the Rhynie chert fossil to this genus. We do not, however, formally describe it as a new species even though it differs greatly in age and habitat from other reported instances of Eoentophysalis because there is only one specimen currently available and this specimen does not possess sufficiently definitive morphological traits to demarcate it at the species level. For the same reason, we do not assign the Rhynie Eoentophysalis to the species E. belcherensis (nor would we claim that this fossil necessarily corresponds to a real biological species that survived from the Mesoproterozoic to the Devonian), but retain it in open nomenclature as Eoentophysalis sp.
Affinities to the Entophysalidaceae have previously been considered for two other cyanobacterial fossils from the Rhynie cherts, namely Rhyniotaxillus devonicus and Rhyniotaxillus minutulus, but neither of them has been formally assigned to this family (Krings & Sergeev, Reference Krings and Sergeev2019; Krings, Reference Krings2021 d). Rhyniotaxillus devonicus occurs singly or in clusters in the chert matrix, and is characterised by cuboid to irregular colonies of up to 64 cells surrounded by prominent gelatinous envelopes. The colonies are very similar to the cell groups and small colonies that make up larger formations in Entophysalis and serve as dissemination units. However, no evidence has been found of substrate-covering colonies or more extensive formations. Conversely, R. minutulus occurs within lobed and pustulate formations composed of what appears to be a mucilaginous substance. Present in the mucilage are multiple dyads, groups of four or eight cells and larger colonies of R. minutulus, each surrounded by a gelatinous envelope. Specimens occur predominantly along the margins of the mucilage and in the pustules, where they are, in places, regularly aligned and closely spaced. The formations containing R. minutulus are similar to specimens of pustulate (mammillate) mats of Eoentophysalis belcherensis figured by Butterfield (Reference Butterfield2015: fig. 2A). Moreover, cell groups, packages and colonies of R. minutulus situated at the surface of the mucilage often possess darkened envelopes that correspond to the pigmented envelopes seen in both Entophysalis and Eoentophysalis.
4.2 Implications for the Rhynie ecosystem
Eoentophysalis in Palaeo- and Mesoproterozoic deposits is usually abundant and widespread, which raises the question: How abundant and ecologically important were entophysalid cyanobacteria in the Rhynie ecosystem? The fact that formations as the one described in this study have not previously been reported from the Rhynie cherts, notwithstanding the intensive research that has been conducted on this Lagerstätte for more than 100 years, could suggest that entophysalids were rare constituents of the Rhynie ecosystem. It is also possible, however, that these cyanobacteria occurred only in certain areas of the ecosystem that did not become preserved in the chert, or that are not represented by the chert blocks examined to date (Krings, Reference Krings2021 c). On the other hand, larger cyanobacterial colonies and formations held together by mucilage may rapidly disaggregate into individual cells and small cell groups after burial such that no evidence of an entophysalid affinity remains (Sergeev et al. Reference Sergeev, Sharma and Shukla2012). Thus, the characteristic entophysalid formations are perhaps not regularly encountered in the Rhynie chert simply because they hardly ever became preserved. If this is accurate, then it raises the question of what made it possible that the specimen described here nevertheless became preserved, albeit somewhat poorly? This specimen comes from a small fenestra or inclusion of clear chert situated amidst silicified substrate. Well-preserved specimens of two other cyanobacteria from the Rhynie cherts, namely Palaeolyngbya kerpii and Rhyniococcus uniformis, have previously been described from clear chert inclusions within silicified substrate (Krings, Reference Krings2019; Krings & Harper, Reference Krings and Harper2019). Krings & Harper (Reference Krings and Harper2019) suggest that a special micro-environmental setting was imperative for the fragile, unistratose colonies of R. uniformis to become preserved intact and that the substrate appears to have served as a preservation trap by shielding organisms enclosed in small inclusions between substrate layers from destructive mechanical forces and taphonomic alteration. Krings & Kerp (Reference Krings and Kerp2019) demonstrate that part of the clear chert inclusions were once land plant axes based on shape and because they are surrounded by cuticles, and hypothesised that microbial life thriving on substrate surfaces and prostrate plant axes regularly became buried by new sediment layers. Within the consolidating sediment, the plant axes decayed and eventually turned into voids, in places still bounded by cuticles and containing remnants of the interior tissues. Microbial life associated with the plant axes, or washed into the voids from the vicinity, became protected in this way from mechanical destruction by water or sediment.
