Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T03:42:05.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biodesign: a means to preserving indigenous craft practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2024

A response to the following question: Bio-calibrated: tools and techniques of biodesign practices

Debarati Das*
Affiliation:
MA Biodesign, Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London, London, UK
*
Corresponding author: Debarati Das; Email: d.das0420211@arts.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biodesign, an innovative multidisciplinary approach to design, addresses anthropocentric challenges by minimizing ecological footprints in product and system creation. It incorporates living organisms such as bacteria, fungi, plants and algae into products and manufacturing processes. This approach harnesses the organisms’ potential, including their metabolic activities, growth, stimuli responses, reproductive capabilities, and relationships with other life forms, to create living-like design outcomes. Indigenous communities have a historical connection to living systems in agriculture, wine making and traditional crafts, offering valuable insights.

This paper presents a real-life case study of the Kotpad craft community in Odisha, India, highlighting their challenges. As indigenous communities like the Mirigan craftsmen face pressure to integrate into the mainstream economy, there is a risk of losing their connection with nature, traditional knowledge, and unique identity. The paper envisions the possibility of Biodesign applications in indigenous craft practices and explores hypothetical approaches to problem-solving by application of Synthetic Biology to indigenous crafts preservation. It critically analyzes the advantages, disadvantages, ethical considerations and socio-economic-cultural implications for the community.

Information

Type
Impact Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Pic 1 (Left): 80-year-old saree with mauve hue achieved using earthen pots for boiling the yarns with Aul dye during the dyeing process. Pic 2 (Right): Contemporary Kotpad sarees with yarns boiled with Aul dye in iron vats adding rustic red to the achieved color.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Clockwise from left, Pic 1: Application of cow dung, castor oil, and ash water as part of the yarn preparation process. Pic 2: Hanging the yarns coated with cow dung for the biodigestion process. Pic 3: The change in colors of the yarns after one month of repeating the same process and drying them under the sun. Pic 4: The root skins of Morinda citrifolia trees (Aul) used for dyeing. Pic 5: Soaking yarns in Aul dye, castor oil, and ash water, and tanning for one day under the sun before boiling the yarns. Pic 6: Boiling the yarns in big iron vats by the weaver. Pic 7: Drying the dyed yarns under the sun. Pic 8:The usage of Aul-dyed yarns in a traditional Kotpad saree woven by Kapileshwar Mohanto.

Author comment: BIODESIGN - A MEANS TO PRESERVING INDIGENOUS CRAFT PRACTICES — R0/PR1

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: BIODESIGN - A MEANS TO PRESERVING INDIGENOUS CRAFT PRACTICES — R0/PR2

Comments

In this paper, the authors delve into the pivotal role of biodesign in altering and preserving indigenous craft, focusing on the Kotpad craft community in Odisha, India. The analysis is well-structured and highlights the complexities and nuances surrounding the intersection of traditional crafts and biotechnologies.

The authors effectively raise critical issues regarding the potential impact of biotechnological advancements on traditional crafts and the risks they pose to cultural preservation if not approached with careful consideration. Ethical concerns such as biopiracy, the preservation of indigenous knowledge, and environmental sustainability are thoughtfully addressed. Particularly poignant is the discussion on the ethical implications of prioritising process optimisation and commercialisation in biotechnological developments, potentially overshadowing cultural preservation efforts.

The case study of the Kotpad craft community serves as a compelling example of the intricate relationship between biodesign and indigenous crafts. It underscores the need for a holistic approach that considers not only technological advancements but also cultural, social, and environmental factors. Through this lens, the paper offers valuable insights into ways in which biodesign has the potential foster collaboration, preserve cultural identity, and promote sustainable development.

There is an opportunity here to advocate for a more inclusive approach in biodesign, highlighting the significance of compensating these communities for their knowledge while also recognising the value of integrating them into decision-making processes. By working closely with indigenous communities, biodesign can serve as a tool not only for preserving craft skills but also for safeguarding cultural heritage and promoting sustainable practices.

Review: BIODESIGN - A MEANS TO PRESERVING INDIGENOUS CRAFT PRACTICES — R0/PR3

Review: BIODESIGN - A MEANS TO PRESERVING INDIGENOUS CRAFT PRACTICES — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: BIODESIGN - A MEANS TO PRESERVING INDIGENOUS CRAFT PRACTICES — R0/PR5

Comments

This is a compelling paper that investigates whether traditional craft practices of an indigenous population of the Kotpad community in India can be associated or extended with modern advances in synthetic biology and a renewed interest in natural dyes. The argument is compelling and the approach is highly relevant to the BD journal. However, it is not publishable as a peer reviewed paper in its current form.

References to contextualise the work in current research are largely missing. There is extant research into the biotechnologies of indigenous cultures, critical analysis of the tacit knowledge embedded in for example craft practices. I would expect a detailed literature review and for the specific case study to be properly contextualised in existing work. Similarly references to advances in microbial dying technology and Synthetic Biology should be included. Many/most of the claims in the paper are not evidenced with reference to primary of secondary research.

Contextualisation of the sort proposed above would also enable a deeper analysis in what is now quite a narrative paper would also enable the conclusions to be based on an argument. At the moment, the highly speculative nature of the proposal means that the discussion and conclusions feel quite ‘brain-stormy” - i.e. these are some ideas we have, rather than argued as part of the development of a systematic framework. This feels like the sketch for a potential paper rather than a substantial contribution to knowledge yet.

I do see this as the seed for a potentially very interesting contribution and may be relevant for inclusion as a ‘Community’ paper. I would also like to see an developed version of this paper which I think could make a significant contribution to the discourse on biotechnology and merging of cultures of designing with biology.

Decision: BIODESIGN - A MEANS TO PRESERVING INDIGENOUS CRAFT PRACTICES — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: BIODESIGN - A MEANS TO PRESERVING INDIGENOUS CRAFT PRACTICES — R1/PR7

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: BIODESIGN - A MEANS TO PRESERVING INDIGENOUS CRAFT PRACTICES — R1/PR8

Comments

Reviews answered with the new draft