Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T19:25:36.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2025

Idowu Ayisat Aneyo*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
Mumin Olatunji Oladipo
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences, Koladaisi University , Ibadan, Nigeria
Funmilayo Victoria Doherty
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, Yaba College of Technology , Yaba, Nigeria
Julius Osato Ehigie
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
Adebayo Fasasi Adebari
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Engineering, Yaba College of Technology , Yaba, Nigeria
Abdulwakeel Oluwatobi Atoyebi
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Yaba College of Technology , Yaba, Nigeria
Peter Ozomata Balogun
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, Yaba College of Technology , Yaba, Nigeria
Ambrose Obinna Ikpele
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
*
Corresponding author: Idowu Ayisat Aneyo; Email: ianeyo@unilag.edu.ng
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aquatic ecosystem monitoring is important for supporting biodiversity and environmental stability, yet it faces increasing threats from pollution, climate change and human activities. This study presents the development and deployment of a low-cost multi-sensor data logging system for real-time monitoring of Lagos Lagoon. The system integrates temperature sensors, hydrophones, and imaging devices to collect environmental data. Results showed that temperature variations ranged from ~28.5 to 31.5 °C, with fluctuations influenced by partial and full submersion. Acoustic analysis revealed dominant frequencies below 500 Hz, indicative of biological and anthropogenic activity in the lagoon. Machine learning models trained on 31 species closely agreed with the environmental dataset despite some noticeable deviations, suggesting potential improvements through data augmentation and model refinement. Despite challenges such as signal attenuation in submerged conditions and image degradation due to water turbidity, the system successfully recorded and logged environmental parameters. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using artificial intelligence-powered, cost-effective sensor technology for continuous aquatic monitoring, with implications for biodiversity conservation and water resource management. Future research should focus on enhancing wireless communication, refining species detection algorithms and improving sensor resilience in harsh aquatic conditions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. System architecture and data flow diagram.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Data calibration for the temperature sensor.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Hardware system setup. (b) Complete system set up.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Configuration of the system before deployment. (b)Deployment of sensors at the Lagoon water during the daytime. (c) Deployment of sensors in the Lagoon water during the night.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Temperature recorded by the monitoring system.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Sound wave spectrum recorded (top: amplitude spectrum, middle: frequency spectrum, and bottom: magnitude spectrum).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Dry stalk of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes).

Figure 7

Table 1. Training performance metrics over the last five epochs

Figure 8

Figure 8. Loss and validation loss for the image recognition machine learning model.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Machine learning model accuracy for image recognition.

Author comment: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R0/PR1

Comments

Aneyo Idowu A. PhD

ianeyo@unilag.edu.ng

University of Lagos, Akoka,

Lagos, Nigeria

Postcode-101017

+234(0)8062745194

25th March, 2025

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Water

Submission of Manuscript for Consideration in the the Cambridge Prisms: Water

Dear Editor,

We are pleased to submit our manuscript titled “Real-Time Monitoring of Water Quality Dynamics Using Low-Cost Sensor Networks in Lagos Lagoon” for consideration for publication in the Cambridge Prisms: Water. This study presents the development and deployment of a cost-effective, multi-sensor data logging system for real-time water quality monitoring in Lagos Lagoon, an important and environmentally vulnerable urban water body.

The research integrates temperature sensors, hydrophones, and imaging devices to collect environmental data, with the aim of providing an affordable and scalable alternative to traditional aquatic monitoring methods. By employing artificial intelligence (AI)-based species identification techniques, our study offers insights into biodiversity assessment and real-time environmental monitoring. The findings highlight key challenges and opportunities associated with the use of low-cost sensor networks, making a significant contribution to sustainable water resource management and conservation efforts.

We affirm that this manuscript is original, has not been published elsewhere, and is not under consideration by another journal. All authors have read and approved the manuscript and declare no conflicts of interest. Additionally, data supporting our findings are available upon request.

We appreciate your time and consideration and look forward to your feedback. Please do not hesitate to contact us should you require further information.

Sincerely,

Aneyo Idowu (PhD)

Review: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Title: the title of the article may be adjusted to “Real-Time Monitoring of Water Property Dynamics using Low-Cost Sensor Networks in Lagos Lagoon” this is because the monitored parameters (temperature, acoustic, visibility, etc) are not the determinants of water quality but only describes the properties of water.

The write-up on “performance evaluation of low cost sensors” were written in future tense, indicating intended actions. The write up should be in past tense since the actions have already been carried out.

Write-ups under “System integration testing” and “Field deployment of low cost sensors” should be a part of the methodology and not the results.

There is need for a clear separation between the Methodology and the Results. This is because both were mixed up in the article.