4.3 Evolutionary implications
The striking morphological resemblance between Proterozoic cyanobacteria in the genus Eoentophysalis, the fossil reported here from the Rhynie chert, and modern members of the genus Entophysalis bears on debates about possible fossil evidence for evolutionary stasis in prokaryotes. Golubic & Hofmann (Reference Golubic and Hofmann1976) noted the very strong resemblance between Eoentophysalis belcherensis and modern Entophysalis, and Schopf (Reference Schopf1994) interpreted this resemblance as evidence of evolutionary stasis, i.e. the maintenance of an original phenotype across geological time. More generally, Proterozoic cyanobacteria-like fossils can be grouped into morphotypes that appear to be indistinguishable from modern cyanobacteria (Knoll & Golubic, Reference Knoll and Golubic1979; Schopf, Reference Schopf, Schopf and Klein1992, Reference Schopf1994). As Knoll & Golubic (Reference Knoll and Golubic1979) have remarked, ‘essentially all of the salient morphological features used in the taxonomic classification of living cyanobacteria can be observed in well-preserved fossils’. This may reflect the ecological flexibility of many cyanobacteria, which, as generalists, thrive in diverse environments without further specialisation or modification of their fossilisable traits (even through the transition from marine to non-marine environments suggested by the presence of Eoentophysalis in the Rhynie chert). However, Butterfield (Reference Butterfield2015) has cautioned that Entophysalis-like morphology might represent a ‘grade of organization’, which may be ‘prone to evolutionary convergence’ such that Entophysalis-like fossils are unable to inform hypotheses about the long-term evolutionary stability of particular lineages. Nevertheless, evolutionary convergence between disparate taxa seems most likely to occur when environmental factors select for similar traits. Proterozoic Eoentophysalis lived in tidally influenced marine environments (e.g. Hofmann, Reference Hofmann1976; Knoll & Golubic, Reference Knoll and Golubic1979; Knoll et al. Reference Knoll, Swett and Mark1991; Sergeev et al. Reference Sergeev, Knoll and Grotzinger1995), whereas the Rhynie and Windyfield cherts formed in a fully non-marine fluvial-alluvial floodplain setting with ephemeral hot spring pools (Powell et al. Reference Powell, Trewin, Edwards, Friend and Williams2000). Similarly, modern Entophysalis is found in tidal settings, with a preference for lower intertidal ranges (Golubic & Abed, Reference Golubic, Abed, Seckbach and Oren2010), but can also be found in freshwater environments (e.g. Tavera & Komárek, Reference Tavera and Komárek1996; Kaštovský et al. Reference Kaštovský, Fučíková, Hauer and Bohunická2011). It would be a surprising coincidence (although certainly not impossible) for natural selection to have driven the acquisition of such similar morphological traits, modes of growth and organisation and even habits of pigmentation by originally dissimilar ancestors in such disparate environments. The discovery of entophysalid cyanobacteria in the Rhynie chert may be better explained by the broad environmental tolerance of a single lineage than by a multidimensional evolutionary convergence among unrelated cyanobacteria.
5. Conclusion
This study reports the discovery of a colony-forming entophysalid cyanobacterium in the Lower Devonian Rhynie chert of Scotland, which we refer to as the fossil genus Eoentophysalis. In morphology, pigmentation and arrangement, the fossil resembles both modern Entophysalis and the many examples of Eoentophysalis known from Proterozoic shallow-marine cherts. Although we cannot exclude evolutionary convergence between unrelated organisms, the strength of this resemblance is more parsimoniously explained by the persistence across two billion years of a single lineage with a broad environmental tolerance. Continued work on the Rhynie chert will likely yield additional types of cyanobacteria that can be used to further elaborate on the similarities and differences between cyanobacteria in Proterozoic marine cherts, a 407-myr-old terrestrial Lagerstätte, and present-day ecosystems.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756824000049
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank I Febbrari for preparing the thin section, S. Kelly from the Centre Optical Instrumentation Laboratory, University of Edinburgh, for assistance with confocal laser-scanning microscopy, and N. C. Fraser of the National Museums of Scotland for providing the Rhynie chert material for investigation. The manuscript was greatly improved by comments and suggestions of R. Garwood and an anonymous reviewer.
Financial support
This research was sponsored by grants to CCL from the Royal Society (UK) and the Belgium Wallonia Brussels programme WBI. AJH was supported by a UK Research and Innovation Future Leaders Fellowship MR/T018585/1. LMC was supported by a NERC E4 DTP studentship NE/ S007407/1.
Competing interests
All authors disclose no relevant relationships.
Open access