From the results, it is clear that only temperature and acoustic properties were successfully monitored. Visual data collection and AI based species recognition yielded very little or no results. This therefore undermines the integrity and functionality of the instruments and methodology.

Review: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The manuscript “Real-Time Monitoring of Water Quality Dynamics Using Low-Cost Sensor Networks in Lagos Lagoon” presents a comprehensive study of an affordable, AI-enhanced multi-sensor system for continuous aquatic ecosystem monitoring. Integrating temperature sensors, hydrophones, and imaging devices, the system collects and analyzes thermal, acoustic, and visual data through machine learning. Field trials revealed temperature fluctuations between 28.5°C and 31.5°C and acoustic energy concentrated below 500 Hz, while onboard data logging addressed challenges such as turbidity and signal loss. CNN models trained on 31 species achieved a peak accuracy of 30.11%, demonstrating the potential of AI-driven species identification in real-world conditions. The key contribution is demonstrating scalable, real-time environmental monitoring suitable for resource-limited settings. The discussion thoughtfully connects technical outcomes with ecological conservation and water management. Overall, the manuscript is well-structured and forward-looking. I recommend acceptance after technical and structural refinements to enhance clarity and rigor. Specific issues are detailed below:

Introduction: The introduction is comprehensive but dense and loosely structured, reducing readability and flow. It is recommended to restructure it into 4 to 5 focused paragraphs, each focusing on a specific theme: (i) ecological significance of lagoons and stressors facing Lagos Lagoon; (ii) limitations of traditional monitoring methods; (iii) advantages of macroinvertebrates as bioindicators; (iv) prospects of AI and low-cost sensors for aquatic monitoring; and (v) research objectives and study significance. This adjustment will enhance thematic clarity and reader engagement.

Incomplete Sentences: Sentences such as “The deployment of low-cost sensors for real-time data collection and analysis of key environmental parameters in Lagos Lagoon.” (Page 14, Lines 45–47) and “Developing AI algorithms that analyze real-time acoustic data to identify and categorize aquatic species…” (Page 15, Lines 17–19) are grammatically incomplete, lacking main verbs or independent clauses. As these occur in the Introduction, it is recommended to revise them into complete declarative sentences that clearly state the study’s purpose or contribution. This will improve grammatical accuracy and enhance the clarity, coherence, and professionalism of the Introduction.

Figure Optimization: Combining Figure 1 and Figure 2 into a single “System Architecture and Data Flow Diagram” is recommended. This integrated figure would clearly illustrate the flow from sensor inputs through Raspberry Pi 3 processing to data storage and wireless access, enhancing clarity and interpretability.

Methodology Section Redundancy: The sections “Calibration, Testing, Testing and Validation” and “AI-Based Aquatic Species Identification and Categorization” have overlapping content, particularly on AI descriptions. Consolidate into: (i) hardware calibration and testing, (ii) AI model training and validation, and (iii) overall system evaluation to improve narrative flow.

Misplaced Content: The “System Integration Testing” subsection primarily describes test design and execution, fitting better under Methodology. In contrast, performance outcomes and data interpretation should remain in the Results and Discussion section, in keeping with academic conventions.

Quantitative Enhancements: Include explicit numerical or statistical indicators for model performance, sampling frequency, signal strength, and equipment reliability to strengthen rigor and facilitate benchmarking.

Figures and Figure Referencing: Figures are generally clear but need refinement for precision. Use standardized terminology in labels, add error bars or uncertainty ranges where relevant, and highlight key data points. Textual references should cite specific figure numbers (e.g., replace “the graph” on Page 20, Lines 39–40 with “Figure 6”) and clearly mark peak values (e.g., Page 20, Lines 42–43 31.5°C at 08:04 PM). These changes will enhance clarity and readability.

Recommendation: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R0/PR4

Comments

The article presents a low-cost multi-sensor data logging system for real time monitoring of some water parameters including temperature, acoustic and visual data. The system is applied for environmental monitoring of Lagos Lagoon. The topic is of interest and within the scope of the journal but it is rather out of the specific scopes of the special issue indicated by the Authors which is indeed more focused on computing, control and analysis of urban water systems.

Two reviewers evaluated this manuscript. Both of them recognize values in the manuscript and provided some comments and suggestions that could be useful to enhance the quality of the manuscript. In particular, organization of some sections such as introduction and methodology should be revised to improve readability, while discussion of the results should be more supported by quantitative indicators. The decision on publication of this paper is deferred until the authors are able to revise and resubmit the paper.

Decision: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R1/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Thank you for amending your interesting paper. It is now suitable for publication.

Review: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R1/PR8

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

A good paper with great methodology.

Recommendation: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R1/PR9

Comments

The manuscript is ready for publication, congratulations.

Decision: Real-time monitoring of water quality dynamics using low-cost sensor networks in Lagos lagoon — R1/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.